the staff of the Ridgewood blog
Ridgewood NJ, President-elect Donald Trump is set to meet with northeastern House Republicans this weekend at Mar-a-Lago to discuss potential changes to the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap, a policy Trump himself implemented as part of his 2017 tax reform.
Background on the SALT Deduction Cap
The 2017 tax bill placed a $10,000 cap on SALT deductions, limiting the amount taxpayers can deduct for state and local taxes on their federal tax returns. The move was lauded by fiscal conservatives as a way to curb a tax loophole that disproportionately benefited high-tax, wealthy states like New York and California.
However, the cap has faced criticism from both sides of the aisle. Lawmakers in high-tax states argue that it unfairly burdens their constituents, while opponents view it as a necessary measure to prevent federal taxpayers from subsidizing inefficient state spending.
Key Players and Proposals
NY Republican Representatives Mike Lawler, Nicole Malliotakis, Nick LaLota, and Andrew Garbarino will lead the charge in lobbying Trump to revisit the cap. While Trump has hinted at potential changes to the deduction, expectations for a full restoration remain tempered.
One proposal on the table is to double the SALT deduction cap to $20,000, a compromise GOP insiders suggest could gain traction—particularly if it’s offset by ending the corporate SALT deduction. However, more ambitious plans, like Rep. Lawler’s suggestion to raise the cap to $200,000, are seen as politically and fiscally untenable.
The Case Against SALT Expansion
Critics of the SALT deduction argue that it serves as a tax break for the wealthy, with little justification in terms of fairness or fiscal responsibility.
- Disproportionate Benefit: States like New York and California gain the most from the SALT deduction due to their high taxes and spending, which far exceed more efficient states like Florida. For example, New York spends nearly double per resident on state and local services compared to Florida, yet offers worse outcomes in many cases.
- Favoring the Wealthy: The deduction largely benefits millionaires and billionaires in high-income areas such as Manhattan, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley.
- Inequity in Business Taxation: Current corporate SALT deductions allow large companies to claim benefits unavailable to small businesses, creating an uneven playing field.
What’s Next?
While the SALT deduction cap remains a contentious issue, any changes will likely involve compromise. Proposals to modestly increase the cap, paired with offsets like eliminating corporate SALT deductions, may gain bipartisan support.
Trump’s willingness to revisit this policy signals a potential shift in Republican priorities—but any move to expand the deduction will face scrutiny for its fiscal and political implications.
Take the Wall Street Walking Tour https://www.facebook.com/unofficialwallstreet #WallStreetTours,#FinancialDistrictExploration, #ExploreWallStreet, #FinancialHistoryTour, #StockMarketExperience, #FinancialDistrictDiscovery, #NYCFinanceTour,#WallStreetAdventure