Posted on

OUR NEW TURF FIELDS ARE CLOSED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE (NO IDEA WHEN).

>OUR NEW TURF FIELDS ARE CLOSED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE (NO IDEA WHEN).

Thought you should also be aware of this info below.Forget about Lightgate, this is really Fieldgate now!
Both Stadium and Stevens Fields are now closed until further notice. Even though Dan says clean up will begin on Monday who knows with “testing” (for what?) this whole thing will take let alone cost! Since the BOE does not care to secure the fields as noted below I think your blog is the best way to get the word out to non-Sports groups who have not been told that OUR NEW TURF FIELDS ARE CLOSED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE (NO IDEA WHEN).

Also in case of another flood that will come sooner or later THE SAME THING WILL HAPPEN. It’s why the neighbors originally said, before even Lightgate, that to put turf in a flood zone was simply crazy! Unless you have millions of dollars to waste. That’s Fieldgate!I am sure you will be as flabbergasted as we are to learn that Dan did not know the fields have crumb rubber. I feel like this is a bad dream, it can’t be reality! Beam me up, Scotty!

Bookmark and Share

EMAIL+LOGO

Posted on

THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AND THE PLANNING BOARD HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER THE RIDGEWOOD BOE.

>THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AND THE PLANNING BOARD HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER THE RIDGEWOOD BOE.
 It has been said many times and I guess it has to be repeated again; THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AND THE PLANNING BOARD HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER THE RIDGEWOOD BOE. (I’m not talking about defeated school budgets.) Ask the Mayor, ask the Village Mgr, ask the Village Attorney, ask the BOE Attorney, ask the Chairman of the Planning Board, ask anyone who knows what they are talking about, the Village can not force the BOE to do something nor can they stop them from doing something. The BOE “reports” to the NJ Dept.of Education. It might not seem “right” but that is the law in NJ. With that in mind; Why would the BOE go back to the Planning Board? Why would the Planning Board want them back? Why would either one of them want to waste the time when they both have a lot of other things to worry about and absolutely nothing could come from it. It would serve no purpose at all. There is a reason the first two times the BOE appeared before the Planning Board the meetings were called “Courtesy Hearings.” They were just that, a “courtesy” to the Village to outline what was going to happen. The Village had no authority to change anything the BOE was planning to do and the BOE didn’t have to appear but they did.

The BOE and the neighbors need to keep an ongoing dialogue and try and figure out a way to make the upgraded fields work. There was supposed to be a meeting earlier this week that was going to open the dialogue and hopefully move the two sides closer. The turf is in and the lights are in. I doubt either of those is going anywhere. As loud as the neighbors are complaining (and they have some legitimate complaints) the sound of the hundreds of kids and their parents who will complain will be infinitely louder should access to those fields be impaired in a meaningful way.

There has to be some middle ground and I would hope in a town like Ridgewood that ground can be found sooner rather then later so all this back and forth can stop and we can concentrate on the real important issues in town like when is the 2011 Village Calendar going to arrive so I can figure out the new garbage and recycleable schedule?

Bookmark and Share

EMAIL+LOGO

Posted on

Field Lights : neighbors "felt bullied" by the BOE

>Field Lights : neighbors “felt bullied” by the BOE

Ridgewood school board grilled on lights Friday, October 22, 2010
BY KELLY EBBELS
The Ridgewood News
STAFF WRITER

https://www.northjersey.com/news/105505023_Board_grilled_on_lights.html

The Ridgewood Board of Education (BOE) was questioned Monday night by neighbors critical of what they said was an underhanded approach to installing lights at Ridgewood High School (RHS) fields, which began two weeks ago and should be fully connected shortly.

Two residents who live near the school spoke at length at the BOE meeting about what they called an inadequate public consultation process to install permanent flood lights at RHS Stadium Field and Stevens Field.

The award of the bid for the field lighting installation was made at a July 19 BOE meeting; the bid was originally listed as a point of discussion, but trustee Charles Reilly moved to approve the field lighting lease purchase financing to Musco Lighting and the installation to Quality Electric.

Accusing Superintendent Daniel Fishbein of misleading the public into thinking that field lights were only a narrow possibility, resident Jim Morgan, who lives near the field, said that the BOE “played down the lights issue” and sought to “silence opposition to the lights” during conversations about the installation of field turf at meetings for the Ridgewood school district’s bond referendum project.

“There was no attempt to contact neighbors until a Sept. 16 letter was sent to neighbors, after the decisions were made,” Morgan said. “We [neighbors] are very disappointed right now.”

Tom Kossoff, a resident of Heermance Place, said that he and other neighbors “felt bullied” by the BOE.

read the full story:
https://www.northjersey.com/news/105505023_Board_grilled_on_lights.html

Bookmark and Share

Posted on

There’s too much emphasis on athletics in our schools

>There’s too much emphasis on athletics in our schools

There’s too much emphasis on athletics in our schools (and in our lives)! Get back to the academics. Too much time, energy and money is wasted on fields, turfs, etc. Physical education is important, exercise and fitness are important but the emphasis on HS sports is way overboard. With everyone worrying about school budgets and cutting teachers, sports should take a backseat

BOE should spend the money on building maintenance! They let the buildings get into disrepair and are spending too much time and effort on sports fields

The kids should learn a work ethic and have a job after school. They should learn to save, and pay for their own things. Buying your brat a Beemer or Range Rover isn’t the way to instill proper work ethic.

Bookmark and Share

EMAIL+LOGO

Posted on

$48 million dollar Referendum : I am currently watching the BoE meeting.

>I am currently watching the BoE meeting. The referendum came up. They discussed it for a total of FIVE minutes. Brogan said to come to the next public forum at GW on 11/30 to talk about the referendum. Goodman wanted to correct the record in TRW that BF would not be turfed. Hutton said if you want to know why there should be turf, just walk across Stevens field. Brogan(?) said (for a half-minute) that the referendum is more than just fields – and then the talk turned to turf again. Vallerini said that there is no way to change the referendum. (Then, what’s the point to discuss anything, as Brogan said at the opening, other than to push for a ‘yes’ vote)

It seems to me that the BoE wants you to come to the forums or BoE meetings so they can regulate/control the message. Some of the detractors of this blog seem afraid that we may develop an opinion without the proper spin applied by the BoE.

At least, I didn’t hear ‘lets do it for the kids’ once…yet!

Bookmark and Share

Posted on

>$48 million dollar Referendum: I think what sucks here is the fact that the field is on the same referendum as the school repairs.

>So are you saying that the installation of the new turf a/k/a “the carpet” is going to prevent everyone from getting hurt? Don’t you think that is grasping at straws? If the stands are so bad then why aren’t they being condemned by the state? And as for the field itself, I hate to break it to you, but there isn’t a surface known to man that could prevent an injury. Furthermore, the students playing on that field are not there against their wishes, they are there well knowing the assumed risks associated with heavy contact sports that are played on A FOOTBALL AND LAX FIELD. And as much as I agree that we live in a litigious society and anyone can sue for any reason, it would be very difficult to make the argument that the injury incurred during practice and/or game in a high impact sport such as football or lacrosse is the result of the field when there are THOUSANDS of fields out there in MUCH, MUCH worse conditions.

So you may not want reconsider using that argument because, quite honestly is sucks! As for the schools, there is NO doubt that they are in dire need of repair. And how can you compare Graydon pool to a football field? The percentage of residents that would get the use out of the field is a tiny fraction to the percentage of people that would get the benefit of the use of Graydon.

I think what sucks here is the fact that the field is on the same referendum as the school repairs. They should be two separate issues, it’s this “all or nothing” approach that the general public is not pleased with. And quit blaming the teacher’s compensation. Have you ever heard of the saying “what you pay for is what you get?”. Well in this case I assure you it applies 100%. “Fire them and start over?”.. Oh that is a BRILLIANT IDEA! Look what that approach did to the airline industry, which is arguably the most inefficient and financially unstable industry in the WORLD today. But there’s one difference here, we are not talking about a vacation to Wally World from being ruined, we are talking about out CHILDREN’S FUTURE. Besides, what do you think that firing the entire Village’s teaching staff and hiring all new ones is going to be cheap? Ha! And you’re worried about being sued for a bumpy football field or bleachers? You terminate an entire staff of teachers and you will have so many lawsuits complaints coming at you from so many directions we will be paying the town’s plow drivers O/T just to clear the streets of them! Get real!

Craig

Bookmark and Share

3balls Golf Bargain Basementshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=184674

Posted on

$48 million dollar Referendum, BOE: "We are a community and must share the burden of improvements in our collective community"

>Comrade:

“You have a distorted sense of perspective. The fields represent approximately 2.5% of the total budget ($1.2mm). Installing turf at RHS and Stevens will have a dramatic positive impact on the RHS wellness programs and will, once and for all, solve the over-crowding issues that exist on our fields all over town. Furthermore, the full cost is paid for through debt service provided by the state. PLUS, the state is committing an additional $1mm of debt service to offset other areas of the referendum.

Yet, you would urge voters to vote the entire referendum down, unless the field portion is separated from the rest of the referendum, because you don’t like the idea! How selfish and narrow-minded can a person be?

Should we also separate the portions allocated to each school district, so that a person who lives in Willard (and does not benefit from or care about improvements in Hawes or Somerville) can vote against the portions in those districts? Of course not. But, that is precisely what you propose.

We are a community and must share the burden of improvements in our collective community, whether they be to our classrooms or to our athletic facilities, which improve their functionality and accessability, regardless of whether you benefit directly or have a personal interest.

Unfortunately, as our needs expanded, we failed to address small problems for years and now face a larger price tag than had we been more diligent. This is like a homeowner, who neglects a leaking roof for too long that would have cost a few thousand dollars to fix, only to find that the structure of the house has been damaged and now faces a serious repair that costs tens of thousands of dollars. When that time arrives, the homeowner doesn’t have the luxury of putting it off anymore. This is the circumstance, in which, we now find ourselves. Just as our classrooms are over-crowded and in disrepair, so are our athletic facilities. Both are important and must be addressed now. Some might say that it is a poor time in the economy to be considering such expensive projects. Others might say that, with historically low borrowing costs, this is the ideal time to consider such projects. Fiscal responsibility and the facts about our shared facilities favor the latter. But, regardless, of your perspective, we don’t have the luxury of putting this off for another 5-10 years, only for you to object again, then.

You may have no interest in the physical well being of thousands of Ridgewood children or their opportunity/need to participate in sports. But, frankly, your selfish apathy does not supercede the need that exists for those children and hundreds of Ridgewood families.

The referendum should not be split up and should be passed, in its entirety, for the benefit of our collective community.

If you choose to vote against the referendum, that is your choice. If you do so, you will have to look yourself in the mirror every day and look your fellow residents’ children in the eyes, knowing that you are the reason that the referendum failed. Perhaps you are willing to live with that shame. I am not. “

VOTE on Our Poll : Can Ridgewood Really afford a $48 million School Referendum?

Bookmark and Share
Posted on

December $48 Million School Referendum

>Dear Parents,
On December 8, 2009 Ridgewood voters will be asked to vote on a bond referendum. Before going to the polls we want voters to have the facts in order to make an informed decision. Our school buildings, built between 1919 and 1966, are in need of capital improvements. We also need additional instructional space to keep pace with enrollment increases for our general education and special education programs.

The cost of the bond referendum is $48 million and will allow us to complete needed repairs and capital projects at all of our schools and to add classrooms to GW Middle School, Hawes, Ridge, and Willard. It also includes building a 400-meter track at BF Middle School and installing synthetic turf on Stevens and the RHS Stadium fields.

New Jersey approves our construction needs & offers money to help offset costs.

For over a year, the Board of Education’s Facilities Committee performed an in-depth review of every building. The committee consulted principals, reviewed the District’s five-year facilities plan and RHS engineering study, studied energy conservation opportunities and worked with our architects to prioritize needs. Last winter, we applied to the state for construction grant money, and the state approved our request, validating our needs assessment and awarding Ridgewood $9.8 million in direct grant aid towards the building projects and $2.1 million in debt service aid for the track at BF and for improvements on Stevens and RHS stadium fields. This state aid will lessen the burden on taxpayers and reduce the amount the district will have to borrow. With this state aid commitment, the total bond amount will be $38 million, and the tax impact on the average Ridgewood home valued at $802,107 would be $300.55 a year on a 25-year bond assuming a 4.75% borrowing rate.

Our continued growth: 50 new students every year…for 10 years.

The enclosed Fact Sheet outlines the carefully considered repair/capital improvement and energy conservation projects included in the bond referendum. In addition, proposed additions at GW, Hawes, Ridge and Willard address our need for more instructional space. With enrollment having grown by 500 students over the last 10 years, space limitations have resulted in instruction currently happening in school hallways, in subdivided classrooms and in principals’ offices.

It’s imperative that our facilities meet the educational needs of our students.

In recent years, our number of special education students has increased to 14.3% or a little over 800 students. Our special education students who require individualized programs have moved from school to school, as space is available. As we build new classrooms at Ridge, Willard, and Hawes, we will be able to minimize the moving of our special education classes and allow these students to remain in the same school for all of their elementary years. At the same time, classroom space will be freed-up at Somerville, Travell, and Orchard, eliminating the need to redistrict. New instructional space will also include new library/media centers at Willard and GW and a new full-size gymnasium at GW with enough bleacher seating for the entire student body.

Improving our wellness & athletic facilities.

Currently the Ridgewood High School fields are not appropriately sized nor resilient enough to allow use by multiple athletic teams. In addition, the RHS track is too small for our track team to hold competitive meets. For these reasons, the Stadium field often sits empty, contributing to the District-wide and Village-wide field shortage as identified in the Village’s Recreation Master Plan. It is time to address these deficiencies.

Our plan allows for construction of a regulation 400-meter natural grass-center track at BF and installation of a synthetic surface on the RHS Stadium and Stevens fields. At the Stadium, a smaller track will remain for PE classes and community use. These improved fields will enable girls and boys to play soccer and lacrosse, in addition to football, on site at the high school, and will add needed outside teaching stations for physical education and Project Adventure. Detailed plans for these synthetic fields have been submitted to the NJ DEP for review and approval.

As the community has seen the merits of the synthetic field at Maple Park, the addition of synthetic fields at RHS will further reduce the wear and tear on our grass fields, will bring high school sports back to the high school campus, and will provide our student athletes and youth rec sports players with additional quality playing surfaces.

Know the facts. Get your questions answered.

Please familiarize yourself with information about our proposed projects. All of the school and field plans are posted on the district web site at www.ridgewood.k12.nj.us under the Board of Education link. Soon, information sessions will be held at each school and in homes throughout the Village, providing opportunities to hear more and ask questions. Guided tours of our schools will be scheduled and open to the public.

On December 8th make an informed decision about the Ridgewood Public Schools’ bond referendum.

Sincerely,

Joseph Vallerini
Robert Hutton
Sheila Brogan
Michele Lenhard
Laurie Goodman

P.S. Questions are welcome! We want you to have the facts in order to make an informed decision on Election Day. Please email referendum09@ridgewood.k12.nj.us or call 201-670-2700 ext. 10530 with any questions.

Posted on

Maple Park: (((AIR HORN))) Discussion

>maple+field
Maple Park/Air Horn Discussion…

The surface at Maple Park is NOT Astro-Turf, which has been linked to a number of safety issues. It is FieldTurf, which is a very different design. After extensive testing in NY & NJ, the FieldTurf design has been found to pose no meaningful safety risk to the environment or participants using the field. Although you may incorrectly think of Astro-Turf as a harmless generic term for “synthetic turf”, those who are knowledgeable about the facts in the debate over synthetic turf for the past decade, understand the important differences between the two. No doubt that is why the previous poster pointed out the distinction. The safety, drainage and maintenance BENEFITS, as well as improved appearance of the park, over the previous (largely dirt) surface infested with goose droppings, mosquitos, exposed sprinkler heads and unkept weeds around the field is considered by the majority of people, who use the park regularly, to be a tremendous improvement. It has also allowed the Village to limit use of grass fields after heavy rains, which has resulted in improved overall condition of our grass fields in the past 2 years.

As far at the air horns go, air horns and lights have been used at Vets, Citizens and Maple Park for more than 12 years. When, where or whether they are used did not change with the new surface at Maple several years ago. Although no lights are used, air horns have been used at RHS, Brookside, BF, Somerville and other fields for just as long. So, while you may not “live for the game”, you are a member of a larger community that, by law, must provide active recreational space for ALL residents, based on the Village population. The truth is that the overwhelming majority of the approximately 25,000 households in Ridgewood have, at some point, had at least one child participating in youth and/or RHS athletics. Sports involve rules, which means occasional whistles and horns. This is nothing new.

BTW, except on rare occasions, sports events are generally not scheduled on ANY Ridgewood fields on Sunday mornings. So, your claim of listening to air horns at 8AM on Sunday morning is untrue. The ONLY day of the week that sports events are regularly scheduled in the morning is Saturday.

Microsoft Store

Posted on

There is no way that natural grass would stand up to Varsity, JV, and Freshman games in football, soccer and lacrosse in both boys and girls sports.

>If you look at the Fields and Rec Master Plan and understand what drove some of the recommendations you will understand why the plan calls for “turf” at both Stevens and the “RHS Stadium.” The committee looked at all sports, not just football. The school administrators, coaches and teams are all very interested in playing as many games in as many sports as possible at all levels “on campus.” Currently the various teams play all over the place, some on substandard fields without available restrooms, locker rooms etc… With the lack of room on Stevens and the Stadium Field the best way for this to be accomplished would be to move the track to BF (increase it to 400 meters like every other HS in America) and “turf” both of the fields. The resulting larger space at the HS Stadium will allow both boys and girls soccer and boys and girls lacrosse games at both the varsity and sub varsity levels to play their games on a quality field in a beautiful setting in front of the HS with access to restrooms, locker rooms, and athletic trainers. It would also allow Stevens to be used for more than just football practice as the resulting damage every fall pretty much makes Stevens unusuable for big chunks of the rest of the year.

There is no way that natural grass would stand up to Varsity, JV, and Freshman games in football, soccer and lacrosse in both boys and girls sports. I think everyone would agree if we had the space and the resources to maintain grass fields to the level they should be maintained we would all choose grass over “turf.” Unfortunately that is not possible with the limited fields controlled by the BOE combined with the number of teams and the number of participants in the various sports and thus “turf” becomes the next option.

GigaGolf, Inc.show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=60066

Posted on

CBN News Covers Ridgewood Math Debate

>https://eclectic-educator.blogspot.com/2007/09/ridgewood-featured-on-cbn-news.html

Tuesday, September 4, 2007
Ridgewood featured on CBN News

“The tide is turning too slowly for parents.” That’s just one pithy comment in Heather Sells’ report for CBN News in a news story that features Ridgewood’s math woes.

Disillusionment with reform math seems to cut across race, religion, political affiliation, and even one’s stance on reform math, as evidenced by a shocking quote from pro-reformist Joe Rosenstein.

The segment airs multiple times throughout today on the 700 Club program, carried on ABC Family Channel cable network, FamilyNet, Trinity Broadcasting Network, and other U.S. television stations

In NYC – CBS Family Channel 14 at 10:00 am – 11:00 am; 11:pm – 12:00 am

Text of the story is reprinted below:

The Math Debate: When Johnny Can’t Count
By Heather Sells
CBN News
September 4, 2007

CBNNews.com – RIDGEWOOD, New Jersey – A new survey shows three out of four high school graduates aren’t ready for college even though they’ve taken the recommended classes. The problem for many students is math.

But math is an issue for teachers too because many educators can’t even agree on the best way to teach it.

Eleven-year old Rebecca Lucas is a modern-day ice princess. After two years of lessons, she can spin and jump. She’s also a talented student. But in the fourth grade last year, she wasn’t even sure how to subtract, let alone multiply.

Her mother, Nicole Lucas, remembers the stress.

“[There was] a lot of crying, arguing,” she recalled. “I was pushing her.”

And there was also the confusion.

Nicole said, “She would get lectures from me ‘Are you paying attention?’ ‘Why aren’t you getting this?’ And then, of course, we find out later it’s because she just didn’t know it.”

Rebecca joins countless students across the country whose lack of basic math skills may hurt their college career.

That’s why one group of fifth-graders is practicing their multiplication. Their immediate reward is a lollipop. But experts like NYU’s Dr. Sylvain Cappell say the long-term benefit is mastering the fundamentals.

“If you can put aside the technical steps and just do the calculations automatically then you can go on to advanced material,” Cappell said.

But how much emphasis should be placed on “the basics” versus lessons that emphasize conceptual thinking and self-discovery?

That question has been the subject of an almost 20-year math debate that began when the National Council of Math Teachers endorsed so-called “reform math.”

It began because of a concern about future competitiveness for tomorrow’s jobs. Reform math emphasizes hands-on learning and real-world situations.

The textbooks are heavy on story problems and light on numbers, equations, and practice sheets for kids.

“They need to become engaged. And if they don’t become engaged they don’t learn, they don’t retain it,” said Dr. Joseph Rosenstein of Rutgers University.

In the last several years, Rosenstein, the council, and others have shifted somewhat, admitting that perhaps schools should focus more on skills such as arithmetic, multiplication, and division.

But in many communities from coast to coast, the tide is turning too slowly for parents.

Those worried that reform math isn’t teaching their kids the basics are waging curriculum battles on their local turf.

One of the hottest debates might be in suburban Ridgewood, New Jersey. There, a new superintendent is taking over for a math reformer who left after protests from parents.

Opposing a math curriculum may appear straightforward on the surface. But in towns like Ridgewood the debate has become ugly. Parents here who oppose reform math refused to go on camera with us, fearing harassment or even their own personal safety.

Ridgewood police are even investigating threats against one family, the Carolls, which has publicly opposed the new math.

Kathleen Carroll said, “It’s really sad that it’s become a big deal. It’s very divisive.”

But long-time New York City math activist Elizabeth Carson says it’s no surprise that math is such a big deal.

“We’re talking about a huge industry that’s involved in this reform math, so there’s a lot of money at stake, a lot of professional careers on the line,” she said. “There’s a pride of a school system on the line.

In towns like Ridgewood, parents suspect reform math is the reason for booming tutoring businesses.

“Most of these kids are average or above average IQ that are coming to us,” said Lisa Mlinar of Huntington Learning Center. “They don’t tend to get enough of that core skill and drill. They never really master a single subject like multiplication or division before they move on to the next thing.”

Troubles with math are also surfacing on college campuses, as shown in a new survey by the college testing service act.

“Only 16 percent of the kids who took core courses in math are ready for college-level courses,” ACT’s Cyndie Schmeiser said.

Right now, remedial education costs more than a billion dollars a year.

College math professors say high school teachers are trying to cover too many different kinds of math and many students don’t even know their basic skills.

“Many of the students will use calculators in my freshman calculus classes when they really shouldn’t. They will use it to multiply two times three,” Rosenstein said.

With more jobs demanding math and science know-how, the stakes are higher than ever. That’s a main reason some math professors worry about reform math.

“There may be several generations of students who’ve been brought through that kind of curriculum who’ve been told they know math, who’ve played games with it-all of which is fine-but in the end didn’t have the skills they need to advance into the fields that need it,” New York University’s Dr. Charles Newman said.

And that may make reaching for the stars literally impossible.

Schmeiser said, “We owe them the education we promise in K through 12, and that is to be ready to go out into the world when they graduate.

show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=131313

Posted on

Keep it Green

>I didn’t realize my name would be published but it serves me right because I just said to a friend that I believed the Blog would be better served if one had to use their name. I guess I was being put to the test. Thank you for not commenting on my spelling errors! I have given packets of info regarding grass fields/turf to the council members, Bd. of Ed. members and other significant people in the community.

