Posted on

Bergen’s James O’Keefe Takes Down the New York Times and CNN

external content.duckduckgo 34

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Wyckoff NJ, legacy media outfits have failed to mention a stunning opening victory that guerrilla the Bergen filmmaker James O’Keefe won last month in his libel suit against the New York Times.

Continue reading Bergen’s James O’Keefe Takes Down the New York Times and CNN

Posted on

Concerns Raised Over Basing Public Health Policy on One-Size-Fits-All PCR COVID Test

external content.duckduckgo 21

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Trenton NJ, Concerned that aggressive testing for the COVID virus could be yielding ambiguous data, Senator Joe Pennacchio today called for the state to revise laboratory reporting on positive case numbers.

Continue reading Concerns Raised Over Basing Public Health Policy on One-Size-Fits-All PCR COVID Test

Posted on

New York Times Pulls Anti-Semitic Cartoon

NYT Cartoon

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

New York NY, In Thursday’s international edition of The New York Times, featured a cartoon with “anti-Semitic tropes” it portrayed a blind President Trump led by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu depicted as a dog with a Star of David collar around its neck.

The cartoon appeared in the April 25 international edition and coincided with the end of the Passover holiday and Shabbat, two days many observant Jews were not online.

Continue reading New York Times Pulls Anti-Semitic Cartoon
Posted on

New York Times Will Vacate 8 Floors In Its HQ To Generate “Significant Rental Revenue”

NYT_theridgewoodblog

by Tyler Durden
Dec 16, 2016 11:00 AM

Remember when The NYT reported that its ad hoc campaign to boost revenue by selling subscriptions in response to the vicious back and forth with Donald Trump, was said to be a smashing success? Perhaps it was subscriptions for the crossword puzzle because it appears the monetary success was not smashing enough, and according to a just released note from executives Arthur Sulzberger and Mark Thompson, the newspaper will vacate at least eight floors in its iconic building, allowing it to “generate significant rental income” because it is “frankly, too expensive to occupy this many floors when we don’t truly need them.”

Maybe the lesson here is that when the newspaper business model no longer works, one can just pivot into a REIT?

The remaining staff will be consolidated on the remaining, redesigned floors in a “more dynamic, modern and open workplace, one that is better suited to the moment.”

Furthermore, the NYT publisher and CEO will lose their corner offices, which they call a “vestige from a different era” and will “introduce more team rooms and common spaces.”

It is unclear if NYT would distribute pink slips as part of the cost-cutting effort, however as the letter adds, “in the end, these changes will impact every employee at 620 Eighth Ave. In the near term, we will have to move about 400 employees out of the building to nearby office space while the first phase of work is completed. We expect that group, which includes parts of marketing, technology, the newsroom, news services, corporate finance and print products and services pre-press operations, to move in the first quarter and return by the end of 2017. Your manager will notify you if your position is affected by this temporary move. We understand and appreciate the disruption this will inevitably cause and we will do everything in our power to mitigate it.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-16/new-york-time-will-vacate-8-floors-its-headquarters-generate-significant-rental-reve

Posted on

New York Times: Charles Blow Takedown letter to editor

The New York Times

 As I watched last week as protesters took to the streets in big cities, what struck me was the vast and growing divide between America’s rural and urban populations and their politics and sensibilities. One look at county maps of this year’s election results and you see what looks like a handful of blueberries sprinkled on an endless spread of red sauce (between the blue coasts). And yet, it is likely that the final result will be that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, although Donald Trump won the electoral vote and therefore the election. Part of the reason for this is that, as a census report noted last year: “U.S. cities are home to 62.7 percent of the U.S. population but comprise just 3.5 percent of land area.”

Etc Charles Blow New York Times

Letter comment selection

Quote “Charles, there is this little thing called social media, you should check it out sometime. It’s allowed the average person to communicate directly with one another and share THEIR ideas without the pompous, narrow viewed opinions of some Liberal elite.

For decades you and yours were able to get away with controlling the narrative by virtue of having the only relevant soapboxes in town. Fast forward to today and you see a completely different landscape for information sharing, one in which ideas are exchanged at the speed of light free of media controlled bias.

Trump won the election because when people compared the dialogue that they were having with one another to your Liberal prism, they realized that they were no longer being represented.

