Posted on

Biden Tax Plan Will Destroy US Competitiveness

Integrated tax rate on corporate income would be the highest in the OECD under Biden tax plan. Biden corporate tax increase Biden corporate income tax rate increase Biden corporate rate increase

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Washington DC, according to the Tax Foundation if the Biden tax plan is fully implemented,  increasing the corporate income tax would undermine the progress policymakers made four years ago. An increase in the federal corporate tax rate to 28 percent would raise the U.S. federal-state combined tax rate to 32.34 percent, giving the U.S. the highest combined corporate income tax rate in the OECD, ahead of France at 32.02 percent and the U.S. rank on the Tax Foundation’s International Tax Competitiveness Index would fall from 21st in 2020 to 30th, with the corporate rank falling from 19th to 33rd overall.

Continue reading Biden Tax Plan Will Destroy US Competitiveness

Posted on

U.S. Capital Gains Tax Rate, 6th Highest in OECD

Obama-Golf

Obama-Golf

U.S. Capital Gains Tax Rate, 6th Highest in OECD
March 25,2015

President’s budget proposal would bump rate to 5th highest

Washington, DC ,The United States currently has the 6th highest top marginal tax rate on capital gains in the OECD at 28.6 percent. President Obama’s recent budget proposal seeks to increase the top marginal tax rate on capital gains to 32.8 percent, which would give the U.S. the fifth highest rate in the industrialized world. However, this expansion of the capital gains tax could lead to slower economic growth, according to a recent report from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

“Increasing taxes on capital income discourages savings, which leads to lower levels of investment and slower economic growth,” explains Tax foundation Economist Kyle Pomerleau. “The expansion of this tax as suggested in the recent budget proposal would only further this bias against saving.”

The report argues that as more people prefer consumption today due to this bias, there will be less capital available in the future. For investors, this represents less available capital for factories, machines, and other investment opportunities.

“Additionally, capital gains taxes create a lock-in effect that reduces the mobility of capital,” adds Pomerleau. “People are less willing to realize capital gains from one investment in order to move to another when they face a tax on their returns. Funds will be slower to move to better investments, further reducing economic growth.”

By raising the federal top marginal capital gains tax rate, President Obama’s FY 2016 budget would compound these negative effects and make the U.S. tax code less competitive globally. On the other hand, the report finds that lowering taxes on capital gains would have the reverse effect, increasing investment and leading to greater economic growth.

The report’s key findings include:

The average combined federal, state, and local top marginal tax rate on long-term capital gains in the United States is 28.6 percent – 6th highest in the OECD.
This is more than 10 percentage points higher than the simple average across industrialized nations of 18.4 percent, and 5 percentage points higher than the weighted average.
Nine industrialized countries exempt long-term capital gains from taxation.
California has the 3rd highest top marginal capital gains tax rate in the industrialized world at 33 percent.
The taxation of capital gains places a double-tax on corporate income, increases the cost of capital, and reduces investment in the economy.
The President’s FY 2016 budget would increase capital gains tax rates in the United States from 28.6 percent to 32.8, the 5th highest rate in the OECD.

Posted on

OECD Fears Middle Class Civil Unrest Is Coming

url-1

OECD Fears Middle Class Civil Unrest Is Coming

by Tyler Durden on 07/18/2014 14:49 -0400

This idea that we live in a world where government cares about us is just the biggest propaganda ever. Everyone one will only pursue their own self-interest.The OECD has interesting come out and warned that if governments are unable to stop the transfer of wealth to a small financial elite, the displeasure of the dispossessed middle class could easily turn and go against the prevailing governmental systems. The OECD has claimed to have discovered the existence of a veritable “lumpenproletariat” in the supposedly rich Germany. Even though the systems attempt to provide citizens with bread and circuses in the traditional Roman style to keep them quiet, such  tactics they warn may have now become obsolete after the ultimate circus is over – the World Cup.

The problem with all of these studies is the look at class warfare and not at the consumption of government. They do not follow the breadcrumbs. What if you take everything from the elites? Who will start businesses to create jobs? Who will be left to take as government pensions keep ticking away. In Germany, it has now surpassed 50% of the average persons labor goes to taxes.
 
There are a host of books coming out all about just taxing the rich more ignoring reducing the cost of government. The German bestseller “The plunder of the world” presents just another socialist agenda arguing that the rich get richer even in times of crisis, while the consequences of a crisis are always carried by the lower-income groups and the middle class. It fails to explain that the rich get richer from investment, not wage income. This is an argument to effective tax investment substantially to even out the disparity? But who then creates the jobs that produce anything? Is it that those who invest unfairly make money when the others pay too much in taxes and do not invest? Anyone who thinks that these books are real must be insane. If you think for one second raising the taxes on the rich will mean your taxes will decline – good luck. In Germany, Tax Freedom Day has passed the 50% and even in Canada it is now June 9, 2014. In the United States it is April 21st for 2014.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-18/oecd-fears-middle-class-civil-unrest-coming