Posted on Leave a comment

>Could this happen here?

>Vallejo Files For Bankruptcy Due To Budget Woes
VALLEJO (CBS 5 / AP) ― The city of Vallejo filed Friday for bankruptcy protection to deal with a ballooning budget deficit caused soaring employee costs and declining tax revenue.

The Bay Area community of about 120,000 residents is the largest California city to declare bankruptcy.

Mayor Osby Davis said the city’s attorneys filed papers seeking Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection in federal court in Sacramento on Friday morning.

“We’ve exhausted all avenues at this point, and this is all we had left,” Davis said. “I had hoped to avoid it all the way up until yesterday. It’s something we can’t avoid … We can’t pay our bills.”

The City Council voted to authorize the city manager to file for bankruptcy on May 6 after months of failed negotiations with its public safety unions.

Some officials blame the chronic financial crisis on labor contracts they said provide overly generous pay and benefits to the city’s police officers and firefighters.

Those city workers comprise about three-quarters of Vallejo’s general fund.

The unions maintain compensation for Vallejo’s public safety employees is in line with that of other Bay Area cities.

(© 2008 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

Posted on Leave a comment

>Taxpayer State House Rally May 29th

>Taxpayer State House Rally May 29th

SICK OF AMERICA’S HIGHEST TAXES?
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

Join AFP-NJ Executive Director Steve Lonegan, other great speakers, and fellow activists for a Taxpayer Rally at the State House in Trenton. Help us let New Jersey’s big government know that we are fed up with this state’s highest in the nation taxes and worst business climate.

May 29th – 4 PM, State House Steps, Trenton, NJ

Mark the date and BE THERE May 29th at 4:00 pm on the State House steps!

Posted on Leave a comment

>A frightening defense of Everyday Math

>On May 20, an Illinois newspaper reported that in the city of Oswego, Everyday Math 3 has been adopted, even in the face of much parent criticism of Everyday Math 2. According to the news article, teachers said Everyday Math addressed some of the shortcomings of Everyday Math 2 “by inviting parent involvement and identifying students’ weaknesses.”

One wonders what are the other shortcomings? And why do teachers need parent involvement in order to teach math? Isn’t teaching math the teacher’s job? But more frightening is this teacher’s explanation for why Everyday Math is so great: “Now we can tell you if it’s difficulty (converting) fractions to decimals … if its difficulty knowing what an angle is.”

Does this mean that until Everyday Math 3, teachers could not discern students’ areas of difficulties? This is absurd, and if it’s true, then this is the best evidence yet that this generation of public schools have lost all the good teachers to industry. What’s left for our schools is second-rate at best. Therein lies the true problem. Worst of all, the public is buying the notion that teachers lack judgment without these elaborate, expensive, and convoluted materials.

Read the article: https://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/958899,2_1_AU20_OSSKL_S1.article

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

>Ridgewood Memorial Day Run

>Celebrating 33 years of racing in New Jersey, the Fred d’Elia Ridgewood Run remains one of the oldest and most popular running events in the state. A Memorial Day tradition for families and friends, it attracts over 3500 participants, from world-class athletes to the weekend warrior. This year is guaranteed to be one of the most spectacular and memorable races ever. Due to the popularity of the race, pre-registration only and registration is CLOSED at 4,000. Don’t miss out and REGISTER EARLY!

Hello Everyone,
I am looking forward to meeting all of you and becoming part of this wonderful, traditional event. I am honored to be selected as the new race director of the Fred d’Elia Run and I hope that my responsibilities as Director of Development for Bergen County’s United Way will provide me with the necessary tools to make the 2008 event the best ever.

Please visit our website over the next few months to read about all the exciting things coming your way in May.

Cheryl Moses,
Race Director, Fred d’Elia Ridgewood Run

840 – HHK Wheelchair 10K race
8:40 – Runners in corrals
8:45 – Park Ave BMW 10K
10:15 – Park Ave BMW 5K
11:15 – Valley Hospital Womens Mile
11:40 – Valley Hospital Mens Mile
12 Noon – Ridgewood YMCA Fun Run/Health Walk Mile

Email: Ridgewood Run Race Director

Email: North Jersey Masters
Mail: North Jersey Masters
PO Box 56
Ridgewood, NJ 07451
Phone: (973) 333-4837

Sponsors
Amenities
10K Course Map
5K Course Map
Mile Course Map
Course Records
Family Team Registration
Local Weather
Race History

2008 Registration is now open! Register online with either Metro Race Forum or Active.com, or download our race application.