Trump for ALL his flaws recognized and exploited this to great effect.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/14/opinion/trumps-rural-white-america.html

Posted on

The Tax Foundation Looks at Trump’s Tax Return

donald-trump-plane_boarder_trip6b

Five Facts About the Trump Tax Return Disclosure

October 02, 2016
By
Joseph Henchman,
Alan Cole

The New York Times reports that it has obtained pages from Trump’s 1995 state tax returns. The Times reported late Saturday night that it had received an envelope containing the first pages of Trump’s alleged 1995 state tax returns in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. The documents were mailed to the Times from New York City; the return address claimed it was sent from Trump Tower. Last week, the Times showed the documents to Jack Mitnick, who in the mid-1990s was Trump’s accountant and was listed on the New Jersey return as the preparer. He said the documents appeared to be authentic.

The documents indicate Trump had enormous business losses. The documents indicate Trump (and his then-wife Marla) earned wages and salaries of $6,108; interest income of $7,386,825; dividend income of $26,051; business gains of $3,427,092; real estate losses of negative $15,818,562; and “other income” of negative $915,729,293. This is almost certainly what is known as a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, given the amount and the line of the form (although the document references an explanatory statement that remains undisclosed).

Net operating loss carryforwards are not a loophole, but a standard feature of an income tax that discourages tax avoidance. If a business makes $50 in June but loses $100 in July, we call that a $50 loss. A business that makes $50 in December but loses $100 in January is fundamentally the same thing, but straddles the tax year. Net operating losses (NOLs) allow businesses that lose money in one year and make money in another to smooth those ups and downs. We tax income (profits) not losses, and do so somewhat arbitrarily based on the calendar year. Otherwise, a taxpayer would have to pay income taxes despite not earning income, and would have an incentive to manipulate gains and losses to make them happen in the same year. Any taxpayer with business losses can take NOLs, and in 2014, 1.2 million taxpayers reported NOLs on their federal income tax form.

Why Trump had such a large net operating loss carryforward is not known from the documents made available. The documents are just the first pages so they are incomplete, and Trump’s campaign has not released any other information that can explain the $915.7 million business loss reported on the 1995 tax return. The Times notes that several Trump ventures had faltered in 1991-92 (the Trump Taj Mahal and Castle casinos in Atlantic City, the Trump Shuttle airline, and the Trump Plaza hotel), resulting in four of the six bankruptcies in Trump’s business record. As part of the bankruptcy settlements, Trump gave up stakes in these properties to creditors in return for debt write-downs. Generally cancellation of debt is taxed as income, except when discharged as part of a bankruptcy proceeding in which case any NOLs are reduced by the debt discharged. Without further documents or clarifications by the campaign, these are guesses.

The Times may face legal troubles for their article but can mount a First Amendment defense. Trump’s lawyer, contacted for comment by the Times, threatened “prompt initiation of appropriate legal action” if the Times published their article on the documents. The Trump campaign’s response referred to the document both as “alleged” and as “illegally obtained,” and in listing all the taxes Trump pays, did not list income taxes. Unauthorized disclosure of federal tax returns is prohibited by 26 U.S.C. § 7213(a)(3), punishable by a $5,000 fine and 5 years imprisonment, but in this case only state tax returns were disclosed. New York punishes unauthorized disclosure of tax return information with dismissal if the party is a state employee (N.Y. Tax § 314) and a criminal misdemeanor (N.Y. Tax § 1825); I couldn’t find information on imprisonment length for this offense. New York further authorizes civil damages of up to $1,000 or actual damages, plus punitive damages and court costs, for unauthorized disclosure of a state tax return (N.Y. Tax § 3038). Connecticut allows for punishing a state employee that violates tax return disclosure laws to be fined no more than $1,000 and imprisoned for no more than a year (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-15(g)). New Jersey punishes unauthorized tax return disclosure as a “crime of the fourth degree,” punishable by up to 18 months in prison and a $10,000 fine (N.J. Stat. § 54:50-8(b); N.J. Admin. Code 18:7-11.14). Criminal actions require the state governments to begin legal proceedings, not Trump or his lawyers. In mid-September, New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet said he would publish Trump’s tax returns even if it risked jail time, and I would expect them to raise a First Amendment defense to their publication. In 1971, the Times and the Washington Post won a First Amendment defense against a government order to cease publication of the Pentagon Papers, a collection of classified documents explaining how America became involved in the Vietnam War.

