Posted on

Reader asks Where do the two candidates that he supports stand? Are Harwin and Willet going to disavow this miscreant?

IMG 20180417 WA0001

The Jurgen letter defies belief. This pathetic peasant has chosen to attack Ridgewood’s Catholic church and a scholarship committee in town with his false allegations of bribery. Where do the two candidates that he supports stand? Are Harwin and Willet going to disavow this miscreant? Or are they content to let his lies stand, so long as those lies arn’t directed to them?
History is full of people who turned the other way and pretended not to notice falsehoods when it suited them at the moment. Falsehoods that then spread and grew like a cancer in the fabric of society. We will just have to see what sort of people Willet and Harwin really are.

20 thoughts on “Reader asks Where do the two candidates that he supports stand? Are Harwin and Willet going to disavow this miscreant?

  1. I got this in the mail, threw it right in the garbage!

  2. What is a Jurgen lettet?

  3. Mrs Sabino Valdes, your IP address has been reported to the police for using a fake name (i.e. using a real person’s name, while you are not HER).

  4. Does Harwin’s boss at Sanford Heisler Sharp LLP know Harwin supporters bash churches and charities, yet she won’t disavow? Does he know that her supporters publish lies in writing, and she let’s them fly? Does he know that she’s been told about falsehoods on her own website, but does nothing to correct? Is this the Sanford Heisler Sharp LLP style?

  5. Harwin should withdraw from this race before she embarrasses herself. What a joke.

  6. 1235 brings up a very good point. Who really is this candidate once your peel back the cute picture in the park and the fancy claims?

    Harwin holds herself out as a defender of the downtrodden, yet sits idly by as one of her supporters implies that a church in town bribed Harwin’s opponent for Village council? Seems to me she might only be a “breath of fresh air” to those without any olfactory sense.

    Yes, it is tough to break with your supporters in town, but that’s what a person of character needs to do once she discovers they have taken actions in your name that are offensive to people’s religion and charities – – and don’t claim to be a tough attorney from a tough lawfirm if you dont have the wherewithall to support your claim.

  7. She then all. It’s slander.

  8. 12:35 – your statement parallels that which was done to Mike Sedon backk in 2014. Let’s stay away from that and let their employers become engaged if they so desire.

    1. unless she works for a bunch of clueless idiots , they are going to be very disturbed by the overtly bigoted and grossly in accurate statements made in the mailer, unless of coarse Sanford Heisler Sharp LLP concurs with the anti Catholic sentiment

  9. 313 – – did Mike Seddon engage in a series of lies? Did Mike Seddon’s followers attack one of the churches in town? This is really serious, and perhaps its a reflection of our crazy world that no one is calling this for what it is – – a blatant and ugly attack on a religious group and a charity. One can’t just hurl allegations in the air without thinking them through.

    This should be no big deal for the candidate – – she can put out a statement disavowing the author of the letter and those of her followers who transmitted the letter to others or had anything to do with the letter, and she can tell them in clear and unmistaken terms that she does not want their support or their vote. But the longer she lets this sit, the longer that it festers, then its clear she is hoping to cash in on the attack, and she shoudl be called to task for that.

  10. 344 you are correct and neither Harwin or Willet will disavow because they want to win at all costs. They don’t care if the mailer is patently false. They don’t care of it’s all a lie. Willett would identify as a church choir member. Harwin the social justice lawyer married to a rabbi. The same rabbi who was recently reported as stalking a Ridgewood resident and the police had to be called. The vehicle was traced back to Rabbi Noah Fabricant.
    They are all pigs and I’m disgusted by them. Is anyone calling a temple board?

  11. 3:44 – no, Mike Sedon did none of those things. The point is, let us not go to the slime level of the Paulie A. and start engaging a candidates employer. Given Ms. Harwin’s stature as a civil rights attorney, I am sure that her employer is watching this play out as it may impact their business down the road. I don’t think any of us who support Knudsen and Sedon need to call attention to Ms. Harwin’s employer. I think they already know that her supporters have attacked a church and charity and sh’e done nothing to distance herself from this.

  12. 3:13, Harwin relies almost completely on her legal background to justify her candidacy. And it seems to be the one thing people know about her.

  13. 407 – – pullleeesse – – are you referring to some old Saturday night live skit?? Stalking a resident?? Listen, I don’t like these two candidates, and I am pained by their silence on the Hans letter, but let’s stick to reality. Proof please!

    1. the person they stalked filed a police report and is in fact a retired police officer

  14. Harwin has turned our already divided town in to one divided by religious preference and political party. Bad enough Jan Phillips and her lies brought about a non existent homophobia battle. She’s a disgrace. And Harwin is pure evil. Not to mention no one wants to have to deal with the husband of their council member. You actually have to handle things yourself girly. We aren’t in a religious facility in town. Cut the crap

  15. All- willet is here to take away votes. She knows she won’t win. Everyone does. She is here to suck away votes. Period. Don’t be fooled.
    Their hopes are in Harwin.
    Once aronsohn has her in and Roberta is back to toss money out the window they can play whatever religious games they want at town hall!!!

  16. James – – all due respect, how do you know that? what proof is there? Is this all rumors?
    If its true they are stalking people, acting inappropriate, etc., then we should all politely ask them to leave town as soon as possible. And what do people mean by stalking? its perfectly legit to troll websites, go to opposition coffees, and otherwise do your due dilgence on your opposition. Its just plain weird, if not sick, to stake out someone’s house.
    So, like to see the proof before casting any stones.

  17. There is NO comparison between what happened to Mike four years ago thanks to the Aronsohn crowd and notifying Harwin’s employer about this. I sincerely doubt that they know about it already, as someone observes above. Who wants to send an email containing the Lehmann email and a picture of both sides of the postcard to the board of her legal firm? Why not? It’s merely forwarding actual materials, not smearing somebody or lying to their boss. Let her be forced to explain or even better, lose her job. She has earned it.

    Have not seen this but have heard that Aronsohn’s lawn sports a couple of Harwin signs but nothing for Willett. Has she fallen from his graces? Even if all they’re looking for is to divert a few votes, his not supporting her looks odd.

  18. Wait. You lost me on “cute photo”. Cause….nah. Damn.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *