Posted on

Gold Dollars, Rule Dollars, And Yellen Dollars

1000509261001_1709795472001_Bela-Lugosi

vampires react to sunlight

Gold Dollars, Rule Dollars, And Yellen Dollars

On July 7, Congressmen Bill Huizenga and Scott Garrett introduced H.R. 5018, the “Federal Reserve Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014.”  H.R. 5018 would mandate that the Fed articulate a rule for conducting monetary policy.  It would further require that the Fed report to Congress twice a year and compare the actual results with both their chosen rule and with the “Taylor Rule,” which was developed by Stanford economist John B. Taylor in 1992.

Both the Fed itself and progressive economists have reacted to this very mild piece of reform legislation in the way that vampires react to sunlight.  They don’t like it one bit.

During her testimony before the House Financial Services Committee on July 16, Fed Chairman Janet Yellen argued that it would be a “grave mistake” for Congress to adopt legislation constraining the Fed’s management of monetary policy, because this would impair the Fed’s ability to manage the economy, and its ability to respond to financial crises.  She said that such a law “…would essentially undermine central bank independence.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswoodhill/2014/07/24/gold-dollars-rule-dollars-and-yellen-dollars/

Posted on

Scott Garrett Moves ensure the TSA doesn’t overstep its bounds Introduces the Freedom of Travel Act, which would prohibit the TSA from conducting random searches

181752_10150093738283402_4681528_n

Scott Garrett Moves ensure the TSA doesn’t overstep its bounds Introduces the Freedom of Travel Act, which would prohibit the TSA from conducting random searches 
July 16.2014

Ridgewood NJ, Of the many revolutionary ideas that our country’s Founders included in the Constitution, the inherent rights to privacy and due process are truly unique.  Our Founders witnessed firsthand the ruin and terror that a distant, unresponsive, and ultimately tyrannical government could inflict on peaceable people as individual liberties were curtailed.  They could not tolerate such abuses, and neither should we today.

Our right to privacy must be diligently preserved, the more so since it can be so quickly taken away.  Whether it’s the NSA’s unlimited collection of Americans’ communications, the IRS’s unequal and invasive scrutiny of politically disfavored groups, or the TSA’s expansion of unwarranted airport-style screening to our streets, we as Americans owe it to ourselves to fight this barrage of privacy infringements—and that’s not an exhaustive list.

One example that I want to bring to your attention is the TSA’s Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response (VIPR) program.  VIPR teams are roving units that conduct thousands of unannounced, random sweeps of personal vehicles; bus, train, and subway stations; as well as things that have nothing to do with transportation, like football stadiums.  As you can see, these teams reach far beyond the TSA’s traditional jurisdiction of airports and aviation. To ensure the TSA doesn’t overstep its bounds, I introduced H.R. 2589, the Freedom of Travel Act, which would prohibit the TSA from conducting random searches of surface transportation passengers.

The evolution of technology has also opened up many new questions about our rights in an electronic world.  Recently, the Supreme Court unanimously defended our Fourth Amendment rights by holding that police are required to obtain a warrant before searching the cell phone data of an individual who has been arrested.  

While I believe in maintaining our country’s anti-terrorist capabilities and supporting our brave law enforcement officials, I applaud the Supreme Court for drawing a clear line that recognizes the critical privacy interest all U.S. citizens have in their mobile devices. To further this protection, I supported an amendment to the Department of Defense appropriations that would prohibit the use of any government funds for warrantless searches of your electronic communications.

Before and during the American Revolution, homes were raided, people were arrested without warrants, personal property was confiscated and destroyed, and people understandably lived in fear of the arbitrary and invasive government.  It is our duty, as Americans, to protect the civil rights that so many have fought and died for.

Posted on

Democrats counting on Bergen voters to unseat Garrett

DSCF9070

 

file photo Boyd Loving

Democrats counting on Bergen voters to unseat Garrett
By Myles Ma/NJ.com 

RIDGEWOOD — Scott Garrett has handily won every race he’s run for New Jersey’s 5th Congressional District since 2002.

Garrett has vastly outspent his opponent in every election year, with the exception of 2008, when he outspent Dennis G. Shulman, but not vastly.

But Roy Cho, his Democratic opponent, believes Garrett can be beaten. So too, does rapper Ghostface Killah.

It was Killah’s (Ghostface’s?) endorsement over Twitter last year that first put Cho and his campaign on the map. But it is the new math in the 5th that Cho believes will put his campaign over the top.

Redistricting in 2010 added Democratic-leaning Fair Lawn, Lodi, Hackensack and Bogota, and parts of Teaneck to the 5th. By population, Bergen County makes up almost three-quarters of the district.

Rob Esposito, Cho’s campaign manager, said these towns have turned the 5th from a safe Republican stronghold dominated by Sussex and Warren voters into a competitive district.

“We know we have a real shot,” he said.

https://www.nj.com/bergen/index.ssf/2014/07/democrats_counting_on_bergen_voters_in_5th_district_race.html

Posted on

God Bless Those Who Have Fallen In Defense of Our Freedom

Ridgewood_5Memorial_Day_Ceremony-2013_theridgewood-blog.net_1-300x2251

God Bless Those Who Have Fallen In Defense of Our Freedom

Dear Friend,

This week I voted in the House to give the Congressional Gold Medal to a number of military heroes.  The bills I supported, among others, include H.R. 1726 to honor the 65th Infantry Regiment, known as the Borinqueneers; H.R. 1209  to honor the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders; and H.R. 685 to honor the American Fighter Aces.  As you may know, the American Fighter Aces are an elite group of combat pilots that destroyed at least five hostile aircraft in air to air combat.  Interestingly, New Jersey’s Fifth District serves as the home to three of these distinguished pilots, Major Thomas Buchanan McGuire of Ridgewood, Colonel Edward Stanley Popek of Hackensack and Captain Richard Dike Faxon of Haworth.

Though we can often get caught up in the parades and barbeques, this Memorial Day I urge you to truly reflect on what we hold so dear and who we have to thank for those blessings.  We are a nation of free people because of those who never wavered in their commitment to liberty and democracy.  As President Reagan said in his first inaugural address, “we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.”  To all the soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines and coast guardsmen who paid the ultimate price for our freedom, thank you.  

On this Memorial Day, may God bless the families who grieve for their loved ones, and may God bless all those who have fallen in defense of the United States of America.

Sincerely,



Scott Garrett

Microsoft Store

Posted on

Culture of Control is Unfair & Un-American

8989386-large

Culture of Control is Unfair & Un-American
Mar 4, 2014
By Rep. Scott Garrett

Despite not knowing your situation or your specific needs, perfect strangers now decide what is best for you.

WHETHER it’s the food you want to eat, the home loan you want to get, the toys your kids want to play with, the cars you want to drive or how much water your toilets can flush, America’s everyday choices have always been plentiful. A primary reason for this abundance is the tradition of negligible government intrusion in your lives.

Unfortunately, this tradition has been eroded over the years, and your choices and your freedom to make even the smallest decision are suffering because of it.

Faceless bureaucrats — strangers who have decided they know better than you — set out a handful of options that they like and force you to “choose” from them. In today’s America, this is what government bureaucrats pass off as your choice. The façade of choice is present, but — as you and I both know — we accept their dictates or else.

Riddled with subjective rules and regulations and laced with numerous mandates, President Obama’s health care law is a stifling example of government bureaucrats asserting their control over your choices. From the type of plan to the insurance provider, and from the doctor to the hospital, you no longer have true choice when it comes to your health coverage. Rather, the limited choices available to you are those deemed appropriate by our omniscient government bureaucrats.

“Sub-standard” is the word bureaucrats are using to tell Americans that they don’t like the choice they’ve made while selecting their personal insurance policy. At last count, 4.7 million Americans have been told they made the wrong choice, and are being forced by bureaucrats to pick another policy. In New Jersey alone, approximately 800,000 residents will be losing the health care plan they picked, in favor of an appropriate plan that fits the bureaucrats’ mandate — plans that may be more expensive, may have less coverage and might not serve the needs of your family.

Unfree marketplace

Like your newly restricted health coverage choices, the home loan market is no longer the robust free marketplace it once was. The type of loan, the amount you can borrow and whom you can borrow from are now all things government bureaucrats manage. Despite not knowing your situation or your specific needs, perfect strangers now decide what is best for you.

The elimination of choice doesn’t stop with your health care coverage or your home loan, sadly. Rather, it is fading with regard to nearly every aspect of your lives. Let me provide you with just a few examples.

Thought those who insist on “doing with your body as you wish” included choosing what to eat and drink? If the food is made with trans fats, think again. The FDA is close to tightly controlling those.

Thought you could choose what kind of toy to buy? Not if the Consumer Product Safety Commission doesn’t like it.  For example, the CPSC banned Buckyballs, an adult magnetic-balls desk toy, because — if swallowed — they pose a health risk.

Federal bureaucracies’ rules tell you what kind of safety equipment you must have in your car, how much ethanol must be in your fuel and what fuel economy must be regardless of its harmful effect on crashworthiness. What’s best for you and your driving habits? What’s most efficient? It doesn’t matter — your options are limited to the ones deemed worthy by bureaucrats.

It’s long been an essential element of our representative government that most of the choices we make are our choices. The reason for this is that it is impossible for a relative few bureaucrats to comprehend every situation in which we might find ourselves and subsequently decide — in advance — what limited choices will be best for everyone. A system that tries to apply narrow options to every situation does a lousy job of providing a fair solution to circumstances that fall outside a bureaucrat’s predictions or imagination. “One-size-fits-all” ends up working for no one.

When the system isn’t right for you or your family, suffocating rules and government control tend to prevent the bureaucrats from being accommodating. Americans are increasingly left out of luck and confined to ever-narrower sets of options by people they’ll never meet and didn’t elect but who have the power not only to deny them freedom of choice, but also to take their money and send them to prison if they don’t comply.

Culture of control

I believe we should welcome diverse cultures — beliefs, customs and traditions — but, when it comes to the culture of control that most government bureaucrats exist for, we must do everything in our power to reject it.

The culture of control costs us more while simultaneously making us less free. The culture of control is unkind, unreasonable, unfair and un-American. It’s time to put the kibosh on the culture of control and return to the simple, essential freedom of choice our forefathers shed blood to guarantee, and enshrined in the Constitution.

Posted on

Repeatedly raising the debt ceiling,offers a glimpse into the very real and very sad state of our nation’s finances.

scott-garrett

Repeatedly raising the debt ceiling, offers a glimpse into the very real and very sad state of our nation’s finances.

Garrett Statement on Debt Ceiling Vote
Feb 12, 2014

Washington, DC – Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ), a senior member of the House Budget Committee and Chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, issued the following statement after voting against raising the debt ceiling on Tuesday night:

“Repeatedly raising the debt ceiling, as if it’s just a tedious task that must be dealt with, offers a glimpse into the very real and very sad state of our nation’s finances.  While this bill has been heralded as a ‘no strings attached’ debt limit increase, the reality is there are strings attached and they’re directly attached to our children and grandchildren’s future.

“Politically, it is much easier to avoid the trillion dollar elephant in the room. But the cycle of borrowing and spending and borrowing more cannot continue indefinitely.  The longer it goes on, the worse the problem will get, and the harder it will be to solve.  It would be better to solve the problem now by cutting spending and adopting a plan to balance the budget in the near future with specific, achievable goals.  Sadly, the political will to do so does not abide in this Congress.”

Posted on

Garrett: CBO Report Highlights Need to Tackle Our Spending Problem Now

Scott_Garrett_took5_a_break_from_DC_theridgewood-blog.net_-300x225

Garrett: CBO Report Highlights Need to Tackle Our Spending Problem Now
Feb 4, 2014

Washington, DC – Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ), senior member of the House Budget Committee and Chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, issued the following statement regarding the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) Budget and Economic Outlook for 2014-2024:

“Today’s CBO report again highlights America’s very serious financial problems.  Despite President Obama’s big talk about tackling our deficit last week, CBO estimates that our deficit will once again top $1 trillion within eight years.  Over the next ten years, interest costs alone will be $5.8 trillion—the third largest expense in the federal budget.  And, by 2021, ObamaCare will cause a ‘reduction in full-time-equivalent employment of about 2.3 million.’

“Though we are racing against time, if Washington takes swift action to cut spending, reform our entitlement programs, and overhaul our broken tax code, we can save our children from a future rife with debt and devoid of opportunity.  With a healthy dose of courage from elected leaders, we can get America moving on the right track again.”

To read the full report: https://cbo.gov/publication/45010.

Save 20% on Valentine's Day Flowers & Gifts at 1800flowers.com. Use Promo Code: HEARTTWNTY at checkout (Offer Ends 02/09/14)show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=216823

Posted on

Your Pocketbook: The New Bank of America? Op-Ed By Scott Garrett (NJ Herald)

>September 21, 2008

Your Pocketbook: The New Bank of America? Op-Ed By Scott Garrett (NJ Herald)

As the Wall Street drama of the past several weeks has unfolded, I have become increasingly worried about the consequences of our government’s actions on American families. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson throws a lifeline to company after company, all the while Americans, New Jerseyans in particular, struggle to make ends meet. While New Jersey families struggle to balance their household budgets and high gas and heating oil prices, Wall Street companies aren’t held to the same standards of accountability. If any resident of the Fifth District stopped paying his or her mortgage, the bank would come take their house. Bear Stearns wasn’t even worth the building in which they were located, and yet the government gave them a loan! Somehow, I fail to see the logic in this situation.

Bear Stearns was “too big to fail.” Reported as a historic bailout, the taxpayers were put on the hook for $30 billion in the name of preventing disaster. That Sunday morning in March, Paulson stated that the intervention of the Federal Reserve “was not a difficult decision. It was the right decision.”

