Collapse of American Influence Recalls Disintegration of Soviet Union, Fall of France
By CONRAD BLACK, Special to the Sun | September 7, 2013
Not since the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, and prior to that the fall of France in 1940, has there been so swift an erosion of the world influence of a Great Power as we are witnessing with the United States.
The Soviet Union crumbled jurisdictionally: In 1990-1991, one country became the 16 formerly constituent republics of that country, and except perhaps for Belarus, none of them show much disposition to return to the Russian fold into which they had been gathered, almost always by brute force, over the previous 300 years.
The cataclysmic decline of France, of course, was the result of being overrun by Nazi Germany in 1940. And while it took until the return of de Gaulle in 1958 and the establishment of the Fifth Republic with durable governments and a serious currency, and the end of the Algerian War in 1962, and the addition of some other cubits to France’s stature, the largest step in its resurrection was accomplished by the Allied armies sweeping the Germans out of France in 1944.
What we are witnessing now in the United States, by contrast, is just the backwash of inept policy-making in Washington, and nothing that could not eventually be put right. But for this administration to redeem its credibility now would require a change of direction and method so radical it would be the national equivalent of the comeback of Lazarus: a miraculous revolution in the condition of an individual (President Obama), and a comparable metamorphosis (or a comprehensive replacement) of the astonishingly implausible claque around him.
Until recently, it would have been unimaginable to conceive of John Kerry as the strongman of the National Security Council. This is the man who attended political catechism classes from the North Vietnamese to memorize and repeat their accusations against his country of war crimes in Indochina, and, inter alia, ran for president in 2004 asserting that while he had voted to invade Iraq in 2003, he was not implicated in that decision because he did not vote to fund the invasion once underway. (Perhaps Thomas E. Dewey would have been an upset presidential winner in 1944 if he had proclaimed his support for the D-Day landings but advocated an immediate cut-off of funds for General Eisenhower’s armies of liberation.)
https://www.nysun.com/foreign/collapse-of-american-power-recalls-dis/88400/
This story pretends to be based in history but it is just another political dig. Comparing the collapse of the Soviet Union to America’s world influence in 2013 is beyond silly. The collapse of the Soviet Union was mainly caused by economics – agricultural costs, the buildup of the military and the lack of worker productivity. It was a failure of the Communist economic state.
The fourth paragraph of the above post does not even make a point, it just rambles.
Agree the article is a stretch but there is certainly bi-partisan concern over what’s going on with foreign policy. If Putin is the bored kid in the back of the class, Obama is the kid with a wedgie stuffed into a locker.
Mr Black hits this one out of the park the “failure generation” ie …PJ , is failing on purpose .