the staff of the Ridgewood blog
Ridgewood NJ, Read this for a full understanding of how former Ridgewood Village Manager Roberta Sonenfeld, supported by former Village Council members Paul Aronsohn, Gwenn Hauck, and Albert Pucciarelli, worked AGAINST those seeking to preserve the Historic Zabriskie Schedler House.
Friends of Historic Zabriskie-Schedler House addressed the council last week . The Zabriskie-Schedler House, is a historical home built in the 1820’s and located at 460 West Saddle River Road.
The Zabriskie-Schedler House was purchased by the Village of Ridgewood, together with the surrounding area commonly referred to as the “Schedler Property”.
The group formerly known as RED made the following salient points to the council:
1. Since 2012 our group, the “Friends of the Historic Zabriskie-Schedler House” (previously known as “RED” (the Ridgewood Eastside Development)) has been repeatedly asking the Village to stabilize the house (which would include roof replacement and mold remediation). Despite our requests the only funds that have been spent by the Village thus far were for the installation of window louvers by the engineering department as a way to increase ventilation and decrease mold production. In lieu of Village funds, privately donated funds have been spent to provide for tarps (on several occasions) in order to protect the house from further water infiltration and saturation and for the removal of vegetation posing a threat to the structure of the house. These actions are merely “band aid” solutions which only have short term benefits. With fall nearly upon us and the accompaniment of torrential rain, as well as another harsh winter on the horizon, more permanent solutions are desperately needed at this time. Without immediate necessary remediation to the house, the house will not survive through the winter.
2. First and foremost, in order to stabilize the house, the house is in dire need of a professional roof replacement. The previous Council’s majority was instrumental in ensuring that no funds would be spent on the house stating that “no decision had been taken on the use of the house”. The Council made this statement ignoring the fact that our group had provided a use – the Bergen County Historical Society was very interested in using the house as a library. The interest was so strong that the President of the BCHS appeared at least twice before the Council. This use, as well as other productive suggestions (such as a field house for athletic groups, a community center and a nature classroom/organic garden) were continually ignored because we believe that the majority of the Council’s intent was for the house to be demolished by neglect.
3. The Schedler Property was purchased by the Village for $2.7 million funded through grants from the Bergen County Open Space, Farmland and Historic Preservation Trust Fund. The Village received a $1 million grant in 2009, followed by a $570,000 grant from Bergen County in 2010 and a $450,000 matching grant received in 2011 from the Garden State Preservation Trust Fund. Historic preservation is an essential element of these grant monies. Nonetheless, the 2009 grant application (attached hereto) failed to include the historic house together with its historic four lots (9,10,11 and 12) of land. Also, a false NO answer was given on the grant application with respect to potential historic structures on the Schedler Property and the square footage of the house was grossly exaggerated to 21,000 when it is in fact only 2,200. The Bergen County Cultural Historic Commission was not contacted in connection with the application, however the application falsely states that the Village contacted the Ridgewood Historic Commission (the “RHC”) – while in fact there is no record of any such contact. In light of these errors it is our belief that the application was intentionally misleading in order to solely address the supposed “needs” of the Village’s athletic groups, rather than the needs of the entire community.
They went one step further and listed the steps that have been taken:
1. In 2014 our group, worked with the RHC on an application to give the house a Certificate of Historic Eligibility (a “COE”), which is attached hereto. The COE was awarded on May 2, 2014 and it recognizes the historical importance of the structure. This recognition allows the Village to file an application that once approved, places the house on the national historic preservation list.
2. In July of 2014, our group, tired of obtaining no assistance from the Council, worked on an application for grants to be issued by the Bergen County Historic Preservation Trust Fund, Bergen County Open Space, Recreation, Floodplain Protection, Farmland and Historic Preservation Trust Fund. These grants were a great opportunity to receive 50% of the total cost of stabilization since the Village kept stating that no funds were available for the house. However, the Village Manager, Roberta Sonenfeld, refused to sign the application, nor would she provide the required 50% of funds to match the grant. Moreover, Ms. Sonenfeld advised that our group was responsible for the 50% matching funds, but because the deadline to submit the application was very close, the application was never sent.