Enter Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, our two enormous housing finance agencies. Too big to fail. Historic bailout. A weekend decision made with little or no congressional oversight. Taxpayers placed at risk. Again.

Now with AIG, Congress is whipped into a frenzy, acting with shock and dismay at the actions of Treasury and the Fed. Well, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me three times? I don’t think Congress gets to play that game. It’s a little too late to be flabbergasted, as the American taxpayer is being hung out to dry to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars.

In March, when the Bear Stearns bailout occurred, I spoke out against setting a dangerous precedent of bailing out private sector companies. As a Member of the Financial Services Committee, I demanded hearings on the litmus test Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke and Paulson used to make their decision. The Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, Barney Frank (D-MA), failed to hold a hearing for more than two months.

Finally, when this hearing did occur, I asked Bernanke and Secretary Paulson, “Can you assure us that you will not conduct any similar Bear Stearns transaction if another investment bank or a GSE gets in trouble?”

Bernanke replied, “I don’t think a situation like this is at all likely.”

That prediction lasted only days until Fannie and Freddie were propped up by our government, again exposing taxpayers to untold amounts of risk.

As Lehman Brothers faltered last weekend, all eyes were on Paulson to see what he would do. In a high-stakes game of chicken, potential buyers of the flailing company waited on the so-called White Knight of Corporate America to come to the rescue; Paulson stood fast in the face of criticism, while Lehman filed for bankruptcy. Then, just twenty four hours later, he and Bernanke were writing insurance giant AIG an $85 billion check – from the bank account of the American people. Well what happens when the Federal Reserve no longer has any reserves?

Rather than letting the marketplace resolve these crises, Paulson has become the Officer Krupke of Wall Street, attempting to quiet down the neighborhood. In reality, Paulson hasn’t been deputized and Wall Street and Congress aren’t the Sharks and the Jets. Government intervention in the marketplace may only prolong our current economic crisis, providing false security for businesses which aren’t stable enough to perform on their own. Rather than allowing the market to regain its balance through natural contractions and corrections, government intervention fails to address the problems behind any crisis. Paulson has publicly expressed his sympathy for the senior executives and boards of Fannie and Freddie, saying he felt “sorry” for them. We have yet to hear him say “sorry” to the American taxpayer.

I am ready for more than a simple apology, however. I want answers. This week, I introduced a bipartisan bill to establish the Select Committee on Bailouts in the House of Representatives. Taxpayer risk should not be a partisan issue, so I was pleased to have Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur, a Democrat from Ohio join me in introducing this legislation. This Select Committee will be tasked with finding out what exactly happened in the conference rooms at the Treasury and the Federal Reserve this year. After all, when the American taxpayer is footing the bill—we deserve to have all of the facts.

I am also continuing my work to reform the Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Going forward, we must implement major changes to limit the size and scope of the GSEs and ensure that free markets are given the opportunity to work on behalf of all Americans. Congress needs to recognize its role as the watchdog and protector of the American taxpayer. This does not include policing the Street or offering up taxpayer dollars when things start to look rocky.

There is evidence to suggest that the conservatorship in which the Treasury has proposed for the GSEs will result in the revitalization of the failed business model currently in place for Fannie and Freddie. This only serves to promote ongoing troubles stemming from a poorly structured business model, the flaws of which have been openly acknowledged by Paulson and others. The GSEs should be put into receivership, unwound and broken into smaller entities, and then privatized, severing the link between the Federal government and these institutions. Historically, the backing which the government provided for Fannie and Freddie has protected investors at the expense of taxpayers, creating socialized losses and private profits.

The exponential growth of our housing markets is the root cause of the economic downturn. Under the current mortgage system, lenders had incentives to pass questionable loans through the two GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, onto unwitting investors on Wall Street. Once these loans turned sour, mortgage availability dried up. To begin addressing this liquidity crisis, I introduced legislation to encourage the development of a newer and safer tool called “covered bonds.” Covered bonds are financial instruments which include incentives to prevent un-creditworthy borrowers from receiving loans and instead encourage lending to people who deserve the extension of credit. My legislation, “The Equal Treatment for Covered Bonds Act,” provides more legal certainty to help get the covered bond market off the ground.
I will continue to work as a vocal advocate for taxpayer concerns as the United States works through this difficult economic period. If we continue to rely on the “too big to fail” logic, I fear that in the future, Wall Street CEOs will first look to the American taxpayer to solve their problems, rather than to the private marketplace. The total cost and risk to American families caused by the government’s recent actions has yet to be determined, but the preliminary math is rather daunting. Bear Stearns: $30 billion. Fannie and Freddie: $200 billion. AIG: $85 billion. Mortgaging your future? Priceless.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400145