Posted on

The “Fatherlessness” Epidemic in America

Involved-Fathers-Reduce-Kids-Risk-of-Smoking-2

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, According to the Annie E. Casey Foundation’s website, National Kids Count, approximately 35 percent of children under 18 live in a single-parent home as of 2016. As many as 25-percent of children in the U.S. live in households with a mother alone. That is over 18 million children who do not live with a father figure. Additionally, father-only households were noted at just 8 percent.

Most research focuses on two major causes for the growth in fatherlessness since the early 1960’s: divorce and out-of-wedlock births.

Continue reading The “Fatherlessness” Epidemic in America

Posted on

Happy Father’s Day from the Ridgewood blog

father's day
PJ Blogger and the staff of the Ridgewood blog
Ridgewood NJ, Happy Father’s day to all the fathers . The Ridgewood blog would like retell a short bit of history on Father’s day . It seems the campaign to celebrate the nation’s fathers did not meet with the same enthusiasm as mothers day .

Continue reading Happy Father’s Day from the Ridgewood blog

Posted on

Readers Opine on Daniel Patrick Moynihan

o-DANIEL-PATRICK-MOYNIHAN-facebook

Moynihan was an interesting character. He grew up in East Harlem and Hell’s Kitchen and worked as a longshoreman before becoming a Harvard intellectual and liberal icon. The Moynihan Report made him a pariah to the liberal Democrats and should have ended his career, The report was too honest and undermined the liberal agenda of the day. He found an odd bedfellow in Richard Nixon who recruited him to his White House staff in 1968. Another Republican, Gerry Ford, made him Ambassador to the UN. After restoring credibility on the international stage, the Democrats accepted him back and he had a successful run as a Senator from NY–still a liberal but also still an independent thinker. He often took stances at odds with the liberal agenda, such as his opposition to Hillary’s original health care scheme.

Moynihan was one of the last of a dying breed…a real New York character… he ascended from a tough start in life and became an icon as well as a forward thinker…and he loved his little drink now and then… I would see him hoist a few at Langans on occasion and he was funny as hell… my 3 favorite quotes from him were 1) when a reporter asked him if he had a drinking problem, he responded “Madame, I do not have a problem drinking” , 2) as UN ambassador, when the UN passed a resolution equating Zionism with racism, in front of the whole assembly, put his arm around the Israeli ambassador and loudly said to him “F_ck them!”… and 3) when he referred to hillarycare as “boob bait for bubbas”…

Posted on

The Moynihan Report 50 Years Later: Why Marriage More Than Ever Promotes Opportunity for All

Ridgewood_Street_fair_theridgewoodblog

March 27, 2015
By Martin D. Brown and Rachel Sheffield

In 1965, Assistant Secretary of Labor Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who later served as a U.S. Senator from New York, introduced what has come to be known as the Moynihan Report.[1] His report focused on the increases in disparities between white and black Americans in terms of income, standard of living, and education. Moynihan boldly asserted that the root cause of these disparities was the breakdown of marriage in the black community. “The fundamental problem,” he assessed, “is that of family structure.” In his report, Moynihan called for a national effort to strengthen the black family in America.

While the report was denounced by activists at the time, Moynihan’s observations were valid and the problems he identified have worsened over the past 50 years. Family breakdown among all Americans is a far greater problem today than it was five decades ago. To advance opportunity for all in America, policymakers and other leaders must promote marriage and the intact family in policy and culture.

Where We Were in 1965

The following statistics illustrate the state of the American family when Moynihan released his report:

Marriage. Overall, in 1965, only about 7 percent of men and women had never married by age 35. The percentage of whites who never married by age 35 was just about 7 percent. For black women, it was roughly 6 percent; for black men, the percentage was just below 10 percent.[2]

Single-Mother Households. Overall, about 11 percent of children lived in homes headed by a single mother (1968 data). About 6 percent of white children and 29 percent of black children lived in homes headed by a single mother.[3]

Unwed Childbearing. In 1965, 7.7 percent of all children in the United States were born to single mothers. Roughly one-quarter (approximately 26 percent) of black children and about 4 percent of white children were born outside marriage.[4]

Divorce. In 1960, just 2 percent of all men ages 15 and older had ever been divorced and 2.5 percent of all women had ever been divorced. Among white Americans, 2 percent of men and 2.5 percent of women had ever been divorced. Among black Americans, 2 percent of men and 4 percent of women had ever been divorced.[5]

Poverty. In 1965, the poverty rate had been steadily declining for more than a decade and was at 17.3 percent.[6]

Where We Are 50 Years Later

Since Moynihan’s report 50 years ago, marital breakdown and unwed childbearing in the United States have reached far greater levels among all Americans.

Marriage. Overall, the percentage of never-married Americans has increased significantly since 1965. About 10 percent of women and 14 percent of men have never married by age 35, according to 2010 data. Among black men and women, the percent never married was substantially higher, at about 25 percent for both men and women in 2010.[7]

Single-Mother Households. In 2014, about 24 percent of children in the United States were living in a household headed by a single mother, over twice the amount in 1965. Among white children, the percentage had more than tripled, from 6 percent to about 19 percent, and for black children had increased by 42 percent such that over 50 percent of black children were living in a single-mother household last year.[8]

Unwed Childbearing. The number of children born to single mothers has also skyrocketed since the 1960s. More than 40 percent of children in the United States are born outside marriage. About 29 percent of white children, 72 percent of black children, and over half of Hispanic children were born to single mothers in 2014.[9]

Divorce. In 2014, the percentage of individuals ever divorced had increased dramatically from the 1960s. Overall, about 9 percent of men and 11 percent of women had been divorced. These percentages were roughly the same by gender for both white and black Americans.[10]

Poverty. In 2014, the poverty in the United States was slightly lower than it was in 1968, at about 14.5 percent.[11]

Family Structure Matters for Opportunity

Tragically, family breakdown, including the decline in marriage and the rise in unwed childbearing and divorce, leave children in fragmented families and at significantly greater risk for poverty and other negative outcomes that can hinder their opportunity to thrive.