3. In July of 2015, thanks to privately donated funds our group was able to open a bank account to deposit the required 50% of matching grant funds in escrow. This information was communicated to Ms. Sonenfeld and our group was able to compile a labor intensive grant application (herewith attached) that included cost estimates, the history of the house and several other necessary documents. With 50% of matching funds in the account, there was no reason why the application could not go forward but, unbeknownst to us, there was another application being issued by Tim Cronin, the Director of Parks and Recreation, requesting Phase 1 grants to construct a 90′ multipurpose field. Mr. Cronin’s application provided for the demolition of the house. Additionally, while our group was always told that there were no capital funds available for the house, Mr. Cronin’s application clearly stated that the Village would provide $100,000 in capital funds, equal to 50% of matching funds. The grant application was signed by Ms. Sonenfeld.
4. On August 5, 2015, Mayor Aronsohn announced that in order to proceed with the application or municipal historic grants for the house, the Council needed to approve a resolution. In addition, Mayor Aronsohn mentioned the need for a second resolution relative to the 90′ field, which also required Council approval. The date for said resolutions was set for August 12, 2015.
5. On August 12 2015, the Council’s chambers were packed with concerned citizens who voiced their opinions regarding the house and the field. The meeting minutes, herewith attached, offer an additional glimpse into what transpired that night. To a very disappointed crowd, Resolution 15-257: Acceptance of Open Space Committee Recommendations Concerning the Schedler Property was approved (by a majority of 3-2) and Resolution 15-258: Apply for Grant – Schedler House was denied (by a majority of 3-2).
6. With our chances of applying for municipal historic preservation grants being denied, we had felt that once again we wasted our time and effort to preserve the history of our Village and the Schedler Property. Following the passage of these resolutions we were alerted by Ms. Sonenfeld that Resolution 15-257 included a section that would allow a 501(c)(3) group to file a grant application for the house on behalf of the Village on the conditions that the 501(c)(3) group would (i) enter into a 20-year lease with the Village and (ii) be responsible for the maintenance of the house. Our group immediately filed for 501(c)(3) status and asked for lease documents, but Ms. Sonenfeld stated that the Village attorney would have to charge our group legal fees in connection with the preparation of the lease. As a result, although a September 3, 2015 grant application deadline was met by our group, without 501(c)(3) status and a signed lease with the Village, our application was considered invalid. All of these consequences could have been avoided if Ms. Sonenfeld had signed the application on behalf of the Village as the owner of the house.
Of course she did, because they are wrong. Just sell the land.
Why is there ANY debate about whether Roberta should have resigned? She should have been fired, arrested, and made to stand trial for all her misdeeds. This is outrageous. The Shcedler people were put through the wringer. Disgusting.
Roberta had help from someone/others on her staff to engineer this entire charade. Whomever that person is/those persons are should be fired immediately.
Jackie Hone was right. Aronsohn and his cronies were simply despicable. They should all go to jail.
The big runaround. Glad it’s in the past tense! Keep on truckin’!
What a complete waste of time….GET OVER IT ALREADY. Move on. FORGET ABOUT IT. Now that th e3 scumbags are gone you have no recourse but to continue to talk about them. ENOUGH. Move forward and get over yourself.
Of course they did….they had a 100,000 reasons to screw the Schedler folks….
Janet Fricke must go. Tim Cronin must go. Chris Rutishauser must go. They all colluded on this and much more.
Love revisionist history. The property was being vetted by various commercial interests for a mini mall, 7-11, etc. through efforts of the neighbors working with the town, funds were obtained and the property purchased by the village (with assistance ). There is and never was any historical intent or use. It is just an old house that is a hazard and holds no special historical value and not worth any restoration.
The town purchased it with the intent to complete a portion of the plans for open space and fields. The selective memory of the local neighbors is interesting.
We should market and sell the property, put it back on tax rolls, and allow a commercial interest to create local jobs, etc.
Can’t sell it if you took open space grant funds to buy it.
9:36 It is an old, very dilapidated, run down house. It was built like all old houses–a step or two up or down for every addition. How is this going to be restored and made handicapped accessible if plans for public use are in mind? And what importance did it have in history? I am sure it was a battlefield, but the house wasn’t there then, so how does that make it historic? Ridgewood has many homes that are older, and in much better condition. Certainly a 90 foot ball field is too big for that piece of property but, without the house, there would be more available land for passive recreation and even a smaller field.