Posted on

Princeton University Rated “Best College for the Money”

princeton

July 11,2017

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ in the Best Colleges For Your Money 2017 rankings of 2,400 colleges 711 rated as the “Best Colleges For Your Money” . College is a great investment ,if you choose the right school. According to Money magazine, at $65,300, Princeton University in Princeton, NJ was rated the best value for your dollar. Interestingly enough CUNY Bernard M Baruch College came in a sold second place at about half the price and at a much lower price point with a tab of $31,400.

Find your best college with rankings that combine educational quality, affordability, and alumni success https://time.com/money/best-colleges/rankings/best-colleges/

Posted on

Parents not a ‘wallet’ in kid’s college costs, court finds

10-Things-College-students-should-not-do1

By Greg Adomaitis | For NJ.com
on February 11, 2017 at 7:50 AM, updated February 11, 2017 at 9:29 AM

CAMDEN — Parents can’t just be forced to hand over cash for college payments without being involved in their child’s higher education decisions, an Appellate Court has ruled.

The Feb. 9 opinion on the long-simmering case between Caitlyn Ricci and her divorced parents Michael Ricci and Maura McGarvey sheds light on whether the two were legally obligated to pay for their estranged daughter’s higher education

“A parent cannot be viewed as a ‘wallet’ and deprived of involvement of college decision making process,” the ruling states. Also at heart here, however, is when those over the age of 18 become truly independent and the circumstances surrounding such a decision.

“Once the issue of emancipation is decided, an obligation to pay college costs for an academically motivated un-emancipated child requires a two-fold analysis,” the opinion reads. The first being whether the parents are involved in those choices and whether they can afford it.

https://www.nj.com/camden/index.ssf/2017/02/nj_parents_have_responsibility_to_pay_for_daughter.html#incart_2box_nj-homepage-featured

Posted on

Why College Isn’t Worth It, No Matter How Rich or Poor You Are

Graduation 13

ByJohn Sandman

A highlight of the Great Recession was the flight of the unemployed to the far-flung precincts of higher ed. Many of those people left school for the job market in recent years, but higher ed experts viewed this as an opportunity for lower income groups to become better acclimated to the idea of going to college.

Foundations bank-rolled this effort, including new organizations like Complete College America, while money was poured into college prep programs. Between the 2008-09 academic years, government grant aid increased by about 40%, from $82 billion to $123 billion in 2013-14.

But a contrarian trend has emerged, one that higher ed honchos find troubling. According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the percentage of students from low-income families enrolling in higher education immediately after graduating from high school has dropped by over 10% since 2008, from 56% of graduates then to 46% today. As a result, the percentage of low-income students attending college today is only about 3% higher than it was two decades ago.

https://www.thestreet.com/story/13382172/1/why-college-isn-t-worth-it-no-matter-how-rich-or-poor-you-are.html

Posted on

Federal Aid Is Likely Driving College Costs Up

Back-to-School

Federal Aid Is Likely Driving College Costs Up
Jillian Frost / August 11, 2014

Federal financial aid for higher education was supposed to grow the market, bring down costs and help families afford this critical step to financial security.

But a recent report finds the effort to provide educational assistance to students has turned into decades of unaccountable federal spending on higher education.

According to the report from the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, the federal student aid system “contributes to skyrocketing costs, finances a wasteful academic arms race, weakens academic standards, lowers educational opportunity, and worsens the underemployment/overinvestment problem.”

As authors Richard Vedder, Christopher Denhart, and Joseph Hartge explain:

“The most striking thing to observe is that, not only have tuition fees risen after adjusting for inflation, but the rate of increase is rising since 1978. Federal involvement in providing student financial assistance is also growing over time… Before 1978, increases in tuition fees after adjusting for overall inflation were roughly 1 percent a year. In the era of substantial federal student aid after 1978, inflation-adjusted tuition fee increases have ratcheted up to 3-4 percent a year.”

It’s not just students who feel this burden. Taxpayers currently shoulder nearly $90 billion of the $1 trillion dollars of student loan debt now in default. The CCAP report also details shortcomings on the part of the federal government to account for risk in making federal student loans:

“The federal student loan programs are fundamentally unique because any consideration of risk is largely ignored when deciding whether to make a loan… During the past 11 years, the number of seriously delinquent student loans has grown by about 15.41 percent per year on average, outpacing those loans that are merely delinquent (fewer than 90 days past due on payments) which averaged 13.54 percent annually. In other words, student loan debt is growing at an unsustainable pace.”

Moreover, the federal government’s current accounting practices largely fail to account for market risk, which means the costs to taxpayers of student loans probably are higher than estimated. Federal student loan programs fail to take into account students’ credit worthiness, major or whether the student has a co-signer, which means federal student loans probably cost the government money, rather than turn a profit as is often claimed. Fair-value accounting, which takes into account market risk, would be a far more accurate reflection of the cost of federal student loans.

Attempts to rein in college costs by expanding the Pay As You Earn Plan, as President Obama did, or allowing for the refinancing of student loans, as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., proposes, encourage further borrowing without creating pressure on colleges to limit spending and keep tuition reasonable.

The Dynamic Repayment Act of 2014, offered by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Mark Warner, D-Va., is little better. It would expand federal involvement in higher education by not only requiring “every borrower of a federal student loan to pay 10 percent of his monthly income upon graduation,” it would “garner those payments through paycheck withholding.” The withholding provision in particular would, as a recent report from The Heritage Foundation detailed, enshrine the federal government in lending.

As Congress prepares to reauthorize the Higher Education Act, a number of other bills have been introduced, the most promising of which is the Higher Education Reform and Opportunity Act (HERO) proposalfrom Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla.

HERO would restructure higher education by decoupling federal financing from accreditation and allowing states to permit any entity to credential individual courses. This could help reduce college costs, decrease federal involvement in higher education and make for a more customized college experience for students who choose to attend.

https://dailysignal.com/2014/08/11/federal-aid-likely-driving-college-costs/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Posted on

Students to Rutgers board: Freeze tuition

rutgers-university

Students to Rutgers board: Freeze tuition

APRIL 8, 2014, 8:06 PM    LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 2014, 8:11 PM
BY PATRICIA ALEX
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD

Students on Tuesday asked Rutgers’ governing board to consider freezing tuition, saying that the cost of the state university is exceeding the grasp of the state’s middle class.

“My mother makes as much as Rutgers costs,” said Margarita Rosario, a junior. “Every semester I’ve had to rely on the generosity of others.”

About a dozen students spoke at a sparsely attended hearing in New Brunswick on Tuesday evening that drew about 40 people. The university’s board of governors took the testimony in advance of setting tuition and fees this summer.

Tuition and fees at Rutgers now tops $13,000 for state residents, making it one of the most expensive public universities in the nation. For students who live on campus, a year at Rutgers costs more than $25,000.

“I work 40 hours a week and even with aid it’s difficult to afford this education,” said Joe Fisher, a student from Matawan. “It’s a lot of stress.”

Fisher and others noted a spate of building projects around Rutgers campuses and questioned whether the administration was more concerned with the Rutgers brand than students.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/students-to-rutgers-board-freeze-tuition-1.857691#sthash.DS4zGuff.dpuf