Posted on

Ridgewood Council Candidate Ramon Hache Responds to the Village Removal of His Campaign Signs

Ramon Hache ridgewood NJ

April 13,2016

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, Village council candidate Ramon Hache responds to Ridgewood blog reports yesterday that the Village’s Streets and Parks Departments were ordered to remove any campaign signs, specifically those belonging to Ramon Hache, found erected on Village owned properties.

“I am very troubled by the decision of the Village to take down my campaign signs. It is my understanding that, as of last November, there is no ordinance that prohibits them from being on village-owned properties.  Although I didn’t personally place the signs at the locations in question, I understood that my supporters were not violating any local ordinances. It is very discouraging as a candidate, but especially as a resident, that a double standard has been applied when it comes to my signage. I guess my candidacy, unlike the “Vote Yes For Parking” initiative, is not in line with the Council’s agenda.”

21 thoughts on “Ridgewood Council Candidate Ramon Hache Responds to the Village Removal of His Campaign Signs

  1. Just follow the legal regulation and you will not have a problem.

    1. yes Dom whats that ?

  2. Ridgewood has two sets of rules. One for the “connected” crowd and one for everyone else

  3. I’m guessing your right Ramon.

  4. He did follow the legal regulation. But Miss Roberta did not like looking at the signs of one of the new council,people,who will hopefully remove her from the job she has screwed up so miserably.

  5. Great response.

    Is it because they are saving the spots for Brook?

  6. Unrelated topic but did anyone in the South Pleasant area hear a gunshot this morning at about 2:20AM…?

  7. 8:42. Yep, I heard those booms, several in a row. Assumed they were firecrackers. Never heard sirens after that,

  8. Ramon is handsome, That is all that matters.

  9. So I don’t think they should remove his signs, but I think this is a ploy to make people feel bad for him. He’s totally one of them. I don’t trust the people he has advocating for him. We’ve been burned before. Where there’s smoke there’s fire.

  10. Are they going to remove the concrete planters too?

  11. Fireworks on April 13? New holiday?

  12. Ramon is absolutely not one of them.. Ramon is honest. Independent. Civil. Smart. Dedicated. None of these adjectives apply to paulalbertgwennroberta, the four headed monster.

  13. 9:08. Of course he is not one of them. If he were one of them, they would have left his signs alone.

  14. Keep telling yourself that.
    He’s one of them.
    Just wait. It will come out.

  15. You are totally falling for it- this is a trick. Pure and simple to make it look like he is being picked on by the current regime and gain sympathy because nearly everyone doesn’t trust this dude. Not a chance it’s true that they just took his signs down. No way. And he has plenty tricky people up his sleeve to come up with and execute this silliness.
    Ridiculous.

  16. From his website:
    Respecting and listening to our residents
    Protecting the character of our community from the wrong development
    Stabilizing property taxes
    Investing in water infrastructure to improve drinking water
    Improving downtown on-street parking and business relations
    Working with our police department and schools to reestablish the School Resource Officer program that will include drug and alcohol awareness
    Enhancing existing recreational facilities, fields and programs
    Establishing a working group between municipal government and schools to share services in order to reduce spending
    Sharing services with neighboring towns and the county to create efficiency and reduce costs
    Establishing a Business Improvement District to enhance and improve business development and relations and work to create a more vibrant downtown area with an improved mix of retail shops and services

    Enhancing existing recreational facilities – does that mean “no” to development of Schindler?

  17. No! He is not opposed to a 60 foot schedler field. Go ahead and ask him.

  18. Hache way better than Walsh

  19. Walsh over the bunch of them. Voight probably next. After that if we need to choose from among candidates who to some degree or another pro-Amigo, we should determine which of the bunch is the least politically dangerous and agitate in favor of electing that person.

  20. Do a write in – > Keith Killion…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *