Ridgewood Planning Board to open public comment on Valley Hospital plan
MAY 8, 2014 LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, MAY 8, 2014, 4:13 PM
BY DARIUS AMOS
STAFF WRITER
The experts are done, and the floor now belongs to the residents.
Beginning May 20, the hearing for The Valley Hospital master plan amendment proposal will be open to public comments, the penultimate phase of a process that recently passed the 14-month milestone. Each resident who speaks at the next Planning Board meeting will be afforded three minutes to offer commentary on the application and describe any potential impact that might result from the project.
Though speakers may address many topics, Planning Board Attorney Gail Price offered residents guidance on how to present their statements.
“Make it about you and your family, your thoughts and issues that affect your life in connection to the hospital,” Price said at Tuesday’s board meeting. “Those things should be personal to you, not what’s happening to your neighbor or third parties.”
At the conclusion of this week’s Valley hearing, in which municipal planner Blais Brancheau answered remaining questions regarding his March 31 report, Price and Planning Board Chairman Charles Nalbantian reviewed the hearing procedure going forward. At the May 20 meeting, which will begin at 7:30 p.m. at Ridgewood High School, the board will establish a speaking order for residents, all of whom will be sworn in prior to making their statements.
A June 2 meeting at Benjamin Franklin Middle School has already been scheduled to accommodate additional speakers.
– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/ridgewood-planning-board-to-open-public-comment-on-valley-hospital-plan-1.1012535#sthash.r4I08ttc.dpuf
Tag: Urbanization
Ridgewood Planning Board sends changes to redevelopment plan to council
Ridgewood Planning Board sends changes to redevelopment plan to council
MAY 9, 2014 LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, MAY 9, 2014, 12:31 AM
BY LAURA HERZOG
STAFF WRITER
A Planning Board discussion elicited further comments on pending amendments to the redevelopment plan for the village-owned section at the corner of North Walnut Street and Franklin Avenue.
The comments will be sent to the Ridgewood Council for review, according to Village Planner Blais Brancheau.
“We’re just going to send them a letter,” Brancheau said. “If the council reads the comments and says, ‘Let’s change it,’ they could.”
The council has already discussed amendments to a previous redevelopment plan, drafted by Brancheau with the help of the Planning Board. A second reading is expected at a council meeting on May 14.
The Planning Board approved its amended plan for council introduction in March. Those amendments include some added allowable uses, including an assisted-living facility, which could be incorporated into a parking garage structure. Allowing this use in the plan would not guarantee that an assisted-living facility would be built at that location. It would, however, allow the village to consider any assisted-living developers’ proposals that might come in, should the village adopt the amendments and draft a request for proposal (RFP).
Assisted living has been proposed by several developers for that location, ever since a presentation on a facility, with ground floor retail, was made last June to the council by Kensington Senior Development. The firm also offered to build a parking garage nearby.
The original redevelopment plan was created in 2007, following a village resolution labeling the area “in need of redevelopment.” The plan includes several objectives for the redevelopment. Primarily, the village is seeking to establish a parking garage, and secondarily, it is looking to encourage more retail in that location (which may be incorporated into the garage structure at street level).
An RFP was drafted for that plan, but the council rejected every consequent proposal, prompting the need for a reinvigorated look at the plan.
– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/changessent-to-council-1.1012667#sthash.i6S1DHNx.dpuf
Hawthorne sets a new era of smaller-scale business development along two thoroughfares
Hawthorne sets a new era of smaller-scale business development along two thoroughfares
MAY 7, 2014, 8:17 PM LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, MAY 7, 2014, 8:24 PM
BY MINJAE PARK
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD
HAWTHORNE — The door was already shut on Wal-Mart coming to town, but borough officials — at the urging of opponents of the planned supermarket — locked it for good measure on Wednesday night.
Wal-Mart announced in March 2013 it would scrap plans to bring a supermarket to Wagaraw Road after its application was met with fierce resistance from some residents, who argued the supermarket undercut community aspirations for a better development suitor.
On Wednesday night, the council — which had argued Walmart would bring in much-needed tax ratables — unanimously adopted a zoning ordinance that forecloses the possibility of any big-box developments returning to a stretch of Wagaraw Road, including the 8.6-acre lot where Wal-Mart planned to locate.
The vote follows a series of public hearings on the ordinance that borough officials and Walmart opponents alike said were productive.
“This new ordinance was negotiated with extensive public input and without a pending project to shape it,” said Joe Osborne, president of Hawthorne Deserves Better, the non-profit that led the charge against Wal-Mart. “That’s how it should be. We’re very pleased.”
Mayor Richard Goldberg said, “I don’t know anybody who’s not happy with what we’re doing.”
“All in all, it should be a win-win for all the residents in the borough,” he said.
The ordinance is aimed at making it “a little easier for businesses to open up,” Goldberg said, by establishing two new business districts on parts of Goffle and Wagaraw roads. Officials hope the districts will attract bakeries, electronics stores, grocery stores, restaurants, offices, health clubs and other businesses.
The new ordinance is expected to end the lawsuit against the borough, the developer and the Planning Board brought by Hawthorne Deserves Better, which had claimed previous zoning ordinances, dating to 2000, had been adopted without public notice, and that a 2011 ordinance was adopted to benefit the Wal-Mart project.
– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/hawthorne-sets-a-new-era-of-smaller-scale-business-development-along-two-thoroughfares-1.1011111#sthash.prpzv4cs.dpuf
Planning Board Special Public Meetings – May 6
Planning Board Special Public Meetings – May 6
PLANNING BOARD
AMENDMENT TO MEETING SCHEDULE
Special Public Meetings: Tuesday, May 6, 2014
In accordance with the provisions of the “Open Public Meetings Act,” please be advised that the Planning Board has scheduled a special public meeting for Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. in the auditorium at the Benjamin Franklin Middle School, 335 North Van Dien Ave., Ridgewood, NJ.
The Board may take official action during this Work and Public Meeting at which time the Board will:
• Continue the public hearing on the proposed H-Hospital Zone amendment to the Master Plan.
• Continue the public hearing concerning a proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan Element of the Master Plan which would recommend changes in zone district classifications and boundaries within the Central Business District and surrounding area including AH-2, B-3-R, C-R and C Zone Districts.
All meetings of the Ridgewood Planning Board (i.e., official public meetings, work session meetings, pre-meeting assemblies and special meetings) are public meetings which are always open to members of the general public.

![]()
Readers continue to question Gail Prices Objectivity
Readers continue to question Gail Prices Objectivity
On top of this conflict of interest, she is clearly not impartial and has allowed Valley and its disgraceful attorney to call all of the procedural shots.
It’s time to demand better.

![]()
Reader says Planning Board Proceedings are a “Sham”
Reader says Planning Board Proceedings are a “Sham”

![]()
Amendments to the redevelopment plan for the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Area
Amendments to the redevelopment plan for the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Area.
PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE/AGENDA
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Village Hall Court Room – 7:00 P.M.
(all timeframes and the order of agenda items below are approximate and subject to change)
1. 7:00 p.m.- Call to Order, Statement of Compliance, Flag Salute, Roll Call – In accordance with the provisions of Section 10:4-8d of the Open Public Meetings Act, the date, location, and time of the commencement of this meeting is reflected in a meeting notice, a copy of which schedule has been filed with the Village Manager and the Village Clerk, The Ridgewood News and The Record newspapers, and posted on the bulletin board in the entry lobby of the Village municipal offices at 131 North Maple Avenue, and on the Village website, all in accordance with the provisions of the Open Public Meetings Act.
Roll call: Aronsohn, Bigos, Pucciarelli, Nalbantian, Hurley, Reilly, Joel, Dockray, Peters
2. 7:05 p.m. – 7:15 p.m. – Public Comments on Topics not Pending Before the Board
3. 7:15 p.m. – 7:20 p.m. – Correspondence Received by the Board
4. 7:20 p.m. – 9:15 p.m. – Mr. & Mrs. George Halwagy, 313 West Glen Ave., Block 1607, Lot 3 – Minor Subdivision application (Underlying Remand Proceeding) – Continued from April 15, 2014
5. 9:15 p.m. – 9:45 p.m. – Scherrer Enterprises, LLC, 160-166 S. Broad St., Block 3905, Lots 4 & 5 – Clarification of conditions of approval and timing of permits and certificate of occupancy.
6. 9:45 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. – Discussion re: Referral of Ordinance #3411 – Amendments to the redevelopment plan for the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Area.
7. 10:00 p.m. – 10:05 p.m. – Approval of Minutes – October 29, 2013
8. 10:05 p.m. – 10:15 p.m. – Executive Session if needed
9. Adjournment
In accordance with the Open Public Meetings Act, all meetings of the Ridgewood Planning Board (i.e., official public meetings, work sessions, pre-meeting assemblies and special meetings) are public meetings, which are always open to members of the general public.
Members: Mayor Paul Aronsohn, Nancy Bigos, Councilman Pucciarelli, Charles Nalbantian, Morgan Hurley, Kevin Reilly, Richard Joel, Wendy Dockray, Michele Peters
Professional Staff: Blais L. Brancheau, Planner; Gail L. Price, Esq., Board Attorney; Christopher J. Rutishauser, Village Engineer; Jane Wondergem, Board Secretary

![]()
Ridgewood Planning Board Continue public hearing on the proposed H-Hospital Zone amendment
Ridgewood Planning Board Continue public hearing on the proposed H-Hospital Zone amendment
PLANNING BOARD AMENDMENT TO MEETING SCHEDULE
Special Public Meetings: Tuesday, May 6, 2014
Note Village Calendar says 12 noon the announcement says 730pm
In accordance with the provisions of the “Open Public Meetings Act,” please be advised that the Planning Board has scheduled a special public meeting for Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. in the auditorium at the Benjamin Franklin Middle School, 335 North Van Dien Ave., Ridgewood, NJ.
The Board may take official action during this Work and Public Meeting at which time the Board will:
Continue the public hearing on the proposed H-Hospital Zone amendment to the Master Plan.
Continue the public hearing concerning a proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan Element of the Master Plan which would recommend changes in zone district classifications and boundaries within the Central Business District and surrounding area including AH-2, B-3-R, C-R and C Zone Districts.
All meetings of the Ridgewood Planning Board (i.e., official public meetings, work session meetings, pre-meeting assemblies and special meetings) are public meetings which are always open to members of the general public.
Jane Wondergem
Secretary to the Board

![]()
Readers are not sympathetic with Valley’s business plans
Valley was told that they could not expand the campus years ago. If only Valley had developed a strategic plan at that time we wouldnt be blogging about this.
Why are Valley’s expansion plans somehow given equal status to the land owned by the BOE and the Village residents?
I do not care if Valley never expands. Their business plan is not my problem. They have no special rights. Expand in Paramus.
No matter what Valley has been given in the past, they always want more. The BF field purchase would not have been the last thing they wanted they still would want to modernize their buildings and they would have needed more space to do that. They were told 20 years ago that enough is enough and yet they haven’s gotten the message. It is so frustrating that this is Ridgewood’s problem and not Valley’s problem.
Valley can remain where and how it is, if they (valley) don’t like it let them move elsewhere.!!

![]()
Valley Expansion Supporters Resort to Fear mongering
Anonymous
0 approved
108.59.11.116
Submitted on 2014/04/21 at 4:00 pm
#8, Think you are unhappy with Valley now….You are going to be more unhappy if the secret talks with https://cca.com/locations results in Valley selling their Ridgewood Property.
Reader claims had the BF field been sold and leased back to the BOE under the long-term lease, as proposed the entire need for Valley to expand with taller structures today would have been avoided
Reader claims had the BF field been sold and leased back to the BOE under the long-term lease, as proposed the entire need for Valley to expand with taller structures today would have been avoided
Had the BF field been sold and leased back to the BOE under the long-term lease, as proposed, Valley would have placed parking under ground and the entire need for Valley to expand with taller structures today would have been avoided. But, the same NIMBYs, who prevented that plan, are the ones opposing Valley’s expansion plans today.
BTW, part of that proposal was to provide a turf facility at BF for free, which would have saved the BOE (taxpayers) almost $1mm. Go over and look at the “recently improved BF field” today. It is a dirt lot!!! And, the spring season is only 3 weeks old.
In retrospect, working with Valley to create a win/win for the village back when they presented the BF field proposal would have been a pretty good/smart idea. Anyone, who is proud of shooting that idea down is part of the group who is responsible for the current state of Ridgewood
Reader says all we have been saying for 7 years is Valley’s proposal is too big for Ridgewood
Reader says all we have been saying for 7 years is Valley’s proposal is too big for Ridgewood
If, FOR SEVEN YEARS, you had been attending meetings, spent hours on your computer trying to educate and inform people on the issue and get them to meetings, fundraised to pay lawyers and planners to get a reasonable proposal and donated thousands of dollars of your families hard earned money towards getting a reasonable proposal, you’d be a bit venomous too.
I think it would be a great idea for you to attend an upcoming Planning Board meeting and tell the Planning Board (and Valley Hospital) exactly what you just said…”You’re a friend/supporter of the hospital, but their proposal is too big for Ridgewood.” That’s all we have been saying for 7 years!!!

![]()
Reader says Ms. Hauck has a long and close involvement with Valley Hospital and should recuse herself on any Valley vote
Reader says Ms. Hauck has a long and close involvement with Valley Hospital and should recuse herself on any Valley vote
A perceived conflict of interest by legal definition need not entail any financial or business relationship to make it appropriate for an elected or appointed official to recuse on a vote.
Ms. Hauck accepted over $800 on the day of her election from an officer of Valley Hospital. So there’s a little financial hit–not much, but it’s telling. She says she paid it back–so what? It’s on her official campaign contribution list that must be submitted and is posted online.
Before Aronsohn tapped her, no doubt to her amazement, to run for council and become his lapdog in exchange for a vote on Valley, she spoke publicly at a village council hearing, saying that she would trust Valley implicitly to do whatever they wanted.
There are many more indications of her long and close involvement with Valley, notably when she was vice chair of its women’s auxiliary, fundraising to the tune of millions of dollars–a financial relationship that did not put money in her pocket (she didn’t need it) but did put a ton of money in Valley’s. Suddenly she was running for council and abruptly ceased all Valley fundraising and social events. Very convincing.
In short, this was hardly supporting AIDS funding or any real charity, although Valley continues to call itself nonprofit with a treasure chest of many millions.
Officials have recused themselves from votes for much, much less. She may yet see the wisdom of doing so and should be so advised by the Village attorney–he’s paid to advise the council for the good of the Village, right?–since a vote on Valley from her would have serious ramifications, including opening the Village to lawsuits.

![]()
Reader says Beneficial Use Doctrine dictates that even hospitals must demonstrate that the benefits to the community
Reader says Beneficial Use Doctrine dictates that even hospitals must demonstrate that the benefits to the community
Inherently Beneficial Use Doctrine dictates that even hospitals must demonstrate that the benefits to the community resulting from development projects must outweigh the detriments.
Valley has yet to prove that doubling in size will benefit Ridgewood at all (less than 10% of Valley patients actually live here), and it is VERY CLEAR that the detriments will be enormous.
Reader says I came to Ridgewood because I want a small village
Reader says I came to Ridgewood because I want a small village.
If I want a big hospital I go to Hackensack or New York. If I want a great concert I go to Lincoln Center or Carnegie Hall.
I don’t even want a million restaurants here. When I first came here there were one or two or three.
There should be an ordinance stating number of duplicate businesses.
I want a quiet charming not much traffic village.

