The Ridgewood Run has been designated the 2008 Road Runners Club of America (RRCA) State Championship for New Jersey.

Total prize money for 2008 increased to $6,120! See Awards & Prizes.

Race day photos will be provided by Ken Shelton Photography.
View last year’s photos.

2007 featured the USATF-NJ Championship 10K for Masters men and women. More info…

2007 Results posted: All Results
All results by compuscore

Thank You to all our runners, support staff, volunteers, sponsors and supporter for another great race!

10K
Men: Denese Denibob – 30:03
Women: Atalalech Ketema – 34:43
5K
Men: Gurmessa Megevssa – 14:23
Women: Aziza Alieu – 16:47
10K Wheelchair
Men: Krige Schabort – 20:16
Women: Jessica Galli – 25:38
Elite Mile
Men: Stephan Chemlany – 04:12
Women: Claudia Camargo – 04:40
Masters Mile
Men: Paul Mwangi – 04:38
Women: Zophia Wieciorkowska – 05:19
Family Team Kalwa – 1:01:25

All Results

10K – 500 pts.
5K – 500 pts.

Ridgewood, NJ

48° F
Mostly Cloudy

Hour-by-hour 10-day

General Info Registration Awards & Prizes Directions Results Photos North Jersey Masters Home

Hotline: (973) 333-4837
Email: Ridgewood Run Race Director
Mail: PO Box 56, Ridgewood, NJ 07451
Comments for the webmaster

© 2008 North Jersey Masters Track and Field Club.

Posted on Leave a comment

Orchard School, Ridgewood, NJ has become our 2007-2008 Grand Prix champions…again!

>CHESS
from the New Dean of Chess Blog

Orchard School, Ridgewood, NJ has become our 2007-2008 Grand Prix champions…again! Though Mt. Horeb School, Warren, NJ gave them a run for their money, with the home field advantage for the final tournament, Orchard outscored Mt. Horeb by only 10 points to take 1st place.

In the individual race, Simon Thomas, George Washington Middle School, Ridgewood, NJ gave another stellar performance to finish first.

Our final spots for the Tournament of Champions has also been decided. Michael Bender, St. Joseph’s High School, Metuchen, NJ has become the 7th qualifier while Richard Davisson, Shongum Elementary, Randolph, NJ is the wildcard.

Please visit our Grand Prix page for all standings and our Tournament of Champions page for more information.

Congratulations to all and good luck to our champions!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Local 4th of July Fireworks Displays May Be Lackluster

>May 17, 2008

This July 4, Fewer Bombs May Burst in Air

THE NEW YORK TIMES

The New York Times

By KATE MURPHY

An explosion that destroyed 20 fireworks warehouses in China three months ago will probably dim night skies in the United States this Fourth of July.

Fireworks vendors said that because of the sudden shortage, fireworks like bottle rockets, ladyfingers and Roman candles, as well as mortars used in professional displays, will be hard to get, meaning many of the usual pyrotechnic extravaganzas across the country may have to be curtailed or even canceled.

“Everybody in the industry is scared to death that their orders aren’t going to get here in time,” said Ken Sprague, president of Hamburg Fireworks Display in Lancaster, Ohio, which choreographs fireworks shows throughout the Midwest. “I haven’t slept a full night in months.”

The blast on Feb. 14 in the Chinese port city of Sanshui shook homes miles away and fireworks soared and burst in midair for more than 24 hours, according to local news reports. It is unclear whether anyone was harmed.

The accident led to a ban on fireworks shipments at all Chinese ports except two that are far from fireworks production areas, resulting in further delays.

“We’re not getting much information about what caused the fire,” said Julie L. Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association, which represents the $900 million fireworks industry in the United States. “We’ve heard reports ranging from improperly packaged material to a security guard flicking a cigarette.”

The result, she says, is that exports of consumer fireworks from China are down 35 percent this year and professional display fireworks are down 40 percent. Many shipments have not even left factories in Liu Yang, a city in Hunan Province, where more than 95 percent of fireworks sold in the United States are made.

When fireworks shipments arrive at the shallow port of Beihai, they may sit on the docks for weeks waiting for transfer to cargo ships anchored outside Hong Kong harbor.

Only one shipping line, Maersk, will handle pyrotechnics after Hyundai Merchant Marine discontinued service following a blaze aboard one of its vessels carrying fireworks in 2006.

“It’s been a perfect storm,” said Harry Chang, president of marketing for Black Cat fireworks, a division of Shiu Fung Fireworks in Hong Kong. Wholesale prices for fireworks are up 30 percent this year, he said, because of the limited supply, as well as higher shipping costs and increased prices for chemicals, paper and labor.

“People will need to be prepared to dig deeper,” said William A. Weimer, vice president of the B. J. Alan Company in Youngstown, Ohio, one of the largest importers of fireworks in the United States.

Because he ordered earlier than usual this year, he already has 85 percent of his shipments from China. “A lot of other guys are in big trouble,” he said, adding that he has received frantic calls from competitors hoping to buy some of his inventory. “It looks like some communities aren’t going to have shows this year.”

American manufacturers of munitions and demolition explosives said they were getting inquiries from fireworks show operators, hoping they can custom-make shells for them.

Bill Bahr, president of Red Dragon Tactical Supplies in Farmingdale, N.J., which makes various training devices for the State Department, said he was going to try to shift some production over to fireworks but “there’s only so much we can do.”

Transporting explosives has become difficult since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, so “people are going to have to come here and get it,” he said.

If shipments do not leave China in the next two weeks, millions of pounds of fireworks may not make it to the United States in time for the Fourth of July.

Jim Souza, president of Pyro Spectaculars by Souza, the company based in Rialto, Calif., that handles the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks display in New York, said he had not yet received two of his shipping containers. But, he said, “the show will go on.”

Labor Day, Christmas and New Year’s fireworks displays are even more doubtful since the Chinese government announced on April 14 that it would ban the transport of some 256 types of hazardous or potential explosive materials on various dates through October to coincide with planned Olympic events.

This includes not only fireworks and the chemicals used to make them but also substances used in some pharmaceuticals, coolants, solvents and cosmetics.

Bob Richard, deputy associate administrator for hazardous material safety with the Department of Transportation, said he was working to get the Chinese government to rethink its directive, considering the “serious impact” it would have on the fireworks industry and the “entire supply chain.”

He said his department was also working on a long-term plan to get more ports open to fireworks by providing Chinese officials with guidance on better packaging, labeling and enforcement.

“The last thing we want is a shortage to force the market underground,” Mr. Richard said.

Posted on Leave a comment

>A Ridgewood Blog Poll: Ridgewood’s Next Mayor Should Be . . .

>Although the responsibility for choosing Ridgewood’s next mayor rests entirely with the Village Council, The Fly would like to know which Council member our readers would select if given the opportunity.

So, who would you like Ridgewood’s next mayor to be?

Paul Aronsohn

Keith Killion

Pat Mancuso

David Pfund

Anne Zusy

Check the “posted comments” button for responses.

Thanks.

The Right Gift at the Right Priceshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=60066

Posted on Leave a comment

>Emergency room to open at old Pascack Valley Hospital

>Emergency room to open at old Pascack Valley Hospital
Thursday,May 15, 2008

BY LINDY WASHBURNSTAFF WRITERWESTWOOD – An emergency room is to open in October, and a full-service 150-bed hospital will open within two years at the former Pascack Valley Hospital, under plans presented to the public Wednesday night by Hackensack University Medical Center.

“It’s going to be an incredible, beautiful community hospital again – big time!” John Ferguson, Hackensack’s chief executive officer, told 150 residents of northern Bergen County gathered at the Westwood Community Center.

At the same time, Touro University College of Medicine will open a four-year medical school, starting with 40 students in the fall of 2009 or 2010, said its dean, Dr. Paul Wallach. The students, who will eventually number 400, will live in apartments and homes in the community.

“This is probably the most profound developments in Westwood,” said Mayor John Birkner, who chaired the special meeting of the Westwood mayor and council. He invited local residents to tell hospital officials what they missed about the former hospital on Old Hook Road, and what services they would like to see return.

The 251-bed hospital closed in November, after years of financial losses forced it into bankruptcy. More than 750 nurses, technologists and other staff members lost their jobs, and residents of 18 surrounding towns had to seek emergency care elsewhere.

Hackensack and Touro bought the hospital and its 20 acres on Old Hook Road for $45 million in a bankruptcy court auction. They must state approval for both the emergency room and the hospital beds to reopen.

A three-phase plan to restore medical services and renovate the hospital over the next 30 months was presented by Robert Garrett, Hackensack’s chief operating officer. It includes single rooms for all patients, as well as cardiac catheterization, a sleep center, a wellness center, and radiology and oncology services.

Kay Gellert of Westwood, a long time cardiac rehabilitation patient, asked if the Hackensack planned to reopen that popular service.

“We need to reopen that kind of facility,” said Dr. Peter Gross, Hackensack’s chief medical officer, in answer. “This is certainly one of the services we are considering.”

All of the doctors formerly affiliated with Pascack Valley have indicated their interest in returning to the hospital when it reopens, he said.

Ferguson joked with members of the public as they asked questions, and stressed the hospital’s commitment to bringing high-quality medical care to the Westwood site. He asked for continued support, as the hospital’s applications to the state Health Department wend their way through the regulatory process.

Posted on Leave a comment

Update Town Garage: Controversial Eminent Domain Hearing Scheduled For Friday, 5/16

>Town+Garage
The Honorable Peter E. Doyne will preside over tomorrow’s scheduled Village of Ridgewood vs. Ridgewood 120 LLC eminent domain hearing. The hearing will begin at 9:00 AM in Room 323 of the Bergen County Courthouse.

Village officials are seeking to condemn Ridgewood 120 LLC’s property, located at 120 Franklin Avenue, to facilitate construction of a parking garage/retail complex.

Ridgewood 120 LLC’s principals have filed a counterclaim, which accuses Mayor David T. Pfund, Deputy Mayor Betty G. Wiest, Councilman Jacques Harlow, Councilman Patrick A. Mancuso, and Councilwoman Kim Ringler-Shagin of reneging on several “secret promises” regarding the plaintiff’s acquisition of the property.

Hotwire

Posted on Leave a comment

>Valley Hospital Update:Planning board asks for amendment to village plan

>Tuesday, May 13, 2008

BY BOB GROVES

THE RECORD

STAFF WRITER

The Ridgewood Planning Board has asked for an amendment to the village master plan that balances Valley Hospital’s desire to expand with the fears of residents that their neighborhood will be overwhelmed by the new structures.

The Planning Board decided it must first change the village master plan before it can decide on Valley’s building plan. The board asked village planner Blais Brancheau to draft an amendment to the master plan and its hospital zone ordinance.

The move follows months of heated discussion over Valley’s proposed $750 million plan to replace two old buildings with three new ones and to add a above- and below- ground parking ramp.

Without changes in the master plan, Valley would have to continually seek variances from the village board of adjustment, which is “a dysfunctional process,” said Planning Board Chairman David Nicholson.

This will further delay the Planning Board’s vote on Valley’s plan, which Nicholson had hoped would take place by the end of this month May.

“No one is more disappointed than I am” at delaying the vote, he said. “But I think in making some changes to the ordinances, we can improve the process dramatically.”

“We would certainly like to move this along,” Nicholson said at a special public meeting of the board on Monday at Benjamin Franklin Middle School. About 50 people attended.

At the meeting, the board also received documents from Valley in response to its request for more information.

Valley, for example, said it could not shift the loading area of its north building to a location further south on its campus because it would disrupt ambulances dropping patients at its emergency department.

The hospital also supplied drawings of a taller, tiered “wedding cake” design building, a concept that opponents had suggested as a less obtrusive alternative because the height would be in the center of the building.

A “wedding cake” structure, with two levels of ventilating equipment on top, would be 132 feet high, compared to Valley’s proposed 80-foot high buildings, said Megan Fraser, a hospital spokeswoman.

“I can’t say how seriously the board members would really take that idea” of the wedding cake, Nicholson said.

The board, he said however, is concerned about maintaining proper building setbacks, such as the 38 feet that Valley’s parking ramp must be from Linwood Avenue on its south border.

He noted, however, that Bergen County has rights to an easement on Linwood, and could decide to widen the roadway to accommodate hospital traffic.

Earlier this year, Valley asked the Planning Board to amend the master plan and hospital zone ordinance to allow what it contends is needed modernization. Concerned Residents of Ridgewood, a neighborhood group which opposes the hospital plan, asked for amendments to “limit its impact on the community and preserve the village’s residential character.”

Fraser said she was “delighted that the board overwhelmingly recognized the need for change.”

Paul Gould of Concerned Residents said he agreed with the board that setbacks are of “primary importance.” The group, he said however, “still believes that the proposed size of the expansion is too big for this village.”

The Planning Board set May 27 as the tentative date for its next public meeting on the issue.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Title 9 Not the Answer for Scientific Men’s Club

>My take on the following article is that it is more evidence that the constructivist death grip Ms. Botsford holds on the Ridgewood district’s math and science programs stems from an agenda having nothing to do with encouraging academic excellence.

Title 9 Not the Answer for Scientific Men’s Club
Allison Kasic
Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Graduation season is upon us. In the coming weeks thousands of American students will celebrate their accomplishments, reflect on four years’ of memories, don silly robes and hats, and graduate from college. The majority of those students will be women, who nationally make up 6 in 10 college students.

Women have made tremendous strides in all aspects of life over the last few decades, but perhaps none is as pronounced as in higher education. In 1970, only 42 percent of undergraduate students were female. Women now dominate campus life, raking in the majority of bachelor’s and master’s degrees awarded each year. But those tremendous accomplishments won’t stop those dedicated to convincing women they are victims.

The latest charge from the gender equity crowd is that women face widespread discrimination in STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). They say government action (in the form of increased Title IX enforcement) is needed to correct this imbalance.

Much of the hysteria can be traced back to a 2007 report from the National Academy of Sciences. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering looked at the different rates of participation between the sexes in STEM fields and concluded that discrimination was the key factor holding women back. The report has been taken as gospel since its publication, but policymakers need to take a closer look at the potential causes of this gender disparity before jumping to “fix” the discrimination problem.

Most likely several factors are at play. Unfortunately, some of the likely factors are considered so taboo in the modern academic environment that few people will openly discuss them. Larry Summers came under tremendous fire at Harvard when he suggested that innate biological differences between the sexes might be a factor. Summer’s detractors may have been offended by his comments, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t an element of truth in there. There is a growing body of research revealing biological differences that affect how men and women learn and process information. Women also tend to profess different interests and priorities. The key question is how big of an impact do those differences have on the disparity in STEM fields.

At this point all potential factors should be on the table for serious inquiry, including differences in aptitude, learning styles, temperament, interest, work-life priorities, and discrimination. To jump ahead and label discrimination the key factor is, at best, intellectually lazy and, at worst, purposefully misleading. I, for one, find it incredibly unlikely that discrimination is the key factor. Women have broken down countless barriers in recent history, including “boys clubs” like business school and law school. Are we really to believe that the last unbreakable bastion of sexism in the academy is being led by scientists in white lab coats?

Even if there is a problem that needs fixing, politicians should pause before looking to Title IX as the solution. Currently, Title IX enforcement is most visible in college athletics where it is lauded for increasing female athletic participation over the past 35 years. But the successes of Title IX have often come with a serious price tag. Too often, Title IX gets used as a weapon against male athletes in the form of cut teams and roster caps rather than a positive force for women’s athletics. The problem lies in the controversial proportionality measurement—the gender breakdown of athletes must match the gender breakdown of the student body. That leaves schools with two options: recruiting more female athletes or cutting opportunities for men. Schools often go for the latter. It’s hard to see how that sort of quota mentality would benefit women in STEM fields.

Universities should aim to ensure that any remaining barriers to fields of studies are removed so that students are free to choose their preferred area of study. Yet any effort to create a politically correct gender balance is a misuse of power that disserves students.

Copyright © 2008 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.

Posted on Leave a comment

The incumbents were swept out yesterday because (top 10 reasons):

>Of their sheer stupidity for accepting $1.2 million in gifts from an individual who had a controversial application pending before the Zoning Board of Adjustment

Of their continued push to build a superfluous, $30 million, gargantuan parking garage, even to the point of engaging in arguably unlawful negotiations with a local real estate investment firm

Of their desire to sell off capital assets (e.g., Ridgewood Water) under the premise of “too complicated to manage,” when the real reason is to raise capital for funding new property purchases for athletic fields, and to pay off debt from past leadership mistakes

Of their abject insensitivity to the constitutional rights of residents to voice opinions on community issues by erecting lawn signs

Of their efforts to cut essential public services (e.g., fire department staffing levels), while at the same time approving funds and personnel resources to move forward their own pet projects (e.g., more athletic fields)

Of their asinine decision to install spy cameras in the downtown business district over the strong objection of most residents, and despite crime statistics that refuted any need for such devices

Of their inability to control the on-duty, long-term use of alcohol and/or controlled dangerous substances by key VOR employees

Of their continued insistence to discuss matters of public interest and importance behind closed doors, and in direct violation of the NJ Open Public Meetings Act

Of their complaints regarding ineffective advisory boards (e.g., Library Board and Zoning Board of Adjustment), when it is they who have the power to appoint members to those Boards

Of their total lack of awareness that the public was just plain fed up with it all and wanted them out of office

show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=56753

Posted on Leave a comment

>Ridgewood challengers keep it civil

>By Matt Friedman

RIDGEWOOD – Anne Zusy recently registered as a Democrat to vote for Barack Obama. Paul Aronsohn likes Hillary Clinton. And Keith Killion, who’s registered as a Republican, is a John McCain supporter.

But the three stood outside of a post office in Ridgewood today to run as a team for three council seats, saying that the village needs new blood in its government. The fact that the three of them could run together, they say, is evidence how seriously this traditionally Republican town takes its non-partisan elections.

Their opponents are incumbent council members Betty Wiest, the town’s Deputy Mayor, and Jacques Harlow. Wiest spent most of the day at home calling supporters to get them out to the polls, while Harlow competed in a senior citizens’ tennis tournament, which he said would help take his mind off of the election.

At least one of the challengers will get a spot on the council, and a voice to choose whether Mayor David Pfund will keep his post (if he wants to) or whether he’ll lose those stripes and become merely another councilman.

Zusy said that she’s only focusing on the council election and hasn’t thought about whether she’d be interested in becoming mayor herself. Killion and Aronsohn both say that they’d prefer one of the council members with more experience to take the reigns.

As they paused to shake hands with the occasional passer-by and ask whether they voted yet, the three challengers lamented what they said was the slow pace of the village government.

“I’ve watched the council for quite a while, and there’s a failure to get things done in a timely manner,” said Killion, who’s retiring as the village’s Captain of Detectives in July.

Killion was upset to learn that he was lumped with Wiest and Harlow in a robocall put out by the county’s Republican organization – which both Harlow and Wiest, who said they had nothing to do with, have condemned.

“I am suspect, not necessarily of Betty Wiest but I’m suspect of the whole incident,” he said.

Aronsohn, who worked in the Clinton State Department, served as former Gov. Jim McGreevey’s press secretary and ran for Congress before taking on this decidedly lower profile task, also condemned the call.

“It’s injecting partisan politics into a non-partisan election,” he said.

That robocall was the first flare-up in what has been, up to this point, a race with about as much conflict as the average meeting of the county’s notoriously lock-stepped Democratic organization.

But this is not a Bergen County battleground, and things are generally kept civil in this upper-middle-class village.

“I think that Ridgewood is a town known for its gentility. Everything is kind of handled with kid gloves,” said Zusy.

To Wiest, the complaints about the glacial pace of council business are founded in unrealistic expectations. Only when you’re in the position, she said, do you understand all the hoops you have to jump through to do something as simple as, say, put a fence around a pool.

“It’s not that we’re not responsive. If you don’t dot your i’s and cross your t’s in the end, if something goes wrong it’s very difficult to get back on track,” she said. “Having been there for four years, frankly, until you’re in the spot, you don’t realize what you have to go through. And I can certainly list a whole page of accomplishments that we’ve managed to take to fruition.”

And Wiest, whose husband was mayor from 1986 to 1990 and is considered a potential pick for the spot if she wins reelection, would prefer not to address that aspect of the race.

“I’m not going to go there…. I haven’t made any claim or innuendo,” she said. “I’m here to tackle issues and try to do something for the village in a positive way.”

Posted on Leave a comment

>School board elections may move to November

>Monday, May 12, 2008

THE RECORD

BY ELISE YOUNG

STAFF WRITER

New Jerseyans would elect school-board members in November rather than in the spring, under a bill approved by an Assembly committee Monday. But voters also would lose the power to decide multimillion-dollar district spending plans, which account for at least 50 percent of their property taxes.

The two-pronged bill drew a curious mix of testimony before the Assembly Education Committee. Representatives of the 200,000-member New Jersey Education Association and other lobbyists were displeased about the change in balloting date, but championed the decision to remove voters from the decision on spending.

Some committee remembers referred to a dismal voter participation rate, an average of less than 15 percent statewide.

“We need to have much more participation,” said Assemblywoman Joan Voss, D-Fort Lee. “This is disgraceful. We have to do something to get more public input into how money is spent.”

This year 14.3 percent of eligible voters voted in school elections, and they defeated 26 percent of the budgets, according to the state Department of Education. Last year 13.9 percent voted and rejected 22 percent of the budgets.

Critics acknowledged the low turnout, but argued that a move to November would politicize what is — officially, anyway — a nonpartisan event.

Ginger Gold, representing the teachers union, went so far as to suggest that the change in voting dates could be likened to a trap, forcing people to cast ballots when they rather would not.

“Just because people go into the booth doesn’t mean people will vote. You may not increase voter turnout as much as one might think,” Gold told the Assembly Education Committee. “We don’t force people to vote.”

Gregg M. Edwards, president the Center for Policy Research of New Jersey, a nonprofit public-issues group, testified that opponents to the November balloting feared a loss of power.

“It comes down to this: They don’t want more people voting,” Edwards said. He referred to his longer written testimony, which read: “The fewer the voters, the easier it is to affect election contests. The largely invisible and inaccessible April election magnifies the influence of certain special-interest groups.”

The bill was sponsored in part by Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts, D-Camden, an indication that it has significant support among the majority party.

Some committee members — including Assemblyman Scott T. Rumana, R-Wayne, who voted against the measure — said they were uneasy about excluding voters from the budget process.

“Taking the vote away from the public is a big concern for me,” he said. And as a practical issue, he said, a ballot with multiple contests may not be able to accommodate only so many names.

Some who testified pointed out that even if voters reject a local spending plan, state officials have the power to restore it. Even Edwards, so in favor of a November election, called the budget vote “a sham” and “largely symbolic.”

New Jersey’s Board of Education elections are a perennially odd rite of April: Historically low numbers of voters decide how the majority of property owners’ tax money is spent. Statewide, just 15 percent of eligible voters turn out for the contests, which take place apart from races for any other elective office. By comparison, 77 percent of eligible Bergen County voters cast ballots in the 2004 General Election.

Would-be trustees often are longtime Parent-Teacher Association activists or educators employed outside their hometowns. Their campaign budgets rarely reach four figures, a fund so limited that many candidates try to reach voters via a Web site or in interviews with weekly newspapers.

Rosemary Bernardi, a trustee in Evesham, Burlington County, told the committee that if school elections were in November — particularly in a presidential year — voters would be too preoccupied learning about candidates for more visible office.

“How much press time would you have for a school election candidate? None,” she said.

Richard Snyder, a Ramsey trustee, testified that a November election date would expose would-be candidates to machine politics, in which well-funded organizations could back a slate. Candidates who resist the machine’s overtures, he said, would be outspent and unseen.

Edwards, however, said a change to November — when voters are more aware about politics in general — could raise awareness about trustees’ role, possibly drawing more people to run.

“This could dramatically change the way school districts work,” Edwards said.