Posted on Leave a comment

Top Village Managers Still Commuting In Taxpayer Fueled, 4WD SUVs

>Despite skyrocketing gas prices, Village Manager Jim Ten Hoeve and Director of Operations Frank Moritz are still commuting back and forth to Village Hall, from their respective out-of-town homes, in Village owned & maintained SUVs.

Ten Hoeve, who lives in Hawthorne, is assigned an unmarked, black Dodge Durango 4WD (EPA rated at 12 mpg city driving).

Moritz, who also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Ridgewood Water, commutes to Ridgewood from his home in Hasbrouck Heights. His assigned municipal vehicle is a white, unmarked Ford Explorer 4WD (EPA rated at 13 mpg city driving).

Although unmarked, both vehicles do have state issued “Municipal Government” license plates.

Many North Jersey communities are being forced to increase their fuel budgets by tens of thousands of dollars as a result of rapidly rising fuel costs.

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

Ridgewood Athletics Foundation to Fund Artificial Turf & Lights at Two BOE Owned Properties

>The Fly has just received word that the Ridgewood Athletics Foundation has applied to turf and light athletic fields at Hawes School and Ridgewood High School.

Both projects will be managed by Conklin Associates, a consulting engineering firm based in Ramsey. Reportedly, applications for NJDEP stream encroachment permits were signed off on by BOE Administrator Angelo DeSimone.

The stream encroachment permit application, by the way, says it is for “in kind” replacement, but does say it is artificial turf.

So much for the publically announced plan that Lower Hawes would not be touched.

Match.com

Posted on Leave a comment

Three Artificial Turf Fields Shut Down Due To Lead Levels

>Posted: 4:28 pm EDT April 14, 2008
Updated: 6:52 pm EDT April 14, 2008

TRENTON, N.J. — Three athletic fields in New Jersey used by thousands of people have been shut down because officials say elevated lead levels in the turf pose a health risk.

The fields are in Newark, Ewing and Hoboken. In Newark, workers in hazmat suits rolled up the turf and put it into Dumpsters to be hauled away.

In Hoboken, soccer players were turned away from Frank Sinatra Park because of concerns about lead in the fibers of its turf.

New Jersey officials are urging owners of these types of fields to make sure their turf is lead-free.

State health officials said they found lead levels eight to 10 times higher than allowed in soil when they randomly tested two-dozen turf fields around the state. The state’s epidemiologist is asking the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission to investigate.

Health Commissioner Heather Howard said the New Jersey findings could have national implications.

It’s not known how easily lead from turf is absorbed by the body. Specialized tests on the high-lead turf samples are expected early next month.

Posted on Leave a comment

Kids being rushed past childhood.

>Ready, Set, Relax! is one town’s effort to stop hyper-parenting, in this exclusive excerpt.

Apr 05, 2008 04:30 AM
Carl Honoré

Ridgewood is the sort of place that comes to mind when people talk about the American dream. Nestled in the woodlands of northern New Jersey, this quiet, verdant town of 25,000 souls breathes affluence and well-being. The locals work hard at high-powered jobs in Manhattan, but they enjoy the fruits of their labour. Large, handsome houses sit on spacious lots dotted with swing sets and trampolines. Luxury sedans and shiny SUVs glide along wide streets lined with oak, dogwood and maple trees.

Move in a little closer, though, and this happy portrait starts to fray round the edges. At the school gates, around the tables in the local diner, and in the supermarket parking lot, you hear the people of Ridgewood voicing the same complaint: we may live inside a 21st-century Garden of Eden, but we are too damn busy to enjoy it.

Many families here are scheduled up to the eyeballs. Caught between work and home, parents struggle to find time for friends, romance, or even a decent night’s sleep. Their children are in the same boat, filling the hours not already occupied by school work with organized extracurricular activities. Some 10-year-olds in Ridgewood are so busy they carry Palm Pilots to keep track of their appointments. Eating dinner or doing homework in the car while travelling to swimming or the riding club is common here. One local mother emails an updated family schedule to her husband and two sons every evening. Another keeps her timetable pinned to the front door and the underside of the sun visor in her people carrier. With so many schedules to mesh, with so much going on, even getting toddlers together for a playdate can be a logistical nightmare. One of my favorite New Yorker cartoons was penned with places like Ridgewood in mind. It depicts two little girls waiting for the school bus, each holding a personal planner. One tells the other, “Okay, I’ll move ballet back an hour, reschedule gymnastics, and cancel piano. … You shift your violin lessons to Thursday and skip soccer practice. … That gives us from 3:15 p.m. to 3:45 p.m. on Wednesday the 16th to play.”

Unlike other towns, though, Ridgewood has taken a stand against overstuffed schedules. What started with a few moms grumbling over coffee at the kitchen table has blossomed into a mini-movement. In 2002, Ridgewood pioneered an annual event called Ready, Set, Relax! The idea is that one day a year this alpha town takes a breather: teachers assign no homework, extracurricular activities are cancelled, and parents make a point of coming home early from the office. The aim is to cast off the tyranny of the timetable, to let children rest, play, or just daydream, and to give families time together that is not built around driving to the next volleyball practice or band rehearsal.

Hundreds of households put down their planners to take part in Ready, Set, Relax! and the event has inspired towns across North America, not all of them as well-heeled as Ridgewood, to follow suit. To help out frazzled families, the school board in Sidney, N.Y., a blue-collar hamlet 210 kilometres northwest of here, no longer schedules any extracurricular activities or meetings after 4:30 p.m. on Wednesdays. In 2007, Amos, a small forest and mining town in northwestern Quebec, held its first activity-free day based on the Ridgewood model. Marcia Marra, a mother of three who helped set up Ready, Set, Relax! in tandem with a local mental health agency, hopes the tide is turning. “People are starting to see that when their lives and their children’s lives are scheduled to the hilt, everyone suffers,” she says. “Structured activities can be great for kids, but things are just out of control now.”

This is not a new panic. Warnings about children being overscheduled, racing from one enriching activity to the next, first surfaced in the early 20th century. Dorothy Canfield Fisher, a popular novelist-cum-parenting guru, warned in 1914 that American parents were stripping childhood of its “blessed spontaneity” by placing “a constricting pressure upon the children to use even the chinks and fragments of their time to acquire accomplishments which seem to us profitable.” In 1931, Ruth Frankel, a pioneering cancer specialist in Canada, described how “the modern child, with his days set into a patterned program, goes docilely from one prescribed class to another, takes up art and music and French and dancing … until there is hardly a minute left.” Her fear was that overscheduled children would grow so jaded that they would turn “desperately to the corner movie in an effort to escape ennui.”

That same worry has reached fever pitch over the last generation. Books with titles like The Hurried Child and The Overscheduled Child have carved out shelf space in the library of modern parenting. Even the kids’ section has tackled the topic. In The Berenstain Bears and Too Much Pressure, the famous ursine family goes into stress meltdown because Sister and Brother Bear are enrolled in too many after-school activities.

Why are so many children so busy today? One reason is the rise of the working mother. When moms stayed home, it was easier just to let the kids play around the house. But as women entered the workplace and the extended family dissolved, someone else had to pick up the slack on the child-care front. Extracurricular activities fit the bill perfectly, promising not only supervision but also enrichment. Yet putting children on a tight schedule is not always a response to the child-care gap. Many stay-at-home moms also sign their children up for endless activities. Part of this is self-defence: when every other kid in the neighbourhood is booked solid, who is going to indulge in free play with your unscheduled child? In our atomized, bowling-alone society, organized activities are also a good way – sometimes the only way – to meet other parents. Nor does it help that many extracurricular activities are designed like a slippery slope: you sign up your 4-year-old daughter for a weekly dance lesson, and then, before you know it, she has a class every other night and is travelling across the country to compete. Rather than rock the boat, though, we persuade ourselves that lots of scheduled activities are just what children need and want, even when they tell us otherwise. The other day I watched a mother drag her 3-year-old daughter from a nursery school near our house. The child was weeping. “I don’t want to go to ballet,” she howled. “I want to go home and play.”

No one is saying that extracurricular activities are bad. On the contrary, they are an integral part of a rich and happy childhood. Many kids, particularly in lower-income families, would actually benefit from more structured activities. Plenty of children, especially teenagers, thrive on a busy schedule. But just as other trappings of modern childhood, from homework to technology, are subject to the law of diminishing returns, there is a danger of overscheduling the young. When it comes to extracurricular activities, many children are getting too much of a good thing.

Wayne Yankus, a pediatrician in Ridgewood since the early 1980s, reckons that 65 per cent of his patients are now victims of overscheduling. He says the symptoms include headaches, sleep disorders, gastric problems caused by stress or by eating too late at night, and fatigue. “Fifteen years ago it was unusual to see a tired 10-year-old,” says Yankus. “Now it’s common.” Recently he hired a therapist to spend one day a week in his office to talk to families about the need to prune their planners.

The extracurricular merry-go-round can also ensnare the family in a vicious cycle. Parents resent children for taking up so much time and costing so much money – Britons spend £12 billion a year on their children’s hobbies, half of which are abandoned within five weeks – while children resent their parents’ resentment. Activities overload also squeezes out time for the unscheduled, simple stuff that brings families together – relaxed conversation, cuddling, shared meals or just hanging out together in companionable silence. Yankus sees this disconnect in many Ridgewood households. “When the snow comes and the activities get cancelled, everyone is horrified because they’re suddenly stuck at home and have to deal with each other,” he says. “They don’t know how to get along without a schedule.”

Ridgewood does not shut down completely on Ready, Set, Relax! day. Some residents regard the event as silly or patronizing. Sporting matches arranged with neighbouring districts are not cancelled, and the homework ban is not always as strictly enforced as it could be, especially in high school. Yet the town does feel different on the big day. With fewer soccer moms running red lights, the traffic is less frantic. People are more likely to stop and chat than exchange a brief nod before pointing to their watch and rushing off to the next appointment. To many families, Ready, Set, Relax! has been an epiphany. More than a third of those who took part in 2006 trimmed their schedules afterward. Consider the Givens. The three children used to be enrolled in so many after-school activities that there was barely time to eat, sleep or talk. Even though she felt overwhelmed and often found herself jogging round the supermarket to save a few seconds, Jenny, the mother, somehow felt that it was her duty to keep the family maxed out on extracurricular pursuits. “Every activity that comes up you want your kids to try, and you fear that you are failing them if they are not busy every second,” she says. “You want the best for them, but always at the back of your mind, even if you don’t admit it, you have the fantasy that they might turn out to be brilliant at something, that by signing them up for an activity you might uncover some latent genius.”

In the Given household, that translated into an eye-watering barrage of art classes, Spanish lessons, soccer, lacrosse, softball, volleyball, basketball, baseball, tennis, scouts and book club. Every weekend, the parents would split up to ferry the children to their various activities. At home, time and tempers were short. Ready, Set, Relax! came as a wake-up call. On the first night, the Givens made Mexican food and chocolate chip cookies together. Then they got down Cadoo, a board game that had been sitting unopened on the shelf since Christmas. The evening rolled along in a riot of laughter and cuddles. “It was an amazing revelation for all of us,” says Jenny. “It was just such a relief not to be rushing off to the next thing on the to-do list.”

After the Ready, Set, Relax! night, the Givens cut back, keeping only activities the children are passionate about. Today Kathryn, 16, does an art class, Spanish lessons, and a book club. Chris, 14, plays on basketball and baseball teams while Rosie, 12, concentrates on soccer, tennis and lacrosse. The whole family is more relaxed, and the children are all doing better at school since the cutback. The spirit of Ready, Set, Relax! has rippled out into other initiatives in Ridgewood. Every Wednesday, weather permitting, about 80 children aged 4 to 7 are now let loose in the playground of the local primary school. This is Free Play Day and parents are confined to the sidelines. Left to their own devices, the children skip, play hide-and-seek and tag, make up stories, throw balls around, sing and wrestle. The noise is exhilarating, the child equivalent of a Wall of Sound. To many parents it is a revelation. “It never occurred to me to do this, to just let them play like this,” says one mother. “You always feel like you have to be organizing something for them, but actually you don’t.”

There is, of course, something absurd – even a little tragic – about having to schedule unscheduled time, yet given the world we live in, that is probably the first step for many families. And clearly the Ready, Set, Relax! movement reflects a wider rethink.

Harvard urges incoming freshmen to check their overscheduling ways at the door. Posted on the university website, an open letter by Harry Lewis, a former dean of the undergraduate school, warns students that they will get more out of college, and indeed life, if they do less and concentrate on the things that really fire their passion. Lewis also takes aim at the notion that everything young people do must have a measurable payoff or contribute toward crafting the perfect resumé. “You may balance your life better if you participate in some activities purely for fun, rather than to achieve a leadership role that you hope might be a distinctive credential for postgraduate employment. The human relationships you form in unstructured time with your roommates and friends may have a stronger influence on your later life than the content of some of the courses you are taking.”

Most families that ease the load end up spending more time eating together. In a hurry-up, hyper-scheduled culture, where dining al desko, in front of the TV or computer, in the street or in the car is commonplace, the family meal often falls by the wayside. One study found that a fifth of British families never eat together. The irony is that many of the benefits extracurricular activities, including homework, purport to deliver may actually by achieved through the simple act of breaking bread en famille. Studies in many countries show that children who have regular family meals are more likely to do well at school, enjoy good mental health, and eat nutritious food; they are also less likely to engage in underage sex or use drugs and alcohol.

A Harvard study concluded that family meals promote language development even more than does family story reading. Another survey found that the only common denominator among National Merit Scholars in the United States, regardless of race or social class, was having a regular family dinner. Of course, we’re talking here about meals where both parents and children ask questions, discuss ideas at length and tell anecdotes rather than just watch TV and grunt “pass the salt.”

Why does a proper family meal pay such handsome dividends? When it comes to diet, the answer is obvious. A 9-year-old boy is more likely to finish his greens, or to eat any vegetables at all, in front of his mom and dad than when he is dining alone at the computer in his bedroom. Sitting around the dinner table, taking part in conversation, also teaches children that they are loved and cherished for who they are, rather than for what they do. They learn to talk, listen, reason, and compromise – all those essential ingredients of a high EQ. Of course, no one is saying that family meals are always a bed of roses. Sometimes they are sheer hell. Gathering tired toddlers, sullen teenagers and stressed parents around the table can be a recipe for open warfare. But then, dealing with conflict is part of life, too.

Excerpted from Under Pressure: Rescuing Childhood from the Culture of Hyper-Parenting. Copyright 2008 Carl Honoré. Published by Knopf Canada. Reproduced by arrangement with the publisher. All rights reserved.

Posted on Leave a comment

Happy Easter!

>According to the New Testament, Christ was crucified on the eve of Passover and shortly afterward rose from the dead. In consequence, the Easter festival commemorated Christ’s resurrection. In time, a serious difference over the date of the Easter festival arose among Christians. Those of Jewish origin celebrated the resurrection immediately following the Passover festival, which, according to their Babylonian lunar calendar, fell on the evening of the full moon (the 14th day in the month of Nisan, the first month of the year); by their reckoning, Easter, from year to year, fell on different days of the week.

Christians of Gentile origin, however, wished to commemorate the resurrection on the first day of the week, Sunday; by their method, Easter occurred on the same day of the week, but from year to year it fell on different dates. An important historical result of the difference in reckoning the date of Easter was that the Christian churches in the East, which were closer to the birthplace of the new religion and in which old traditions were strong, observed Easter according to the date of the Passover festival. The churches of the West, descendants of Greco-Roman civilization, celebrated Easter on a Sunday.

Rulings of the Council of Nicaea on the Date of Easter

Constantine I, Roman emperor, convoked the Council of Nicaea in 325. The council unanimously ruled that the Easter festival should be celebrated throughout the Christian world on the first Sunday after the full moon following the vernal equinox; and that if the full moon should occur on a Sunday and thereby coincide with the Passover festival, Easter should be commemorated on the Sunday following. Coincidence of the feasts of Easter and Passover was thus avoided.

The Council of Nicaea also decided that the calendar date of Easter was to be calculated at Alexandria, then the principal astronomical center of the world. The accurate determination of the date, however, proved an impossible task in view of the limited knowledge of the 4th-century world. The principal astronomical problem involved was the discrepancy, called the epact, between the solar year and the lunar year. The chief calendric problem was a gradually increasing discrepancy between the true astronomical year and the Julian calendar then in use.

Later Dating Methods

Ways of fixing the date of the feast tried by the church proved unsatisfactory, and Easter was celebrated on different dates in different parts of the world. In 387, for example, the dates of Easter in France and Egypt were 35 days apart. About 465, the church adopted a system of calculation proposed by the astronomer Victorinus (fl. 5th cent.), who had been commissioned by Pope Hilarius (r. 461–68) to reform the calendar and fix the date of Easter. Elements of his method are still in use. Refusal of the British and Celtic Christian churches to adopt the proposed changes led to a bitter dispute between them and Rome in the 7th century.
Reform of the Julian calendar in 1582 by Pope Gregory XIII, through adoption of the Gregorian calendar, eliminated much of the difficulty in fixing the date of Easter and in arranging the ecclesiastical year; since 1752, when the Gregorian calendar was also adopted in Great Britain and Ireland, Easter has been celebrated on the same day in the Western part of the Christian world. The Eastern churches, however, which did not adopt the Gregorian calendar, commemorate Easter on a Sunday either preceding or following the date observed in the West. Occasionally the dates coincide; the most recent times were in 1865 and 1963.

Because the Easter holiday affects a varied number of secular affairs in many countries, it has long been urged as a matter of convenience that the movable dates of the festival be either narrowed in range or replaced by a fixed date in the manner of Christmas. In 1923 the problem was referred to the Holy See, which has found no canonical objection to the proposed reform. In 1928 the British Parliament enacted a measure allowing the Church of England to commemorate Easter on the first Sunday after the second Saturday in April. Despite these steps toward reform, Easter continues to be a movable feast.

An article from Funk & Wagnalls® New Encyclopedia. © 2005 World Almanac Education Group, A WRC Media Company

ADVERTISEMENTResources: Discussions | Newsletters | Shop History | THE HISTORY CHANNEL Magazine | Travel | World Timeline | Maps

Services: How to Cite This Site | Site Map | TV Parental Guidelines | FAQ/Contact Us

Corporate: Corporate Information | Employment Opportunities | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Around the World | Advertise With Us

© 1996-2007, A&E Television Networks. All rights reserved.

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

Money woes . . .

>In spite of an announced $270K cut in annual aid from the NJ State Department of Community Affairs, with resultant reductions in public safety personnel (both police and career fire), Village Council members continue to fiddle with the following non-essential projects:

North Walnut Street redevelopment plan – estimated $7-9 million expense with property acquisition

Acquisition of 5 acre property on West Saddle River Road for recreational fields – estimated $4 million expense

Valley View water tank replacement (existing tanks now off-line with no adverse impact to water supply system) – estimated $3 million expense

Habernickel Park improvements – estimated $2 million expense

When in Ridgewood, do as the Ridgewoodites do; SPEND, SPEND, SPEND!

show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=56753

Posted on Leave a comment

Ridgewoods First international Mail Art Installation and Rock Star DJ Photos

>artchick+stable

artchick+stable2

Stable Gallery, 259 N. Maple. Ave. Weekdays, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. First international Mail Art Installation to take place in Ridgewood, NJ. Come see ArtChick’s (Kristine Di Grigoli Paige) personal collection of Mail Art from places such as Italy, Portugal, California, Brazil, among many others. ArtChick enjoys trading Mail Art with other artists as well as participating in mail art exhibitions around the world and sending work to private art collectors. Visit: www.TheSoundandVision.com to view ArtChick’s creations. This installation also exhibits ArtChick Nightclub Photography. Come see some of the worlds top DJ’s displayed on Metal Murals and pop style dancing silhouettes. Each mural displays the DJ in focus surrounded by impressionistic color light movements. These photos simply display the raw talent of digital photography and this generation defining themselves. Come by the Stable Gallery Mon-Fri at your own leisure. Its Free and ArtChick hopes to inspire you!
Posted on Leave a comment

Wheres the Beef?

cow404_676596c

>NEWS FROM THE ED CENTER via rps eNews

Beef Recall Update The RPS district is in regular communication with Pomptonian, our food services provider, about the NJ Department of Agriculture beef recall.

Until the recall has been fully satisfied, the district has elected to remove beef from all K-12 menus.

The Right Gift at the Right Priceshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=60066

Posted on Leave a comment

"Math program is ‘inherently flawed’"

>From the Ridgewood News

Friday, February 8, 2008

Reader Viewpoint

“Math program is ‘inherently flawed'”

BY LAWRENCE MASKIN

There seems to be a callous disregard for parental input regarding our district’s current math programs. Balanced approach is what we’re hearing time and time again. Our Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction, Ms. Regina Botsford, stated last April that the math program at Travell was balanced. Then, this summer, Ms. Botsford stated that they had reset the balance. Currently, Ms. Botsford states that we have to find the balance. Why would the administration and BOE whole-sale adopt a program that needed a balance adjustment not just once, but three times! Yet, they still search for that balance.

To me, the program was inherently flawed from the start as evidenced by this need for constant reshuffling. They are taking an experimental program with no track record that is highly criticized and sprinkling in the tried and true traditional math with a proven past high record of success. As a former biologist, I can tell you this is analogous to a dilution. In this case a huge dilution of the very math that put Ridgewood on the map as an educational powerhouse of the past.

They keep repeating, “we need math for the 21st century.” What the heck does that mean? Have standard equations honed through the centuries changed somehow with the times? Doesn’t 2 plus 2 still equal 4? Supporters of diluted math say that parents simply don’t understand it because it looks different from what they had learned in the past.

They tell us to “have blind faith in the program.” Surely they must be joking. The program expects children to solve problems in multiple ways with little emphasis on obtaining the correct answer. Therefore, it is the journey, not the destination. Let me repeat that — GETTING THE CORRECT ANSWER IS NOT THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MATH. Oh really? Since when? In this diluted math program’s methodology, the most important thing is explaining your thought process. Tell that to your pharmacist when he’s measuring your medication. Perhaps your accountant can “guesstimate” your taxes. Let’s hope he errs on your side.

They keep saying this math has “real world” problems. There have always been “real world” problems to solve in math. In fact, from the very beginning of elementary school education we have all had problems such as theses: There are 3 oranges in one basket and 2 oranges in another basket. What are the total number of oranges in both baskets?

They keep saying, “Deep understanding” of math. I see a convoluted methodology severely lacking content. They call practice, “Drill and Kill.” Are you kidding me? How does one become proficient at any endeavor without practice?

This math uses what’s called a “spiral approach.” This means you briefly visit a topic, move on to other topics, move on to get more topics and ultimately return to the first topic. The preliminary findings of President Bush’s current panel on math education recommend moving away from this approach. Yet this is the methodology our Board of Education is continuing to embrace.

According to the state test, NJASK, our students are doing very well. Sounds great, right? Well the fact is our state standards received poor marks from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In addition an independent non-profit educational institute gave our state standards a “D” grade. Additionally our children are only required to pass 50% of the questions on the state test in order to be rated proficient. I thought 50% was failing. So, rather than soar well beyond those paltry standards, we just simply meet them.

Did you know there are 3 different math programs in our 6 elementary schools?

Did you know there are no math textbooks in the diluted math programs?

Did you know our kids are expected to discover answers on their own in groups, rather than teacher directed instruction? When students ask a question regarding a math problem, the teacher’s first response should be, well, what do you think”?

Did you know for the past 7 years Benjamin Franklin Middle School ranked in the top 1-2% in math (out of more than 1300 middle schools in New Jersey) utilizing traditional math. So what did the Board recently decide to do– replace it with this diluted math.

Did you know this math program is considerably more expensive to us taxpayers than traditional math?

Did you know this math has been highly criticized by the top 200 mathematicians in the United States?

Did you know this controversy continues in states around the country?

Did you know our Board used our tax dollars – more than $90000.00 to hire an expert to help us figure out this problem? Her conclusions were essentially that we need to partner with a local university to help us through this matter.

Did you know our teachers have to be totally “retrained” to teach math and that the training needs to be ongoing and long term? The list goes on and on…

Ultimately this long term erosion of our kids’ math education will affect their ability to compete in the global job market. You simply have to look at those nearby out of town districts that are continuing to educate their students with solid, time proven programs. There are also available programs that emulate the best international math curricula in the world. They are readily available and offer solid content and provide world class results. Why these are not even considered is baffling and frustrating. Because our school district’s reputation and our academic successes from years past are continuing to fall by the wayside our property values too will drop as a result. Ridgewood cannot afford to ride on its reputation. As the phrase goes, you can pay me now or pay me later. It appears here in Ridgewood we are doing both.

Posted on Leave a comment

An Invitation from Tim Brennan

>This email from our superintendent was sent to subscribers of Travell enews but should be available to everyone in the community.

Toward the end, Dr. Brennan makes it clear he intends for the whole district to move toward the horrid Everyday Math curriculum.January 10, 2008

What are we going to do about math?

You are cordially invited to sit in on a discussion of this topic, to be held this coming Monday, January 14, at 7:30 p.m in the third-floor Board Room of the Ed Center. We will be televising on Cablevision Channel 77. The program will then be video cast and podcast from our website, so you can download and play at your convenience. We will be following up with visits to each faculty and Home and School Association meeting in either January or February as their schedules allow. We will then report the information from the faculties and school HSA’s back to the Board to help them form a decision on our proposed action plan.

At the meeting this Monday, the Board, central office administrators and all of the district principals will discuss moving Ridgewood forward in k-5 math curriculum, instruction and assessment, as a part of a coordinated k-12 program. Right now we are in good shape, but, as one of my colleagues likes to say, “Ridgewood did not get to be Ridgewood by standing pat.”

Our SAT scores have improved almost every year for the past five years and are now higher than the average of New Jersey private school college-bound seniors. The SAT math scores at RHS are actually higher than the verbal, which are also high. State testing also shows good results. Aggregated performance remains at 90-95% passing in all areas. Elementary schools meet or exceed comparable school districts in 12 of 12 math tests administered since 2002. Our middle schools did the same for 7 of the 10 tests, while the high school met or exceeded the top districts on 5 out of 6 math tests administered at grade 11 since 2002.

Noting an opportunity for improvement at the middle school, last year we introduced Connected Mathematics II at Grade six. This year the second level of CMPII was introduced at Grade seven. Next year, for the first time in the history of the school district, Algebra will be offered to all eighth grade students. The American Academy for the Advancement of Sciences has ranked Connected Mathematics (1998) number one in a study of middle school math textbooks
(https://www.project2061.org/publications/textbook/mgmth/report/).

Here’s a preview of what the elementary principals will be advancing for the Board’s consideration. Using the Ridgewood model that has been so successful in our literacy programs, we offer the idea of teaming with a university to share expertise and information. For the remainder of the current school year, that would mean appointing a group to evaluate local research and instruction faculties, including both mathematicians and math educators. Over the course of the 2008-2009 school year we would work with that university, using sophisticated assessment to help answer key questions relative to the needs of our students. By September of 2009, Ridgewood students would be using new curriculum, procedures and materials, to the extent that they are needed.

Our proposed timetable coincides with a good deal of information that should be coming our way. The President’s Panel, a group of math experts called together in Washington, should be presenting their report this April. The Department of Education has awarded a fifty million dollar grant to do a national study of different math programs. Across the nation, other federal dollars will be propelling four regional laboratories, one at Rutgers, to evaluate current math programs for effectiveness. This should stimulate the publishing companies to get busy preparing materials to match the national findings.

Here’s what we won’t be recommending to the Board. The states who knee- jerked against reform math, California in particular, have once again endured the empty experience of running headlong toward the mirage called “back to basics.” Last month, Education Week reported that the California Department of Education admitted its legislatively mandated traditional math programs have not generated the results they wanted. They are switching statewide to Everyday Math, a reform program currently used in Somerville and Ridge Schools here in Ridgewood.

In Pittsburgh, where some schools use traditional texts and some use Everyday Math, a study commissioned by the Board of Education with Mathematica Inc. concluded that the results achieved by students in the two programs are indistinguishable. Cost of the study: $60,000. One conclusion noted in the study: It’s actually the teachers, not the materials, that make the difference. We could have told them that.

I hope that you find a way to be a part of our discussion over the next several months. Please give me a call (201)270-2700, or drop me an email, [email protected], if you have questions or ideas.

Tim

Posted on Leave a comment

The adequacy funding amount should be fairly and appropriately weighted for regional cost differences…..

>To all:
Please take the time this busy holiday season to e-mail your representatives in Trenton with concerns about the new funding formula. Even though there is a proposed funding increase for next year, we do not know where Trenton will find $532,000,000 to fund it. Remember the state already has a $3 billion deficit. In the long run the new formula for special education aid distribution will mean less money than what we would have received with the old formula if it had been properly funded. Finally rushing to enact legislation that the legislators have not even read, analyzed, or debated makes little sense. They will receive the legislation tomorrow and will have only a few legislative sessions during the holiday season before the January 7 vote.


You can cut and paste the letter below and e-mail it to the following legislators:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]


Don’t forget to put your name and address on the e-mail before sending.

To: Assemblymen Russo, O’Toole, Roberts, and Stanley and
Senators McNamara, Turner, Lance, and Codey:

My children attend the Ridgewood Public Schools in Bergen County. I am a taxpayer. Ninety percent of our local school budget is funded through the property tax. I support our schools and the high quality instruction provided to my children. I am concerned about some aspects of the proposed school funding formula.

o The adequacy funding amount should be fairly and appropriately weighted for regional cost differences. It is more expensive to educate a child in northern New Jersey then in central or southern New Jersey. In 2006-07 our cost per student was $12,133. In the proposed formula adequacy per pupil spending is costed out at $11,289. What would we need to strip from our budget in order to meet the adequacy figure? Should be provide fewer AP courses, fewer honors level electives, make cuts to our visual and performing arts program, offer less support to our struggling students, or eliminate our extracurricular activities? Is it adequacy or excellence that we want for our children’s education?

o Do not use a wealth based formula to distribute any part of the special education aid. It should remain as Categorical Aid. This year our enrollment in special education increased by 56 students and there are twenty-four more students waiting for evaluations. Families are moving to Ridgewood for the quality of our special education programs. We are proud of this, but the costs are taking a toll on our budget. The unintended consequence of the proposed hybrid formula – part categorical/part wealth equalized – will pit special education and regular education parents against one another as they vie for precious budget dollars to insure their children receive the high quality instruction that they have come to expect in Ridgewood.

o Slow down the process and do not rush to enact a flawed formula. The legislature is being asked to rush approval of the proposed funding formula. The time between now and January 7, with the holidays in-between, is too short to do the due diligence required on such an important matter that will impact all of New Jersey’s public school students.

Ridgewood has a tradition of educational excellence. Our students benefit from a high quality instructional program offered cost effectively. A school district like Ridgewood should be the norm in New Jersey. The state should support the values of excellence and efficiency and align the public school funding formula with them.

Sincerely,
Name and address

Posted on Leave a comment

EVERYDAY MATH = JUNK

>And to think, here in Ridgewood, we are plowing ahead on the reform math, constructivist express train.


https://www.nypost.com/seven/12072007/postopinion/letters/everyday_math___junk_778730.htm

December 7, 2007 — THE ISSUE: Whether new methods of teaching math provide sufficient education.

Congratulations to The Post for running Michelle Malkin’s “Fuzzy Math Isn’t Cuddly” (PostOpinion, Nov. 28).

It is a pleasure to read a description of the problems with fuzzy math written by someone who actually understands. I wish there were more written on the subject from Malkins’s accurate perspective.

Many readers are interested in this issue, and many of them are parents who are afraid to speak up to their school boards to protest the bad math programs being implemented for fear of retribution.

Columns such as Malkin’s help give people courage to fight this epidemic.

Thanks to The Post for its coverage – and courage.

Barry Garelick
McLean, Va.

****
As a math teacher, I am deeply offended by educrats who use the word “math” to push a non-math curriculum.

The use of “new math” is nothing more than the politically correct practice of dumbing-down the curriculum, mostly to provide the illusion of success to parents and to make schools look good.

The “new math” lacks math. Neither my colleagues nor myself have seen these students obtain a deep understanding of mathematics.

Students who are exposed to the new math have an uphill battle when they reach high school, especially when they take the SATs.

The old computer term GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) is perfectly applicable.

Elio Valenti
Brooklyn

****

I live in an Everyday Math district in Pennsylvania, and while scores on our state test, the PSSA, are rising, our SAT scores are dropping.

Our state standards and the PSSA are aligned with constructivist programs like Everyday Math. Even a perfect score on the PSSA does not ensure that a student knows the math that he should at his grade level.

A child could be getting straight As in Everyday Math and still be counting on his fingers.

I have heard Everyday Math referred to as “Every Night Math” because every night parents are teaching their children the math they should be learning in school or driving them to tutoring centers to supplement their education.

Sharon Collopy
Doylestown, Pa.

ORDER FINE ART/ STOCK PRINTS ON-LINE

Posted on Leave a comment

Shameful, huh? Really…

>Regarding the Ridgewood News editorial on Fri. 11/30/07 describing as “shameful” the lack of public participation in the recent BOE meeting held to receive public comment relating to the ongoing search for a new super for the the school district:

It was not only the BOE critics that were absent from the recent meeting, but also BOE supporters. It was not only reform math opponents that were absent, but also its adherents. To whom, then, should this label “shameful” apply? One presumes that it must apply to each and every resident in Ridgewood, since everyone was equally absent.

How can a newspaper that is the namesake of a town justify indicting an entire town full of its own residents?

It is perhaps easier for the writer of such an editorial to lapse into that sort of lazy ‘badmouthing’ attitude if that same person does not live in Ridgewood. Otherwise, wouldn’t this be a self-indictment? No rational person would indict themselves without explaining the reason for such self-hatred (I couldn’t help myself), the motivation for such an epiphany (gee, upon further reflection, I really should have gone), or the particular reason why the indictment does not apply to them (my car broke down).

For what its worth, it’s also hard to see why an entire town full of residents should feel shame for failing to keep company with a Board of Education, the trustees of which are incapable of feeling any such emotion for the predictable results of their past actions/inactions/blatant negligence.

Sincerely:

An anonymous Ridgewood resident who blew off the BOE meeting for good reason–THEY COULDN’T CARE LESS WHAT I HAVE TO SAY, AND I WOULD PREFER TO AVOID THE INVIDIOUS RECRIMINATION THAT WOULD SURELY BE ADMINISTERED BY MY CHILD’S PRINCIPAL AS PUNISHMENT FOR MY FOOLISH DECISION TO PUBLICLY REBUKE THE TRUSTEES.
50% off Cozy Quilted Throw with any purchase: expires 12/31/07show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=137177

Posted on Leave a comment

Public Hearing Tonight: Ordinance #3087 – Authorize Expenditure of $80K

>

Installation of High Water Barriers on Village Hall Doors

Ironically, on the heels of receiving news that architect Barry Poskanzer won an award for his “flood-proof” design of the Ridgewood Village Hall renovation and expansion project, Village Council members will vote this evening on a plan to install removable “door dams” in front of all exterior doors on the lower level of Village Hall. Estimated total cost for the project is $80K.

Ridgewood Fire Headquarters, on East Glen Avenue and also in an identified “high risk” flood hazard zone, is equipped with similar devices.

See what a “door dam” looks like here:

https://www.doordam.com/

Posted on Leave a comment

Happy Thanksgiving :The Real Story of Thanksgiving

>The Great Thanksgiving Hoax
By Richard J. Maybury
Posted on 11/20/1999

Each year at this time school children all over America are taught the official Thanksgiving story, and newspapers, radio, TV, and magazines devote vast amounts of time and space to it. It is all very colorful and fascinating.

It is also very deceiving. This official story is nothing like what really happened. It is a fairy tale, a whitewashed and sanitized collection of half-truths which divert attention away from Thanksgiving’s real meaning.

The official story has the pilgrims boarding the Mayflower, coming to America and establishing the Plymouth colony in the winter of 1620-21. This first winter is hard, and half the colonists die. But the survivors are hard working and tenacious, and they learn new farming techniques from the Indians. The harvest of 1621 is bountiful. The Pilgrims hold a celebration, and give thanks to God. They are grateful for the wonderful new abundant land He has given them.

The official story then has the Pilgrims living more or less happily ever after, each year repeating the first Thanksgiving. Other early colonies also have hard times at first, but they soon prosper and adopt the annual tradition of giving thanks for this prosperous new land called America.

The problem with this official story is that the harvest of 1621 was not bountiful, nor were the colonists hardworking or tenacious. 1621 was a famine year and many of the colonists were lazy thieves.

In his ‘History of Plymouth Plantation,’ the governor of the colony, William Bradford, reported that the colonists went hungry for years, because they refused to work in the fields. They preferred instead to steal food. He says the colony was riddled with “corruption,” and with “confusion and discontent.” The crops were small because “much was stolen both by night and day, before it became scarce eatable.”

In the harvest feasts of 1621 and 1622, “all had their hungry bellies filled,” but only briefly. The prevailing condition during those years was not the abundance the official story claims, it was famine and death. The first “Thanksgiving” was not so much a celebration as it was the last meal of condemned men.

But in subsequent years something changes. The harvest of 1623 was different. Suddenly, “instead of famine now God gave them plenty,” Bradford wrote, “and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God.” Thereafter, he wrote, “any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day.” In fact, in 1624, so much food was produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting corn.

What happened?

After the poor harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, “they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop.” They began to question their form of economic organization.

This had required that “all profits & benefits that are got by trade, working, fishing, or any other means” were to be placed in the common stock of the colony, and that, “all such persons as are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions out of the common stock.” A person was to put into the common stock all he could, and take out only what he needed.

This “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” was an early form of socialism, and it is why the Pilgrims were starving. Bradford writes that “young men that are most able and fit for labor and service” complained about being forced to “spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children.” Also, “the strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak.” So the young and strong refused to work and the total amount of food produced was never adequate.

To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each household a parcel of land and told them they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw fit. In other words, he replaced socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines.

Many early groups of colonists set up socialist states, all with the same terrible results. At Jamestown, established in 1607, out of every shipload of settlers that arrived, less than half would survive their first twelve months in America. Most of the work was being done by only one-fifth of the men, the other four-fifths choosing to be parasites. In the winter of 1609-10, called “The Starving Time,” the population fell from five-hundred to sixty.

Then the Jamestown colony was converted to a free market, and the results were every bit as dramatic as those at Plymouth. In 1614, Colony Secretary Ralph Hamor wrote that after the switch there was “plenty of food, which every man by his own industry may easily and doth procure.” He said that when the socialist system had prevailed, “we reaped not so much corn from the labors of thirty men as three men have done for themselves now.”

Before these free markets were established, the colonists had nothing for which to be thankful. They were in the same situation as Ethiopians are today, and for the same reasons. But after free markets were established, the resulting abundance was so dramatic that the annual Thanksgiving celebrations became common throughout the colonies, and in 1863, Thanksgiving became a national holiday.

Thus the real reason for Thanksgiving, deleted from the official story, is: Socialism does not work; the one and only source of abundance is free markets, and we thank God we live in a country where we can have them.

* * * * *
Mr. Maybury writes on investments.

This article originally appeared in The Free Market, November 1985