Posted on

Proposed assisted living facility in Waldwick rejected

sn-solanawaldwick_theridgewoodblog

JULY 9, 2015    LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, JULY 9, 2015, 2:53 PM
BY MICHAEL OLOHAN
CORRESPONDENT |
WALDWICK SUBURBAN NEWS

Waldwick – Following more than two hours of testimony Wednesday, July 8, by residents who have been opposing construction of an assisted living facility on Wyckoff Avenue, the zoning board voted 5-2 to reject the application after 13 months of hearings.

The board will formalize its decision by resolution at its Aug. 12 meeting, said board attorney John D’Anton. He said the developer, Formation-Shelbourne Senior Living Services, would then have 45 days to file an appeal in state Superior Court.

Formation-Shelbourne had originally proposed an 85-unit, 100-bed facility, to be known as Solana of Waldwick, on 3.5 acres that is now occupied by four single-family homes at 237, 239, 241, and 247 Wyckoff Ave. Formation-Shelbourne attorney Robert Podvey said the applicant had submitted a final revised site plan on July 7 that reduced the number of units from 85 to 79 and the bed count from 100 to 94. He said the facility was moved back on the property approximately 16 feet from Cambra Road neighbors by removing six residential units on three floors.

The applicant’s engineer, Joseph Miele of Dresdner Robin, Fairfield, said it had also slightly reduced the building’s floor area ratio and impervious coverage, though both still required variances. The facility required a total of four variances, including ones for side parking and its height of three stories. It also required a minor subdivision.

Board members Eugene Sullivan, George Tencza, Ken Gurian, Jesus Mones and Stan Wekarski opposed the application, while member George Pedersen and chair J. Patrick Hunter favored it.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/business/proposed-assisted-living-facility-in-waldwick-rejected-1.1371608

4 thoughts on “Proposed assisted living facility in Waldwick rejected

  1. You mean some town boards care what the locals say? Besides on Mars?

  2. Bad luck for them. If Big Al the Developers Friend were there it would have a sure thing and as a matter of fact he would want it higher.

  3. This is how the process should work. Notice how the developer may now go back and present a scaled down project. If it feels “too big” it probably is. Why can’t our Council majority push back even a little on the plans on the table in Ridgewood? Why do they seem to be pushing for the biggest project possible in every case?

    Part of the answer lies in the fact that our Council majority clearly continues to meet and collaborate privately. It’s clear that the Council minority (Ms. Knudsen and Mr. Sedon) are not included in these discussions. It feels like the decisions are reached and minds are made up before any public hearings or commentary even start.

  4. 8:22am, assuming you are correct about these private meetings (and I believe you are), aren’t they considered illegal?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *