Tag: CBD

Posted on by — 5 Comments

Reader says Its way cheaper and comfortable for a senior to stay in your moderate sized house with no mortgage vs. apartment or condo

12068522_10153713537379722_5302765389892099717_o

The number of days it takes to sell a single family home in northern NJ continues to decline.
source: NJMLS. Info deemed reliable but not guaranteed.

Its way cheaper and comfortable for a senior to stay in your moderate sized house with no mortgage vs. apartment or condo, just expenses of property taxes, (get the NJ senior freeze) usual monthly electric, gas, cable, insurance etc. bills, with expected seasonal maintenance lawn, snow removal. There could a major replacement costs if one needs a new roof after 20+ yrs,.or if property taxes get ridiculous.. As a senior, my preference is the privacy of my own home, would never like apartment living or even consider it. If things get to expensive, move south Jersey to retirement villages with new house.

When you get to the stage where one can’t manage on their own, age related or physical, either home care is preferable, or next step assisted livings runs average $5,000 month and up, they are a gimick, my mom was in one before needing a nursing home $12 -15,000 month. A 92 yr.old neighbor went to Cupola assisted living just last year, was $5,000 month. Hope I’m gone before my money gets pissed away to one of those places.

Posted on by — 1 Comment

Ridgewood downtown housing hearings wrap up Sept. 30

clock_cbd_theridgewoodblog

SEPTEMBER 29, 2015    LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2015, 11:41 AM
BY MARK KRULISH
STAFF WRITER |
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

As the second of two public hearings in front of the Village Council dedicated to multifamily housing nears, a long chapter in the town’s history may come to a close as officials will render a decision regarding the future of new apartment buildings in downtown Ridgewood.

On Wednesday, Sept. 30, residents will have one final chance to persuade the governing body to vote one way or the other.

The council is scheduled to take a vote on each ordinance, ostensibly settling the issue of high-density housing in Ridgewood.

What is unclear, however, is the status of litigation related to the master plan amendment as it has been revealed that neither the village nor the Planning Board has been officially served.

During a Sept. 15 meeting, it was brought to light by board attorney Gail Price that the Planning Board had not yet actually been served as defendants in the lawsuit.

The Ridgewood News reported last month that Citizens for a Better Ridgewood (CBR) had filed a lawsuit in state Superior Court against the Planning Board and the Village of Ridgewood, citing numerous irregularities, procedural missteps and alleged conflicts of interest as reasons the Planning Board’s June 2 decision to amend the master plan should be declared void.

A copy of the complaint obtained by The Ridgewood News certifies that it was filed with the Superior Court clerk on Aug. 10 and docketed on Aug. 13.

Village Attorney Matt Rogers said he was not aware of any service from the village standpoint, which goes through the clerk’s office.

This was confirmed by Village Clerk Heather Mailander on Wednesday afternoon. She said the village indeed had not yet received a lawsuit.

When asked for a statement, CBR did not directly comment on the status of the lawsuit, but did state the group is “continuing to pursue its original objectives, specifically to heighten awareness about significant zoning changes underway and to encourage the village to engage in comprehensive planning that is strategic and visionary.”

 

https://www.northjersey.com/news/ridgewood-housing-hearings-wrap-up-sept-30-1.1420947

Posted on by — Leave a comment

VILLAGE COUNCIL SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 7:30 P.M. LAND USE AND DEVELOPEMENT

clock_cbd_theridgewoodblog

VILLAGE COUNCIL

SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015

7:30 P.M.

1.  Call to Order – Mayor
2.  Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meeting Act

MAYOR: “Adequate notice of this meeting has been provided

by a posting on the bulletin board in Village Hall,

by mail to the Ridgewood News, The Record, and by             submission to all persons entitled to same as provided          by law of a schedule including the date and time of            this meeting.”

3.   Roll Call

4.              ORDINANCES – PUBLIC HEARING

a.  #3489 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development –         Establish AH-2 Zone District

b.  #3490 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish B-3-R Zone District

c.  #3491 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish C-R Zone

d.  #3492 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish C Zone District

e.  #3493 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Amend Various Sections – Multiple Zone Districts and General Affordable Housing Regulations

f.   #3500 – Lease of 1057 Hillcrest Road for              Recreational/Educational Purposes

5.   RESOLUTIONS

15-305    Award Contract – Lease of 1057 Hillcrest Road

15-306    Accept Donation from Ridgewood Baseball/Softball                   Association (RBSA)

3 DAYS LEFT…..Email council to VOTE NO!Paul Aronsohn – paronsohn@ridgewoodnj.netAlbert Pucciarelli – apucciarelli@…

Posted by Citizens For A Better Ridgewood on Sunday, September 27, 2015

Posted on by — 1 Comment

Firm details design of proposed parking garage in Ridgewood

Hudson_street_parking_theridgewoodblog

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015    LAST UPDATED: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2015, 1:30 PM
BY BY MARK KRULISH
STAFF WRITER |
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

The eighth Central Business District forum was held on Wednesday night with an emphasis on parking and concepts for a potential garage to be built at the Hudson Street lot.

The Village Council recently selected Desman Design Management to design a multi-level parking deck and present architectural renderings for a public review by residents and the governing body.

Desman will be working with S&L Architectural studio, which Desman Executive Vice President Tim Tracy said would help develop the “bones” of the garage, along with the aesthetics. Desman will also be working with Maser Consulting to assist with the site engineering and traffic studies. Tracy said Maser has previously been engaged with the village and is familiar with traffic flow and patterns.

Ideally, Tracy said, the new garage would bring a net increase of at least 300 spaces, giving the deck approximately 350-400 spaces in its final configuration.

The width of the Hudson Street lot is not ideal for a parking garage lot, but Desman is looking at other opportunities to “borrow” from existing infrastructure, such as building a cantilever over the sidewalk, to expand the footprint of the site. Although such a proposal could mean losing the on-street parking available on Hudson Street, it could potentially bump the total number of parking spots available even higher.

“We have a site that is somewhat geometrically challenged,” said Tracy. “We have properties adjoining three sides of this property and we need to respect those properties. Some of those properties rely on this current parking lot for access and egress and service vehicles. All of that will be considered.”

https://www.northjersey.com/news/firm-details-design-of-proposed-parking-garage-in-ridgewood-1.1420443

Posted on by — 5 Comments

Reader says The Village has been lucky to have politicians who were serving the citizens not developers….until now

3 amigos

…they say 1. ‘it’s to provide high end apartments to seniors looking to downsize, 2. To re energize our town which is apparently viewed as deteriorating and 3. If you don’t let us do this we will put something on the properties which will be way worse than apartments. People say aren’t apartments better than what is there now? NO. Why do you think they have been barren properties for so long? Because they have been told they have the support of politicians to get this done for them. High density apartments is the most profitable option for developers. For decades developers have wanted to crack our Master Plan which has always been in tact to prevent such overdevelopment. The Village has been lucky to have politicians who were serving the citizens not developers….until now.

3 DAYS LEFT…..Email council to VOTE NO!Paul Aronsohn – paronsohn@ridgewoodnj.netAlbert Pucciarelli – apucciarelli@…

Posted by Citizens For A Better Ridgewood on Sunday, September 27, 2015

Posted on by — 9 Comments

Readers not buying Senior Move to Apartments in Ridgewood

a

Ridgewood’s senior population is 12%, 4 % is under the poverty level and could never afford one of these apartments. Majority of the rest of the senior population are living in houses where their mortgage is paid off so their expenses are taxes and maintenance. Average tax burden is around $15,000 per year. Apartments renting at $3,000-$4,000 per month (they’ll be “luxury apartments”), will costs seniors $36,000-$48,000 TO RENT. The argument that Ridgewood has to do this for the seniors is BS. It’s just a BS political sound bite HE glommed onto to justify his supporting the developers. ‘Doing it for the seniors’ who could argue with that, right. He would have used children as a sound bite but you know, that would be ridiculous. This is all about using Ridgewood to make the developers a ton of money and the paybacks for supporting it will be beneficial to their personal pursuits. Shame on all 3 of them.

Emptynesters in town like the privacy of their home.They do not want to hear their neighbor in an apartment .They can afford landscapers and snow removal so since the mortgage is paid for they can afford to make repairs as necessary.The Former NYC residents who moved here 10-20 years ago “for the schools” will move BACK to NYC to an apartment , since NYC has the museums etc that Ridgewood does Not. As a resident since 1969 I know plenty of old timers, their families, etc….not a single one h as considered moving to those proposed apartments. It’s either back to NYC, or to NYC or FL.

3 DAYS LEFT…..Email council to VOTE NO!Paul Aronsohn – paronsohn@ridgewoodnj.netAlbert Pucciarelli – apucciarelli@…

Posted by Citizens For A Better Ridgewood on Sunday, September 27, 2015

Posted on by — 4 Comments

Question for users of Parkmobile app or “pay by phone”

parkmobile_meter (1)

September 26,2015

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Parkmobile’s website says – “Parkmobile is the payment solution and does not own or manage the area in which you park.  As such, we do not determine whether or not parking is free [Note:  meaning whether parking at the time you are accessing the Parkmobile app, or initiating a “pay by phone” request, is actually free; e.g., before/after metered hours, Sunday, legal holiday].  In some cases, your local parking authority instructs us to code our system for free parking.  Please note that transaction fees charged by Parkmobile are assessed any time you activate or extend a parking session.  If you are creating a session and see that the charge only includes your transaction fee, parking may be free.”

This statement begs the Staff of The Ridgewood Blog to ask the following:  Has the Village of Ridgewood instructed Parkmobile to “code” their system with the times, days, and dates on which parking in each specific Ridgewood zone is free.  For example, if a user accesses the Parkmobile app in any Ridgewood zone on a Sunday, is the Parkmobile transaction charge the only charge that shows up, or is an hourly parking rate posted as well?  What about parking at meters after 6:00 PM?  And how will the free shopper parking during “Downtown for the Holidays” be handled?

We would appreciate feedback from any Parkmobile users regarding this issue.

Thanks.

Posted on by — 3 Comments

Ridgewood Parking : an Idea

Chestnut_street_parking_theridgewoodblog

September 26th 2015
the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, The Ridgewood Exxon station on Godwin Ave. is closing.

Station sold to Citizen Bank. Interesting, the station was closed last year to replace the gas tanks. Just what we need, another bank. But this one will have 3 drive-thru teller windows.

Sign at the gas station says effective October 1st., the parking lot is to be closed.
So, that affects 45 parking spots commuters use for the train.

If the Ken Smith dealership becomes housing, that eliminated 80 to 100 spots for Ridgewood workers w/ special passes.

Hudson Street becomes a parking deck. During the 3 years constructions, that eliminated 120 spots temporarily. Toss in Brogan Cadillac parking spots, if that becomes housing, we have have a total of non-usable parking of approx. 300 spots.

Here’s what we need to do.

All neighborhoods around the train station and even the Ridgewood Park & Ride, do not allow commuter parking on the streets except a few areas.Home owners complain they don’t want cars parked in front of their houses all day.

Time to stop complaining.

I live across from one of the town schools and the teachers park on each side of the street. Should we ban that because they’re on my street?

So, don’t you think by opening up streets for commuter parking, can make parking for those wanting to shop in town better?

Here’s what I’m proposing.

Those current spots near mass transit, are moved a block or 2 further away. ( Where they are not currently allowed)Then the current commuter spots become shoppers spots.

Think about it. Hmmmmmm

Posted on by — 5 Comments

Save Our Village!!

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog

VOLUNTEERS NEEDED TODAY AND SUNDAY!!

Dear Friend,

We are asking for your help this weekend to get the word out about the big vote on Wednesday. The future of our village is at stake.

Come join a group of enthusiastic volunteers TODAY and/or Sunday at 1:00 pm to help pass out flyers and talk to our fellow residents about the importance of showing up for Wednesday’s vote at Village Hall.

Many, many residents have written emails to the Mayor and Council (it’s not too late for you to write, too — see attachment), there were four compelling Letters to the Editor in the paper yesterday (see links below), and our cause has gone viral on Facebook.  We have a lot of momentum going into Wednesday’s meeting, and we need all the help we can get to make one final push!!

YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

When: Sat/Sun 1pm
Where: Northwest corner of Van Neste Park (Across from Raymond’s)
Why:  Because this is the real rent we pay for living in a great democracy and a place like Ridgewood.

If you have kids, please bring them. This is a great opportunity to teach civic engagement.

If you plan to arrive, please email Dana at [email protected] or call 917-685-9056

If you can’t make it but want to be involved, email Dana as well.

Hope to see you out there this weekend — and at the Village Council meeting on WEDNESDAY!!

Thank you for your continued support!!

Citizens for a Better Ridgewood
[email protected]

Posted on by — 12 Comments

Reader say , The apartments will be filled with the people who always move to towns with good schools

clock_cbd_theridgewoodblog

Schedler and Valley people are tired of fighting and people are confused/think it is over anyway.

I am not one of those three but I will tell you this, the worst way to reduce taxes is to have high density housing that is not age restricted. The absolute worst. Actually no, the worst is that they are tricking seniors/empty nesters into believing that this is for them, if it were they would be age restricted. Fact is one of the developers admitted there is not enough market for empty nesters to even get a loan for that purpose so they are well aware that the demand is not there. The apartments will be filled with the people who always move to towns with good schools, young families who use services at a rate much higher than seniors.

So our beautiful town will not only be more congested but you will pay more for it.

Posted on by — 6 Comments

Citizens for a Better Ridgewood : Say NO to High Density Housing

clock_cbd_theridgewoodblog
Please copy and paste this Quick and Easy email message to council. We MUST be heard. The more people who send the more we will be heard. Feel free to add your own personal touch.

Step 1: copy and paste these email addresses into the recipient line:

 

[email protected], gha[email protected], msedon@ridgewoodnj.net, sknudsen@ridgewoodnj.net, apucciarelli@ridgewoodnj.net

Step 2: copy and paste this into the Subject line:
 
Say NO to High Density Housing
 

Step 3: copy and paste this text into the message:

 
 

Dear Village Council,

 

I’m writing to urge you to vote “no” on the high density housing proposed for our Historic Central Business District. The density is too high and should not be considered for Ridgewood. If you think it should be considered, please take the time to first listen to the people who elected you then take the time to hear from real experts about the impact on taxes, traffic, infrastructure, schools, property values, quality of life, stress on services, and more.

 

The impact on our Village will be irreversible and this permanent change requires more than just two meetings and a quick vote. It certainly requires you to consider the will of the public, the homeowners, the taxpayers, the residents, the VOTERS who elected you!

 

Posted on by — 20 Comments

Vote “Yes for parking garage” signs start appearing

Parking Garage

September 25,2015

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Several of the pictured signs were observed on lawns in front of private residences on Ridgewood’s East Side early this morning, including the Mayor’s home on Linwood Avenue and the Deputy Mayor’s home on Cottage Place.

Although the First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects a property owner’s right to display such signs, is it appropriate for both the Mayor and Deputy Mayor to be displaying their respective support for the garage not knowing 1) what the final price tag is, 2) what the design will be, nor 3) how the garage will be funded?  In short, they both have little if any factual data about the project, but yet they support it?  Duh?

Additionally, what taxpayer funded resources, if any, were used to design, print, and/or distribute these signs?  The Mayor mentioned during a recent public meeting how pleased he was that promotional material in support of the referendum was being developed (perhaps an inappropriate comment for an official meeting); did the Village’s contribution to the endeavor stop there, or is there more?

They have zero idea how much taxpayers will be on the hook for this pie in the sky project, but they’re happy to be riding the train out of the station.  ALL ABOARD!

Posted on by — 5 Comments

Ridgewood Water Serious Capacity Issues

RidgewoodWaterLogo_061912_rn_tif_

September 25 2015

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, If the current water storage tanks, wells, pumps, are not sufficient to meet current summer time peak demands (as Peak summertime demands are not the design standard, Average daily demands are the standard), what would happen with future growth as in the proposed apartments? There might not even be sufficient water supply for average household daily demands, let alone for firefighing. We can forget about outdoor irrigation of any kind completely, and become a cement city.
Additional larger capacity storage tank, wells and pumps, at another location in Ridgewood, should be addressed now. Other towns serviced such as Wyckoff has shown population growth, building expansion since the 1997 water study.

https://mods.ridgewoodnj.net/pdf/water/08VVFAQs.pdf
Review of 1997 study referenced in 2008 “Valley View Storage Tank Replacement study, indicated “minor additional demand might occur in decade or over several decades, not focusing on future demand should it occur, saying future change would be minimal. The sizing of the Valley View Tank should be a viable solution for many decades into the future.”
“Population growth has not markedly changed in the last 30 – 40 years. The minor amount of growth that has occurred in the last two decades can be characterized as in-filling (e.g. one house is torn down and two or three are built in its place). There is little room for development of any significance throughout the entire system that will have any impact on typical daily demands.
“The project is for regional public good. True, the project more directly services a particular area, but that area houses numerous properties that service the general public good – Ridgewood High School, GW Middle School, Village Hall, the downtown area, Valley Hospital, etc.”
Reference was made to the E.Glen and N. Monroe as possible sight . Study shows there are 4 other tanks with larger capacity 2,000,000 gallons, and 1 tank with 2,5000,000.gallon at locations Wyckoff, Glen Rock, E. Saddle River Rd, Ridgewood. Referenced other locations with lesser capacities.
https://mods.ridgewoodnj.net/pdf/water/08VVFAQs.pdf

Posted on by — 7 Comments

Readers Question all the focus on Tito’s Burritos , seems a bit of selective outrage

itsgreektome2 theridgewoodblog.net

All of this focus on Tito’s, but It’s Greek to Me gets a pass on those intrusive planters. I wonder why? Money talks, nobody walks. Support the right candidate for public office and you’ll be good to go too!

Mayor Paul’s friend Paulie V (Greek to Me)got away with that no questions asked. They are ugly, illegal, and dangerous (wall).

I agree, it is clean, it looks good. The colors are not outrageous. No neon green or anything wild. For heaven’s sake, DROP IT

I love Titos, great food, reliably delicious, nice employees, good prices. Leave them alone. Please!

Since when is the opinion of the historic commission binding ???

Posted on by — 9 Comments

Planning Board, Ridgewood restaurant still seeking a solution over color scheme

Titos Burritos theridgewoodblog.net

SEPTEMBER 22, 2015    LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2015, 10:54 AM
BY MARK KRULISH
STAFF WRITER |
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

A discussion on Tito’s Burritos color scheme will have to wait until next month as the Planning Board announced the matter would be carried to the second meeting in October.

Planning Board attorney Gail Price notified the board that attorney David Rutherford had sent a letter requesting the application be carried until the Oct. 20 meeting, stating his client was still working on a few items.

Price said Rutherford’s email indicated they were “re-working” things and were going back for another meeting with the village’s Historic Preservation Commission (HPC).

Board alternate Isabella Altano and Councilwoman Susan Knudsen indicated that representatives from Tito’s had recently met with the HPC to discuss the situation and possible solutions.

A public hearing began last month as Tito’s co-owner Mike Caldarella admitted the dark blue paint job on the front entrance was done accidentally, but without permission from the town.

However, some members of the board took issue with the color scheme itself, as did the HPC, which believes the color is out of character with the surrounding buildings.

 

https://www.northjersey.com/news/business/board-ridgewood-restaurant-working-on-a-solution-1.1415397