Posted on

Ridgewood Village Council’s Push to Curtail Public Comments Silenced

0
the staff of the Ridgewood blog
Ridgewood NJ, at the June 26 Village Council meeting, Councilwoman Winograd was PUSHING to have the first public comments session permanently moved way down the agenda, Councilwoman Perron was not in attendance, but Mayor Vagianos and Councilman Weitz agreed with Winograd.  Councilwoman Lorraine Reynolds was completely opposed and clearly stated that public comments should be at the beginning and at the end, not at the middle and the end, of each meeting.  Ms. Winograd got it moved forward to be on the agenda for a vote at the July 17 Village Council Public Meeting.

On July 17, mysteriously, it was nowhere on the agenda.  After the matter was brought up by some members of the public, here is what we learned:
1. Councilwoman Winograd admitted that she quietly pulled it from the agenda following a side-bar conversation with Councilwoman Reynolds.  (THANK YOU LORRAINE REYNOLDS)
2. Councilwoman Winograd was not going to say a word about her big idea.  Why?  Because she read all the posts on The Blog about what a horrible idea it was, so unfriendly to the citizens who want their voices to be heard.  Sorry, Siobhan, you cannot sweep your ridiculous suggestion under the carpet without us knowing.  The citizens are watching you.
3. Councilman Weitz insisted on July 17 that he was fully in support of keeping the public comments at the beginning of meetings with rare exception – when in fact on June 26 he was in total agreement with Winograd’s plan.  Sorry, Evan, the citizens are watching (and listening to) you.
So public comments will remain at the beginning of the meetings, thanks to the loud and emphatic voices of the public on THE BLOG and other social media sites.
I love Wing Bikes. Use my referral link to get a discount now! http://wingbikes.refr.cc/jamesfoytlin?t=tw

30 thoughts on “Ridgewood Village Council’s Push to Curtail Public Comments Silenced

  1. LONG LIVE THE RIDGEWOOD BLOG!

    8
    1
  2. Weitz had a momentary memory lapse and denied saying something that he actually did say during a televised and recorded meeting.

    1. Leave Evan alone. He’s sleepy and can’t be expected to remember every little detail.

  3. Dumb as stumps

    1. but not as dumb as the “stumps” who voted them in.

  4. Just watched it. She was a doe in the headlights. As always.

  5. Don’t insult the doe. Deer are way smarter and kinder and they are not bigoted.

  6. Just hilarious and highlights exactly who she is.

  7. That’s why we all need Donald Trump to be back in Office freedom of speech baby, if the president can say bullshit on TV while guess what I can say bullshit anywhere I want. If they don’t like it, oh well.

    1
    3
    1. Yeah no

  8. Power to the people. She tried to hide her stupid idea. Sorry Karen – TRANSPARENCY RULES!

    4
    1
  9. This just proves the fact that they’ve lied. We can go back and watch the meetings because they are recorded. What they say and then try to backtrack on is hilarious. She wanted to expressly squench the ability to speak in public, when she herself used to get up at meetings and speak. The hypocrisy is astounding. She is not a good role model for all of those young people she is trying to mentor because lying is really a bad thing to teach a young mind. Go figure.

    1. Wow. That shows a very poor character I don’t want that kind of a person to have a say in what happens with my $$$

  10. She should just keep her mouth shut! When she starts taking who knows what is going to come out..
    Can you say train wreck 🤣🤣🤣

    1. Can she pronounce “train wreck?”

  11. She is on social media now denying that she ever did this. What an idiot.

  12. She is a complete and utter LIAR. She tries to rewrite what she said but time after time the video shows otherwise

  13. Paul running for re-election backed winograd’s move. Remember this when you all vote. He doesn’t care about the public

    1. Vagianos donated to both Winograd and Weitz’s campaign and was involved in getting them to run so that they could put the giant field over on the Schedler property. Don’t kid yourself for a minute that these bad actors didn’t have this all planned out in advance.

      1. And here we are two years later:

        -The attempted destruction of Schedler has massively failed
        -A major taxpayer funded remediation is coming for what will ultimately be a return to the 2018 plan
        -Massive class action suits are percolating even as we speak…both Schedler + Habernickel

        What an embarrassment.

        1. And Habernickle is still a mess and over run with clients of a business. Not tax payers children having fun. Very unwelcome with tents and tables by the park entrance

  14. Dead ringer for Spicoli’s sister and dumb as a stump.

  15. Here’s the issue, and it’s not about when the public’s pathetic comments are heard, whether in the beginning, middle and/or end: this administration has been perfectly transparent with you, in fact, transparent in its impatience with, and disdain for, the pro forma theatrics of these meetings.

    Your input is unnecessary. It has no bearing on what has already been decided. The only difference is this council isn’t concerned with play acting with you.

    2
    4
    1. Haha, nice try but everyone is aware that Vagianos, Winograd, Weitz and Perron are the most sneaky and devious bunch of liars around, except for Lorraine Reynolds who they probably keep out of their evil dealings. They would not know what transparacy is if it was emblazoned on the dais in writing. What a joke.

      1. And yet they keep running circles around you upstanding citizens and getting away with everything. Doesn’t speak very highly of you now does it? That just makes you a whiny, weak, ineffectual loser that’s going to keep bending over and asking for more, right little Ollie Twist?

        3
        1
  16. Why be ashamed to state that you heard the voice of the people and decided to deep six the idea? That is not a bad thing.

    2
    2
  17. Her husband should prevent her from leaving the house.

    1. And the downside for him is that she would never leave the house.

      1. So all of our woes can be traced back to the happiness of one man????

  18. Foe someone who literally never stops talking, it’s completely irony that she tried to silence the public. What a total losee and a liar. How many years are left with this dim bulb?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *