January 31,2016
the staff of the Ridgewood blog
Ridgewood NJ, Other than by possible anonymous postings, we have not heard a word from Paul, Albert or Gwenn. Sadly, this is not surprising. Paul and Albert lost their tempers and spewed innumerable nasty adjectives to discredit a resident who was acting completely in accordance with the law, and Gwenn sat quietly and allowed this verbal onslaught to carry on. This is one of many, way too many, such meetings at which Paul, Albert, and Gwenn have allowed and enabled the public crucifixion of an elected official, an appointed official, or a member of the general public.
Whether a resolution is inserted into the code at a future time to require that all recording by private citizens must be announced, the fact is that at this time such an announcement is not required. Thus, their nasty characterizations were way, way out of line. It is entirely possible that they went over the line into libel and slander. Lawyers can decide about that. Well, lawyers other than the one who calls himself Deputy Dawg.
We, the people, have all the dates and transcripts of their vicious outbursts dating back 4 years, and in Paul’s case 8 years. For Albert and Gwenn, who are running for reelection, we will be happy to replay these over and over and over for the voting public to be reminded of your true colors. We do not need to say anything; your own words will say it all.
To use one of Albert’s favorite catch words – GOTCHA!
Can the three stooges be recalled or do we have to wait until election day?
Let’s see those film clips even if they don’t all run for reelection, as a parting gift.
Thank you to Michael and Susan for trying to stop their attempted slaughter.
Watch the tape. How many times to Albert and Paul interrupt Susan by saying that Dana was disruptive? They interrupt and interrupt and disrupt their colleague as she was attempting to speak. It is hilarious. They were so disruptive and disrespectful.
approximately 320 car garage. 4 levels. The mayor said in the last meeting that 2 levels may be dedicated to commuters. That’s about 160 cars for commuters. We currently already have one level, which is mostly used by Ridgewood commuters. Lets say the second level is used by Bergen County commuters at no extra money compared to Ridgewood commuters. So, 2 levels are either used by out of Ridgewood commuters or commuters who are already using this lot today without the garage.
With remaining 2 levels, we will get 160 new spot, presumably for non commuters. Cost – 12.3 million in new bond, 500K bond has been already spent + 450k already spent on environmental studies in 2014 & 2015 on this lot. = 13.25M.
That’s 82,800 for every new parking spot created for CBD. This assumes that the project will not go over the budget. With the way this council and village manager are spending the money, this is highly unlikely to stay in the budget.
The deputy mayor said last week it will not stay in budget. He actually promised there would be more change orders, because according to him that is just part of construction.
But it’s okay for the insults to fly in anonymity here. The author is a hypocrite. It’s a 2 way street.
guess you didn’t attend the council meeting or watch the video
this blog has a no threat policy which is far more than the Village council
Ah the water must be getting high again.
did both. and it is a 2 way street.
no making threats in a public meeting is unprofessional and grounds for immediately removal from the council , any resident who did that would have been arrested
And i want 12 foot wide sidewalks in front the auteur’s house
videoing a council meeting is entirely legal PERIOD no debate , as for sidewalks , the council suffers from deals they make
Our public offices should be held to a high standard.
Yeah it’s legal and the auteur was baiting a person on the dais. there’s lots of people upset, hope to see them on the ballot next election. Lets see the turnout.
you will when the deputy mayor and lady Valley get their walking papers
A poor choose of word for an elected official, Deputy Mayor and Attorney. ” Some on is going to pay”
If he was being baited don’t you think he should have been the bigger person and not respond like a common Guttersnipe. If he has such a thin skin maybe he should not be in public offices.
I think some of the problem comes from our Deputy Mayor being upset with Mr Glazer not giving a pass on this subject because the Deputy Mayor voted for no sidewalks on Clinton Ave so the Deputy Mayor is owed . You know the old saying One hand washes the other”
The Deputy Mayor is an attorney. In court he can control the responses. What frustrating to him is in public meeting he can control the speaker. This frustration bring out his true personality if only for a brief time.
James- i think you’re 50/50 on that 1. I’m thinking 1 stays and 1 goes. but let’s hope for a big turnout for a change.
Although our Deputy Mayor Albert J. Pucciarelli touts his education, his background on the Planning Board and his expertise in the law among other things he has been unable to suppress his primitive urge to get even. This is a danger when people like him hold the position of elected official.
Garage would look pretty in solid gold.