First, children in single-parent homes are at a much greater risk for poverty. Compared to their peers in married-parent homes, children in single-parent homes are more than five times as likely to be poor.[12]

Children in single-parent families also experience diminished educational opportunities. They are less likely to graduate from high school and to attend and graduate from college.[13]

Furthermore, marriage protects children against delinquent activity. Teens in father-absent households are significantly more likely to engage in criminal activity and are also more likely to be incarcerated.[14]Teens from single-parent households are also at greater risk for abusing alcohol and drugs.[15]

Teens in non-intact families are also at a greater risk for engaging in early sexual activity and of becoming a teen parent.[16]

Moynihan’s Report and Opportunity for All

The need to strengthen the family is even more urgent today than it was 50 years ago. While Moynihan’s report focused on the black family, and while the concern today is all the greater for this original group, trends in marriage and family breakdown are a concern among Americans of all races. In order for all families in America to have the greatest opportunity to thrive in the 21st century, it is crucial that America heed Moynihan’s original warning and seek to reestablish the stability of the family.

In 1965, the generations of injustice and racial oppression that had contributed to the weakness of the family in the African American community were poignant. While it is still necessary today to fight systemic injustice where it exists, it is crucial to strengthen the institutions that nurture opportunity and protect against the many adverse outcomes that are associated with family breakdown. Without addressing these issues, far too many children will be left with diminished opportunities to reach their potential.

Conclusion

Policymakers and other leaders must find ways to strengthen marriage. They can start by ensuring that policy does not undermine marriage. This can be accomplished by reducing marriage penalties prevalent in the nation’s means-tested welfare system.

Furthermore, policymakers should send a clear message about the crucial importance of marriage and the intact family, particularly with regard to how strong families protect children from poverty and other risks. They can do this through a public advertising campaign, following the model of anti-smoking campaigns and campaigns that have encouraged youth to “stay in school.”

Leaders in all sectors should utilize their resources to strengthen and nurture healthy marriages. Churches and nonprofit and community-based organizations must also make the strengthening of marriage and family a priority.

It will require great courage from leaders to push back against the prevailing cultural trend of family breakdown, particularly since America is now seeing second-generation and third-generation fragmented families. However, these efforts are necessary if America hopes to restore and expand opportunity for all Americans.

—Martin D. Brown is a Visiting Fellow in the Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society, of the Institute for Family, Community, and Opportunity, at The Heritage Foundation. Rachel Sheffield is a Policy Analyst in the Institute for Family, Community, and Opportunity.

https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2015/03/the-moynihan-report-50-years-later-why-marriage-more-than-ever-promotes-opportunity-for-all

 

Posted on

Former Md. governor: More fathers in homes might have helped Baltimore

images

May 02, 2015, 12:03 pm
By Mark Hensch

Former Maryland Gov. Bob Ehrlich (R) said Saturday better parenting from fathers may have prevented riots earlier this week in Baltimore.

“If more fathers would have been in those homes the first day those kids congregated and all the trouble started, and said, ‘You know what? There’s a way to do this, let’s do it right, let’s not go torch things, we need to protest, we need to dissent, we need to do what we do, but not this,’ maybe we wouldn’t be in the jam we are right now,” Ehrlich told the Boston Globe.

Ehrlich was reacting to Friday’s announcement that six Baltimore police officers will face criminal charges in the death of Freddie Gray. He added that “the timing” of that decision was “somewhat surprising.”

“The thought was that the prosecutor would take time … to do her investigation, determine the facts, look at this report and determine how to proceed,” he said of Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby’s handling of the Gray case.

Friday’s ruling that Gray’s death was a homicide calmed Baltimore after periodic riots launched earlier this week. The fact Gray was black, Ehrlich argued, had shifted debate over his passing from police brutality to race.

“It shouldn’t be about race but it is, because this is America,” he said. “Race is just there. It’s just there.”

“It’s frustrating,” Ehrlich added. “It should be about the police practices in this city and not about race.”

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/240866-former-md-governor-more-fathers-in-homes-might-have-helped

Posted on

How a Dad’s Involvement Can Change His Children’s Future

Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Sasha Obama, Malia Obama

How a Dad’s Involvement Can Change His Children’s Future

Rachel Sheffield June 06, 2014

Rachel Sheffield focuses on welfare, marriage and family, and education as policy analyst in the DeVos Center for Religion & Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation.

Children with involved fathers are more likely to graduate from college—particularly among middle- and upper-income families but also among those from lower-income backgrounds, a recent study found.

According to this new research by Brad Wilcox at the University of Virginia, the family structure that best promotes this involvement is a married, intact family. This is the case for youth from lower-educated homes as well as those from more highly educated homes.

Wilcox also found fathers are more involved with their children today than they have been in the past. The amount of time fathers spend with their children each week has increased from 4.2 hours on average in 1995 to 7.3 hours on average in 2011. The down side is that fewer teens live in intact families, particularly teens from working-class and lower-income homes.

On the other hand, their peers from college-educated homes are “triply advantaged,” according to Wilcox: “They typically enjoy more economic resources, an intact family, and an involved father.”

The question then is, how to keep youth connected with their fathers, or, as Wilcox puts it, how to “bridge the fatherhood divide between children from college-educated and less-educated families.”

Increasing the odds that more children are raised in homes with their married mother and father is a crucial factor in the equation.

https://dailysignal.com/2014/06/06/dads-involvement-can-change-childrens-future/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social