Posted on

Village Website Pushes Height Comparison for Parking Garage

parking garage cbd

 

Village website has posted a height comparison of the garage to other building in town – No real scale

Hudson Street Parking Deck – Height Comparison

Click Here for comparison heights


10 thoughts on “Village Website Pushes Height Comparison for Parking Garage

  1. Year of construction:

    263 Franklin Avenue – 1915
    49 Cottage Place – 1895
    1 East Ridgewood Avenue – 1914
    54 East Ridgewood Avenue – 1945
    111 East Ridgewood Avenue – 1920
    18 East Ridgewood Avenue – 1914
    45 North Broad Street – 1927

    No tall buildings built in CBD since 1945.

  2. I know Roberta and the Boys are “re-writing” the code, but according to the existing B-1 Retail Business District bulk requirements “Maximum building height: 45 feet, except as provided otherwise for affordable housing developments” and “Maximum floor area ratio: 50%, except as provided otherwise for affordable housing developments” No where does it say 100% lot coverage. So now they are up to three variances at a minimum.

  3. Scaled Photo of Garazilla looks the women’s house of Detention in a Bollywood Urban renewal Saga.Shoot thisTurkey now for Humanities sake and the future taxpayers who would be saddled with this Liability no less its Urban Blight..its a Slum maker for the Out of Towners marketing plan of les restaurant-teures.A JOKE

  4. TESTIFY..WELL DONE HERR Frapz. End this boondoggle.

  5. The Village is exempt from its own zoning regulations. There will be no visit to either the Board of Adjustment, nor will there be a visit to the Planning Board.

  6. dear 5.04 PLS translate..perhaps tongue in cheek comment..otherwise we are screwed on this boondoggle,

  7. You have to Love the corner Missle Silo elevator shaft touch.Like the new kid on the block with a new set of Nikes trying to fit in with the other classic
    Architecture on the Block..REJECT ..DOES NOT PASS SMELL OR Any other reasonable test that they do your home expansion projects by VOR…the inspectors call IT lack of continuity of existing Streetscape,REJECT..THE town could send itself one of their own standard building permit rejections so beloved THEN HATED BY MANY costing taxpayers millions net for simple family room expansions IN VOR KEEP IT CLEAN VOR GOOD ENOUGH FOR PEASENTS GOOD ALSO FOR YOU..

  8. “dear 5.04 PLS translate..perhaps tongue in cheek comment..otherwise we are screwed on this boondoggle,”

    Translation: The Village can build whatever it wants to wherever it wants to without having to obtain approval from its own zoning & planning boards. The only exception would be if they were somehow adjacent to either a County or State roadway.

  9. The BOED also 6:08. Thats how they got away with the lights on the football field.

  10. Definition of a dictatorship.no public or private accountability nor exchange of views by impacted homeowners

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *