Posted on

Ridgewood council weighs costs of turf versus grass

DSCF4899

file photo Boyd Loving

Ridgewood council weighs costs of turf versus grass

AUGUST 14, 2014    LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 2014, 3:48 PM
BY LAURA HERZOG
STAFF WRITER

Artificial turf appears to cost less to maintain than grass, at least on Maple Field.

According to Village Manager Roberta Sonenfeld, an estimated $121,500 was spent maintaining the turf on Maple Field during an eight-year period from 2006 to 2014.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/ridgewood-council-weighs-costs-of-turf-versus-grass-1.1067710#sthash.qIgm1R3Q.dpuf

2 thoughts on “Ridgewood council weighs costs of turf versus grass

  1. $33,000 to maintain grass at Maple Field in 2004? Hard to believe how mowing once a week for the growing season adds up to $33,000.

  2. Major whitewash. What a fool. In office such a short time and already peddling the mayor’s trash.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *