Posted on

Elon Musk vs. Big Government: Can Cutting Waste Save the Economy?

High time I confessed 3925367589

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Washington DC, the Department of Government Efficiency is making waves, and Washington, D.C., isn’t happy about it. The media backlash against proposed agency cuts has been swift, but I support Elon Musk’s stance on streamlining government operations.

Government Efficiency: A Promise Never Kept

For decades, politicians have promised a more efficient government, yet the federal bureaucracy has only expanded. Wasteful spending continues, with millions of taxpayer dollars funding projects that provide little to no benefit.

Take, for example, some ridiculous government-funded studies:

$118,000 to study finger snapping, inspired by Marvel villain Thanos. Conclusion? Friction impacts snap performance.

Thousands of dollars spent analyzing whether Neil Armstrong said, “One small step for man” or “a man” on the moon. The final verdict? “Ambiguity exists.”

$1.5 million allocated to researching how to improve tomato flavor. Their groundbreaking discovery? Sugar makes things taste better.

These projects don’t just waste money—they highlight the government’s chronic inability to prioritize spending.

Can Cutting Wasteful Spending Solve the Deficit?

While eliminating such frivolous spending wouldn’t erase the national deficit, targeting major subsidies and corporate welfare could make a significant impact.

🔹 Trillion-Dollar State & Local Subsidies
Chris Edwards from the Cato Institute suggests cutting over $1 trillion in subsidies to state and local governments, including funding for K-12 education, school lunches, and food stamps.

While food stamps aim to support low-income families, taxpayers are also funding junk food purchases. States aren’t even allowed to ban candy and cake from welfare programs.

🔹 Corporate Welfare: $180 Billion a Year
The federal government spends $180 billion annually subsidizing major corporations, despite no direct benefit to average taxpayers. Cutting these handouts could reduce deficit spending without impacting essential services.

🔹 Unused Government Property Worth Trillions
The federal government owns 300,000 buildings, many of which sit empty. Instead of selling them, bureaucrats let them deteriorate.

The same goes for federal land, especially in the Western U.S.. The government holds trillions of dollars in land assets but refuses to monetize them—while continuing to buy more land, like President Biden’s recent 640-acre purchase in Wyoming.

Will Trump Follow Through on Spending Cuts?

President Donald Trump has promised to cut government waste if re-elected. He’s already moved to eliminate DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs, telling federal employees “Don’t come in.”

The problem? They’re still getting paid.

Firing federal workers is incredibly difficult, and even if Trump removed every federal employee, it wouldn’t eliminate the deficit. The real issue lies in Defense, Medicare, and Social Security—areas Trump says he won’t touch.

Edwards argues that while Trump doesn’t need to eliminate the deficit in four years, he must start cutting spending to avoid economic disaster.

Regulations Are Stifling Growth

Beyond government overspending, excessive regulations slow down the private sector. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk shared a frustrating example of regulatory overreach:

🚀 SpaceX had to conduct a study to determine whether a Starship rocket launch would hit a shark.

🌊 After regulators dropped the shark concern, they then asked, “What about whales?”—wondering if an underwater explosion could damage whale hearing.

This bureaucratic red tape makes innovation needlessly difficult and slows economic growth.

The Path Forward: Less Spending, Fewer Regulations

To combat the nation’s soaring deficit, we need:

Spending cuts—starting with wasteful subsidies and corporate welfare.
Smaller government—eliminating useless agencies and excessive regulations.
More private-sector growth—allowing businesses like SpaceX to innovate without unnecessary interference.

Can Elon Musk and a potential second Trump term bring real government efficiency? We’ll have to wait and see—but one thing is certain: America can’t afford to continue on its current path.

 

Tell your story #TheRidgewoodblog , #Indpendentnews, #information, #advertise, #guestpost, #affiliatemarketing,#NorthJersey, #NJ , #News, #localnews, #bergencounty, #sponsoredpost, #SponsoredContent, #contentplacement , #linkplacement, Email: Onlyonesmallvoice@gmail.com

5 thoughts on “Elon Musk vs. Big Government: Can Cutting Waste Save the Economy?

  1. Save the economy? Not really. But, it’s vital to expose this fraud and restore the public’s faith in Government. A lot of it comes down to the control of information messaging which has been overwhelmingly Democrat. It’s insane that tax payer dollars have been spent on what is effectively leftist propaganda.

    7
    2
    1. I’m pretty sure that when they told you they were selling you the rope you were going to hang yourself with, they meant it.

      But happy to see at least Elon is getting something out of it.

      1
      1
      1. More government contracts to make him even richer.

        1
        1
        1. I hope you’re not suggesting that a public servant would use the levers of government to enrich themselves? That sounds like some crap that goes on in Mexico, NOT America.

          1. yes because when Pelosi, Obama , Schumer, Fauci , Menendez etc… do it to enrich themselves without ever having a job its OK

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *