“There’s a conspiracy out there against Citi,” said Russell Forenza of Ridgewood, New Jersey, who said he owns more than 20,000 shares. Short-sellers borrow shares and sell them in anticipation of buying back at lower prices, pocketing the difference as profit.
>After Security Lapses at Newark Airport, TSA Official in Charge Promoted to HQ Post Thursday, April 21, 2011 By Edwin Mora
More than 33 million passengers moved through Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey in 2009.
(CNSNews.com) – The Transportation Security Administration appointed as a senior adviser at its D.C. headquarters an official who requested reassignment after quitting as federal security director of Newark Liberty International Airport, following a string of security lapses.
Barbara Powell, who served as TSA’s security director at the New Jersey airport since July 2007, has been promoted to the post of “senior adviser in the Office of Human Capital,” TSA said in a statement this week.
Before she left the Newark post, Powell was reportedly the subject of a blistering internal critique that found “inconsistent leadership” under her watch and “a work environment that is often fueled by fear of reprisal and retaliation.”
>AUTHOR PAULA POLACCO WILL SPEAK TO PARENTS ON MAY 2
Elementary School Librarians to Host Author Paula Polacco Parents Invited to Special Presentation on Monday, May 2
Children’s author and illustrator Paula Polacco will be visiting the district elementary schools in early May. Ms. Polacco will give a special presentation to adults on Monday, May 2, at 7:30 p.m. at George Washington Middle School. Her topic will be the heroes in her life. All district parents are invited to attend. For more information, contact Orchard School librarian Maureen LaBarr at 201-670-2730, ext. 53525 or [email protected].
I’d like to see Bergen County Clerk Kathe Donovan, fix this issue in our County Parks…from today’s letters to the Editor:
April 9 was one of the first truly beautiful spring days of the year. My family, like many others that day, took advantage of the weather and headed to Ridgewood Duck Pond, ready to rejoice in nature and to try to put the miserable winter behind us.
As expected, the park was mobbed, and parking was at a premium. Since all the lots were full, cars were lined up along one side of the road on the grass. Since we didn’t see any signs (I have since returned and found none) and since even the spots on the grass were coveted, we grabbed one. We even passed a parked police officer as we walked our dog into the bike path. We didn’t realize at the time that he was waiting to pounce on all the unsuspecting people as he watched them leave their vehicles.
I find this setup despicable. It’s a very sad day when a family, many of which are suffering from financial hardships, can’t spend a day at their “free” county park (that their taxes support) without this kind of anguish.
Cell Tower: T-Mobile’s application is a complete disregard of the Village of Ridgewood’s (Village) Master Plan and zoning ordinances
On March 23, 2011, T-Mobile Communications presented its application to the Ridgewood Board of Adjustment (Board) for numerous and significant variances to construct a 120 foot cell phone tower on a lot zoned for residential use on the corner of Barnett Place and First Street. The enormous tower would be placed only 40 feet from the house of a fellow village resident and in the immediate vicinity of other residences. T-Mobile’s application is a complete disregard of the Village of Ridgewood’s (Village) Master Plan and zoning ordinances and the granting of such an application would set a dangerous precedent in our town as to the permissible use of residential lots. We urge the Board to stand-up to T-Mobile and deny this application.
The Board should not permit a Village property owner to completely modify the legally permissible use of his or her residential property simply because the owner would like to generate rental income from a wireless carrier. This is not a legally cognizable basis for the granting of such a variance and a slippery slope that will come back to bite Village residents if granted. If these towers are built they should be placed away from residential areas on Village owned property so that the Village can generate income from the wireless carriers. Indeed, in these economic conditions, the Village could utilize additional revenue sources.
In addition, this is not the only cell tower that the telecommunications carriers will try to construct in our Village. T-Mobile and other carriers will certainly seek out other locations in the Village, possibly on residential lots, which is why it is extraordinarily important for the Board to send a clear message to T-Mobile and other wireless carriers that the Village does not permit residential lots to be used for cell phone towers. In fact, we have learned that an application by Verizon to build a cell phone tower on another location within the Village was scheduled for late April but has now been rescheduled.
The Board is entrusted by Village residents with the duty to interpret and enforce the ordinances of the Village in accordance with the Master Plan so as to preserve the Village’s integrity, character and beauty. To fulfill its duty, it must be educated by independent experts as to the true merits of T-Mobile’s application. T-Mobile’s experts should be viewed by the Board with great apprehension and skepticism. T-Mobile retains the same experts over and over again who recite a script for each zoning Board they testify before. Indeed, Mr. Ben Shidfar, T-Mobile’s first expert witness, admitted that he has testified over 70 times on behalf of T-Mobile and approximately 90% of his business is derived from T-Mobile. We urge the Board to retain its own experts so as to ensure that the testimony of T-Mobile’s experts is independent, credible and valid.
The permissible use of residential lots is a very important issue in the Village that affects all Village residents. If T-Mobile is permitted to build this tower on a residential lot, T-Mobile or another wireless carrier will surely attempt to build on another lot close to your home in the near future. Show the Board you oppose such use of residential lots and attend the next Board meeting on May 24, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. We hope to see you there.
Eric and Christen Gross on behalf of concerned residents of Barnett Place, Mulberry Street and First Street.
>Gov. Christie’s legal team tells N.J. Supreme Court to keep hands off education dollars
Published: Thursday, April 21, 2011, 8:30 AM Updated: Thursday, April 21, 2011, 5:31 PM By Chris Megerian/Statehouse Bureau
TRENTON — Back off.
That was the Christie administration’s message today to the state Supreme Court as New Jersey’s legendary battle over the state’s obligations to its poorest students was renewed in nearly two hours of arguments.
With former Supreme Court Justice Peter Verniero leading the charge, the Christie administration basically told the state’s highest court it should step aside and let the other two branches of government handle school funding.
>Ridgewood to use grant funds to bolster pedestrian safety awareness Thursday, April 21, 2011 BY MICHAEL SEDON THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS Staff Writer display story on 1 page Page 1 2 >> Ridgewood’s $31,500 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) grant award will be used for “non-infrastructure” projects to bolster safety education and encourage activities while spreading safety awareness to the village’s youth.
In 2010, there were 20 reported crashes involving 23 pedestrians; 60 percent of these incidents happened while pedestrians were outside of marked crosswalks, and nine pedestrians hit were between the ages of 5 and 21, said Ridgewood Police Capt. Jacqueline Luthcke.
By Shannon Bond in New York Published: April 21 2011 14:31 | Last updated: April 21 2011 14:31
The number of people claiming unemployment benefit stayed above 400,000 for the second week in a row, according to the latest US labour department figures.
>Christina M. Krauss : Concerned about the future of Ridgewood schools and our Tradition of Excellence
Next Wednesday, April 27th, Ridgewood voters will have the opportunity to vote for Board of Education candidates. I am prepared and committed to working diligently for Ridgewood residents and for our Village students. I am asking for your support: the support of my fellow Ridgewood residents, taxpayers, parents and all who are concerned about the future of Ridgewood schools and our Tradition of Excellence.
My decision to run for a position on the Board of Education was borne out of many years of community involvement and a sincere interest in our governing bodies and their decision making process. My background as a small business owner is the lens through which I view most issues. In order to make an informed decision, I feel all options must be investigated, potential problems thought out, spirited debate with all concerned parties engaged in and critical cost analysis (where it applies) performed. Then, and only then, can a well-reasoned conclusion be drawn. From my own experience and that of other parents I have spoken to over the years, that process is often not the norm when dealing with the BOE. For many, interaction with the Board, particularly at a public meeting, is often an anxiety-inducing encounter. Most who speak are left with a negative impression of the Board because their demeanor suggests a lack of sensitivity and engagement. Perception is reality and the current perception discourages participation. While technology and e-mail communication can be useful in responding to concerns, plain-spoken answers free of bureaucratic catch phrases would be welcome by many. It can never hurt to have an additional conversation in regard to any issue.
It is my goal, when elected to the Board of Education, to ensure taxpayers are informed about the process that results in any final decision. Whether taxpayers agree with decisions or not, at least they will be able to trust the decision makers and respect the process.
With the new master plan amendment currently being reviewed by the Village Council, opportunities will again arise for public comment. I am by no means a detractor of Valley Hospital. My children were born there and it has served my family and this community well over the years. I do, however, have serious concerns about the scope and duration of the proposal. While technological advancements and continuing facility improvement will forever be a part of the hospital’s development, the impact on the surrounding community and neighboring schools may well result in unprecedented changes to the character of our village. It is the Board’s responsibility to be mindful of the impact that a multi-phase, decades-long demolition and construction project will have on the adjacent middle school and nearby elementary school and high school. Health and environmental concerns need to be addressed well before any work takes place and the unrelenting distraction to and disruption of the children’s learning environment needs careful consideration by the Board.
Our school district has been embroiled in the controversy over the math curriculum for several years now. The math curriculum is of great concern to many families who have expressed frustration: a significant number are opting for outside tutoring. While tutoring certainly has its merits, it should not be a requirement in a district like ours with such a talented and dedicated staff. Perhaps ongoing research into the most effective program with proven results (at the lowest cost to taxpayers) bears further investigation. If the current math program is inappropriate or does not meet current standards, it must be redressed immediately in order to ensure the district prepares our students most effectively.
The issue of teacher tenure and benefit compensation is another area that residents across the state are facing currently. I believe those issues should be approached as any responsible business person would and have employees retained based on their contribution to the organization and the growth of the students in their care. Nowhere in the private sector is job security based primarily on the length of time one has been in their position. Additionally, many taxpayers’ incomes have stagnated or decreased and boards of education are going to have to find ways to be creative and do more with what they already have and the benefit compensation structure will have to reflect those changing economic realities. Many of those decisions are being crafted in Trenton now and it seems as though a restructure of the system is in order.
It is my hope that given the opportunity I will be able to facilitate a more responsive and transparent relationship between the Board and the citizens it serves. The fiscal realities we are currently faced with leave little doubt that times have changed and so to must our approach to public education. As I am not currently involved in the budget process, where the best long-term cost savings may lie is yet to be determined, but I truly believe that a new perspective will reveal options that have yet to be considered.
I look forward to serving this community as a member of the Board of Education and hope that you will allow me that privilege by casting your vote for me next Wednesday, April 27th. If anyone would like to contact me directly with questions, please e-mail to [email protected].
The Tobacco Shop of Ridgewood | 10 Chestnut Street | Ridgewood, New Jersey 07450 Phone: 201-447-2204 | Email: [email protected] Hours: Monday – Saturday 10:00AM – 5:30PM and Thursday Night 6:30PM – 8:30PM