Readers continue to question Gail Prices Objectivity
On top of this conflict of interest, she is clearly not impartial and has allowed Valley and its disgraceful attorney to call all of the procedural shots.
It’s time to demand better.
Readers continue to question Gail Prices Objectivity
On top of this conflict of interest, she is clearly not impartial and has allowed Valley and its disgraceful attorney to call all of the procedural shots.
It’s time to demand better.
Reader says Planning Board Proceedings are a “Sham”
Ridgewood Planning Board Continue public hearing on the proposed H-Hospital Zone amendment
PLANNING BOARD AMENDMENT TO MEETING SCHEDULE
Special Public Meetings: Tuesday, May 6, 2014
Note Village Calendar says 12 noon the announcement says 730pm
In accordance with the provisions of the “Open Public Meetings Act,” please be advised that the Planning Board has scheduled a special public meeting for Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. in the auditorium at the Benjamin Franklin Middle School, 335 North Van Dien Ave., Ridgewood, NJ.
The Board may take official action during this Work and Public Meeting at which time the Board will:
Continue the public hearing on the proposed H-Hospital Zone amendment to the Master Plan.
Continue the public hearing concerning a proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan Element of the Master Plan which would recommend changes in zone district classifications and boundaries within the Central Business District and surrounding area including AH-2, B-3-R, C-R and C Zone Districts.
All meetings of the Ridgewood Planning Board (i.e., official public meetings, work session meetings, pre-meeting assemblies and special meetings) are public meetings which are always open to members of the general public.
Jane Wondergem
Secretary to the Board
Cardiologist allegedly fondled two New Jersey women during exams
Dr. John Stroback was indicted this week on two counts of criminal sexual contact. He faces up to three years in prison if convicted.
Two women say they visited a New Jersey doctor for cardiology exams, but were groped instead of evaluated.
Dr. John Stroback, 67, was indicted Tuesday on two counts of criminal sexual contact after two women claim he fondled them during separate exams. Stroback, of Hawthorne, is a nationally renowned doctor and the director of the Heart Failure Program at Valley Hospital in Ridgewood, NJ.com reported.
Valley was told that they could not expand the campus years ago. If only Valley had developed a strategic plan at that time we wouldnt be blogging about this.
Why are Valley’s expansion plans somehow given equal status to the land owned by the BOE and the Village residents?
I do not care if Valley never expands. Their business plan is not my problem. They have no special rights. Expand in Paramus.
No matter what Valley has been given in the past, they always want more. The BF field purchase would not have been the last thing they wanted they still would want to modernize their buildings and they would have needed more space to do that. They were told 20 years ago that enough is enough and yet they haven’s gotten the message. It is so frustrating that this is Ridgewood’s problem and not Valley’s problem.
Valley can remain where and how it is, if they (valley) don’t like it let them move elsewhere.!!
Anonymous
0 approved
108.59.11.116
Submitted on 2014/04/21 at 4:00 pm
#8, Think you are unhappy with Valley now….You are going to be more unhappy if the secret talks with https://cca.com/locations results in Valley selling their Ridgewood Property.
The Valley Hospital Adds State-Of-The-Art Truebeam™ Radiation Oncology System to Its Arsenal of Cancer-Fighting Technology
Reader claims had the BF field been sold and leased back to the BOE under the long-term lease, as proposed the entire need for Valley to expand with taller structures today would have been avoided
Had the BF field been sold and leased back to the BOE under the long-term lease, as proposed, Valley would have placed parking under ground and the entire need for Valley to expand with taller structures today would have been avoided. But, the same NIMBYs, who prevented that plan, are the ones opposing Valley’s expansion plans today.
BTW, part of that proposal was to provide a turf facility at BF for free, which would have saved the BOE (taxpayers) almost $1mm. Go over and look at the “recently improved BF field” today. It is a dirt lot!!! And, the spring season is only 3 weeks old.
In retrospect, working with Valley to create a win/win for the village back when they presented the BF field proposal would have been a pretty good/smart idea. Anyone, who is proud of shooting that idea down is part of the group who is responsible for the current state of Ridgewood
Reader says all we have been saying for 7 years is Valley’s proposal is too big for Ridgewood
If, FOR SEVEN YEARS, you had been attending meetings, spent hours on your computer trying to educate and inform people on the issue and get them to meetings, fundraised to pay lawyers and planners to get a reasonable proposal and donated thousands of dollars of your families hard earned money towards getting a reasonable proposal, you’d be a bit venomous too.
I think it would be a great idea for you to attend an upcoming Planning Board meeting and tell the Planning Board (and Valley Hospital) exactly what you just said…”You’re a friend/supporter of the hospital, but their proposal is too big for Ridgewood.” That’s all we have been saying for 7 years!!!
Reader says Ms. Hauck has a long and close involvement with Valley Hospital and should recuse herself on any Valley vote
A perceived conflict of interest by legal definition need not entail any financial or business relationship to make it appropriate for an elected or appointed official to recuse on a vote.
Ms. Hauck accepted over $800 on the day of her election from an officer of Valley Hospital. So there’s a little financial hit–not much, but it’s telling. She says she paid it back–so what? It’s on her official campaign contribution list that must be submitted and is posted online.
Before Aronsohn tapped her, no doubt to her amazement, to run for council and become his lapdog in exchange for a vote on Valley, she spoke publicly at a village council hearing, saying that she would trust Valley implicitly to do whatever they wanted.
There are many more indications of her long and close involvement with Valley, notably when she was vice chair of its women’s auxiliary, fundraising to the tune of millions of dollars–a financial relationship that did not put money in her pocket (she didn’t need it) but did put a ton of money in Valley’s. Suddenly she was running for council and abruptly ceased all Valley fundraising and social events. Very convincing.
In short, this was hardly supporting AIDS funding or any real charity, although Valley continues to call itself nonprofit with a treasure chest of many millions.
Officials have recused themselves from votes for much, much less. She may yet see the wisdom of doing so and should be so advised by the Village attorney–he’s paid to advise the council for the good of the Village, right?–since a vote on Valley from her would have serious ramifications, including opening the Village to lawsuits.
Valley Hospital to Offer Free Lung Cancer Screening
Is Lung Cancer Screening Right for You?
Earlier this year the United States Preventive Services Task Force, a government panel, recommended annual low dose computed tomography (CT) scans for current and former smokers at high risk for developing lung cancer. The recommendations and the screening guidelines apply to current heavy smokers and to those who have quit within the last 15 years.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men and women. An estimated 160,000 people die from lung cancer every year. Many of these deaths could be prevented by following these screening guidelines. Studies have shown that treatment for lung cancer can be highly successful if the tumor is detected in its earliest stages, before there are any signs or symptoms of the disease.
The Valley Hospital is currently offering a limited number of free, low-dose CT scans to those who are eligible based on the screening guidelines. The test is painless and only takes about 15 or 20 minutes. Click here to request an opportunity to be considered for a free screening, or you may call 201-634-5757.
Reader says Beneficial Use Doctrine dictates that even hospitals must demonstrate that the benefits to the community
Inherently Beneficial Use Doctrine dictates that even hospitals must demonstrate that the benefits to the community resulting from development projects must outweigh the detriments.
Valley has yet to prove that doubling in size will benefit Ridgewood at all (less than 10% of Valley patients actually live here), and it is VERY CLEAR that the detriments will be enormous.
The Valley Hospital Recognized for Providing an Outstanding Patient Experience
April 8, 2014
Recognition Places Valley Among Top 10 Percent of U.S. Hospitals
Ridgewood NJ, For the fifth time, The Valley Hospital has been recognized with the Healthgrades Outstanding Patient Experience Award™ (2014, 2011, 2010/2011, 2009/2010, 2009). This distinction places Valley among the top 10 percent of hospitals in the nation for patient experience. Valley is the only general, acute-care hospital in New Jersey to receive this recognition.
