Posted on

>Flooding Reported At Village Hall – Many Ridgewood streets are closed

>Reports are being received that first floor of Village Hall is currently
taking on water (10:00PM, Sunday, 4/15/07). The Village Hall/Library
parking lot is totally flooded. Fire and Streets department personnel are
working to sandbag doors to the building and pump out as much water as they
can.

Many Ridgewood streets are closed due to flooding. The Saddle River and Ho Ho Kus Brook continue to rise. As of 9:30 PM, the Ho Ho Kus Brook was 2.15 feet above flood stage; the Saddle River was at 1.02 feet above flood stage in Ridgewood.

Posted on

>Reader Calls Fly "out on the Carpet "….

>Hey Fly..it is great to see so many people finally calling you out on the carpet. The SD recommendations will almost certainly involve recommendation for substantial renovations to BOE properties.

It is typical of you to try an find some conspiracy in any village process. The fact is that the SD recommendations are focused on all recreational resources in town. Because Ridgewood does not have adequate facilities for the BOE and all the youth programs in town to each have their own dedicated facilities, they must share facilities. Unfortunately, the RHS stadium is not in the mix of “shared” facilities. It is, by far, the most underutilized facility in town. Therefore, it may be the most costly to maintain on an annual $/usage basis. This places considerable (and unacceptable) burden on other BOE and village-owned fields in town.

If the RHS stadium and Stevens fields can be rennovated with a sythetic surface, it will be the equivalent of adding a totally new field in Ridgewood. That is how the cost/benefit ratio of such a project must be rationalized.

The promised benefits of the renovations at Maple Field have been realized beyond the most optimistic expectations. Even ardent naysayers from a year ago have acknowledged the positive impact of the Maple Field renovation. The issues that the SD recommendations will try to address MUST include BOE properties.

This is not a debate about academic vs. non-adademic plans. The SD recommendations have noting to do with the BOE academic mission. Their mandate was to evaluate and offer a proposal for long-term planning of Ridgewood active and passive RECREATIONAL resources. That’s it!

I know that you don’t think it is important to have all the facts before you rush to judgment. But, perhaps you can try…just this once…to get all the facts first, without distorting the truth.

And the Fly Strikes back…..
I know that you don’t think it is important to have all the facts before you rush to judgment. But, perhaps you can try…just this once…to get all the facts first, without distorting the truth.

FACT: SD’s study was TAXPAYER funded by a “Special Emergency Appropriation” in the amount of $42,194 approved by Village Council members on 7/19/2006.

FACT: SD’s report was received by Village Parks & Recreation Department on 2/23/07.

FACT: It is now 4/15/07. Despite repeated requests, including submission of an offical OPRA form to the Village Clerk’s office as requested by Village Attorney Matthew S. Rogers, recommendations contained in the TAXPAYER FUNDED SD report are NOT being made available for review by either the press or members of the public.

What facts am I missing?

Posted on

>Local woman works to Support our Troops

>linda+protest

Well, to celebrate my fourth week out there at the Armory, I finally put my thoughts on paper. However, I had to cut a lot as most papers only print 400 words and this is a thousand. When it is so cold and windy out there, my thoughts go out to our brave men and women who experience this and worse on a daily basis. Just let me know if you find this in one of your local papers. Did anything come out from the reporter that was there that day?

Hope you are feeling well. Oh yeah, they no longer park in the Armory parking lot

Linda

*************************************************

Dear Editor;

On March 3rd, I had the high honor to be invited as a CERT member (Citizens Emergency Response Team) to help load donated food and personal supplies to supplement the daily needs of military families whose spouses have been deployed from our National Reservist Armory in Teaneck. This event, organized by two Hasbrouck Heights residents- Tim Moots and Tom Meli in conjunction with the VFW Post 4591 and many other local volunteer organizations, was able to deliver over 500 bags of food and supplies to the sacrificial families of our brave men and women.

While there, I was told by one of the volunteers that every Wednesday from 4-6pm protesters rally at the Teaneck Armory on Liberty and Teaneck Rd. I was so outraged. I thought “I have to go protect my troops”. That Wednesday, I took my big “Thank You” sign that I usually use for Memorial Day parades and went out there to say “Thank you!” for their service and that I support our troops.

