Posted on

Reader Calls Chris Kaufman, “a fractured Board Member”

Chris (Kaufman) is a fractured Board Member, all he does at this point is raise opposing views for no other reason than to hear his own voice, most of his arguments are just for the sake of arguing because of the changing dynamics of the school board which he has no control over. When a board is ‘fractured’ by just one member it can barely function. Why is it that a tenured board member, chooses to run for re-election with his buddy (“Lastly, I have chosen to run with my friend Mahmoud.”) ? It’s because he realizes that he can no longer stand on his own two feet, and in addition, to present an even deeper divide to the board in the event that they both are elected. Chris should finish his term, and leave his volunteer post, there is only positive in having served, by running for re-election all he is doing is cementing a negative, lets do him a favor and keep him on the positive side of the volunteer ledger and cast your vote for a fresh volunteer board member. Mahmoud is barely present, so no mention.

9 thoughts on “Reader Calls Chris Kaufman, “a fractured Board Member”

  1. Guy is a joke. Not one original thought and usually has no clue on topic of discussion . He opts to bring up petty observations from prior board mtgs to deflect.

    8
    1
  2. He’s trying to get a “buddy” elected to the board so they can be a voting block.

  3. He’s gone very negative and divisive.

    5
    1
  4. His behavior is irrational. Is he on drugs?

    5
    1
  5. He is truly irrational. He is also a jerk

    5
    1
  6. Their names are linked with a bracket on the sample ballot that arrived today. I don’t recall ever seeing that before and I don’t like it. Members of all board are supposed to be independent thinkers who vote on each issue as they see best for the community. That doesn’t mean they may not agree about many things. But they should not be joined at the hip. It may also confuse voters who think they must vote for both if they vote for either, which is untrue.

    Just bullet vote for Ms. Kwak and be done with it.

    4
    4
  7. His “buddy” Mahmoud disowned him at the debate night. That was a hillarious moment.

  8. Assholes are assholes….
    Time to take him out.

  9. Chris is running a full blown slander campaign, lead by his insecurities and hate towards HyunJu Kwak and Saurabh Dani. “Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned.” LET IT GO CHRIS!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.