Posted on Leave a comment

So Who is Jeff Bell

unnamed-3

So Who is Jeff Bell

Jeff Bell has worked at the highest levels of American politics and public policy for over forty years. In 1978, at age 34, he became the New Jersey Republican Party nominee for U.S. Senate when he defeated four-term incumbent Clifford Case. As the first major candidate to win on the theme of tax cuts, he produced television ads for Ronald Reagan’s 1980 presidential campaign using the same message. He later worked as an advocate for the bipartisan Tax Reform Act of 1986 with Jack Kemp and Bill Bradley, the man who defeated him in the 1978 general election.

A graduate of Columbia University, Jeff went on to serve in the U.S. Army in Vietnam, where he was an intelligence advisor to the South Vietnamese infantry during the Tet offensive. Upon returning home, he joined the national presidential campaign staff of Richard Nixon in 1968 and later went to work for Ronald Reagan in 1974. He developed Governor Reagan’s first proposals for federal tax and spending reduction when Reagan ran for president in 1976. During the 1980 campaign, Jeff was elected from New Jersey as a Reagan delegate to the Republican national convention.

From 1988-2000, Jeff served as president of Lehrman Bell Mueller Cannon Inc., an economic forecasting and consulting firm. From 2000-2010, he was a principal of Capital City Partners, where he worked on promoting comprehensive immigration reform, the Bush Administration’s faith-based initiatives, and combating human trafficking, among other issues. In 2009, he was among the co-founders of the American Principles Project, a public policy organization dedicated to advancing conservative ideas derived from the principles of the American founding. As Policy Director, he headed its monetary reform initiative aimed at renewing sound money by restoring the dollar’s value in gold. He resigned from that position in February 2014 to run for U.S. Senate.

Jeff is the author of two books, The Case for Polarized Politics: Why America Needs Social Conservatism (2012), for which he was interviewed by the Wall Street Journal and Rush Limbaugh, and Populism and Elitism: Politics in the Age of Equality (1992). His articles have been published in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, Weekly Standard, National Review, and various other outlets. He has served as a fellow at Harvard’s Kennedy Institute of Politics, visiting professor at the Eagleton Institute at Rutgers University, the DeWitt Wallace Fellow in Communications at the American Enterprise Institute, and as a board member of the American Conservative Union and Campaign Finance Institute. From 1978 to 1980, he served as the president of the Manhattan Institute.

Jeff and his wife Rosalie have been married since 1983 and have three sons and one daughter ranging in ages from 19 to 28 as well as a one-year-old granddaughter.

Posted on 5 Comments

Tesla recharged: Assembly panel to take up bill to allow sales in NJ stores

tesla-model-s-electric-car-photo-post001

Tesla recharged: Assembly panel to take up bill to allow sales in NJ stores

TRENTON — A bill to allow Tesla to once again sell its electric cars from New Jersey stores is scheduled for a hearing today.

The Assembly Consumer Affairs Committee this morning plans to vote on the measure (A3216) that would allow manufacturers of zero-emission vehicles – like Tesla – to sell them at up to four stores in New Jersey.

Under the bill, Tesla – or any other company that goes into the business – would have to open up at least one service center in the state as well.

Tesla has two locations in New Jersey, in Paramus and Short Hills, but it was forced to stop selling cars directly from them in April when the Motor Vehicles Commission — made up of cabinet officials of Gov. Chris Christie’s administration and appointees — passed a rule requiring car companies sell cars through dealers, which is contrary to Tesla’s sales model.

Tesla appealed the rule change.

Christie defended the decision, saying the commission was merely following state law by requiring Tesla to go through dealers, and that it’s up to the Legislature to change it.

Jim Appleton, president of the New Jersey Coalition of Automotive Retailers, said he plans to have a statement on the bill tomorrow but that his group has yet to take a stance on it.

New Jersey customers who want to buy a car from Tesla can still purchase it online on in other states’ showrooms.  (Friedman/Star-Ledger)

https://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/06/tesla_recharged_assembly_panel_to_take_up_bill_to_allow_sales_in_nj.html#incart_river

Posted on 5 Comments

Bergen County reaches deal to bring gourmet food trucks to county parks

callahans_truck-600x399

Bergen County reaches deal to bring gourmet food trucks to county parks

JUNE 4, 2014, 6:49 PM    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2014, 11:55 PM
BY JOHN C. ENSSLIN
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD

The gourmet food truck craze has landed in the Bergen County parks.

The first trucks in what organizers hope will be a rotating caravan serving everything from Thai food to hot dogs to ice cream have set up their mobile shops at Overpeck County Park and in Paramus at the Orchard Hills Golf Course and Van Saun Park.


– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/bergen-county-reaches-deal-to-bring-gourmet-food-trucks-to-county-parks-1.1028980#sthash.hsIcTQ1X.dpuf

Posted on 1 Comment

Booker campaign ready for another battle; challenger Bell says right issue can spur an upset

unnamed-3

Booker campaign ready for another battle; challenger Bell says right issue can spur an upset

JUNE 4, 2014, 2:18 PM    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2014, 11:19 PM
BY HERB JACKSON AND MICHAEL PHILLIS
STAFF WRITERS
THE RECORD

Democrat Cory Booker made a strategic decision before last year’s special U.S. Senate election not to engage his Republican opponent Steve Lonegan, and the conservative firebrand savaged the carefully polished image Booker had built during two terms as Newark’s mayor.

Though Booker won by 11 percentage points, the margin was seen as a disappointment.

This year will be different, Booker’s campaign manager, Brendan Gill, said Wednesday.

“We don’t want to just win, want to win decisively,” Gill said. “We want to make sure, as we have been, that Cory is paying close attention to issues in the state and spending lots of time in |the state.”

Instead of facing the hard-charging Lonegan, Booker will square off for a full six-year term against the more policy-focused Jeff Bell, who won Tuesday’s primary without the support of any of the county Republican organizations, just as he did in 1978 when he defeated Sen. Clifford Case, a moderate, in that year’s primary.

Bell, 70, moved back to New Jersey in February after 30 years in Virginia, where he worked for think tanks and advocacy groups, because he couldn’t persuade policymakers to take up what he sees as the solution to the nation’s economic problems: a return to the gold standard in setting the value of the dollar.

“The congressmen I was talking to and federal candidates were afraid and unwilling to take up the issue, so I felt that there was a chance that even with limited resources, that I could communicate the issue to average voters,” Bell said Wednesday.

Unofficial results showed Bell won 30 percent of the total vote against three opponents who also struggled to get attention.

“It is possible, if you have the right issue in the right year, to upset the incumbent U.S. senator of New Jersey,” he said at a news conference in Freehold, where he was endorsed by second-place finisher Richard Pezzullo.

“In order to get this fight going, I’m going to throw all of my support behind Jeff Bell,” said Pezzullo, who had refused to concede Tuesday night as unofficial tallies showed him with about 35,000 votes to Bell’s 42,000.

Brian D. Goldberg and Murray Sabrin, who finished third and fourth, respectively, also called Wednesday for the party to unite.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/second-place-finisher-endorses-bell-in-senate-race-against-booker-1.1028840#sthash.XCDNAAV0.dpuf

Posted on Leave a comment

Where’s Cory: Zuckerberg’s bad investment in Newark schools

oprah

Where’s Cory: Zuckerberg’s bad investment in Newark schools

JUNE 5, 2014    LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2014, 1:21 AM
BY GLENN GARVIN
THE MIAMI HERALD
THE RECORD

SAMUEL JOHNSON called second marriages the triumph of hope over experience. When an Internet billionaire announces a plan to give away an additional $100 million to a second public school district after the first fritters it away without any results, I’d say it’s more like the triumph of delusion over the dead certainty that teachers’ unions and educational bureaucrats are a bottomless pit of greed.

Last week’s announcement that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, are donating $120 million to poor school districts in the San Francisco Bay Area coincidentally came a day or two after the publication of a long and horrifying piece in The New Yorker about what happened to their first attempt to wash away public education’s problems with a flood of cash.

Four years ago, Zuckerberg and his wife, convinced that the trouble with public education was that society doesn’t value it enough, put their money where their liberal ideals were, donated $100 million (a sum quickly matched by other philanthropists) to the Newark school district.

The result might be titled No Consultant, Bureaucrat or Union Goon Left Behind. Consultants took $20 million right off the top, routinely charging $1,000 a day for services like public relations, human resources and other stuff that’s been around since the beginning of corporate time but that apparently had to be reinvented for Newark.

Fifty new principals were hired in a district that already had a ratio of one administrator for every six students, double the state average. (Nearly a third of Newark’s educational bureaucrats were clerks, four times the rate of other New Jersey districts. “Even some clerks had clerks,” The New Yorker noted in awe.)

Meanwhile, the principals already onboard fought like demons to keep the district from closing their failing schools, even as students streamed out to enroll in new charter schools set up with Zuckerberg’s money.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-guest-writers/zuckerberg-s-bad-investment-in-newark-schools-1.1029705#sthash.7fFLceph.dpuf

Posted on 11 Comments

Crosswalk flags placed at busy Ridgewood intersection

unnamed-2

Crosswalk flags placed at busy Ridgewood intersection

JUNE 4, 2014    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2014, 5:57 PM
BY DARIUS AMOS
STAFF WRITER

New crosswalk flags have been installed to combat pedestrian dangers in downtown Ridgewood, and they arrived just as area roadwork and warmer temperatures have spawned an increase in vehicle and foot traffic.

A set of bright orange crossing flags has been mounted at each corner of the Franklin Avenue-North Walnut Street intersection, which is widely considered by safety officials and residents as one of the most dangerous spots for a pedestrian hoping to cross the road. Individuals are encouraged, but not required, to carry one of the flags as they traverse the intersection and replace them into the designated containers after safely crossing.

unnamed-4

Signs instructing pedestrians on the appropriate use of the flags have also been installed on site.

By carrying a flag, according to village police, pedestrians will be more visible to motorists approaching the intersection, which is neither guarded by stop signs nor controlled with a traffic signal.

The flags are also meant to remind drivers of Ridgewood’s Stop, Look, Wave: Be Safe Be Seen campaign.

unnamed-5

some adjustments still needed 

According to municipal engineer Chris Rutishauser, the village will test the usefulness of the crossing flags and, after several weeks, determine whether or not the program will expand to other intersections in the Central Business District.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/crosswalk-flags-placed-at-busy-ridgewood-intersection-1.1028971#sthash.6LeQGSU7.dpuf

Posted on 2 Comments

The American Dream is out of reach

140603051910-american-dream-poll-american-dream-620xa

The American Dream is out of reach
By Tami Luhby  

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The American Dream is impossible to achieve in this country.

So say nearly 6 in 10 people who responded to CNNMoney’s American Dream Poll, conducted by ORC International. They feel the dream — however they define it — is out of reach.

Young adults, age 18 to 34, are most likely to feel the dream is unattainable, with 63% saying it’s impossible. This age group has suffered in the wake of the Great Recession, finding it hard to get good jobs.

Younger Americans are a cause of great concern. Many respondents said they are worried about the next generation’s ability to prosper.

Some 63% of all Americans said most children in the U.S. won’t be better off than their parents. This dour view comes despite most respondents, 54%, feeling they are better off than their own parents.

The downbeat mood is not surprising, say economic mobility experts.

“The pessimism is reflective of the financial realities a lot of families are facing,” said Erin Currier, the director of the Economic Mobility Project at Pew Charitable Trusts. “They are treading water, but their income is not translating into solid financial security.”

https://money.cnn.com/2014/06/04/news/economy/american-dream/index.html

Posted on Leave a comment

Gold Star mom: ‘This guy was worth my son’s life?’

YmIu3.AuSt.91

Gold Star mom: ‘This guy was worth my son’s life?’

Sondra Andrews’ son, 2nd Lt. Darryn Andrews, is one of six soldiers killed reportedly while searching for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.

The sergeant’s return to captivity has stirred “very raw emotions.”

“It gets really hurtful when I think, this guy was worth my son’s life? My son who was patriotic? Who was a true soldier? Who defended his country with his life?” Andrews told Army Times via phone on Monday. “That guy was worth that? I don’t think so.”

Sondra Andrews said she’s “very angry” that the military didn’t contact the family before announcing Bergdahl’s recovery.

“They didn’t have enough respect for us to give us the consideration of letting us know, especially since Darryn was part of that mission,” she said. “As a mother, you’re like, ‘what else have they not told us?’ “

Within hours of Bergdahl’s disappearance, her son and his soldiers went out on foot patrols to search for him, Sondra Andrews said.

“They found his gear. They knew [he’d left],” she said. “You don’t get captured and leave your gear in neat little stacks. They knew he had walked away from his post.”

Rest of the article here:

https://www.militarytimes.com/article/20140602/NEWS/306020055/Gold-Star-mom-guy-worth-my-son-s-life-

Posted on Leave a comment

It’s income mobility that matters, not income inequality

Job_Applicants

It’s income mobility that matters, not income inequality

By John Stossel

Published June 04, 2014
FoxNews.com

“Young people are exploited!” “Income mobility is down!” “Poor people are locked into poverty!”

Those are samples of popular nonsense peddled today.

Leftist economist Thomas Piketty’s book “Capital in the Twenty-First Century” has been No. 1 on best-seller lists for weeks (with 400 pages of statistics, I assume “Capital” is bought more often than it is read). Piketty argues that investments grow faster than wages and so the rich get richer far faster than everyone else. He says we should impose a wealth tax and 80 percent taxes on rich people’s incomes.

When markets are free, poor people can move out of their income group. In America, income  mobility, which matters more than income inequality, has not really diminished.

But Piketty’s numbers mislead. It’s true that today the rich are richer than ever. And the wealth gap between rich and poor has grown. Now the top 1 percent own more assets than the bottom 90 percent!

But focusing on this disparity ignores the fact that over time, the rich and poor are not the same people. Oprah Winfrey once was on welfare. Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton was a farmhand.

When markets are free, poor people can move out of their income group. In America, income  mobility, which matters more than income inequality, has not really diminished.

Economists at Harvard and Berkeley crunched the numbers on 40 million tax returns from 1971-2012 and discovered that mobility is pretty much what The Pew Charitable Trusts reported it was 30 years ago.

Today, 64 percent of the people born to the poorest fifth of society rise out of that quintile — 11 percent rise all the way into the top quintile. Meanwhile, 8 percent born to the richest fifth fall all the way to the bottom fifth. Sometimes great wealth makes kids lazy and self-indulgent, and wrecks their lives.

Also, the rich don’t get rich at the expense of the poor (unless they steal or collude with government).

The poor got richer, too. Yes, over the last 30 years, incomes of rich people grew by more than 200 percent, but according to the Congressional Budget Office, poor people gained 50 percent.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/06/04/it-income-mobility-that-matters-not-income-inequality/

Posted on Leave a comment

Free Blood Pressure Screenings in May and June

Bike_Valley_theridgewoodblog.net_7

Free Blood Pressure Screenings in May and June

The month of May is recognized as National Stroke Awareness Month. On average, one American dies every 4 minutes from a stroke.  According to the American Stroke Association, high blood pressure is the leading cause of stroke and the most important controllable risk factor for stroke.

On select days and times during the months of May and June, various Valley Medical Group primary care locations in Bergen, Passaic and Morris counties will be offering free blood pressure screenings.

Managing blood pressure, along with cholesterol and glucose levels, is the key to preventing not only stroke but heart disease and other cardiovascular conditions.  Because high blood pressure has no symptoms and cannot be detected without being measured, it is important to be screened regularly.

There is no appointment needed for the free screening.  To find a participating Valley Medical Group practice near you and specific dates and times of the screening events, please call 1-800-637-1136, or visit www.ValleyMedicalGroup.com/Screening.

Posted on Leave a comment

Three Lessons From Primary Night

gGXr1C5Y8D0G6RSI8Tp_hh5olwrvW3q4Ep8YzCMRB-M

Three Lessons From Primary Night
Jun. 04 Election 2014, Uncategorized no comments
By Matt Rooney | The Save Jersey Blog

A few thoughts as the dust settles from Tuesday night:

(1) #NJSen: All other things being equal, targeting matters most…

Jeff Bell

We’re going to spend some time in the days ahead analyzing Jeff Bell‘s surprising U.S. Senate primary victory, Save Jerseyans, having defied conventional wisdom and won a plurality of the vote despite shunning the county convention circuit and carrying not a single line. Residual name recognition? Maybe a little. Benefiting from opponents’ mistakes? Sure, to a degree.

The most obvious explanation: solid targeting.

It’s all anecdotal, but I’ve heard from numerous reliable GOP primary voters living in different counties who reported hearing from only one candidate in their mailboxes over the past couple of weeks: Mr. Bell, a former Senate candidate and speech writer for Ronald Reagan who hasn’t resided in New Jersey for three decades prior to this instant contest but who is determined to make an issue out of monetary policy and, specifically, reviving the gold standard.

Notwithstanding institutional disadvantages (and a less-than-orthodox messaging strategy), Bell’s relatively modestly-priced targeted mail campaign apparently allowed him to win populous counties like Bergen and Morris where there wasn’t an awarded line and place a respectable second place in places like Atlantic where someone else had the line. The end result: a sub-30% win in a crowded field.

The Bell strategy likely would’ve come up short in a higher-turnout model or if any of Bell’s opponents had had real resources at their disposal but they didn’t, did they?  So there you have it…

(2) #CD12: Bridgegate – or at least Chris Christie – is a winning issue among Democrats…

Bonnie Watson Coleman

This one’s pretty simple. New FDU poll results released Primary Day found Governor Chris Christie rocking a weak but “stabilized” 44% job approval rating in New Jersey. Reading deeper, however, leads to the discovery that Democrats continue to slip away from the Governor. Only about one quarters of Democrats approve of his performance; over 60% have adopted the opposite opinion, representing a major reversal from one year ago in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.

Newly-minted CD12 nominee Bonnie Watson Coleman didn’t exactly anticipate this trend when she was forced to quit the SCI after baselessly and inappropriately calling for Chris Christie to resign. It worked for her all the same.

Oh, and that time that her major adversary told Mercer Democrats that they were her enemy? And then Mercer took her at her word and turned out 17,000 voters to defeat her? That also played a role (h/t Olivia Nuzzi).

– See more at: https://savejersey.com/2014/06/lonegan-macarthur-primary-new-jersey/#sthash.wsZrKVKG.dpuf

Posted on Leave a comment

Bridgegate Committee Zeroes In On Port Authority Mismanagement

-f18e9530d3413d0a

Port Authority Commissioner William “Pat” Schuber

Bridgegate Committee Zeroes In On Port Authority Mismanagement

Republican legislators who have been urging the Select Committee on Investigation to broaden its focus beyond the George Washington Bridge lane closures got their wish yesterday, as Democrats and Republicans alike grilled Port Authority Commissioner William “Pat” Schuber on how such an array of scandals could have beset the bistate agency.

Assemblyman John Wisniewski (D-Middlesex), the committee’s cochair, led Democrats in questioning the behind-the-scenes machinations of Port Authority staffers in orchestrating the massive 2011 toll hike, as well as the failure of Schuber and other Port Authority higher-ups to dig into the reasons for the lane closures as the Bridgegate scandal unfolded between September and January.

Meanwhile, Assemblywoman Amy Handlin (R-Monmouth) led Republicans in zeroing in on the Port Authority’s questionable payments to an architect for unsolicited work, excessive real estate holdings in Jersey City, conflict of interest policies, failure to adequately pursue reports of ethics violations, and the wisdom of doling out special grants to municipalities instead of using whatever money is available for needed airport and infrastructure repairs.

It marked the first time since the formation of the committee more than four months ago that the panel’s four Republican legislators devoted their energies not to defending the Christie administration’s response to Bridgegate and questioning the purpose of the committee, but to aggressively going after Port Authority mismanagement — which they have been arguing should be the panel’s primary focus.  (Magyar/NJSpotlight)

https://www.njspotlight.com/stories/14/06/03/bridgegate-committee-zeroes-in-on-port-authority-mismanagement/

Posted on 6 Comments

Where is the vision for the current leadership of our community?

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog.net_-1

Our future as an inclusive community

Where is the vision for the current leadership of our community? 

JUNE 2, 2014    LAST UPDATED: MONDAY, JUNE 2, 2014, 5:38 PM

Letter: Our future as an inclusive community
Martin Walker

To the editor:

Congratulations to the winning candidates of our recent council election. We are extremely fortunate to have had three such talented and committed villagers running, but I am dismayed that not one of them articulated a vision of Ridgewood’s future as an inclusive family community, one that includes and fosters all generations.

Susan Knudsen and Michael Sedon rightfully insisted that village planning must shift from ad hoc responses to individual developer’s proposals, but our village politics as a whole seems stuck in the “tail(s) wagging the dog” syndrome. Some folks don’t like taller poles, our council must respond. Other folks don’t like construction, our council must respond. Others don’t want trees cut down, our council must respond. Still others don’t want public land fully public, but instead devoted to their kid’s favorite sport … ditto.

Now we read that one Planning Board member objects to a Walnut Street downtown location for assisted living because of “traffic.” Earlier objections reported have been “height.”

When will Ridgewood ever progress beyond the “not this, not that” level of leadership in community development? At what point can we break away from Washington, DC’s politic gridlock mentality by fully acknowledging that “NO” is not a plan?

Leadership requires elaborating on and then acting on choices. The greatest level of authority in community leadership accrues to those whose vision encompasses the widest sectors of a community projected the farthest into the future. Leadership for property value enhancement via educational excellence only looks as far into the future as the high school graduation dates of our current school population.

Leadership for family-oriented community includes allowances for the possibility that babies being born into our community could live out their lives and also die here. I see no plan addressing whether or not our children should have the ability to live here at all. I see no plan addressing whether or not our Ridgewood community should even include grandparents. No plan addressing whether Ridgewood should be a place to retire to versus retiring from.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/letter-our-future-as-an-inclusive-community-1.1027823#sthash.8zWkLHY0.dpuf

Posted on 16 Comments

Half of Americans can’t afford their house

realestate_forsale_theridgewoodblog.net_13

Half of Americans can’t afford their house
June 3, 2014, 1:58 p.m. EDT

Over half of Americans (52%) have had to make at least one major sacrifice in order to cover their rent or mortgage over the last three years, according to the “How Housing Matters Survey,” which was commissioned by the nonprofit John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and carried out by Hart Research Associates. These sacrifices include getting a second job, deferring saving for retirement, cutting back on health care, running up credit card debt, or even moving to a less safe neighborhood or one with worse schools.“Affordability issues are real and a major hurdle,” says Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, an industry group. Home prices have increased 20% over the past two years while wages have barely gone up, he says. “Only by adding more new supply, via housing starts, can home prices be tamed,” Yun adds. In fact, construction of housing units has averaged around 1.5 million a year for the past five decades, he says, but it’s likely to be less than 1 million in 2014.

What’s more, at least 15% of American homeowners (or residents of 78 counties across the country) were living in housing markets where the monthly mortgage payment on a median-priced home requires more than 30% of the monthly median household income — long considered the maximum for rent/mortgage repayments. Housing costs above that threshold are “unaffordable by historic standards,” says Daren Blomquist, vice president at real estate data firm RealtyTrac. In New York county/Manhattan, mortgage payments represent 77% of the median income and in San Francisco County represents 70%.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/over-50-of-americans-struggle-with-home-affordability-2014-06-03

Posted on 4 Comments

1 in 5 Children Live in Poverty in U.S

oliver-twist-007

1 in 5 Children Live in Poverty in U.S.
June 3, 2014 – 1:09 PM
By Ali Meyer
Subscribe to Ali Meyer RSS

CNSNews.com) – One in five children under age 18, or 21.3%, are living in poverty in the United States, according to the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

In 2012, there were 15,437,000 children under 18 years old, or 21.3%, who were classified in the “below poverty” threshold, according to the Census.

“The incidence of poverty rates varies widely across the population according to age, education, labor force attachment, family living arrangements, and area of residence, among other factors. Under the official poverty definition, an average family of four was considered poor in 2012 if its pre-tax cash income for the year was below $23,492,” according to a Congressional Research Service (CRS) report entitled, Poverty in the United States: 2012.

“The Census Bureau’s poverty thresholds form the basis for statistical estimates of poverty in the United States,” reads the report.  “The thresholds reflect crude estimates of the amount of money individuals or families, of various size and composition, need per year to purchase a basket of goods and services deemed as ‘minimally adequate,’ according to the living standards of the early 1960s.”

“Persons are considered poor, for statistical purposes, if their family’s countable money income is below its corresponding poverty threshold,” the CRS states.

The Census has been tracking these data since 1959, when the percentage of children under 18 living in poverty was 26.9%. In 1964, when then-President Lyndon B. Johnson announced the War on Poverty, the percentage of children living in poverty was 22.7%. Since then until now, the percentage has decreased by only 6.2%.

“In 2012, over one in five children (21.3%) in the United States, some 15.4 million, were poor – both their poverty rate and estimated number poor were statistically unchanged from 2011,” said the CRS report.  “The lowest recorded rate of child poverty was in 1969, when 13.8% of children were counted as poor.”

https://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/1-5-children-live-poverty-us