Posted on

New Phishing Scam Targets the Ridgewood blog

gone phishing 870x566 1

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, in recent days the Ridgewood blog has been the target of “new” phishing scam . Phishing is the fraudulent attempt to obtain sensitive information such as usernames, passwords and credit card details by disguising oneself as a trustworthy entity in an electronic communication. This new one claims the Ridgewood blog is claiming we are using copyrighted images .

Continue reading New Phishing Scam Targets the Ridgewood blog

Posted on

Ridgewood Deputy Mayor Emails During Council Meeting

Albert Puccrelli Deputy mayor ridgewood

 

 

file photo by Boyd Loving

March 4,2016

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ Just a few points about the March 2nd Village meeting:

1. Albert sent an email to a resident during the meeting.  This is strictly forbidden according to a resolution that he himself penned, as follows:

Resolution 13-87 (April 24, 2013), item #4 reads as follows:

Telephonic or electronic communication between or among Councilmembers or between a Councilmember and a member of the public during public meetings is prohibited.

As soon as he realized his gaffe, Albert made a big point of saying that this is THE FIRST TIME EVER that he has sent an email during a meeting to a “member of the public” other than his family.  Evidently colleagues on the dais and members of his family are not considered to be members of the public.  Or, maybe the Deputy Mayor considers himself to be above his own rules.

2. The Deputy Mayor got nasty with a member of the public who questioned the accuracy of one of the renditions of the new garage plan.  The resident had not only questioned the depiction, but had also questioned whether this misrepresentation might have been intentional.  Mr. Pucciarelli referred to the resident’s email as STUPID and announced that he deleted it immediately.  Instead of actually looking at the resident’s suggestions, he just discarded it and then was insulting about it.

3. They voted 5-0 to go forward with bonding in-town, which will be a final hearing on the 23.  They voted 2 in favor (Susan and Michael) and 3 opposed to killing the ordinance to bond with the BCIA. Aronsohn made it abundantly clear that he will barrel ahead with the BCIA if the in-town bonding does not go through.  So the terrible three are keeping “parallel” tracks open so they can get the garage one way or another.