My goal was to inform the community about the benefits of grass fields to the athlete and the community. Many of my friends are in the sports fields because I went to Cortland many years ago. All of them prefer grass to artificial turf because of incresed temps on artificial turf, wear and tear on the athlete and now the threat of a new strain of staph infection that has crept into the sports world associated with artificial turf. However many places in the US still have the luxury of space and so are not as limited in accomodating the needs of a community.

Ridgewood was over developed and now open space is at a premium. The benefits of grass include the exchange of carbon dioixde for oxygen, natural cooling and cleaning properties to name just a few. I sat on a committee in the 80,s that looked at our fields and decided that Maple Field could benefit the entire community by placing a grass playing field in the center surrounded by natural vegetation. I feel that this was an excellent compromise and served us well for many years. I was told that Maple Field was being maintained at a cost of 11,000 dollars per year. Even if that cost had been increased 3 times to improve the field, it would be 30 years before we had spent 1,000,000 dollars { the cost of an artificial turf field]. I love the landscaping and the upgrades at Maple but if the green in the center was natural, I would be donating money instead of worrying about the consequences. I understand the increased need for fields as enrollment in sports continues to rise and we want all kids who want to participate to be able to do so. I have talked to many landscapers who tell me that the quality of new grass blends on the market are so superior to the old ones, that grass fields would be far more durable and able to handle more useage.

With the master plan being reviewed in September, it is my hope that figures will be obtained on the use of natural grass and that it will be considered. Ridgewood has always been known for its leadership in quality of life issues. Why can’t we be also known for having the finest grass playing fields in the area? I can guarentee that in the coming years, laws will mandate a better use of our natural resources. How better to show our kids how we can treat our environment with care and still not loose essential aspects of sports and recreation.

Linda McNamara

ORDER FINE ART/ STOCK PRINTS ON-LINE

Posted on

To Compost or Not to Compost

>”Composting is about creating good, healthy dirt. It is the decomposition of plant remains and other once-living materials to make an earthy, dark, crumbly substance that is excellent for adding to houseplants or enriching garden and yard soil. It can enrich gardens, improve the soil around trees and shrubs, and be used as a soil additive for house plants and planter boxes. Insects, earthworms, bacteria, and fungi help in transforming this material into compost. It is a way you can recycle your yard and kitchen wastes, and is a critical step in reducing the volume of garbage needlessly sent to landfills for disposal. Yard and food wastes make up approximately 30% of the waste stream in the United States. Composting most of these waste streams would reduce the amount of municipal wastes requiring disposal by almost one fourth. ” (Healthy Families)

Environmental Benefits

Compost use can result in a variety of environmental benefits. The following are a few of the most important benefits:

Compost enriches soils
Compost has the ability to help regenerate poor soils. The composting process encourages the production of beneficial micro-organisms (mainly bacteria and fungi) which in turn break down organic matter to create humus. Humus–a rich nutrient-filled material–increases the nutrient content in soils and helps soils retain moisture. Compost has also been shown to suppress plant diseases and pests, reduce or eliminate the need for chemical fertilizers, and promote higher yields of agricultural crops.

Compost helps cleanup (remediate) contaminated soil
The composting process has been shown to absorb odors and treat semivolatile and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including heating fuels, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and explosives. It has also been shown to bind heavy metals and prevent them from migrating to water resources or being absorbed by plants. The compost process degrades and, in some cases, completely eliminates wood preservatives, pesticides, and both chlorinated and nonchlorinated hydrocarbons in contaminated soils.

Compost helps prevent pollution
Composting organic materials that have been diverted from landfills ultimately avoids the production of methane and leachate formulation in the landfills. Compost has the ability to prevent pollutants in stormwater runoff from reaching surface water resources. Compost has also been shown to prevent erosion and silting on embankments parallel to creeks, lakes, and rivers, and prevents erosion and turf loss on roadsides, hillsides, playing fields, and golf courses.

Using compost offers economic benefits
Using compost can reduce the need for water, fertilizers, and pesticides. It serves as a marketable commodity and is a low-cost alternative to standard landfill cover and artificial soil amendments. Composting also extends municipal landfill life by diverting organic materials from landfills and provides a less costly alternative to conventional methods of remediating (cleaning) contaminated soil.
(Environmental Protection Agency)