The award recognizes The Valley Hospital for outstanding performance in the delivery of positive experiences for patients during their hospital stay, as measured by Healthgrades, an online resource for information about physicians and hospitals.
Healthgrades evaluated 3,582 hospitals that submitted patient surveys to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, covering admissions from March 2012 through April 2013. To be eligible for the patient experience award, hospitals had to meet additional clinical quality requirements. This ensures recipient hospitals are delivering strong outcomes in addition to an excellent patient experience during hospitalization. Only the top 15 percent of this national group — or 447 hospitals — received the 2014 award. Valley’s recognition places the hospital in the top 10 percent in the nation.
“We are very pleased to once again receive this recognition,” said Audrey Meyers, President and CEO of The Valley Hospital and Valley Health System. “I think it’s a wonderful reflection of the standard of care we provide to all our patients and a testament to the priority Valley staff and physicians place on achieving the highest-quality clinical outcomes, while delivering the most compassionate care.”
Healthgrades evaluated Valley’s performance as assessed by the hospital’s patients across 27 different questions that roll up to ten distinct measures. Ranging from cleanliness and noise levels in a patient room to factors such as pain management and responsiveness to patient’s needs, the measures also include whether a patient would recommend this hospital to friends or family.
“As consumers are becoming more active participants in their healthcare, measured performance surrounding the patient experience at a hospital is an increasingly important consideration for patients in choosing where to receive their care,” said Evan Marks, EVP Informatics and Strategy. “Consumers can rest assured that those hospitals that have achieved the Healthgrades 2014 Patient Experience Award demonstrate a commitment to exceptional focus on the needs of the patient during their stay at the hospital.”
Reader says I came to Ridgewood because I want a small village.
If I want a big hospital I go to Hackensack or New York. If I want a great concert I go to Lincoln Center or Carnegie Hall.
I don’t even want a million restaurants here. When I first came here there were one or two or three.
There should be an ordinance stating number of duplicate businesses.
I want a quiet charming not much traffic village.
Ridgewood planner: Balancing act needed for decision on Valley Hospital
APRIL 3, 2014 LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, APRIL 3, 2014, 3:30 PM
BY DARIUS AMOS
STAFF WRITER
With expert testimony winding down, the Ridgewood Planning Board will soon be charged with weighing the benefits of a proposed Valley Hospital expansion against any and all detriments that might arise from the project.
Hoping to guide the board before its deliberations, municipal planner Blais Brancheau on Monday offered his recommendations and a detailed comparison of the hospital zone standards established in 2010 with those currently proposed by the hospital. Valley is seeking a master plan amendment that would allow the health care facility to nearly double its hospital floor area to 900,000 square feet, largely through new construction.
Other key elements of Valley’s application include a maximum building height of 94 feet, inclusive of rooftop mechanical equipment; a limit of 1,700 on-site parking spaces; and an improvement coverage cap of 469,000 square feet.
This week, Brancheau said Valley’s proposal is “somewhat smaller” than the hospital’s 2010 plan, which was approved by the former Planning Board. He further stated that reductions seen in the new expansion plan were made partly in response to the Ridgewood Council’s 2011 resolution that explained why the governing body did not introduce the ordinance enacting the master plan changes.
The changes in the scaled-down plan, he said, should be considered when the board mulls over the entire application. Brancheau placed even heavier emphasis on the board’s analysis of the pros and cons of the potential development, but he cautioned that the criteria for evaluating the requested amendment do not contain a “hard and fast rule, in a sense that this is how you always do it.”
“It’s not a cookbook approach, and it’s not something that is precise,” he said. “It’s part heart and part science.”
“[The board’s] decision has to be reasonable, it can’t be arbitrary or capricious” and must be made upon sound information, the planner added.
– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/health-news/ridgewood-planner-balancing-act-needed-for-decision-on-valley-hospital-1.841243#sthash.RlqEZDxq.5a13lhRi.dpuf
Add an Event | More
– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/health-news/ridgewood-planner-balancing-act-needed-for-decision-on-valley-hospital-1.841243#sthash.RlqEZDxq.dpuf