The late Gov. Alfred E. Driscoll, a founding father of the modern state constitution, probably would have been appalled with state Senate President Stephen Sweeney’s approach to New Jersey’s hallowed charter.
In 1947, Driscoll urged the 81 delegates who had been chosen to draft the new document to refrain from padding it with their pet legislative projects. Stick to “basic fundamental principles,” he said.
The plan by New Jersey’s largest insurance company to divide hospitals into two tiers has already angered customers and health care providers and now it has split Democratic lawmakers as the Legislature considers bills to review the move. John C. Ensslin, The Record Read more
By Brent Johnson | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
on March 03, 2016 at 8:33 PM, updated March 04, 2016 at 7:33 AM
TRENTON — Facing calls for his resignation and scrutiny over his endorsement of Donald Trump for president, Gov. Chris Christie stood at a podium for nearly two hours Thursday and answered questions about a slew of topics during a sprawling Statehouse news conference.
Here is a closer look at what he discussed:
1. His focus on New Jersey
Christie was repeatedly criticized for spending so much time out of state on his own presidential campaign. Then after endorsing Donald Trump last week and campaigning for him, af few irked Republican state lawmakers called on Christie to either get off the trail or step down.
But Christie stressed Thursday that he has been in New Jersey 19 of the 22 days since ending his White House bid. He emphasized that he will not be “a full-time surrogate for Donald Trump.” And, he said, he has “absolutely no intention” to resign.
“I am here,” he said. “I am back to work.”
Amid rumors he could be Trump’s pick for vice president or U.S. attorney general, Christie said he is “not interviewing (for) or considering any other public job” and plans to finish his second and final term as governor.
2. Why he is backing Trump
Some supporters said they felt betrayed when Christie threw his support behind Trump, whom he once said was “unfit” to be president and whom many establishment GOP members say is a danger to the party.
But Christie said he and Trump have been friends for 14 years and that the billionaire businessman and former Atlantic City casino tycoon has the best shot among the Republican field at beating Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton in the general election.
The governor added that his endorsement “doesn’t change me being serious and policy-minded and all those things.”
“But I have to make a choice,” he said. “I don’t sit on the sidelines. I don’t wait for other people to make things happen. I try to make things happen. So now I’m trying to make things happen to make sure Hillary Clinton doesn’t become president of the United States.”
3. Why his campaign failed
Christie gave several reasons for why his campaign for president failed: He couldn’t raise enough money, which made it hard to respond to attack ads in New Hampshire. There were too many candidates in the race. And there was Trump.
“If he had not been in the race,” Christie said, “I would have been the nominee.”
4. About those newspapers
Christie ‘not surprised’ at The Star-Ledger calling for his resignationGov. Chris Christie comments on his reaction to two of the state’s largest newspapers calling for his resignation. The N.J. governor held a press conference on March 2, 2016 to talk about jobs and employment in the state. (Courtesy NJTV)
Shortly after Christie’s Trump endorsement, Joseph McQuaid, the publisher of the New Hampshire Union Leader, said the governor swore to him weeks before he would not endorse the businessman. But Christie said he did not lie.
Christie said McQuaid called him two days after the governor placed sixth in the New Hampshire primary election. McQuaid wanted to know if it was true Christie was endorsing Trump that day.
“I said, ‘Absolutely not true. I am not endorsing anyone,'” the governor recalled. “It was two days after the primary.”
Christie said when he ultimately decided to throw his support behind Trump, “I knew Joe was going to mad. But I made a choice. He obviously doesn’t like Donald Trump.”
The Union Leader had endorsed Christie, but after the Trump endorsement, it retracted and declared, “Boy were we wrong.”
Christie also slammed The Star-Ledger, which called on him to resign Thursday morning. He said the paper “never supported me, my policies, or my existence.”
Star-Ledger columnist Tom Moran responded by saying the paper backed him in his 2013 re-election bid, as well as on pension reform, a property tax cap, and more.
PATERSON – As municipal employees filed out of City Hall at quitting time on Monday, one of their colleagues stood near the doorway and wished them a “Good Holiday.”
Only 453 Paterson employees hold positions the administration deems essential – mostly police officers, firefighters and sanitation collectors – and were told to come back to work on Tuesday. The rest are supposed to stay home as the budget showdown between the mayor and city council continued toward what now seems like an inevitable partial shutdown of municipal government.
The shutdown will affect school crossing guards, street-cleaning, after-school recreation programs and senior citizen services, officials said.
Paterson’s non-essential employees are in limbo and have been told to call the city’s hotline Tuesday night to find out if the council approves the mayor’s budget proposal, a move needed to allow them to resume work on Wednesday.
“I’m angry,” said Joanne Bottler, a tax search officer. “I have a sick mother I care for and losing a day’s pay is going to be a hardship.”
Posted by Laurie Ehlbeck On March 01, 2016 2 Comments
By Laurie Ehlbeck
We haven’t even made it out of the first quarter of 2016 but there is already plenty for small businesses in New Jersey to be concerned about on the upcoming legislative calendar. Senator Sweeney and Speaker Prieto seem determined to continue to challenge the economic stability of our state by introducing bills to nearly double minimum wage, mandate all employers provide sick leave and attempt to convince the voters that a pension payment must be constitutionally required. Sweeney and Prieto are creating what may ultimately amount to the most hostile session in state history in terms of damage caused to the small business community.
When it comes to minimum wage it is imperative that as a society we are honest about what it truly is. Minimum wage is not now, nor has it ever been, a vehicle in which to feed a family 4. It is an entry level wage that is earned almost exclusively by teens and young adults seeking work experience and a smooth transition into a career. Raising the minimum wage again, especially to the rate of $15 will have one direct effect. It will result in a loss of job opportunities for those seeking to expand their skill sets. It will not alleviate poverty. It will not empower the middle class. It will leave teenagers wondering what to do after school.
According to a recent study, 63 percent of workers who earn less than $9.50 per hour are the second or third earner in their family and 43 percent of these workers live in households that earn over $50,000 per year. In spite of what the proponents would have you believe, minimum wage earners are not an impoverished, disenfranchised group of struggling single mothers just trying to make ends meet. Most are teenagers from middle class families and many more are sharing the responsibility of providing for their families, not breaking under the burden of putting food on the table.
Police have charged 12 women they say work at 11 area massage parlors with prostitution offenses, Acting Bergen County Prosecutor Gurbir S. Grewal said Friday in a release.
The arrests followed a week-long undercover investigation and were made at massage parlors in seven municipalities on three separate days, Grewal said. He said that each person arrested worked as a masseuse and is accused of engaging in sex with customers.
Nine of the women are from Queens, N.Y., one is from Maryland and two are from Little Ferry, the acting prosecutor said. The arrests were made at four massage parlors in Edgewater, two in Fairview and one apiece in Wyckoff, Tenafly, River Edge, Little Ferry and South Hackensack.
The two women who reside in Little Ferry are Shunyu Pio Piao, 48, who worked at a spa in Little Ferry, and Mihwa Jang, 41, who worked at one of the Edgewater massage parlors targeted in the investigation, Grewal said, and the Maryland woman, Yougin Cho, 36, was arrested at a spa in South Hackensack.
New Jersey faced $153.5 billion in outstanding debt obligations last July, hitting a new record, according to a report released by state officials Friday.
The cost of public employee benefits, school construction and transportation projects drove the 6.9 percent, or $9.9 billion, increase for fiscal 2015.
But not all of the increase was attributed to new debt.
Treasury Department officials said New Jersey transitioned to a new accounting methodology for pension and post-retirement health benefits last year. Those bookkeeping methods, which are more stringent than what the state used previously, were designed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Growth in unfunded pension liabilities, unfunded medical benefits for retirees, and the effect of switching to the new accounting standards contributed an $8.5 billion increase in the state’s non-bonded debt.
On the other hand, New Jersey’s bonded debt rose $1.4 billion, or 3.35 percent, according to the report, led by a $755 million surge in borrowing for school construction projects and $609 million in added borrowing for the state’s troubled Transportation Trust Fund.
That fund’s borrowing authority runs out at the end of June, and Governor Christie and lawmakers have not said how it will be renewed – through more borrowing, an increase in New Jersey’s gas tax, or another method.
(Reuters) – More than 200 people treated at a New Jersey medical center may have been exposed to HIV or hepatitis B or C because of a former employee accused of tampering with drugs, the hospital said on Thursday.
Shore Medical Center in Somers Point, located on the southern New Jersey coast outside of Atlantic City, sent letters last week to 213 patients who were treated with certain intravenous medications, including morphine, between June 1, 2013 and Sept. 17, 2014.
“We have been working with public health authorities to determine if patients could have been exposed to blood-borne pathogens at Shore through contact with this employee’s blood,” said hospital spokesman Brian Cahill in a statement.
Free testing and support are being offered to the patients, the hospital said. New Jersey Health Department spokeswoman Dawn Thomas described the risk of exposure as low.
A former Westwood councilman pleaded guilty to federal charges on Wednesday, confessing that he sold phony massage therapy training certificates to women who worked as prostitutes at more than two dozen massage parlors in New Jersey.
Robert W. Miller, 67, of Westwood, who resigned from public office in 2015 after seven years of service, entered the plea in federal court in Newark to a single count of using facilities in interstate commerce to promote prostitution.
As a result of the plea, Miller could face up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine when he is sentenced by U.S. District Judge Claire C. Cecchi on May 19.
The defendant, bald and dressed in a gray pin-stripped suit, calmly answered a series of questions posed by the judge and a prosecutor during the hearing.
Miller admitted that for a fee of $500 to $2,500 he offered to provide a massage therapy training certificate, as well as a transcript listing classes taken and grades received, to customers seeking to obtain a state massage license without actually receiving the required training.
Besides creating the fraudulent documents, Miller admitted he was willing to provide them to the New Jersey Board of Massage and Bodywork Therapy on behalf of his customers.
Miller acknowledged that between 1997 and 2013 he created at least 50 training certificates containing false information about the classes completed and grades earned by applicants for massage licenses, and provided them to about 25 different massage parlors in Passaic, Hudson, Union and Middlesex counties.
Under questioning by Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark J. McCarren, Miller admitted that he knew many of the massage parlors were fronts for prostitution and that the phony documents allowed the workers to engage in prostitution under the guise of providing legitimate massage services.
The charges specifically refer to fraudulent certificates and transcripts that he provided for five women working as prostitutes at a massage parlor in Middlesex County in June 2013. The documents falsely claimed the workers had completed 650 hours of training through Miller’s RWM Associates business in order to facilitate their real work as prostitutes, authorities said.
Miller, who also served as a councilman in Ridgewood from 1996 to 1998, also admitted that he operated a purported advertising agency in Westwood, known as A.R.M. Enterprises L.L.C., that could place ads in newspapers for massage parlors using discreet wording that signaled that the massage parlor was also a house of prostitution.
Miller placed ads in local newspapers for a number of massage parlors that operated as prostitution businesses and told many of the owners that he would give them advance notice of any law enforcement investigations into prostitution activities at their businesses, according to the charges.
Miller, who was released on a $50,000 bond, and his public defender, Linda Foster, declined to comment after the hearing.
Ridgewood NJ, “Not As Good as You Think: Why Middle-Class Parents in New Jersey Should Be Concerned About Their Local Public Schools,” a report produced by the Pacific Research Institute analyzing academic performance at 1,170 Garden State public schools, says plenty of middle class suburban kids aren’t college ready!
Senate President Sweeney, Speaker Prieto, Lieutenant Governor Guadagno, members of the New Jersey State Legislature, friends, and my fellow New Jerseyans:
Today I come before you to present my budget for Fiscal Year 2017.
This is the seventh time I have presented a budget to this chamber, and I’m proud to say this for a seventh time.
This budget is balanced.
And once again it is balanced through fiscal responsibility, and not on the backs of our citizens, for the seventh straight year, this budget imposes no new taxes on the people of New Jersey.
I want to begin by saying thank you to the people of New Jersey for allowing me the great privilege of running for President of the United States.
It was the governing experience of this great state, the reforms we tackled here in New Jersey, the bi-partisan hard choices we made, and the recovery from one of the largest natural disasters in our country’s history, that I felt, prepared me for higher office.
While the result was not what I had hoped for, the experience has made me a better Governor, a better American, and a better person.
I owe that growth to the people of New Jersey and I intend to use it to make the next two years great ones for our state.
We have more work to be done here in New Jersey.
And I look forward to working together with all of you to get it done.
There are two key principles that are the foundations of the proposal I’m sharing with you today.
The first is fiscal restraint.
We’ve put New Jersey’s financial house back in order.
And we’re going to keep it that way.
The 2017 fiscal year budget calls for $34.8 billion in State appropriations.
Discretionary spending is $2 billion less than in 2008.
That means that 95% of all the growth in this budget is for pensions, government worker health benefits, and debt service.
We’ll return to that subject later.
We have showed that smart fiscal management and focusing on our real priorities allows us to do more with less.
The days of taxing and spending and wasting taxpayer money have gone to the dustbin of history where they belong.
The second principle is to continue advancing the hard reforms New Jersey needs, so we can build a stronger economy and make this State a better place to live — for our generation and the next.
These are the same principles that have underpinned everything my administration has done over the last six years and we’ve seen the results.
This budget builds upon these principles.
In it, we meet our obligations, we further our commitment to the most vulnerable, and we continue to make investments in the future.
This budget provides a pension payment that is the largest in our state’s history more than any administration ever before, contrary to the hyperbole from special interest groups.
With the State no longer forced to rely on one-shot gimmicks, non-recurring revenues are at the lowest level in more than a decade.
When we took office, one shot revenues were 13% of the state budget.
Today, they are less than 1%.
That is responsible fiscal management.
The surplus is higher than any budget proposed during the past 10 years, nearly triple the fund balance we inherited from the last Administration.
It reflects the reforms and hard-fought gains we have secured over the last six years to end waste and right the fiscal ship.
One additional example — the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.
When we took over it was billions in debt.
We have repaid the federal government, lowered taxes, and it now runs a healthy surplus, bolstered by an unemployment rate that has been nearly cut in half in the last six years.
We’re now in our sixth consecutive year of private-sector job growth, the fastest in our state in fifteen years.
Consider that for a moment: since the turn of the century, private sector job growth in New Jersey has never been stronger than it is today, in this moment, under our leadership and reforms.
If you listened to the left wing groups and some in this chamber, you would think it is just the opposite.
But facts are a stubborn thing.
The housing market has experienced double-digit growth and building permits are at their highest number in a decade.
We’ve shrunk the size of our government, and are doing more with less.
We’ve achieved historic investment in our school system, seen our crime rates drop, and have closed a state prison.
And we’ve helped thousands of people whose lives have been blighted by drug addiction to get a fresh start.
All of this progress can lead us, with continued reforms, to a strong, stable economic outlook.
With every budget that I have presented in this chamber, New Jersey has continued to advance down the path towards a future of greater justice and opportunity for all.
When it comes to making the investments we need, we’ve never hesitated.
But we’ve shown that we can live within our means.
And today, it’s important that we continue to hold our course.
Because no matter how much progress we’ve achieved, all this can still be undone.
That’s right, reversed.
The private sector job growth, reversed.
The housing market recovery, reversed.
The smaller government we have achieved, bloated once again.
We live in a time when our national economy and the global economy face new threats.
New Jersey cannot stand alone — our state has to be ready to weather the economic storms as well as the actual storms.
In the eight years before I took office, taxes and fees had been increased 115 times, making New Jersey the most heavily taxed state in the nation and placing an undue burden on residents and job-creators alike.
Since taking office, I’ve held the line on taxes.
I’ve vetoed the millionaire’s tax every time it’s come to my desk.
I vetoed a legislative proposal to increase the Corporate Business Tax.
I have vetoed five income tax increases passed by this body.
As Governor, I’ve also provided well-needed tax relief.
Last year, I raised the State earned income tax credit from 20% to 30% of the federal credit in concert with the signing of the FY16 budget.
My 2011 Business Tax Reforms have saved the business sector over $3 billion.
And by far, the broadest impact benefitting New Jersey taxpayers was our collaboration on the 2% property tax cap, which has brought property tax growth to a near halt, averaging less than 2% statewide since we passed the cap.
That compares to 7% per year in the 10 years before the law was enacted.
We are making real progress rolling back taxes that should never have been enacted in the first place.
If we stop exercising this type of fiscal restraint, if we back away from the reforms we all fought to achieve these past six years, then we’re going to go back to the bad old days.
Bureaucracy and mediocrity and wastefulness are like weeds.
You need to keep ripping them up and we know there are plenty of powerful special interests who would like to go back to the old days of giveaways on the back of our taxpayers.
We need to continue our work together and enhance the competitiveness of New Jersey.
Instead, just in the past two weeks, yet another economically irresponsible constitutional amendment was proposed by the Legislature that would mandate a near doubling of the minimum wage, which will have a chilling effect on the steady growth of our small business sector.
This proposed increase is on top of those imposed just three short years ago through, again, a constitutional amendment.
The New Jersey Business and Industry Association just released a report on out-migration from New Jersey caused by high taxes and expensive mandates.
Their study concluded that 2 million residents and $18 billion in annual income left our State over the last 10 years.
These facts are not debatable.
They come directly from internal revenue service statistics, not from the rantings of some left-wing think tank.
Are they leaving for Florida, North Carolina, and South Carolina?
Yes, their warmer climates and more inviting tax structures are tempting.
But who are the top two states we are losing citizens to?
Pennsylvania and New York.
The only thing warmer there is their lower taxes.
Those who propose higher taxes and more regulation in this chamber better look in the mirror and to our borders before they act.
62% of businesses surveyed said they would not open another location in New Jersey if they were to expand.
66% said they would not retire here.
67% said they take the estate and inheritance taxes into consideration when making business decisions.
This isn’t a hypothetical policy debate anymore, 2 million people and $18 billion have fled our State as a result of our tax structure.
It is not only older New Jerseyans.
In fact, New Jerseyans 18 to 34 years old leave more than any other age group.
We are losing both, with our antiquated and tone-deaf tax policies.
The time to act is now.
I’ve already called for repeal of the Estate Tax.
What has the legislature done?
They’ve called for yet another government mandated doubling of wages, and an amendment that will cause a $3 billion tax increase on all New Jerseyans.
Where does it end?
Some people in this room want to address the next generation of funding for the Transportation Trust Fund solely on the back of taxpayers by imposing a hike on gas prices without any discussion of tax fairness.
Never mind that we’re already one of the most heavily taxed states in the country, and excessive taxes are driving people and businesses to other states.
And never mind that my administration has repeatedly welcomed, and continues to welcome, the Legislative leadership to reach a sensible, equitable agreement on this issue.
In fact, I was ready to act last year and Democrats refused because of your mid-term elections.
That’s the fact.
The TTF was last renewed five years ago, and that authorization is expiring because that was the length of its term.
To imply that the TTF is in crisis and is suddenly and unexpectedly “running out of money” is a politically driven mischaracterization.
Remedies for any fix of the TTF cannot be made in a vacuum.
The reality is that New Jersey is fully able to support the current capital program as originally proposed in the current five-year authorization.
My administration continues to examine ways to control cash flow and make the most of every taxpayer dollar that the TTF spends.
So, while we wait for realistic proposals and for a legitimate discussion on tax fairness, not just tax hikes, my administration has been hard at work analyzing cost drivers and ways to maintain its roadways in a more cost-effective manner.
There is time to reach a reasonable agreement.
But it will need to be the right one for the hardworking taxpayers of New Jersey.
As if an isolated gas tax hike and 79% government mandated wage increase on our small businesses isn’t enough, New Jersey families and businesses continue to face the potential of another economy-killing proposed constitutional amendment, championed by some in this room, which seeks to divide our state between the government world and the real world.
The constitutional amendment mandates pension payments and places government workers ahead of every other citizen of the state in our state budget.
Approval of this amendment would place government workers:
Ahead of our students.
Ahead of our hospitals.
Ahead of the disabled.
Ahead of our seniors.
And the burden of the cost would be put on the backs of the taxpayers.
Taxpayers who do not receive anything close to these levels of benefits in their lives, would be required to pay for exactly what the public sector unions demand.
Platinum level health benefits.
Exorbitant pensions for life.
How out of line are these benefits from the real world every day New Jerseyans live in?
Take the average government worker who pays $126,000 for their pension and health benefits over 30 years.
Their return?
$2.4 Million in benefits.
This is not the real world New Jerseyans live in.
This chamber cannot divide our state between government workers with huge benefits and every day New Jersey taxpayers who not only don’t have those benefits, but also must pay for them for a privileged few.
There is an option to avoid this, our non-partisan commission has put forward a plan to save $2 billion on government worker health benefits and use it to save the pension system.
Failure to do this will raise taxes, cut municipal aid, hurt students and the disabled, and take aid from our seniors.
We can work together to avoid this.
I am ready to work with you.
Can we put aside partisanship and special interests and put all New Jerseyans first?
If we don’t, only our people will suffer.
And, if you were going to write a playbook for how to wreck the economy and divide a state, this would be it.
Pensions and health benefits already present the largest burden on our budget.
Increased pension, employee health benefits, and debt service together account for an astounding 95% of the growth of this budget.
You heard correctly, 95%.
On pensions, we are proposing to make a $1.9 billion contribution to the State’s pension funds.
This is $550 million more than last year, and in fact, it’s the largest contribution in New Jersey history.
Our overall commitment to the State pension system is bigger than any previous administration.
With this payment, my administration will have made more than $6.2 billion in pension payments.
That is nearly double the total of the last five Governors combined.
The problem is a broken system created by unsustainable giveaways, by politicians to special interests.
The reality is that continuing to bury our heads in the sand only grows the problem and diminishes those with the courage to take on this challenge.
I know you have the courage to make hard choices.
We’ve made them together in the past.
For our children and grandchildren, we simply cannot move in the wrong-headed and backwards direction of locking in platinum-plated benefits into the constitution, at the expense of hardworking, taxpaying families.
Now at the same time, I’m not willing to let gridlock and politics stop our progress on this issue.
In order for the State to be able to afford this pension payment and protect valuable priorities for the rest of our citizens, this budget calls for $250 million in savings from public employee and retiree health costs.
Through reasonable reforms such as requiring the use of generic drugs when available, modest increases in co-pays to discourage unnecessary visits, and establishing new delivery methods for primary care services, we can continue to provide quality care, but with important savings.
Absent any reforms, State costs for government worker and retiree health insurance would increase by $487 million, and at a comparable rate moving forward.
We cannot afford this.
Let me be clear, all of you cannot afford this type of spiraling growth.
Left unchecked, this will kill our ability to cover the cost of essential services that we expect of government, protecting our most vulnerable, making investments in our schools and infrastructure, attracting business, and for those who care about the future viability of their pensions — our ability to make adequate payments.
Or, it will require massive tax increases our citizens cannot sustain.
A 10% sales tax?
A 23% income tax increase?
Insanity.
These are common sense reforms that will save everyone money while still providing great coverage to employees.
As a first step, I’m looking for $250 million in savings in this budget.
Let’s talk more about what that $250 million means.
That’s $250 million in State savings, but this will help everyone.
$250 million in State savings means another $200 million in savings for local governments, school districts, and property taxpayers that fund them.
That’s real property tax relief.
And more than $100 million in savings for State and local employees, who will benefit from reduced premium sharing.
That’s less money coming out of the employee’s paycheck.
It’s a win-win-win for our citizens.
And this isn’t a pie in the sky request or experimentation.
It’s been done before, with great success here in New Jersey.
There are local governments that have already moved out of our State Health Care Plan to address the escalating costs.
They are innovating with new health plans, collaborating with their employees, and generating year over year savings.
They’ve just done this in Burlington County. We can do this statewide.
This is how we achieve the hard reforms our state needs, and put New Jersey on a sustainable path to the future.
We can continue to serve all the people of our state well, while preserving the fiscal restraint that has brought stability to our state over the last six years.
And if we do that, we can also deliver a fairer and better deal for taxpayers.
This fiscal responsibility will allow us to maintain the State’s other commitments.
My proposed budget includes over $16 billion in direct and indirect property tax relief, including $13.3 billion in school aid, $1.5 billion in municipal aid, and $1 billion in direct property taxpayer relief programs.
More than 440,000 seniors and citizens with disabilities will receive an average Homestead Benefit of $515, and more than 160,000 will receive an average Property Tax Freeze benefit of more than $1,200.
More than 200,000 other homeowners earning up to $75,000 will receive an average of more than $400 in Homestead Benefit.
We’re also going to continue working to extend our support for the most vulnerable members of our society.
We’re going to continue investing in housing assistance programs for low-income individuals as well as individuals with developmental disabilities.
Some of you in this room have begun to turn your attention to some of these issues affecting our most in-need residents.
I want to welcome you to that discussion about how we are serving the most vulnerable, those facing housing uncertainty, and how we are helping those in grips of poverty.
This year, we’re maintaining more than $17 million in State and Federal funding for the Division of Family Development’s Social Services for the Homeless Program.
We’re also committing $42 million for the State Rental Assistance Program, and more than $14 million for homelessness prevention and emergency shelters throughout New Jersey.
Because of this commitment, we have made startling progress in reducing homelessness and giving people the hand up they need to end the cycle that housing uncertainty contributes to.
In 2015, homelessness is a staggering 41% lower than it was in 2007.
From 2014 to 2015 alone, we reduced the number of homeless in New Jersey by nearly 14%.
Rates of homelessness among families with children declined by 25% in the last year.
Through a volatile and tough economic period, we protected these programs and reformed government to work better and the results have been extraordinary in helping people get off the streets.
When it comes to healthcare too, we’re making some important investments that will change and save lives.
Last month I called on this Legislature to join me in doubling down on our State’s fight against drug addiction.
We have a chance to help people beat this disease.
We have a chance to reclaim the lives of thousands of our fellow New Jerseyans.
In fact, 2015 saw the first decline in overdose deaths in four years.
That’s why we’re making a historic investment of more than $100 million in state and federal funds to extend access to care for mental health and substance use.
By providing more competitive reimbursement rates for services and providers, we have a chance to dramatically increase access to treatment.
This is the first significant Behavioral Health rate increase in more than a decade, and it’s going to make a big difference by improving critical services, getting more people into treatment earlier, and reducing the size of the burden which currently falls on Emergency Rooms.
With our highly successful Drug Court Program, we’re going to continue investing to provide mandatory treatment to more first-time, non-violent drug offenders.
My budget proposal includes funding of nearly $64 million to maintain and expand this program.
For individuals with developmental disabilities, there will be an additional $48.8 million to create community placement and services, continuing our commitment to transition individuals with developmental disabilities out of institutions and into the community, with the opportunity to live full lives among their families, friends, and neighbors.
For families, we’re providing an additional $25.8 million to support children with needs including behavioral health, substance use, and intellectual and developmental disabilities.
For women, we’re going to continue funding vital preventative and reproductive services.
We’re providing more than $15 million to support pregnant mothers and young children through the Home Visitation Program.
Over $20 million will also go towards supporting women’s services and domestic violence reduction programs.
And to invest in training our next generation of medical professionals who can deliver the world-class care that New Jerseyans deserve, we’re also making a $60 million investment in graduate medical education for New Jersey’s teaching hospitals.
Since 2010 we’ve more than tripled our funding to offset the cost of educating our doctors, and this is important to continue investing in our long-term challenges as well as the short term.
That’s why we’re also continuing to invest in improving the quality of public education.
In the last five years, we’ve changed the face of education in New Jersey.
And we’ve given more of our young people a fighting chance for the future.
This budget proposes our sixth year of historic investments in education, with $13.3 billion in direct aid to schools, and pension and health benefits payments.
I’m proposing nearly $100 million in additional K-12 school aid for New Jersey school districts, taking our total investment to more than $9 billion.
Under this plan, every single school district will have increased funding.
We’re going to continue investing in our incredibly successful charter schools system.
The number of students attending charter schools has nearly doubled during the course of my administration, and we’ve seen charter schools having a huge impact in allowing students to achieve their full potential and turn around education results for at risk communities.
For fiscal year 2017, funding will be provided to support Charter School Aid to ensure per student funding for charter schools remains steady.
Up to six new charter schools will open in the next fiscal year, supporting an additional 1,100 students.
We’re going to continue working to expand charter school opportunities for families in failing school districts.
And as I said before you last month, at my direction the Department of Education has begun to take steps to aggressively slash regulation for New Jersey charter schools and give them the tools they need to serve even more students in even greater ways.
We’re also going to continue strengthening Higher Education in New Jersey, so that all our students can reach their full potential.
Our overall Higher Education funding will be more than $2.2 billion, with steady funding for our institutions of Higher Education.
Investment in student aid programs will also continue, and we’re going to invest an extra $17.8 million in Tuition Aid Grants to bring our total funding to more than $400 million.
Grants are vital for allowing tens of thousands of New Jersey students to go to college, so this is a reasonable investment that will make a big difference for a lot of students.
We’re also going to add a fifth class to the Governor’s Urban Scholarship program, so we can support more than 600 students in targeted school districts.
Finally, let’s talk about how we’re investing in the overall management and administration of our State.
I’m pleased that today’s budget reflects our continued trend towards greater savings and efficiency, with a State workforce that is 10,000 people smaller than when I took office.
Funding for executive operations continues to remain flat.
We can all do more with less and the executive branch is leading by example.
At the same time, there are other areas of administration where we need to continue investing so all our communities have the governance they need.
So we’re also going to continue providing over $1.5 billion in Municipal Aid.
That includes more than $107 million in Transitional Aid to support cities with the biggest financial and management challenges, which will go along with providing valuable State support and expertise to promote good government and sustainable operations for local authorities.
The success of New Jersey depends on the success of all our communities.
So that’s our budget for Fiscal Year 2017.
Now for the final big question.
Will we work together to make progress for our citizens or will we just engage in partisanship?
Many of you are already focused on the next election, raising money, some spending their own money to run advertisements already.
Let me remind you, the election of our next Governor is 630 days away.
630 days.
Are we going to waste those days on partisanship and politics?
Or will you work with me to use those 630 days to help bring relief to our overburdened taxpayers?
We have made so much progress over the 2,220 days together.
Against all odds … nearly 10% unemployment when we started.
5.1% unemployment today.
$11 billion deficit when we started.
$800 Million surplus today.
7% yearly property tax increases when we started. Less than 2% average per year today.
Zero net private sector job growth in the eight years before we started.
230,000 new private sector jobs in the last six years and, this year, the best private sector job growth in 15 years.
The largest public University merger, between Rutgers and UMDNJ, in American history which previous governments had tried and failed over and over again.
Over $1.3 Billion invested in capital improvements to our colleges and universities for the first time in 30 years.
Over $24 Billion invested in our infrastructure in the last six years.
Criminal justice reform which made bail available to those who deserve it and keeps the truly violent off our streets.
Crime rates down.
Prison population down and a state prison closed.
Drug courts in every county and a new emphasis on treating this disease and saving lives.
More of our developmentally disabled in group homes and fewer in institutions.
More of our poor receiving good health care and charity care in our hospitals dramatically reduced.
A dramatic expansion of solar energy and the meeting of our 2020 clean air goals, all without taxing our citizens through the discredited Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
More money is being spent on K-12 education than anytime in history and more families being saved by charter schools in our cities than ever before.
And all of this has been done with no new state tax increases in six years, no radical expansion of government regulation and 10,000 fewer state employees.
We did all of this together in the last 2,220 days.
Regardless of our party differences.
Regardless of the relentless selfishness of the special interests.
Regardless of the constant negativity of the media.
Are we willing to do this again over the last 630 days or will we succumb to politics, selfishness, and negativity?
I am standing here to tell you I am willing to continue to fix the remaining problems.
Let’s take the next steps to insure our future.
Lower taxes to stop people leaving New Jersey.
Build infrastructure in a way that is fair to our taxpayers.
Fix our pension and health benefit system in a way that will not divide and burden our taxpayers, but will bring closer together the real world and the excesses of the government world.
I am ready to work with you if you are willing to stop the partisanship and the reckless amending of our constitution to score political points.
We can sit and reason together for the next 630 days or we can fight for the next 630 days and leave our citizens without hope.
I want to face the future with faith and hope in the people we elected and appointed to make life better.
All the problems created by people can be solved by people — and we’re the ones who have to make it happen.
Over the years I’ve also been honored to work with all of you to make good things happen in New Jersey.
We might not always agree on everything, but we’ve always been able to have the hard conversations we need to move our State forward.
Let’s do that now, and continue to invest in making New Jersey the greatest State possible for all our people.
Thank you, God Bless You, and God Bless New Jersey.
Business-lobbying organization says brain drain makes it hard for state to attract cutting-edge companies that need younger, skilled employees
New Jersey loses a portion of its senior population every year to less-expensive — and less snowy — states like Florida and North Carolina. But a new study of outmigration trends issued by the New Jersey Business & Industry Association raises new alarms about the number of so-called millennials who have also been leaving the state.
Of all the age groups in New Jersey that experienced a net loss in population from 2007 to 2014, the highest rate was among people between the ages of 18 and 34, according to the business-lobbying organization.
That brain drain hurts the overall New Jersey economy and makes it harder for the state to attract the type of companies that rely on young, skilled workers, the association said.
The new data on millennials leaving New Jersey was included in NJBIA’s broader outmigration study, which concluded that the state had a net loss of 682,062 residents between 2005 and 2014. And from 2004 to 2013, New Jersey lost $18 billion in net adjusted gross income, the NJBIA said.
The organization blamed New Jersey’s high taxes and overregulation for that loss of wealth and residents, and it offered a list of recommendations that ranged from tax reform to better workforce development and making higher education more affordable as remedies.
Independent investigators found problems with how NJ Transit runs a $100 million program to improve weather resilience after Superstorm Sandy, problems that could lead to waste, fraud and abuse, according to the state treasurer’s office.
But what those problems are — and how NJ Transit should fix them — remain unknown because the agency has declined to make the findings public, violating a state law intended to ensure transparency, say legislators.
“It certainly violates the law,” John Wisniewski, chairman of the Assembly’s transportation committee and a co-sponsor of the law, said when he learned of NJ Transit’s decision not to release the records. “It’s more than just wrong. It’s outrageous. You can’t help but wonder: What are they hiding?”
What the Top 5 States People Are Moving From Have in Common
Salim Furth / @salimfurth / January 06, 2016
Salim Furth, Ph.D., researches and explains how public policy affects economic growth as a research fellow in macroeconomics at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis.Read his research.
Americans are moving to places with affordable costs of living and strong labor markets (or good retirement communities). The top destination states of 2015could hardly be more different geographically and culturally: Oregon and South Carolina. What they have in common is that both states are relatively affordable places to live.
The data on moving comes from United Van Lines, which ranks the states based on the proportion of interstate moves that were inbound or outbound.
In Oregon, 69 percent of moves were inbound. The state with the worst ratio was New Jersey, from which 67 percent of moves were outbound.
The top five outbound states of 2015 were:
New Jersey
New York
Illinois
Connecticut
Ohio
In metro Portland, Ore., the average owner-occupied home cost $305,402 in 2013, compared to $380,420 in Seattle or a budget-busting $730,156 in San Francisco. But even in Portland there is room for improvement: Easing regulation a bit could make the average house $39,000 more affordable.
In South Carolina, homes are even cheaper, with free-market competition keeping the price of a new home close to the actual construction cost.
Where urban and suburban land use regulation is modest, builders can meet demand with new supply. In places like San Francisco and Boston that lack that flexibility, people leave despite those cities’ high wages and dynamic economies.
Moving patterns show how important cost of living is to American families. With perfect weather and a booming, high-tech economy, California ought to be the #1 destination. Instead, more moving trucks are leaving the state than entering.
The top five inbound states of 2015 were:
Oregon
South Carolina
Vermont
Idaho
North Carolina
Policymakers can lower the cost of living by removing unnecessary regulations and licensure requirements, streamlining bureaucracy, and ending protections that have been granted to favored industries.
Judges to hear arguments in Rutgers webcam spy case appeal
FEBRUARY 3, 2016, 7:50 AM LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2016, 7:51 AM
ASSOCIATED PRESS
NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — A New Jersey appeals court is set to hear arguments in the case of a former Rutgers University student convicted of spying on a roommate who later committed suicide.
Dharun Ravi in court in May.
Dharun Ravi was convicted in 2012 of bias intimidation, invasion of privacy and other crimes. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail.
Ravi secretly broadcast images online of roommate Tyler Clementi in an intimate encounter with another man. Clementi later jumped off the George Washington Bridge.