Slowly, protesters gathered. They stood on the corner, clanging bells and screaming at passing cars, “Support our Troops! Bring them home NOW!” “No more body bags”, holding signs that read “No blood for oil” and “Abort Bush” and proudly counting the dead.

I stood about 25 feet away with my back to them and facing the Armory, holding my “Thank You!” sign over my head for 2 hours.

As I silently stood in the freezing cold, they heckled me, ridiculed me and my family, demanding to know if my daughters have enlisted, etc., and even used profanities at me (You dumb s@#t!) When I responded, “Well, that is a fine way for a ‘gentleman’ to address a lady” His response was “You

f@#*@#g a – – hole!” I was flabbergasted! This is advertised as a “peace” rally?? These were senior citizens looking like aging hippies. These are the people that Congressman Rothman and other elected officials listen to??? Some men held a banner reading “www.veteransforpeace.org”. They were so cruel and hateful. Passengers leaving the buses look down, afraid they will be approached. I spoke with a lady who sounded like she was from Haiti or the Caribbean. She said that a woman from the group had shoved a paper in her face while she was waiting for her bus. The woman demanded to know if she knows what is going on in Iraq. When the lady timidly told her “no”, she said the protester cursed at her.

That day, a small old woman was waving a paper in my face demanding to know if I heard “what the generals were saying”. I tried to ignore her persistence and finally said, “I am sorry. I do not read propaganda”. She angrily stomped away hurling insults.

Here I am, an old woman, standing silently, supporting my troops, holding a “Thank You ” sign for the personnel and families coming in and out of the Armory to see, and these anti-Americans are cursing, threatening and harassing me. How do you think the children and mommies felt as they get out of their cars to go to the commissary, etc., while their brave husbands fight for our freedom, to hear the hatred spewing out of the mouths of these antagonists.

When a Reservist from the Armory came to politely request that they stay on the corner and off state-owned property they demanded to know “have you ever served!?”. When he flashed his card they demanded to know if he went to Iraq. He politely told them he had just returned. They shouted, “Well, go back!” They yell that want our ‘troops home now’ ??????

When 3 police cars came, these ‘peace activists’ verbally attacked them about their freedom of speech and screamed, demanding to know if these officers had served in the military. The police were so reserved, polite and professional, responding to complaints that they were creating a threatening environment. Isn’t this revealing their true intent to demoralize our troops and the American people?

Their actions and those politicians, such as Cong. Rothman, who support them are simply emboldening the terrorists and distributing doubt and hate through the media who blindly support these activists, holding a deaf ear to those who so support a war on terror being fought on distant shores. When I told a vet I would rather have them fight over there than here, he scoffed, saying, “they don’t have two nickels to come over here.” 9/11 anyone? There was so much more that happened. I am still in shock!

My experience going there every Wednesday dramatically exposes their intent. On the organizers’ website, https://www.unitedforpeace.org/ which also organizes those other anti-war rallies in NYC, I found their national sponsors. Here’s a few:

Young Communist League (YCL) – Uptown Chapter, Democratic Socialists of America, Pagans for Peace, Punks For Peace, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) – NY, Cabbies Against Bush, Communist Party USA, Forum of Indian Leftists – NY, House of The Goddess (HotGoddess) Center for Pagan Wombyn, International Socialist Organization (ISO) – NYC, Palestine Activist Forum of NY, KickBush.

These are wolves in sheep’s clothing. I was crying half the time to know that my precious troops have suffered this abuse in silence.

As I was putting my signs away in my car, I felt fearful as of those men came to their car parked behind mine. I was ignoring them but was prepared for confrontation. They did not recognize me. One, who was wearing our precious flag over his nasty self like a cape, was told by his friend, “Nice flag”. The guy said “yeah, it is. I’m trying to find a good one I can burn”.

Now they taunt me by my first name. I can take it. It gives me more purpose and helps take a bite out of the wet and cold. I needed that.

-“Linda”

Posted on

Ridgewood News Purposeful Misrepresentations ?

>Submitted to The Ridgewood News

To the editor:

While it is fair to say that most editors save their opinion for the
editorial pages, clearly some do not. Your article on a recently
filed civil rights lawsuit to stem the purposeful discrimination that
was proliferated against our then 12-year old daughter lacked
credibility. It provided far too many errors, of omission and
commission, which, despite efforts to suppress them, nonetheless rose
to the surface as misrepresented facts collided uncomfortably with
uninformed opinion.

This begs the question: how many times is the editor of the Ridgewood
News allowed to bend the truth without having her credibility broken?
One, five, nine? In the above mentioned article, no less than seven
errors emanated from the first few paragraphs of a hate-filled rant
against our efforts to protect rights to which all are entitled.

Some of these falsehoods even prompted one letter writer to shrill
shamelessly that we should “move” out of town, a town to which I first
moved in 1969. Since when is defending a civil right the source of
such pointed venom? Or are the “rules” just different in Ridgewood?

What concerns me, however, is that the nature and subjectivity of
these errors appear designed to be purposefully mean-spirited. One is
left to wonder at the editor’s true purpose in making them. Take for
instance the following (for clarification, I use italics for what was
stated in the original article):

“…Caitlin Alvaro had asked to play on her brother’s fifth and sixth
grade recreation-league team..”

Our daughter never asked to be on her brother’s team. She asked to be
included in the draft of boys for her grade’s recreation basketball
league, to be drafted for any team like any other player. Though she
completed the evaluation, she was later denied participation and was
removed from the draft by the Biddy organization. After the New
Jersey Division of Civil Rights became involved, Biddy eventually
assigned her to the team on which our son also played, though they
continued to deny her permission to play.

“Despite what her father said was a skillful performance in her
evaluation…”

Caitlin’s father never said such a thing. It was merely noted in the
complaint that she had successfully sunk all five of the required
baskets during that particular evaluation. It is solely the editor’s
opinion that this constituted a “skillful performance.”

“…two sides reached a settlement requiring Ridgewood Biddy
Basketball…”

There was not a settlement, monetary or otherwise, but an agreement by
Biddy to obey the law. This took place between the NJDCR and the
Ridgewood Biddy Inc. The Alvaro’s were neither present nor asked to
participate in this conference. The Ridgewood School district, a
party to the complaint, did not attend, thereby maintaining an active complaint
against them with the NJDCR. Biddy honored this agreement and so is not
a party named in this lawsuit. They allowed Caitlin to play in the
boy’s league the next two years. Her team reached the championship
game the first year, and she was honored by her teammates with the
selection to play on the all-star team this year. Teammates and other
players were always exemplary in their manner towards her.

“…Alvaro is seeking unspecified monetary compensation…pain and
suffering, while watching those games from the bench.”

Having a player sit on the bench is not against the law, nor is it a
reason for seeking compensation. That the editor would make such a
statement is totally ludicrous and misleading.

“…a history of adversarial relations with the school district.”

This characterization by the editor is selectively pejorative. It is
possible to disagree and not be adversarial; only the ignorant to presume
otherwise. District and Village officials have always and continue to
extend the utmost courtesy to our family. We return this treatment
likewise.

“…taking legal action against the board for sponsoring what they
felt was an invasive survey.”

Though later “clarified” by the editor, the purpose of this knowingly
false statement was reprehensible. Seven parents filed complaints
against the school board for the survey and three filed a federal lawsuit. Were
they also “adversarial?” My contribution was to work tirelessly toward
getting a law passed in New Jersey to prevent such an encroachment on
parental rights. The far superior and more appropriate “norms” survey
recently given in the High School was a welcome result of such
efforts.

“…include resistance to renovations at Orchard Elementary School.”

Also knowingly untrue. Our disagreement was not with renovations,
which we welcomed, but with the building of a new addition on top of
the basketball courts which parents had recently provided for our
children with money from their own pockets. What the editor did not
reveal to her readers was that I sat in her office and she looked over
our 200 signatures from parents who signed a petition asking to change
the addition’s location. She knew this was a majority position– two hundred
signatures from a population of fewer than 350 students. Her efforts to
mislead and characterize this as “adversarial” by means of singular
intent are shockingly dishonest.

So, how many times may an editor bend the truth before her
credibility is broken? Only her publisher knows.

Frances Edwards
Ridgewood