Posted on

Economics pushes many young adults to do without cars

fast-furious-and-vin-diesel-paul-walker-178675

Economics pushes many young adults to do without cars

December 25, 2014    Last updated: Thursday, December 25, 2014, 1:21 AM
By JANET MOORE
STAR TRIBUNE |
Wire Service

MINNEAPOLIS — Consider Jake Gau a multimodal millennial.

On chillier mornings, the 25-year-old rehabilitation aide hops on the No. 30 bus in northeast Minneapolis bound for his job at the Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute in Golden Valley. On warmer days, he pedals his mountain bike westward to work.

Missing from his array of transportation options: a car. And that’s just fine with him.

Much of the millennial generation — roughly 77 million Americans born between 1983 and 2000 — is decidedly lukewarm when it comes to Americans’ century-long love affair with the automobile. They appear to prefer biking, walking, taking mass transit and sharing cars, exhibiting behavior that could have a profound effect on transportation and land-use policies for years to come.

“Transportation policy tends to be a generation behind. We’re still trying to build our grandfather’s interstate highway system,” said Phineas Baxandall, a senior analyst with the consumer group U.S. PIRG. Policymakers should not only accommodate Gen Y’s desire to drive less, but encourage it, he said.

“We’ve spent a number of years talking about millennials and how they have different sensibilities when it comes to transportation,” said Minnesota state Sen. Scott Dibble, chairman of the Senate Transportation Committee. “Now we have to respond with policy.”

https://www.northjersey.com/news/business/debt-laden-millennials-shun-cars-1.1179842

Posted on

Sorry Millennials: All Net Jobs Growth Since 2007 Has Gone to Immigrants

2681736682_887218defc_m1

Sorry Millennials: All Net Jobs Growth Since 2007 Has Gone to Immigrants
By Ryan Lovelace
December 19, 2014 11:15 AM

All of the net gains in in jobs since 2007 have gone to immigrants — both legal and illegal — according to a new report from the Center for Immigration Studies, meaning that fewer native-born Americans are working today than were at the end of 2007.

From November 2007 through November 2014, the number of employed native-born Americans has decreased more than 1.45 million, while the number of employed immigrants has risen by more than 2 million (as the immigrant population grew rapidly, too), according to data compiled by the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“Native employment has still not returned to pre-recession levels, while immigrant employment already exceeds pre-recession levels,” the report says. “Furthermore, even with recent job growth, the number of natives not in the labor force (neither working nor looking for work) continues to increase.”

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/395057/report-all-net-jobs-growth-2007-has-gone-immigrants-ryan-lovelace

Posted on

Research shows marriage is responsible for the creation of wealth – so why aren’t millennials interested?

10616364_900598819967842_9166045967351172623_n

photo by ArtChick

Research shows marriage is responsible for the creation of wealth – so why aren’t millennials interested?

Generation Screwed
By Naomi Schaefer Riley
October 20, 2014 | 7:47pm

The attitudes of millennials ­toward marriage are getting harder and harder to understand.

This is a demographic whose economic prospects have never looked good.

They are coming of age at a time when college tuition is at record levels, student debt has surpassed a trillion dollars, houses (even after the bubble popping) are unaffordable, unemployment remains stubbornly high and wages have stagnated in recent years.

It’s no wonder they’ve been nicknamed “The Screwed Generation.”

So you’d think that if research shows there is something that could be a surefire way of improving their economic lot, they would grab hold of it like a life preserver. Well, you’d be wrong.

In fact, research has shown marriage to be responsible for the significant creation of wealth — yet millennials don’t seem interested. The average age of a first marriage for men is 29 and for women it’s 27. Many are simply not marrying at all.

Almost half of children born to women under 30 are out-of-wedlock births now, according to a recent study by Child Trends, a Washington-based research group.

https://nypost.com/2014/10/20/generation-screwed/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_medium=SocialFlow

Posted on

Many parents feel spanking has its place, but doctors worry discipline can cross the line to abuse

imgres-13

Many parents feel spanking has its place, but doctors worry discipline can cross the line to abuse

SEPTEMBER 21, 2014    LAST UPDATED: SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2014, 12:29 AM
BY KARA YORIO
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORDIn study after study, as many as eight out of 10 adults in America say spanking is an appropriate form of discipline.

Suggestions for parents

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics policy, which offers guidance to pediatricians counseling parents about disciplining children:

Effective discipline has three components:

1. Provide a positive, supportive and loving relationship.

2. Use positive reinforcement.

3. When punishment is necessary, use timeouts and other alternatives to spanking or physical punishment.

The policy goes on to state:

Spanking has negative consequences and is no more effective than other forms of discipline. In fact, there’s a gray area between when spanking ends and child abuse begins.

What the studies don’t show is how people define spanking and where they believe corporal punishment of children crosses a line to abuse.

While those questions have long been quietly debated, the indictment of NFL star Adrian Peterson has raised them in a very public way, even if many of those who believe in spanking find Peterson’s alleged behavior abhorrent.

The story is well-known by now — the Minnesota Vikings running back has been indicted on child abuse charges for stuffing leaves in the mouth of his 4-year-old son and beating him with a switch — a tree branch — that left the boy with cuts and bruises all over his body.

The incident started a conversation among opponents and defenders of corporal punishment of children by their caregivers. The issue is so uncomfortable that pediatricians, who are supposed to ask parents how they discipline and if they spank their kids, rarely broach the topic.

The question hardly comes up in discussions between parents and doctors, said Dr. Howard Mazin, an attending pediatrician at Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, because of the belief it has “fallen out of favor and people don’t do it.”

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/many-parents-feel-spanking-has-its-place-but-doctors-worry-discipline-can-cross-the-line-to-abuse-1.1092799#sthash.hLfICuQI.dpuf

Posted on

Millennials aren’t listening to you. That’s a good thing.

285-KidsHeadphones

Generation Independent

Millennials aren’t listening to you. That’s a good thing.

Nick Gillespie & Emily Ekins from the October 2014 issue

There was a moment at the 2013 Grammy Awards that captured how millennials are different than Gen Xers and baby boomers, and what it all means for the future of America. After the traditional parade of side-boob-flashing songstresses and tonsorially wackadoo manchildren allegedly flouting convention in utterly predictable ways, the hipster band fun. (whose name is uncapitalized and over-punctuated) was honored with a richly deserved statuette for the catchy generational anthem “We Are Young.”

The song broke big after being featured on the hit series Glee, itself a touchstone of the millennial generation, roughly defined as those born between the beginning of the 1980s and the early ’00s. Glee is set in the sort of high school unimaginable to Americans raised on older coming-of-age fare such asHappy Days, Rock and Roll High School, or even the ultra-G-rated Saved by the Bell. OnGlee, even (especially!) the football players sing in a music club that features a paraplegic guitarist, a Down Syndrome cheerleader, and a lesbian Latina, an ensemble that would have been a punchline just a few decades ago. (As recently as 1983, U.S. Interior Secretary James Watt made headlines for joking that an advisory panel he appointed consisted of “a black, a woman, two Jews, and a cripple,” a comment that led to his resignation.)

fun.’s “We Are Young” is a smart variation on that enduring theme of pop music, the booty call. “We are young,” croons the singer to a lost or near-lost love, “So let’s set the world on fire/We can burn brighter/than the sun.” But then comes the generational twist: After vaguely alluding to “scarring” his lover through some unspecified failure, the protagonist sings: “If by the time the bar closes/And you feel like falling down/I’ll carry you home./I know that I’m not/All that you got.”

What matter of musical strangeness is this, actually acknowledging that your drunken, staggering bedmate could do better than you? “We Are Young” is a song in which the singer is a decent human being and penitent lover, an emotional designated driver rather than the standard-issue letch that has dominated the charts from your grandparents’ “Baby It’s Cold Outside” to your parents’ “Under My Thumb” to the entire hair-metal genre of the ’80s.

The 2013 Grammys, in contrast, were a millennial coming-out party for a different kind of POV. The post-racial, post-ethnic, post-American, post-heteronormative, post-everythinglikes of Rihanna and Bruno Mars and Frank Ocean and Janelle Monae and Skrillex took center stage, and the winningly metrosexual fun. took home top honors for its kinder, gentler love song.

Then came the real intergenerational shocker­, when one of the members of the group thanked his parents for letting him live at home “for a very long time.” Did Mick Jagger even have parents? Would Axl Rose have been able to pronounce the word mother, let alone thank her for letting him couch-surf? You could feel a half-century of rebellious rockers, from Jim Morrison to Joey Ramone, groaning in their graves.

Millennials, like F. Scott Fitzgerald’s rich, are different than you and me. For one thing, at around 80 million strong, they’re as big as or bigger than the baby boom—and far more populous than both Gen X (born between 1965 and 1980) and the Silent Generation (1929-1945). They are filled with what at first glance looks like contradictions: More Democratic in their voting behavior than previous generations, and yet more politically independent than any cohort in history. Worryingly unafraid of the word socialism, and yet full-bore in favor of the free market.

https://reason.com/archives/2014/08/26/generation-independent

Posted on

The surprising reason millennials won’t get hired

old_spice_on_a_horse1

The surprising reason millennials won’t get hired
Kelli B. Grant | @kelligrant
Monday, 30 Jun 2014 | 12:01 AM ETCNBC.com

Millennials are famously unemployed and underemployed, but the reason may not entirely be the so-so job market. Or gaps in their college education.

It could be their body odor.

In the Bank of America Trends in Consumer Mobility report, released Monday, surveyors asked 1,000 adults about the importance of various items in their daily lives. Among millennials, 93 percent said a smartphone was “very” or “somewhat” important, making it the most important item for that age group. Fewer—87 percent—said deodorant was of daily importance, and 91 percent, a toothbrush.

Read More Half of grads still use the Bank of Mom and Dad

<p>Prepare your graduate to be financially independent </p> <p>CNBC's Kelli Grant discusses the key things to keep in mind while preparing your graduate to become financially independent. </p>

It’s a departure from older generations. Among all adults surveyed, deodorant and smartphones were deemed equally important in daily life, at 91 percent, while the toothbrush got top ranking, with 95 percent saying it’s a daily must.

That differential stinks for grads’ employment prospects.

“Research on first impressions shows people look at not just how you comport yourself, but how you present yourself,” said Susan RoAne, author of “How to Work a Room.” Advice on job interviews often emphasizes presentable clothes and a trim haircut, but fresh breath and a clean scent are must-haves, too. (She also tells attendees of her networking presentations to skip odorous foods like onions and garlic before important interactions.)

“If people can smell you before they see you, you aren’t getting the job,” said RoAne. Slip into bad hygiene habits after getting hired, and you’re not likely to get promoted, or last in a position that involves face-to-face contact with executives or clients.

https://www.cnbc.com/id/101796300

Posted on

Millennials: Marriage Doesn’t Matter — Unless It’s My Marriage

KK-800x420

Kourtney Kardashian, who stars on her family’s reality TV show ‘Keeping Up With The Kardashians,’ is expecting another baby with her long-term partner Scott Disick. After eight years, and two kids together, Kardashian is ‘so not interested’ in getting married. (Photo: Newscom)

Millennials: Marriage Doesn’t Matter — Unless It’s My Marriage

Rachel Sheffield / @RachelSheffiel2

Millennials don’t seem to think getting married and having children is very important to society. According to a recent Pew survey, only 29 percent of 18-24-year-olds and just 35 percent of those 25-34 agree that “society is better off if people make marriage and having children a priority.”

Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean today’s young people have completely kicked marriage to the curb. It may just mean that they are less enthused about marriage at this point in their lives, as an Atlantic article points out .

In fact, another poll from 2013 shows that the majority of Millennials are interested in marriage: 75 percent are either married or want to get married. College educated and non-college educated, white and non-white alike say that they hope to marry. Data from high school seniors reported in 2011 tell a similar story. About 80 percent of these young women and 70 percent of the young men say that having a good marriage and family life are extremely important goals for them – percentages that haven’t fluctuated much since the 1970s.

But there’s a difference between wanting to be married eventually, and understanding the importance of marriage to society. Along with the Pew study, data from high school seniors taken between 2007-2010 shows that the majority believe marriage isn’t necessarily any better than living with someone or remaining single. Data from high school seniors collected between 2001 and 2004 reveals that most believe having a child prior to marriage is a worthwhile lifestyle choice or doesn’t affect anyone else.

All this underscores that today’s young adults don’t seem to understand why marriage is generally a better choice for individuals than cohabitation or having a child outside of marriage.

But there are key differences between those who are married and those who are not.

Married adults are healthier, have higher incomes and are more likely to invest. They are also more likely to actively participate in their communities through volunteering.

Children born to married parents also have key advantages. Regardless of the parents’ education level, they are far less likely to be poor. They are more likely to graduate from high school and college, avoid delinquency and drug abuse and avoid becoming single parents.

The unwed childbearing rate, however, is at an all-time high, particularly among the most disadvantaged. Marriage rates are dwindling and divorce rates are high.

Unfortunately, there is little talk of the importance of marriage in our current culture. That needs to change. This message about marriage’s importance needs to be heard — because it helps support the institution that the vast majority of Americans desire for themselves and their children.

Posted on

Millennials Plan to Vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016; Prefer Rand Paul Among Republican Candidates

10a_presvotechoice

Millennials Plan to Vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016; Prefer Rand Paul Among Republican Candidates

Emily Ekins|Jul. 17, 2014 2:55 pm

Millennials like Hillary Clinton, according to the latest Reason-Rupe poll of millennials. Among likely millennial voters, 53 percent plan to vote for her if she runs for president in 2016.[1]Even though they see themselves as closer to Republican Gov. Chris Christie on economics, they perceive to be closer to Clinton on social issues. Ultimately they are planning to vote for Clinton. There is also reason to believe that social issues are largely driving the wedge between young people and Republicans.

Part of Clinton’s popularly is undoubtedly related to her heightened name recognition. But most of the Democratic candidates asked about in the survey receive more “yes” votes than votes against them. Vice President Joe Biden comes in second with 30 percent and Elizabeth Warren with 22 percent.(Survey respondents could select more than one candidate).

https://reason.com/blog/2014/07/17/millennials-plan-to-vote-for-hillary-cl2

Posted on

Big jump in number of millennials living with parents reported


4648589201_b72312b193bbbbbb3-1

Big jump in number of millennials living with parents reported

More Americans than ever live in multigenerational households, and the number of millennials who live with their parents is rising sharply, according to a study released Thursday.

A record 57 million Americans, or 18.1% of the population, lived in multigenerational arrangements in 2012, according to the Pew Research Center. That’s more than double the 28 million people who lived in such households in 1980, the center said.

A multigenerational family is defined as one with two or more generations of adults living together.

Moving in with parents becomes more common for the middle-aged
Walter Hamilton

The sluggish job market and other factors have propelled the rise in millennials living in their childhood bedrooms.

About 23.6% of people age 25 to 34 live with their parents, grandparents or both, according to Pew. That’s up from 18.7% in 2007, just prior to the global financial crisis, and from 11% in 1980.

For the first time, a larger share of young people live in multigenerational arrangements than of Americans 85 and older.

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-more-millennials-moving-home-20140717-story.html

Posted on

Millennials Don’t Know What “Socialism” Means

stalin-genocide

Joseph Stalin estimated over 20 million people were murdered under his Socialist Rule

Millennials Don’t Know What “Socialism” Means

Emily Ekins|Jul. 16, 2014 9:14 am

Young people don’t know what socialism is.

Recent polls have suggested that millennials are far more positive to socialism than older cohorts. For instance, the Pew Research Center found that 43 percent of 18-29 year olds had a positive reaction to the word socialism, compared to 33 percent of 30-49 year olds, 23 percent of 50-64 year olds, and 14% of 65+. The older you get the more you hate socialism.

But do young people even know what socialism means?

Perhaps not. A new Reason-Rupe report on millennials finds that young people are more favorable to the word “socialism” than a government-managed economy, even though the latter is lessinterventionist. Millennials don’t like government intervention in the economy when you spell it out precisely, rather than use vague terms like “socialism.”

In fact, a 2010 CBS/New York Times survey found that when Americans were asked to use their own words to define the word “socialism” millennials were the least able to do so. According to the survey, only 16 percent of millennials could define socialism as government ownership, or some variation thereof. In contrast, 30 percent of Americans over 30 could do the same (and 57% of tea partiers, incidentally).

Millennials simply don’t know that socialism means the government owning everybody’s businesses. They don’t understand that socialism means the government owns the banks, the car companies, Uber, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, etc. They don’t even want the government taking a managerial role over the economy, let alone nationalizing private enterprise.

In fact, millennial support for a government-managed economy (32%) mirrors national favorabilitytoward the word socialism (31%). Millennial preferences may not be so different from older generations once terms are defined.

Millennials’ preferred economic system becomes more pronounced when it is described precisely. Fully 64 percent favor a free market economy over an economy managed by the government (32%), whereas 52 percent favor capitalism over socialism (42%). Language about capitalism and socialism is vague, and using these terms assumes knowledge millennials may not have acquired.

https://reason.com/blog/2014/07/16/millennials-dont-know-what-socialism-me2

Posted on

Millennials Opt for Meritocracy Over Egalitarian Society

51_compeditivebias

Millennials Opt for Meritocracy Over Egalitarian Society

Emily Ekins|Jul. 10, 2014 1:00 pm

Reason-Rupe has a new survey and report out on millennials—find the report here.

If millennials had to choose, 57 percent would rather live in a society where “wealth is distributed according to achievement” while 40 percent would prefer a “society where the gap between rich and poor is small regardless of achievement.”

The World Values Survey has asked this same question on surveys across the globe, to measure people’s preferences for a competitive/meritocratic society or an egalitarian society where incomes are more equal. American millennials are solidly in the competitive, meritocratic camp.

Economic conservatism is strongly tied to a preference for a competitive, meritocratic society and economic liberalism tied to preference for an egalitarian society. Economically conservative millennials, 79 percent prefer a competitive society, compared to 45 percent of strong economic liberals. Conversely, 53 percent of strong economic liberals prefer an egalitarian society compared to 20 percent of strong economic conservatives.

There are not many significant differences across demographic groups, but political groups do vary.

Egalitarian preferences correlate highly with attitudes toward government and the economic system. Egalitarian millennials say government should redistribute wealth (60%), say socialism is better than capitalism (51%), and prefer a larger government with more services (56%). Millennials who prefer a competitive/meritocratic system are essentially a mirror image, and say government does not have a responsibility to reduce income differences (59%), prefer capitalism over socialism (59%), and favor a smaller government (56%).

Conservatives (72%) and libertarians (83%) strongly favor a competitive/merit-based society, as do 57 percent of moderates, 49 percent of liberals, and 44 percent of progressives. Progressives and liberals are more likely to favor an egalitarian society, 54 and 50 percent respectively, as are 40 percent of moderates, 27 percent of conservatives, and 16 percent of libertarians.

https://reason.com/blog/2014/07/10/millennials-opt-for-meritocracy-over-eg2

Posted on

The $300-per-hour ‘summer planner’ for teens

Marines

humm how about the US Marines

The $300-per-hour ‘summer planner’ for teens
By Tara Palmeri
June 23, 2014 | 2:46am

Deep-pocketed parents are shelling out big bucks to make sure their kids are able to navigate one of life’s biggest hurdles — summer.

For about $300 an hour, experts will assist teens in managing their fun in the sun, all in an effort to help them craft that killer “How I Spent My Summer Vacation” essay and land a spot at a top college.

“In terms of writing his college essays, it was pretty much a slam-dunk,” said Marla Isackson, 57, of Tenafly, NJ, who hired “professional summer planner” Jill Tipograph to plan two trips for her son Josh, who now attends Yale.

“We made an investment in our child. It was important to us, and it was our priority.”

Josh spent two summers in China and used the experience to write the college essay that got him into the Ivy League school.

“When you apply to college, [they] look at a kid in his or her entirety in terms of interests and grades and standardized tests,” Isackson said. “The kids want to present themselves as a story.

“The fact that China was a part of his story, I think, made his story much more authentic and believable — who is this kid, what are his interests, what makes him tick,” she added.

https://nypost.com/2014/06/23/parents-can-hire-a-summer-planner-for-kids-at-300-per-hour/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPFacebook&utm_medium=SocialFlow

Posted on

Reader says we are in some serious trouble if this generation, the Millennial Generation, is our future

4648589201_b72312b193bbbbbb3-1

Reader says  we are in some serious trouble if this generation, the Millennial Generation, is our future.

Folks, we are in some serious trouble if this generation, the Millennial Generation, is our future. Yes, they are lovely, bright kids. However, they are just not like any previous generation of young adults who needed a little prodding into adulthood. There’s plenty of blame to go around as to why they are the way they are. You can blame growing up in the era of decadence, social media, everyone-gets-a-prize education, celebrity culture, helicopter parents, etc. Bottom line, they are narcissistic, entitled, lazy, and see absolutely nothing wrong with continuing their childhoods into their late 20s living off mom and dad. Yes, they’ll tell you that they are looking for work, but their concept of looking for work is a little web searching, emailing copies of their resumes, and then getting on with far more serious projects like updating their social media status. They aren’t really looking for work because they don’t want/need to. They don’t have the scary crap to deal with that real grown ups have when dealing with unemployment. Don’t you know that they are special? In college, they were convinced that they were going to graduate and get rich running their own blog, or starting up the equivalent of Google. For God’s sake, you really don’t expect them to get up at 6am like the rest of us and get a bus into NYC to work all day in an office do you? Having gotten into bed at 3am, such a daily schedule would simply not be a good fit.

Posted on

A Majority of Young Adults Are Having Kids Outside Marriage. Why That Hurts Kids’ Futures.

140621_Marriage_Sheffield-800x420

Kim Kardashian and Kanye West had a baby together before getting married. (Photo: Judy Eddy/WENN/Newscom)

A Majority of Young Adults Are Having Kids Outside Marriage. Why That Hurts Kids’ Futures.

Rachel Sheffield June 21, 2014

Rachel Sheffield focuses on welfare, marriage and family, and education as policy analyst in the DeVos Center for Religion & Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation.

Among young adults, first comes baby, then (maybe) comes marriage. This increasingly is the new normal.

According to a new study from Johns Hopkins University, 57 percent of mothers between 26 and 31 are unmarried when their child is born

But not all young adults are having kids outside of marriage. Instead, the key factor appears to be whether a young woman has attended college.

Among mothers without a high school degree, 63 percent of births occur outside marriage. But among college educated young women, 71 percent of births occur within marriage.

Unfortunately, these differences have consequences. “The U.S. is steadily separating into a two-caste system with marriage and education as the dividing line,” says my colleague Robert Rector.

“In the high-income third of the population, children are raised by married parents with a college education. In the bottom-income third, children are raised by single parents with a high school degree or less.”

Similarly, the authors of the Hopkins study found that “American society is moving toward two different patterns of family formation and two diverging destinies for children.”

But one of those destinies is far less promising, leaving a significant portion of the nation’s next generation with less opportunity.

Children in single-parent homes are more than five times as likely to experience poverty. That isn’t simply because of their parents’ generally lower education level. Even parents with lower levels of education are at far less risk of poverty if they are married.

Children raised by their married, biological parents have other advantages. They are more likely to graduate from high school or college, less likely to engage in delinquent behaviors and less likely to become single parents themselves.

So why do many young adults then still have children outside of marriage?

It’s not because they’re anti-marriage: Research suggests that young, single mothers are not hostile to marriage. Yet they don’t believe it is necessary to marry prior to having children. Rather than seeing marriage as a step to achieving a stable family and social mobility, they view it as a capstone that occurs after they have arrived.

Still, , young men and women don’t seem to understand the consequences of the breakdown of marriage. Thus, the first step would be to get the message out about the importance of marriage in building stable families and communities, particularly in areas where this stability is not the norm.

Additionally, leaders at every level should engage in finding ways to strengthen and maintain healthy families. Examples of this include high schools in Alabama that have taught relationship education courses to youth, the community healthy marriage initiative in Chattanooga, Tenn., that provides relationship education and other resources to couples and families, or the state healthy marriage initiative in Oklahoma that operates marriage and relationship education programs for lower-income couples.

Restoring a culture of marriage is crucial to today’s generation and to the generations they will raise. The goal for all individuals, families, churches, communities and policymakers should be to give every child–regardless of economic background–the greatest opportunity to be reared by their mother and father in a stable married relationship.

https://dailysignal.com/2014/06/21/majority-young-adults-kids-outside-marriage-hurts-kids-futures/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Posted on

Survey: Millennials Love Big Government?

voting-selfie-millennial-votef

Survey: Millennials Love Big Government?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown|May. 20, 2014 12:09 pm

Millennial Vote/FacebookLast week Youth Engagement Fund and Project New America released a new survey on millennial ideology. Millennials—roughly defined as those aged 18 to 33—are my people. I tend to stick up for us. I tend to take heart in this generation’s support for marriage equality and ending the drug war, among other things…

But holy geez Gen Y, this is a poor showing. On measures from “creating jobs” to “making college affordable” to “protecting the rights of women,” millennials overwhelmingly said they favored greater government involvement. And when asked whether they would rather have government “off their backs” or “on their side,” 59 percent of millennials voted for friendly paternalism.

For the survey, Harstad Strategic Research polled more than 2,000 18- to 31-year-olds in March and April 2014. Of course, it should be noted that Youth Engagement Fund, Project New America, and Harstad are all progressive organizations. Maybe there’s some subtle linguistic bias driving these results?

https://reason.com/blog/2014/05/20/survey-millennials-love-big-government