Posted on 4 Comments

“Parking Authority” vs. “Parking Utility”

Parked_cars_theridgwoodblog.net_

“Parking Authority” vs. “Parking Utility”
September 3rd 2014 

Boyd A. Loving
11:46 PM

What are the differences between Parking Authorities and Parking Utilities in the State of NJ, and why does Ridgewood choose to retain a Parking Utility?

Parking Authority

The Legislature of the State of New Jersey in 1948 adopted N.J.S.A. 40:11A et seq., commonly known as the “Parking Authority Law,” which authorized municipal governments to create an independent parking authority. A parking authority has the same geographic boundaries as the city that created it but is “a public body corporate and politic and a political subdivision of the State (of New Jersey).” ANew Jersey parking authority has five commissioners who are appointed by the governing body of the municipality (city council or city commissioners) for staggered five-year terms, or seven commissioners with two mayoral appointments and five governing body appointments. A parking authority may employ an executive director, attorney, engineer, accountant, and any other professionals and staff necessary to manage and deliver parking services to the city’s residents and the general public.

As noted elsewhere in this report, New Jersey parking authorities have extraordinary statutory authority. N.J.S.A. 40:11A-6 grants parking authorities the powers necessary to carry out and effectuate essential government purposes. Furthermore, parking authorities may buy, sell and/or lease property as a lessee or lessor; construct multiuse projects and parking facilities; borrow money; issue bonds; mortgage or otherwise encumber its assets; enter into contracts; and retain earnings.

Because parking authorities fund their operations from revenue derived from parking user fees rather than through real estate taxation, and board members traditionally are appointed from the business community, parking authorities tend to be operated like a business. Parking authorities are conscious of the fact that annual expenses should not exceed parking revenue. Surplus annual revenue is retained to pay for renewal and replacement repairs at existing parking facilities and to purchase real estate or build new facilities.

The strength of a parking authority is its independence. The parking authority’s commissioners are appointed, not elected, public officials. Consequently, a parking authority board of commissioners can make difficult planning decisions such as raising parking rates, installing parking meters, increasing parking enforcement, acquiring property by eminent domain, or selecting a location to construct a parking facility without regard to its immediate political consequence. A parking authority provides elected officials with a measure of political cover in that the authority’s decisions are the result of the actions of the authority’s board rather than the city’s governing council/commission.

Among the other advantages of a parking authority:

• Its debt is outside the municipalities bonding limit (Cap)

• Its sole purpose and function is to construct, maintain, and operate public parking

• It can retain earnings and accumulate surplus revenue for capital projects

• It can develop income-producing mixed-use projects exempt from real estate taxes, which are intended to subsidize the cost of providing public parking.

The negatives of a parking authority are the reverse side of its strengths. Parking authorities are independent and, on occasion, choose to raise parking fees or pursue goals, objectives, or projects that are not supported by a majority of the municipal governing body. Parking authorities are not directly controlled by the local governing body, which has the power only to appoint or reappoint one authority commissioner per year to the authority’s member board. Parking authorities traditionally have generated revenue surpluses at year end or have accumulated significant financial reserves through retained earnings that local municipal governments prefer be utilized for taxpayer relief or be transferred to the municipality’s general fund to offset the city’s operating budget expenses.

Based upon a review of Who’s Who in Parking 2005, published by the International Parking Institute (IPI), there are seven states—Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, New Jersey, Ohio, and Pennsylvania—that have parking authorities. However, it should be noted that Miami is the only parking authority in the state of Florida that was created by a special act of the legislature. The state of New Jersey has approximately thirty parking authorities, more than any other state in the nation.

Parking Utility

A municipality, as an alternative to a parking authority, may create a parking utility. A parking utility has a number of the strengths of a parking authority: executive director; operating budget and debt service separate from the municipality; ability to generate annual surplus revenue and retain earnings; ability to set its own rates and fees; and a function strictly limited to providing public parking.

Among the negatives associated with a parking utility: limited independence; the executive director usually reports through the city administrator/manager or CFO; the local governing body retains jurisdiction over rates, fees, capital projects, operating budget, and personnel; and parking revenues in excess of annual operating expenses generally are turned over to the city’s general fund.

The good news/bad news aspects of a parking utility are that the municipal governing body maintains virtual control of the parking entity. However, the hands-on control exercised by the municipal governing body places parking planning and decision making within the political process.

In municipal environments where control of the mayor’s office and governing body are continually contested, parking can become a political rather than a planning issue, which may affect a parking utility’s ability to aggressively pursue public parking improvements and objectives.

There are at least four parking utilities within the state of New Jersey: East Brunswick, Hoboken, Princeton, and Trenton.

The Answer:

Parking Utility revenues in excess of annual operating expenses are moved over to the Village’s general fund. If Ridgewood had a Parking Authority all these years, all revenues collected (and not stolen) would have been used exclusively to maintain and/or improve parking. There would be no parking problem now, because there would have been plenty of money to resolve it.

Proving once again ladies and gentlemen that you can’t have your cake and eat it too!

(Special thanks go to James Ten Hoeve, who revealed the answer publicly several years ago.)

Esurance

Posted on 14 Comments

NEW FREINDSHIP HAS EMERGED

unnamed-101-300x225-1

NEW FREINDSHIP HAS EMERGED

Paul Vagianos President of the Chamber of Commerce spoke at tonight Council meeting Ad nauseam on how he believes that this Council will build a parking garage and that he and the Chamber are 100 % behind the Council plans. He went on to say that he and Amy Bourque, President Citizens for a Better Ridgewood have struck up a new friendship.
Well I was wondering why Citizens for a Better Ridgewood has been low key. Maybe they need a new President. The parking garage is a prelude to the massive expansion in the CBD. The garage will be sited by the developers as as a place to put overflow parking for the tenements. Its should also be noted that if a parking garage is built on the Hudson St the site it will also be very close to Mr Vagianos eatery along with the old Bank of America building and we all know who owns that.
Our Deputy Mayor the narcissist  that he is could not help himself and said that he will not be one of  past Council Members who pictures are on the wall that did not build a garage. Well Al I guess you have more wisdom then all the Council member that have come before you.

Esurance

Posted on 5 Comments

Reader says 12 pm and still no agenda posted on the website. Transparency !

DSCF3251

Reader says 12 pm and still no agenda posted on the website. Transparency !

The agenda was just posted 12:18pm . why so late? Maybe because of what is going to be discussed in closed sessions ?

 Legal
1.         RIC Development  ( Big Al’s attorney friend trying to get the right of way at the sewage plant to help him build hosing)
           Dave Rutford  
            c.         Contract negotiations               
1.         Employee Parking
2.         Lot 12 – The Gap Parking Lot
3.         Fire Contract Negotiations

09/02/147:30PMPlanning Board Public 
09/03/147:30PMVillage Council Special Public Meeting 
09/03/147:30PMVillage Council Public Work Session 
09/09/147:30PMBoard of Adjustment Regular Public Meeting
09/10/148:00PMVillage Council Public Meeting
09/16/147:30PMPlanning Board Public Meeting
09/17/147:30PMVillage Council Public Work Session
09/23/147:30PMBoard of Adjustment Regular Public Meeting
10/01/147:30PMVillage Council Public Work Session
10/07/147:30PMPlanning Board Public Meeting

Esurance

Posted on 8 Comments

Development of the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Area

town_garage_theridgewoodblog.net_

Bid Notice-RFP for N. Walnut St. Redevelopment Area

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Proposals will be received by the Village of Ridgewood, in the Level 4 Courtroom, at the Village Hall, 131 North Maple Avenue, Ridgewood, New Jersey, and will be opened on Monday, December 1, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. prevailing time for: 

“Request for Proposals and Qualifications

for the 

Development of the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Area

Village of Ridgewood Bergen County, New Jersey”

The Village of Ridgewood is seeking proposals from qualified firms to redevelop certain parcels in the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Area in conformance with the Village’s adopted Redevelopment Plan. 

The RFP package may be obtained from the Office of the Village Manager, Level 5, Village Hall, 131 North Maple Avenue, Ridgewood, New Jersey 07450, (201) 670-5500, extension No. 203. Proposal packages may be examined or picked up in person between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., at 131 North Maple Avenue, Ridgewood, New Jersey 07450, Monday through Friday. Prospective respondents requesting that proposal documents be mailed to them shall be responsible for providing their own postage/delivery service remuneration. No proposal forms shall be given out after 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 26, 2014. 

Proposals may be submitted in person or by mail prior to the proposal opening, addressed to the Office of the Village Clerk. The Village assumes no responsibility for loss or non-delivery of any proposal sent to it prior to the date and time stated for receipt of proposals. 

Each proposal must be enclosed in a sealed envelope with the name of the respondent thereon and endorsed, “Request for Proposals and Qualifications for the Development of the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Area, Village of Ridgewood, Bergen County, New Jersey”. 

All respondents shall present satisfactory evidence of being authorized to do business in the State of New Jersey. All respondents shall also provide a copy of their New Jersey Business Registration Certificate with their proposal. Additional requirements for submittal are presented in the RFP. All respondents shall adhere to the requirements presented in the “Request for Proposals”. The Village of Ridgewood reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any informality or to accept a proposal, which in its judgment best serves the interest of the Village.

Posted on 4 Comments

Proposed apartments on Broad Street will benefit Ridgewood

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog.net_1

Proposed apartments on Broad Street will benefit Ridgewood

AUGUST 29, 2014    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, AUGUST 29, 2014, 12:31 AM

Proposed apartments on Broad Street will benefit village
Robert Jenkins

to the Editor:

As a lifelong resident of the village, and a person who has spent the past 36 years working in downtown Ridgewood, I have seen many changes to the business district. Businesses come and go, but luckily the downtown area continues to be charming and seemingly well attended.

However, in light of the struggling economy, I believe that the village would benefit from a shot in the arm, such as would be provided by the luxury apartment complex proposed at the former Brogan Cadillac site on South Broad Street.

It’s easy to see the benefits of such a complex. Many of my contemporaries have moved, or are planning to move, out of the village at some point — to downsize and/or simply find a place to live without the rigors of upkeep that owning a house entails. Luxury apartments in the downtown area would offer an attractive alternative to moving away and in the process would provide not only increased tax revenues to the town, but also a boost to the local businesses that would ensure the continuation of the downtown district.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/letter-proposed-apartments-on-broad-street-will-benefit-ridgewood-1.1077870#sthash.175ibqUT.dpuf

Posted on 6 Comments

Reader says the Village needs to seize the agenda from the developers

unnamed-21-300x225

Reader says the Village needs to seize the agenda from the developers

Answer – we need parking AND common sense. Unfortunately with the team we have running the show, we’re unlikely to get either.

Until the Village seizes the agenda from the developers, we will be in a state of continuous reaction. Developers want to build huge buildings because they make more money that way. Certain citizens are not in favor of huge buildings. Developers then say that if they can’t build a huge building then they won’t build anything. Then other citizens say that the town is is disrepair and we need to do something so let’s just build the huge buildings because what other choice do we have?

Come to think of it, I’d settle for some common sense and will drive around the block looking for a spot in the meantime.

Microsoft Store

Posted on 21 Comments

Luxury housing will keep people in village

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog.net_1

Ridgewood News letter: Luxury housing will keep people in village

AUGUST 22, 2014    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, AUGUST 22, 2014, 12:31 AM
Print

Luxury housing will keep people in village
James D. Vaughan III

to the Editor:

Luxury apartments along the Ridgewood train tracks are good for Ridgewood.

Once the children grow and leave home, a luxury apartment in town is a very attractive alternative to Ridgewood residents. We raised our children here and our friends still live here. We would prefer to stay in Ridgewood rather than a neighboring town. However, we cannot justify the expense of the large home. Most of the readers of The Ridgewood News know a friend who moved to a townhome or apartment in a neighboring town.

The residents of the luxury apartments would be mostly Ridgewood residents who have sold their home, or young couples moving to Ridgewood. Many of the young couples would be our children.

Currently, the properties are industrial locations. A luxury apartment complex would bring new residents and pedestrian life to downtown. Adding ongoing Ridgewood residents to the sites along the train tracks would be tremendously beneficial to our town, our downtown and our property tax revenue.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/ridgewood-news-letter-luxury-housing-will-keep-people-in-village-1.1071382#sthash.U89qbBbd.dpuf

Posted on 3 Comments

Resident unhappy with actions of attorneys

imgres-1

Ridgewood News letter: Resident unhappy with actions of attorneys

AUGUST 22, 2014    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, AUGUST 22, 2014, 12:31 AM

Resident unhappy with actions of attorneys
Nancy Currey

to the editor:

Frankly I was stunned while attending the Aug. 19 Planning Board meeting with the tandem display of incivility by the Mr. Bruinooge and Mr. Wells toward Open Space Committee chair Ralph Currey.

Currently, the Planning Board is considering amending the master plan so that developments such as The Enclave, The Dayton and Chestnut Village can be built in Ridgewood. In order to assess the widespread impact the addition of a significant number of new citizens would impose, the Open Space Committee was requested by the Planning Board to prepare a report.

The Open Space Committee is a largely all-volunteer citizen committee without funding. The report was prepared in the context of these limitations and posed as an advisory paper. We are fortunate, due in large part to the considerable efforts of these dedicated volunteers, to have Habernickel Park and the Schedler property.

Compared to surrounding towns, the Village of Ridgewood has far less recreational space even with the addition of Habernickel Park and the potential of the Schedler property. The essence of the report prepared by the committee is that Ridgewood is already lacking the fields and open areas that would be suggested for its current population using several guidelines. The addition of a significant number of new residents utilizing those same recreational facilities would only worsen the numbers.

This really is a matter of common sense. One does not need formulas to realize our parks are overcrowded and the competition for field space is fierce. Just drive to a park in our area and try to find a parking space. That is more telling than any stack of paper. The attorneys representing the developers harped on the calculus of the report and congratulated themselves on trying to humiliate the witness. The truth speaks for itself.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/ridgewood-news-letter-resident-unhappy-with-actions-of-attorneys-1.1071392#sthash.ge5aSTly.dpuf

Posted on 6 Comments

Ridgewood News editorial: A plaza for pedestrians

streetfair_theridgewoodblog.net_

file photo Ridgewood street fair

Ridgewood News editorial: A plaza for pedestrians

AUGUST 15, 2014    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, 2014, 12:31 AM

Few believed a pedestrian plaza in Times Square would work, let alone become a permanent fixture in the middle of New York City’s Crossroads of the World. Both happened

In 2008, the American Planning Association bestowed its Great Public Spaces honor to the Church Street Marketplace in Burlington, Vt. There, pedestrians freely walk on store-lined Church Street in an outdoor mall setting.


– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-editorials/a-plaza-for-pedestrians-1.1067833#sthash.bQhaC55M.dpuf

Posted on 1 Comment

CBD Discussion – Ridgecrest Senior Apartments – August 20th – All Are Welcome

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog.net_1

CBD Discussion – Ridgecrest Senior Apartments – August 20th – All Are Welcome

The second open forum on the CBD will take place Wednesday, August 20, at the Ridgecrest Senior Apartments at 7-11 Ridge Road, Ridgewood, starting at 7:30 PM. From 7:30 to 8:00 PM, the microphone will be open to speakers who did not speak at the July forum. From 8:00 until 9:00 PM there will be a panel discussion among residents of ideas advanced to date. All are welcome, naturally subject to the meeting room’s capacity.

GigaGolf, Inc.show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=60066

Posted on 4 Comments

Readers says The fact is, people that take issue with our elected officials tend to be activists and serial volunteers.

DSCF4118

file photo by Boyd Loving

Readers says The fact is, people that take issue with our elected officials tend to be activists and serial volunteers.

I find it interesting that Council apologists assume that anyone that disagrees with them is lazy and ignorant. After all, we didn’t run for Council ourselves and we don’t serve on the Planning Board so therefore all we must do is put signs on our lawn and complain.

The fact is, people that take issue with our elected officials tend to be activists and serial volunteers. We tend to take enough time to formulate an educated opinion on the issues that face our town. We also tend to act on those opinions by attending meetings, participating in the process and yes, posting here. We tend to take enough time to formulate an educated opinion on the issues that face our town. We also tend to act on those opinions by attending meetings, participating in the process and yes, posting here.

TaylorMade RBZ Stage 2show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=205477

Posted on 7 Comments

Reader says businesses that are able to pay the rent and succeed will determine what you see in the storefronts.

10537388_825970970755323_6362366040501113889_n

the Pearl: After dinner, have Anthony make you a strawberry zabaglione tableside. We are the only restaurant in NJ to do this dessert tableside. Come see the show – the KING OF BROAD STREET!

 

Reader says businesses that are able to pay the rent and succeed will determine what you see in the storefronts.

The CBD tenants (of current buildings) change due to markets and the residents can piss and moan all they want, but the reality is, the businesses that are able to pay the rent and succeed will determine what you see in the storefronts.
In my 45 years living in town, I have seen a few changes in ‘retail’.


No more Drapkins, no more Winchells, no more Al & Harrys, no more Sealfons, no more MacHughes, all of which were great stores and fell victim to the malls.


We used to have a liquor store on many corners.


Every corner on franklin had multiple gas stations (Phillips 66, Amoco, Texaco, arco, Texaco, mobil(2), exxon, Sinclair, etc, all of which are gone. (a few gone from godwin as well)


Who was foolish enough to pay the going rate for rent? Banks, nail salons, restaurants, or wives of rich residents who wanted to ‘play store’.


Its an ever evolving mix, and the market will determine things, not those who choose to opine on ‘what kind of stores are good for the CBD”.


Nadler Chevrolet, brogan Cadillac, ken smith Lincoln, and the buick dealer, all gone. (this IS one are that resident input should be welcomed if the property owners request zoning changes)
If I owned a retail store, I’d take advantage of the foot traffic generated by the restaurant trade at nite. Unfortunately, most of these dummies are closed!

TaylorMade RBZ Stage 2show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=205477

Posted on 1 Comment

Multifamily projects gain steam in Bergen County

unnamed-101-300x225-1

Multifamily projects gain steam in Bergen County

AUGUST 17, 2014    LAST UPDATED: SUNDAY, AUGUST 17, 2014, 11:31 AM
BY KATHLEEN LYNN
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD

In a sign of the housing industry’s rebound, two large North Jersey redevelopment projects — in Wood-Ridge and Cliffside Park — are picking up momentum after being stalled during the real estate downturn.

The steel framework is going up at the Towne Center project in Cliffside Park, and developers Fred Daibes and James Demetrakis of Edgewater now expect the project to open around September 2015.

And at the Wesmont Station redevelopment, on part of the old Curtiss-Wright factory site in Wood-Ridge, Pulte Homes has begun work on a section of 217 town houses, while nearby, land is being cleared for 104 affordable apartments.

The Wood-Ridge and Cliffside Park redevelopments are moving forward at a time when home building — especially multifamily building — is on the rise again in New Jersey, after falling to post-World War II lows in the wake of the recession and housing bust. This year, New Jersey home construction approvals are running at their strongest pace since 2006, about 29 percent ahead of last year’s level.

“You’re seeing a convergence of long-term trends toward more multifamily, transit-oriented residential development and the housing market emerging from the deep recession that the industry was in,” said Christopher Jones, vice president for research at the Regional Plan Association.

“There’s a pent-up demand for housing, and builders are getting into position to meet this demand,” said Ralph Zucker, head of Somerset Development, the master developer at Wesmont Station.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/business/multifamily-projects-gain-steam-in-bergen-county-1.1068547#sthash.nS4GZBC9.dpuf

Posted on 17 Comments

Reader says she moved to Ridgewood 35 years ago, because I wanted a quiet pretty village with a sand bottom pool

Graydon_Summerfun_theridgewoodblog.net_

Reader says she moved to Ridgewood 35 years ago, because I wanted a quiet pretty village with a sand bottom pool

Sorry, buddy, I moved to Ridgewood 35 years ago, because I wanted a quiet pretty village with a sand bottom pool.

It had become too congested with traffic NOW, with all the restaurants and businesses.

I don’t want a city , I want a small village atmosphere.

You don’t care. I do. I love Ridgewood and it is no longer Ridgewood; it is Crowdedwood.

You want to destroy what is wonderful about this village. What an insensitive expletive deleted you are.

Posted on 2 Comments

Parking, housing needed in downtown Ridgewood

Ken_Smith_property_theridgewoodblog.net_1-300x225

Parking, housing needed in downtown Ridgewood

AUGUST 15, 2014    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, 2014, 12:31 AM
Print

Parking, housing needed in downtown
Bill Rahal

To the Editor:

After nearly three years of filings, meetings, testimony and public hearings, I feel compelled to write. As the Village of Ridgewood continues to debate development in downtown, stores are closing and vacancies are on the rise.

These delays are not good for anyone who loves our village and wants to see it prosper.

Such a lengthy timeline hurts local business and inhibits the growth and investment that our downtown needs to thrive. A quick walk through town reveals too many “going out of business” signs and vacancies. This threatens the long-term health and attractiveness of the entire village.

As a downtown business and property owner, I see consequences of this stagnation first hand. Any plan to reinvigorate the downtown should include not just parking but also modern multifamily housing. It will expand housing options for people wanting to move to town, create jobs and bring new pedestrian shoppers to the village.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/letter-parking-housing-needed-in-downtown-ridgewood-1.1067890#sthash.rRWY8rsN.dpuf