https://taxfoundation.org/blog/five-facts-about-trump-tax-return-disclosure?mc_cid=643099cf09&mc_eid=c834f22e2e

Posted on

Ridgewood Chief of Police Quoted in New York Times Article on Tulsa Shooting

CHIEF OF POLICE JACQUELINE LUTHCKE

September 27,2016
the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, Ridgewood Police Chief was quoted by the New York Times in a recent article on ,”Rarity of Tulsa Shooting: Female Officers Are Almost Never Involved” https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/us/rarity-of-tulsa-shooting-female-officers-are-almost-never-involved.html?_r=1

….But most current female officers interviewed said those stereotypes did not play out in the field. “We have some men that are the first ones we would put in with difficult people because they are such good communicators,” said Jacqueline Luthcke, who is chief of the Ridgewood, N.J., Police Department….

Posted on

Ted Cruz takes on the New York Times say produce evidence or issue a Formal Apology

ted_CRUZ_THERIDGEWOODBLOG

NEW YORK TIMES IS LYING: CRUZ CAMPAIGN CALLS ON THE TIMES TO RELEASE THEIR EVIDENCE OR ISSUE A FORMAL APOLOGY

07/10/15

HOUSTON, Texas — Yesterday, news broke that the New York Timeshad omitted Cruz’s best-selling book A Time for Truth from their best-seller list.

Bookscan, a subscription service that tracks the vast majority of book sales in America, is usually a reliable indicator of the New York Timesbestseller list. For example, this week’s #1 and #2 books on Bookscan are also #1 and #2 on the NYT list. But the #3 book, Cruz’s A Time for Truth, has been omitted altogether from the top twenty spots on theNew York Times list.

This is despite the fact that Cruz’s book sold more copies last week than 18 of the 20 books on the list.

Their decision to blackball Cruz’s book suggests that the Times very much does not want people to read the book.

The Times’s initial explanation was cryptic: “We have uniform standards that we apply to our best seller list, which includes an analysis of book sales that goes beyond simply the number of books sold.”

When the Times was roundly condemned for its obvious political bias, they issued a revised statement: “In the case of this book, the overwhelming preponderance of evidence was that sales were limited to strategic bulk purchases.”

This statement is false, and the Times knows it.

There were no “strategic bulk purchases.” Cruz spent last week on a nation-wide book tour, signing copies of his book at multiple locations. Booksellers at each event had long lines—sometimes over 400 people per event.

Pictures from some of these signings may be found here: Arlington, TX, Katy, TX, and Sioux City, IA.

Simultaneously, Cruz’s book was ranked the #1 political seller on Amazon, and made it as high as the #9 overall seller (across all categories, including fiction).

“The Times is presumably embarrassed by having their obvious partisan bias called out. But their response—alleging ‘strategic bulk purchases’—is a blatant falsehood,” said Cruz campaign spokesperson Rick Tyler. “The evidence is directly to the contrary. In leveling this false charge, the Times has tried to impugn the integrity of Senator Cruz and of his publisher Harper Collins.”

“We call on the Times, release your so-called ‘evidence.’ Demonstrate that your charge isn’t simply a naked fabrication, designed to cover up your own partisan agenda. And, if you cannot do so, then issue a public apology to Senator Cruz and Harper Collins editor Adam Bellow for making false charges against them.”

Posted on

New York Times reporters Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson published the address of Darren Wilson in the New York Times.

10420290_824088427654005_8987515862057812583_n

New York Times reporters Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson published the address of Darren Wilson in the New York Times.

If these New York Times reporters are willing to put Darren Wilson’s address out there when it will unquestionably endanger his life, then they should have no complaints about the public knowing where they live.

Julie Bosman
5620 N. Wayne Ave, Apt 2
Chicago, IL 60660-4204

Campbell Robertson
1113 N. Dupre Street
New Orleans, LA 70119-3203

Feel free to share this post and send them your opinion. A couple of million postcards should make a statement.

Like they say; “What’s good for the goose, is good for the dirtbag.”

Rick Sarmiento
2 Million Bikers to DC
Florida State Coordinator