Tag: Ridgewood Moms and dads

Posted on by — 1 Comment

>CONGRESSMAN SCOTT GARRETT’S OFFICE COMING TO A TOWN NEAR YOU:

>Congressman Garrett’s staff will be holding Mobile Constituent Service Hours in a number of Fifth District towns this week. The Congressman’s Constituent Service Officers are trained to act as your liaisons with Federal agencies. But, it’s not always easy to make it out to one of the Congressman’s district offices – in Paramus and Newton – to meet with one of them, especially when you are dealing with government red tape. These Mobile Constituent Service Hours sessions bring the Congressman’s office to you. So, if you are having trouble with a Federal program, such as Medicare, veterans benefits, Social Security, or more, please feel free to come by. And, please bring copies of any relevant paperwork with you to facilitate their work.

Given the serious flooding, please contact my office before you head over to one of my Mobile Constituent Service Hours as many libraries and borough halls are closed.

Wednesday, April 18th

Ridgewood

10:00 am to noon
Borough Hall, 131 N. Maple Avenue

Posted on by — 14 Comments

>Ridgewood Avenue Closed Near High School Due To Storm Damage

>A steel container broke loose, entered the Ho Ho Kus Brook, and struck the
Ridgewood Avenue bridge at approximately 11:00 PM. Initial reports are that
the bridge sustained structural damage. The bridge has been closed as a
precautionary measure. Traffic is being diverted to Spring Avenue.

Investigators are still trying to determine where the steel container came
from. Reports are that it may have held athletic equipment on the high
school field, or have been a refuse dumpster located on high school
property.

At this time it is unknown how long the roadway will be closed.

The bridge was deemed safe for passage and opened at 11:35 PM.

Posted on by — 12 Comments

>Flooding Reported At Village Hall – Many Ridgewood streets are closed

>Reports are being received that first floor of Village Hall is currently
taking on water (10:00PM, Sunday, 4/15/07). The Village Hall/Library
parking lot is totally flooded. Fire and Streets department personnel are
working to sandbag doors to the building and pump out as much water as they
can.

Many Ridgewood streets are closed due to flooding. The Saddle River and Ho Ho Kus Brook continue to rise. As of 9:30 PM, the Ho Ho Kus Brook was 2.15 feet above flood stage; the Saddle River was at 1.02 feet above flood stage in Ridgewood.

Posted on by — 12 Comments

>Reader Calls Fly "out on the Carpet "….

>Hey Fly..it is great to see so many people finally calling you out on the carpet. The SD recommendations will almost certainly involve recommendation for substantial renovations to BOE properties.

It is typical of you to try an find some conspiracy in any village process. The fact is that the SD recommendations are focused on all recreational resources in town. Because Ridgewood does not have adequate facilities for the BOE and all the youth programs in town to each have their own dedicated facilities, they must share facilities. Unfortunately, the RHS stadium is not in the mix of “shared” facilities. It is, by far, the most underutilized facility in town. Therefore, it may be the most costly to maintain on an annual $/usage basis. This places considerable (and unacceptable) burden on other BOE and village-owned fields in town.

If the RHS stadium and Stevens fields can be rennovated with a sythetic surface, it will be the equivalent of adding a totally new field in Ridgewood. That is how the cost/benefit ratio of such a project must be rationalized.

The promised benefits of the renovations at Maple Field have been realized beyond the most optimistic expectations. Even ardent naysayers from a year ago have acknowledged the positive impact of the Maple Field renovation. The issues that the SD recommendations will try to address MUST include BOE properties.

This is not a debate about academic vs. non-adademic plans. The SD recommendations have noting to do with the BOE academic mission. Their mandate was to evaluate and offer a proposal for long-term planning of Ridgewood active and passive RECREATIONAL resources. That’s it!

I know that you don’t think it is important to have all the facts before you rush to judgment. But, perhaps you can try…just this once…to get all the facts first, without distorting the truth.

And the Fly Strikes back…..
I know that you don’t think it is important to have all the facts before you rush to judgment. But, perhaps you can try…just this once…to get all the facts first, without distorting the truth.

FACT: SD’s study was TAXPAYER funded by a “Special Emergency Appropriation” in the amount of $42,194 approved by Village Council members on 7/19/2006.

FACT: SD’s report was received by Village Parks & Recreation Department on 2/23/07.

FACT: It is now 4/15/07. Despite repeated requests, including submission of an offical OPRA form to the Village Clerk’s office as requested by Village Attorney Matthew S. Rogers, recommendations contained in the TAXPAYER FUNDED SD report are NOT being made available for review by either the press or members of the public.

What facts am I missing?

Posted on by — 24 Comments

>Local woman works to Support our Troops

>linda+protest

Well, to celebrate my fourth week out there at the Armory, I finally put my thoughts on paper. However, I had to cut a lot as most papers only print 400 words and this is a thousand. When it is so cold and windy out there, my thoughts go out to our brave men and women who experience this and worse on a daily basis. Just let me know if you find this in one of your local papers. Did anything come out from the reporter that was there that day?

Hope you are feeling well. Oh yeah, they no longer park in the Armory parking lot

Linda

*************************************************

Dear Editor;

On March 3rd, I had the high honor to be invited as a CERT member (Citizens Emergency Response Team) to help load donated food and personal supplies to supplement the daily needs of military families whose spouses have been deployed from our National Reservist Armory in Teaneck. This event, organized by two Hasbrouck Heights residents- Tim Moots and Tom Meli in conjunction with the VFW Post 4591 and many other local volunteer organizations, was able to deliver over 500 bags of food and supplies to the sacrificial families of our brave men and women.

While there, I was told by one of the volunteers that every Wednesday from 4-6pm protesters rally at the Teaneck Armory on Liberty and Teaneck Rd. I was so outraged. I thought “I have to go protect my troops”. That Wednesday, I took my big “Thank You” sign that I usually use for Memorial Day parades and went out there to say “Thank you!” for their service and that I support our troops.

Slowly, protesters gathered. They stood on the corner, clanging bells and screaming at passing cars, “Support our Troops! Bring them home NOW!” “No more body bags”, holding signs that read “No blood for oil” and “Abort Bush” and proudly counting the dead.

I stood about 25 feet away with my back to them and facing the Armory, holding my “Thank You!” sign over my head for 2 hours.

As I silently stood in the freezing cold, they heckled me, ridiculed me and my family, demanding to know if my daughters have enlisted, etc., and even used profanities at me (You dumb s@#t!) When I responded, “Well, that is a fine way for a ‘gentleman’ to address a lady” His response was “You

f@#*@#g a – – hole!” I was flabbergasted! This is advertised as a “peace” rally?? These were senior citizens looking like aging hippies. These are the people that Congressman Rothman and other elected officials listen to??? Some men held a banner reading “www.veteransforpeace.org”. They were so cruel and hateful. Passengers leaving the buses look down, afraid they will be approached. I spoke with a lady who sounded like she was from Haiti or the Caribbean. She said that a woman from the group had shoved a paper in her face while she was waiting for her bus. The woman demanded to know if she knows what is going on in Iraq. When the lady timidly told her “no”, she said the protester cursed at her.

That day, a small old woman was waving a paper in my face demanding to know if I heard “what the generals were saying”. I tried to ignore her persistence and finally said, “I am sorry. I do not read propaganda”. She angrily stomped away hurling insults.

Here I am, an old woman, standing silently, supporting my troops, holding a “Thank You ” sign for the personnel and families coming in and out of the Armory to see, and these anti-Americans are cursing, threatening and harassing me. How do you think the children and mommies felt as they get out of their cars to go to the commissary, etc., while their brave husbands fight for our freedom, to hear the hatred spewing out of the mouths of these antagonists.

When a Reservist from the Armory came to politely request that they stay on the corner and off state-owned property they demanded to know “have you ever served!?”. When he flashed his card they demanded to know if he went to Iraq. He politely told them he had just returned. They shouted, “Well, go back!” They yell that want our ‘troops home now’ ??????

When 3 police cars came, these ‘peace activists’ verbally attacked them about their freedom of speech and screamed, demanding to know if these officers had served in the military. The police were so reserved, polite and professional, responding to complaints that they were creating a threatening environment. Isn’t this revealing their true intent to demoralize our troops and the American people?

Their actions and those politicians, such as Cong. Rothman, who support them are simply emboldening the terrorists and distributing doubt and hate through the media who blindly support these activists, holding a deaf ear to those who so support a war on terror being fought on distant shores. When I told a vet I would rather have them fight over there than here, he scoffed, saying, “they don’t have two nickels to come over here.” 9/11 anyone? There was so much more that happened. I am still in shock!

My experience going there every Wednesday dramatically exposes their intent. On the organizers’ website, https://www.unitedforpeace.org/ which also organizes those other anti-war rallies in NYC, I found their national sponsors. Here’s a few:

Young Communist League (YCL) – Uptown Chapter, Democratic Socialists of America, Pagans for Peace, Punks For Peace, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) – NY, Cabbies Against Bush, Communist Party USA, Forum of Indian Leftists – NY, House of The Goddess (HotGoddess) Center for Pagan Wombyn, International Socialist Organization (ISO) – NYC, Palestine Activist Forum of NY, KickBush.

These are wolves in sheep’s clothing. I was crying half the time to know that my precious troops have suffered this abuse in silence.

As I was putting my signs away in my car, I felt fearful as of those men came to their car parked behind mine. I was ignoring them but was prepared for confrontation. They did not recognize me. One, who was wearing our precious flag over his nasty self like a cape, was told by his friend, “Nice flag”. The guy said “yeah, it is. I’m trying to find a good one I can burn”.

Now they taunt me by my first name. I can take it. It gives me more purpose and helps take a bite out of the wet and cold. I needed that.

-“Linda”

Posted on by — 13 Comments

Ridgewood News Purposeful Misrepresentations ?

>Submitted to The Ridgewood News

To the editor:

While it is fair to say that most editors save their opinion for the
editorial pages, clearly some do not. Your article on a recently
filed civil rights lawsuit to stem the purposeful discrimination that
was proliferated against our then 12-year old daughter lacked
credibility. It provided far too many errors, of omission and
commission, which, despite efforts to suppress them, nonetheless rose
to the surface as misrepresented facts collided uncomfortably with
uninformed opinion.

This begs the question: how many times is the editor of the Ridgewood
News allowed to bend the truth without having her credibility broken?
One, five, nine? In the above mentioned article, no less than seven
errors emanated from the first few paragraphs of a hate-filled rant
against our efforts to protect rights to which all are entitled.

Some of these falsehoods even prompted one letter writer to shrill
shamelessly that we should “move” out of town, a town to which I first
moved in 1969. Since when is defending a civil right the source of
such pointed venom? Or are the “rules” just different in Ridgewood?

What concerns me, however, is that the nature and subjectivity of
these errors appear designed to be purposefully mean-spirited. One is
left to wonder at the editor’s true purpose in making them. Take for
instance the following (for clarification, I use italics for what was
stated in the original article):

“…Caitlin Alvaro had asked to play on her brother’s fifth and sixth
grade recreation-league team..”

Our daughter never asked to be on her brother’s team. She asked to be
included in the draft of boys for her grade’s recreation basketball
league, to be drafted for any team like any other player. Though she
completed the evaluation, she was later denied participation and was
removed from the draft by the Biddy organization. After the New
Jersey Division of Civil Rights became involved, Biddy eventually
assigned her to the team on which our son also played, though they
continued to deny her permission to play.

“Despite what her father said was a skillful performance in her
evaluation…”

Caitlin’s father never said such a thing. It was merely noted in the
complaint that she had successfully sunk all five of the required
baskets during that particular evaluation. It is solely the editor’s
opinion that this constituted a “skillful performance.”

“…two sides reached a settlement requiring Ridgewood Biddy
Basketball…”

There was not a settlement, monetary or otherwise, but an agreement by
Biddy to obey the law. This took place between the NJDCR and the
Ridgewood Biddy Inc. The Alvaro’s were neither present nor asked to
participate in this conference. The Ridgewood School district, a
party to the complaint, did not attend, thereby maintaining an active complaint
against them with the NJDCR. Biddy honored this agreement and so is not
a party named in this lawsuit. They allowed Caitlin to play in the
boy’s league the next two years. Her team reached the championship
game the first year, and she was honored by her teammates with the
selection to play on the all-star team this year. Teammates and other
players were always exemplary in their manner towards her.

“…Alvaro is seeking unspecified monetary compensation…pain and
suffering, while watching those games from the bench.”

Having a player sit on the bench is not against the law, nor is it a
reason for seeking compensation. That the editor would make such a
statement is totally ludicrous and misleading.

“…a history of adversarial relations with the school district.”

This characterization by the editor is selectively pejorative. It is
possible to disagree and not be adversarial; only the ignorant to presume
otherwise. District and Village officials have always and continue to
extend the utmost courtesy to our family. We return this treatment
likewise.

“…taking legal action against the board for sponsoring what they
felt was an invasive survey.”

Though later “clarified” by the editor, the purpose of this knowingly
false statement was reprehensible. Seven parents filed complaints
against the school board for the survey and three filed a federal lawsuit. Were
they also “adversarial?” My contribution was to work tirelessly toward
getting a law passed in New Jersey to prevent such an encroachment on
parental rights. The far superior and more appropriate “norms” survey
recently given in the High School was a welcome result of such
efforts.

“…include resistance to renovations at Orchard Elementary School.”

Also knowingly untrue. Our disagreement was not with renovations,
which we welcomed, but with the building of a new addition on top of
the basketball courts which parents had recently provided for our
children with money from their own pockets. What the editor did not
reveal to her readers was that I sat in her office and she looked over
our 200 signatures from parents who signed a petition asking to change
the addition’s location. She knew this was a majority position– two hundred
signatures from a population of fewer than 350 students. Her efforts to
mislead and characterize this as “adversarial” by means of singular
intent are shockingly dishonest.

So, how many times may an editor bend the truth before her
credibility is broken? Only her publisher knows.

Frances Edwards
Ridgewood

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Happy Easter

>easetregghunt

The Christian festival of Easter celebrates the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The spring festival has its roots in the Jewish Passover, which commemorates Israel’s deliverance from the bondage of Egypt, and in the Christian reinterpretation of its meaning after the crucifixion of Jesus during the Passover of AD c.30 and the proclamation of his resurrection three days later.

Early Christians observed Easter on the same day as Passover (14-15 Nisan, a date governed by a lunar calendar). In the 2d century, the Christian celebration was transferred to the Sunday following the 14-15 Nisan, if that day fell on a weekday. Originally, the Christian Easter was a unitive celebration, but in the 4th century Good Friday became a separate commemoration of the death of Christ, and Easter was thereafter devoted exclusively to the resurrection.

According to the Venerable Bede, the name Easter is derived from the pagan spring festival of the Anglo- Saxon goddess Eostre, and many folk customs associated with Easter (for example, Easter eggs) are of pagan origin.

Easter Day is currently determined as the first Sunday after the full moon on or after March 21. The Eastern Orthodox churches, however, follow the Julian rather than the Gregorian calendar, so their celebration usually falls several weeks later than the Western Easter. Easter is preceded by the period of preparation called Lent. Reginald H. Fuller Bibliography: Torvend, Samuel, ed., Passage to the Paschal Feast (1993); Williams, Rowan, Resurrection: Interpreting the Easter Gospel (1994).

Posted on by — 8 Comments

>Man about Town

>Features reviews of restaurants and local businesses

Puzo’s at 16 West Ridgewood Ave (201)445-3332 features a large selection of gourmet pizza’s and customized specialized pizza’s. More than just a pizza parlor Puzzo’s offers a full range of Italian favorites as well as hot and cold sandwiches. The atmosphere is friendly fun and casual making Puzo’s a great place to grab quite bit for lunch.

Email the blog if you have any of your own ideas [email protected]

GigaGolf Special Couponsshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=14707

Posted on by — 1 Comment

>Assembly Challenger Calls on Rumana to Protect Marriage

>Caliguire for State Senate
Schweighardt and Ginty for State Assembly

Press Release

Assembly Challenger Calls on Rumana to Protect Marriage

Ginty Demands that Rumana Refuse to Conduct Bogus and Misguided
“Civil Union” Ceremonies

(Ridgewood, March 26, 2007) – John P. Ginty, a conservative candidate for the Republican nomination for the State Assembly in District 40, today called on Wayne Mayor Scott Rumana to stand tall in the face of judicial and legislative assaults on the institution of marriage in New Jersey.

Ginty noted that Rumana indicated in last Friday’s edition of The Record newspaper that he will officiate as mayor at gay “civil union” ceremonies, for a fee of $100 per event.

In the article (“Civil Unions, Marriages are Free”, page L-3, The Record, March 23, 2007), Rumana criticized several Wayne councilmen, including Ginty’s running mate in the state assembly primary campaign, Wayne Councilman Joseph G. Schweighardt, for voting against the fast tracking of the imposition of fees for both civil marriages and “civil unions”. Rumana said, “The state law is the state law. This is not our battle.”

Ginty disagreed and said, “Scott Rumana is wrong. This is our battle, and if Rumana wants to be a Republican Assemblyman from District 40 he had better figure out what his real position is on the protection of marriage in New Jersey. Any mayor who agrees to officiate at these bogus ‘civil union’ ceremonies is complicit in the campaign to wreck marriage and the family in this state.”

“It looks like Rumana is primarily concerned with how much money the town can collect when he conducts these nonsensical ‘civil union’ ceremonies”, Ginty continued. “Rumana and his running mates, Kevin O’Toole and David Russo, will be held to account by the Republican voters in this district based upon their campaign’s commitment to protect traditional marriage and the family in the state legislature.”

The following municipalities are included in state legislative district #40: Cedar Grove Township, Franklin Lake Borough, Little Falls Township, Mahwah Township, Midland Park Borough, Oakland Borough, the Village of Ridgewood, Ringwood Borough, Verona Township, Wanaque Borough, Wayne Township, Wyckoff Township.

###

Paid for by The Election Fund of Caliguire, Schweighardt, and Ginty

Posted on by — 10 Comments

>Reader Speaks out on BOE Budget

>I was infuriated by the members of the BOE, who seemed to be patting themselves on the back for raising our taxes, AGAIN, in last week’s RN article about the budget! Does anyone else agree that the BOE does NOT have a mandate to propose a budget that uses every bit of Trenton’s “allowable” annual increase, every year.

Isn’t it the BOE’s responsibility to try to deliver a budget that does NOT increase automatically every year? Only infrequently and in unusual circumstances should the annual allowable increase actually be used.When is enough really going to be enough?

If Rudy Giuliani could reduce or eliminate 23 different taxes in NYC during eight years, why can’t Ridgewood manage to even hold taxes (let alone reduce them)? In the past six years the average increase from the BOE has been 4.59% per year and the cummulative increase from the BOE in that time has been over 25%. This is a disgrace. Our BOE members don’t seem to understand that it is NOT “OK” to keep dipping into our pockets. Perhaps it is time to take back control of our village’s educational destiny from the teachers’ union…

Posted on by — 12 Comments

>"Ridgewood High partakes in a "Day Of Silence"":

>”I am a student in Ridgewood, and several of my friends are homosexual or bisexual. Gay people can’t help their sexuality, just like straight people can’t help theirs. Homosexuality is just another thing that people discriminate against, and aren’t schools supposed to help lessen that discrimination? Prejudice against skin color is horrible, but when you discriminate against love- well, that’s just sickening.We have Black History Month. We have Women’s History Month. We learn about the things that they had to go through to get the same rights as white guys, yet there is always a hullabaloo when someone tries to stand up for gay rights.So, are you against organizations sponsoring schools, or are you against taxpayer’s money being used this way (and BTW, staying silent doesn’t exactly cost a whole lot) or are you just HOMOPHOBIC?Oh. I’m reading the above comments…you know, I really had no idea that so many homophobes live in Ridgewood. They make me sick, they really do. My stomach begins to churn when I read their words. I bet that NONE of them even know a single gay person, so why don’t they shove their stupid homophobic comments up their arses? “

Posted on by — 1 Comment

>PET FOOD RECALL

>Recall — Firm Press Release
FDA posts press releases and other notices of recalls and market withdrawals from the firms involved as a service to consumers, the media, and other interested parties. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.

Menu Foods Issues Recall of Specific Can and Small Foil Pouch Wet Pet Foods
Contact:
Sarah Tuite
(416) 848-1703

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE — Emporia, KS — March 16, 2007 — Menu Foods, Emporia, Kansas, is initiating a North American recall of dog and cat food manufactured in its “cuts and gravy” format between December 3, 2006 and March 6, 2007. There has been a small number of reported instances of cats and dogs in the United States (none in Canada) becoming sick from kidney failure after eating the affected products. There have been approximately ten deaths reported.

Consumers who have product which is being recalled should stop using it and return it to Menu Foods in accordance with the procedure found at www.menufoods.com/recall. This procedure will be available from 6 a.m. Saturday March 17, 2007. If your dog or cat is showing any signs of kidney failure, consult your veterinarian.

The recall includes an extensive list of brand names and lot numbers. In order to determine whether cat and dog food is subject to recall, consumers should refer to the comprehensive list of products at www.menufoods.com/recall. This list of products will be available from 6 a.m. Saturday March 17, 2007.

Menu Foods voluntarily recalled the products after learning of complaints of vomiting and renal failure in dogs and cats following their consumption of product produced between December 3, 2006 and March 6, 2007. FDA has been apprised of this action.

Following feedings of the product, some cats and dogs refused further feedings, while others exhibited signs of renal failure (signs of renal failure include loss of appetite, lethargy and vomiting) and others died from renal failure. Menu Foods has undertaken extensive testing of the products in question, employing both internal and external resources, but to date has been unable to confirm any causal relationship to our product. Specifically, tests of some affected products have not revealed the cause of sickness, and testing will continue until a better understanding of the facts has been achieved.

Menu’s products are distributed to supermarkets, pet specialty stores and mass merchandisers across the United States. It can best be identified by reference to the list of products found at www.menufoods.com/recall. This list of products will be available from 6 a.m. Saturday March 17, 2007.

Menu Foods is notifying its customers by telephone and mail and is arranging for the return of all recalled products. The products were distributed throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico.

While the number of complaints has been relatively small, Menu Foods is taking this proactive step out of an abundance of caution, because the health and well-being of pets is paramount to Menu Foods.

Consumers with questions may contact Menu Foods at 1-800-551-7392.

####