those of us opposed to overdevelopment are a mixed lot. You would know this if you have been at the Village meetings and part of the debate. The charge of racism is completely off base. It was something generated by the pro-development crowd last time and it simply had no basis in fact. And, as more than one person asked in response to these false arguments, are “you people” in favor of overdevelopment saying that diversity is only achieved through sub-standard housing?
Big end of game brawl yesterday btwn Hackensack and Teaneck.
Star Ledger had the story but Gannett / The Record did not.
https://highschoolsports.nj.com/news/article/3190145368422224967/melee-overshadows-hackensack-comeback-win-over-rival-teaneck-video/
And by the way, Chuck Johnson was right not to let his kids do the post-game handshake with Montclair after their supporters ran onto the field.
If there’s a race that doesn’t drive cars or use water, let’s give first refusal to them.
This is true. In most instances. Take the whole pride flag debacle. Anyone who dared say they didn’t want it hanging on village property was labeled a homophobe. When the mayor tried to consider legal ramifications, Jeff Voigt and Jan Philips went after her with cries of bigotry. It is a conversation ender. Just horrible.
10am what does singling out Hackensack Teaneck and Montclair have to do with anything? Are you saying we’re above them? That affordable housing will make fights happen? Is it something else? Hmmm
yes Alice… we are above them.
.
they know that.
we know that.
everyone knows that (even you)
.
There is a reason you chose to live here and not there…
.
You and I aren’t above anybody. I actually prefer Hackensack and Montclair to Ridgewood (not as familiar with Teaneck). You don’t know where I live, maybe I just read this blog for the bigoted entertainment ?
only bigot appears to be you