Posted on

What Some of Our Readers said about Councilwoman Siobhan Winograd’s Schedler Related U-Turn

Broken Promises Winograd

the Staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, her campaign mailer (see above) said one thing; after she was sworn in, she said the opposite.

Here’s what our readers said about the U-Turn:

“What has changed since the November election to influence the re-trade? Need to hear directly from the councilwoman on why she misled Ridgewood voters.”

“A classic case of bait and switch.”

“Her husband, for one, was sitting in the audience staring at her. Pressure is being brought to bear from the sports groups.”

“Winograd made sh*^t up and flat out lied for years. She should never have been elected.”

“This twit can’t tell the truth. I hope she gets hammered for lying to the public in public. Unfortunately it takes something like this to wake up the sleepy Ridgewood voter after the fact. These four sleaze bags have two years to ram through the developer’s agenda before the next election. This is only the opening act of the Vag’s traveling puppet show. The only thing that can save the Village is if public pressure is enough to cause the blonde dumpster fire to have a nervous breakdown.”

“She babbled on and on at Wednesday night’s meeting about why she changed her mind. The excuse she offered was a lame one at best. She should not be trusted under any circumstances. Period the end.”

“During Wednesday evening’s Village Council Workshop, Whine -O-Grad stated her support for the installation of a regulation sized football/lacrosse/soccer field, along with artificial turf and permanent field lighting at Schedler. The devil in a pink sweater. Don’t trust her ever!”

“Blondie said no Lights but put in the conduit for lights. Yeah. No lights. Sure. We believe you.”

Tell your story #TheRidgewoodblog , #Indpendentnews #information #advertise #guestpost #affiliatemarketing ,#NorthJersey #NJ , #News #localnews #bergencounty #nj #sponsoredpost #SponsoredContent #contentplacement #guestposts #linkplacement Email: Onlyonesmallvoice@gmail.com

22 thoughts on “What Some of Our Readers said about Councilwoman Siobhan Winograd’s Schedler Related U-Turn

  1. Don’t worry. Her QR code business card will save the Village from complete ruin.

    2
    3
  2. Lightning detection. She’s all over that too. What a gal.

  3. Bored Stepford wife.

    5
    3
  4. she is very difficult to look at for an extended period of time; was she in some sort of accident?

    2
    4
    1. Comments sb limited to debating or challenging polices. What does physical appearance have to with her ability to fulfill her council obligations.

      6
      3
      1. she judges everyone by there appearance , so she should be judged the same way

        3
        3
      2. Grow-up
        12,yr olds make fun of someone appearance.

        4
        1
        1. a$$kissers and enablers are far worse than dishonest candidates

          2
          2
      3. Who put you in charge of free speech?
        You’re offended if someone calls Siobhan Winograd ugly?
        And since you’re offended, they should restrict their speech?

        Well, I’m offended that you are attempting to restrict someone’s speech. According to your logic, I should be able to restrict your ability to make any comments on the blog.

        1
        5
        1. Maturity is obviously lacking. Grow up

      4. Because there is something wrong with her that’s why.
        Look into the vapid empty eyes and tell me what you see.

    2. Her face, particularly under her eyes, look bruised.

      1
      2
  5. Sheesh. These comments.

    Goes to show that while everyone grows old, not everyone grows up.

  6. She is so offensive. She is bossy and a bully on the dais. I absolutely cannot stand her. The worst.

    3
    3
  7. No need to attack her looks. It is her words and actions that are so horrifying. One must look away when she speaks.

    3
    1
  8. Momma used to say a person can’t help how they look.

  9. Wait until she makes her rounds throughout the village.

  10. Siobhan is a bully

    2
    1
  11. We do know that the mayor and council want to cut the budget, and these are some of the things that they are implementing .
    1-no more paid stipends for any employee
    2- all supervision will be working with the workers.
    3-all employees will be rotating, to fill positions that are in need of that day. Like sanitation, recycling, yard waste,
    4- no overtime, only for emergencies only.

  12. This is all great news. Definitely better than Ridgewood news, the record, the herald news,

  13. Well what a candidate says prior to an election and what they say afterwards can be a completely different story and at this point, the Camel’s nose is already under the tent. Plus isn’t her husband a sports, so it stands to reason that the priority and loyalties are evident. My question would be, is this at all legal? If her husband stands to benefit in any way, financially or otherwise, then how can she weigh in and legally opine as an elected representative of Ridgewood? I would assume, as in other legal matters, whenever there is a conflict of interest, the individual needs to recuse themselves.

    1. That’ll be the day. Mayor is the worst about this and she is his acolyte.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *