Posted on Leave a comment

Congressman Garrett Visits Local Bergen County Tech Company Crestron

scott garrett creston

By Paul Nichols
Monday, Feb 22, 2016

Congressman Scott Garrett, the U.S. Representative for New Jersey’s 5th congressional district, met with employees of Crestron on Monday to tour it’s the company’s Experience Center located at its headquarters in Rockleigh, New Jersey.

Crestron, a global organization with more than 90 offices around the world, employs 1,500 employees from Bergen County and the surrounding area at its worldwide headquarters and campus in Rockleigh, New Jersey.

The campus includes the Experience Center, Research Center, manufacturing plant, pre-production facility, and distribution center.

The tour provided Garrett with an in-depth look into the world of Crestron and its award-winning, advanced control and automation technology. Crestron’s solutions have led the way for over four decades, supporting Fortune 500 companies, government organizations, leading hospitals, universities and prestigious homes.

The Crestron Experience Center combines the finest design with cutting-edge technology, for the ultimate immersive demonstration of its innovative solutions. Congressman Garrett saw firsthand how the company has evolved from a pioneer in A/V and control systems, to the world-class enterprise management company it is today.

https://bergendispatch.com/articles/37754650/Congressman-Garrett-Visits-Local-Bergen-County-Tech-Company-Crestron-.aspx

Posted on 1 Comment

GOP invokes Biden Rule No election-season Supreme Court nominees

FE_DA_121012BidenSmirk425x283-1

Biden in ’92: No election-season Supreme Court nominees

By Sarah Wheaton

02/22/16 04:36 PM EST

Updated 02/22/16 07:19 PM EST

Republicans are delighted that a recently unearthed Joe Biden speech appears to be a strong endorsement of the GOP’s current Supreme Court strategy.

“Politics has played far too large a role in the Reagan-Bush nominations to date. One can only imagine that role becoming overarching if a choice were made this year, assuming that a justice was announced tomorrow that he or she was stepping down,” Biden said on the Senate floor in June 1992, not long after Bill Clinton won the Democratic nomination to challenge then-President George H.W. Bush.

“A process that is already in doubt in the minds of many will become distrusted by all,” Biden continued. “Senate consideration of a nominee under these circumstances is not fair to the president, the nominee or to the Senate itself.”

Nearly 24 years later, after C-Span posted the old video, Republicans are offering Biden a hearty second — at least to the part of the 90-minute speech where he calls on the Senate to “seriously consider” not scheduling confirmation hearings and dismissing the potential impact of a short-handed court.

“The precedent of not confirming SCOTUS justices nominated in election years was established by both parties,” the office of Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) tweeted on Monday, with a link to a 2-minute clip of the old footage.

In the aftermath of Antonin Scalia’s death, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was quick to say that any nominee to fill the vacancy should wait until after the coming election.

The clips and quotes Republicans seized on, however, ignored a passage buried deep in the transcript where Biden called for a “compromise” pick, much as he’s done in the past week.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/joe-biden-supreme-court-nominee-1992-219635#ixzz410xD3RQl

Posted on Leave a comment

Ridgewood Symphony continues its 76th season with an all Brahms program, featuring the Orpheus Club Men’s Chorus and Metropolitan Opera tenor, Noah Baetge

12694531_10153337888566643_3954959265959599506_o

*** TICKETS ARE STILL AVAILABLE ***”Great music…close to home”

The RSO continues its 76th season with an all Brahms program, featuring the Orpheus Club Men’s Chorus and Metropolitan Opera tenor, Noah Baetge.

The concert will take place on Saturday, February 27 and will include Brahms’ well-known “Academic Festival Overture” and “Symphony No. 2 in D Major.” The program will also present selections from Brahms’ less familiar “Rinaldo,” a cantata for solo tenor, male chorus, and orchestra.

The concert will begin at 8:00 PM, and will take place at West Side Presbyterian Church at 6 Monroe Street in Ridgewood. Tickets for adults, seniors, and students cost $25, $20, and $10 in advance; and $28, $23, and $13 at the door.

The Orpheus Club Men’s Chorus and the Ridgewood Symphony represent two of Ridgewood’s oldest cultural institutions. Founded in 1909, the Orpheus Club is currently comprised of about 50 singers from New York and New Jersey and is directed by John Palatucci. The chorus is known for its varied repertoire and collaborations with other area musical groups.

The Ridgewood Symphony is led by Diane Wittry, who is in her second season as RSO Artistic Director and Conductor.

For more information on programs, subscriptions, or advance ticket sales, call (201) 612-0118, or visit the RSO website atwww.ridgewoodsymphony.org.

Posted on 2 Comments

Highest percentages of students who didn’t take exams were mostly from more affluent districts like Ridgewood

standardized-testing

February 23,2016
the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, The PARCC exams will be soon be administered once again  but the state’s first experience with the controversial tests in 2015 continues to resonate, not just for the many students who took the tests but for the many students opted out.

The Christie administration can not provide data on exactly how many sat out the test in protest, maintaining that PARCC provided no way to count each student based on their motivation.  Students could have missed the tests for many different reasons including alternative tests .However more students missed the PARCC tests than for any previous standardized testing, led by those at the high-school level and the highest percentages of students who didn’t take exams were mostly from more affluent districts like Ridgewood .

Following is a list of the 10 high schools with the highest percentage of students absent for the various tests, also taking into account the size of the school and other data. ( https://www.njspotlight.com/stories/16/02/21/the-list-nj-schools-with-the-most-students-not-taking-the-parcc-testing/ )

1. Science Park High School

While this list is dominated by schools from the wealthier suburbs, Newark’s selective Science Park High School led the way in terms of percentages, with an active student group doing much of the organizing against the testing. Better than 9 in 10 students didn’t take the 10th-grade language arts tests and the Algebra II test.

2. Montclair High School

Right up the road, Montclair was a hotbed of the protest movement in a number of its schools. At the high school, 92 percent of 11th-graders didn’t take the language arts test, and 80 percent weren’t counted on any of the math tests.

3. Brick Memorial High School

This Monmouth County high school saw a large protest movement organized by parents. Just 8 percent of students took the Algebra II test, while only 16 percent took the 11th-grade language arts exam.

4. Morristown High School

Another case of 11th-graders skipping the test, in part because it was not required to graduate. Nearly 90 percent sat out the language arts, and 82 percent skipped the highest level math exam.

5. Princeton High School

The district got a lot of attention for its opt-out movement, and also saw juniors sitting out in large numbers. But the percentages dropped in the lower grades into the 60 percent-70 percent range, albeit still a majority of students.

6. Ramsey High School

Ramsey High School was among several northern Bergen County high schools to see high numbers of students not taking PARCC tests. Nine in 10 juniors didn’t take the language arts test, although the percentage dropped to just about half in ninth grade.

7. Westwood Jr./Sr. High School

This is another affluent district that saw a vocal protest movement. It has had many students who had other options for passing the high school graduation requirements. Of the school’s 11th-graders, 91 percent weren’t tested. The percentage not taking the exams dropped below 50 percent in ninth grade.

8. Pascack Hills High School

This was another Bergen County high school with high numbers who didn’t take the test. Interestingly, the percentages were not quite matched by its regional brethren at Pascack Valley High School. Pascack Hills saw 90 percent of 11th-graders not take the language arts test, while 75 percent didn’t take the Algebra II exam.

9. Livingston High School

This Essex County high school drew some media attention when its superintendent informed families of the process for sitting out the exams. In the end, 90 percent of 11th graders skipped the language arts test, although that dropped to 54 percent for ninth-graders.

10. (tied) Bernards High School, Montville High School, Ridgewood High School, Cherry Hill High School East and West Orange High School

These schools were the leaders among dozens of high schools where at least a half of the students sat out one PARCC test or another.

Posted on Leave a comment

Ridgewood’s Super Science Saturday : There is no denying Science is super

Super_Science_-Saturday_theridgewoodblog

Science is super

To the Editor:

Science and technology inspire us to ask insightful questions and get amazing answers. This month, many students are working hard on wonderful exhibits showing the results of their own experiments at school science fairs throughout Northern New Jersey.

Super Science Saturday was founded 28 years ago to bring together student science exhibits from many different schools to encourage learning about and appreciation of science and technology in our daily lives. Professional scientists also have joined in with their own interactive exhibits and shows.

Student science exhibits remain a vital part of Super Science Saturday and show the broad interests, creativity and knowledge of Northern New Jersey students. Several generations of students fondly remember attending and exhibiting at the event.

In that spirit, the Super Science Saturday all-volunteer Executive Committee again invites students to showcase their exhibits at our 28th annual, award-winning event from 9 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on Saturday, Feb. 27 at Ridgewood High School, 627 East Ridgewood Ave., Ridgewood.

Billed as “Northern New Jersey’s biggest science extravaganza,” Super Science Saturday is a free, non-competitive event that recently won a prestigious New Jersey Inventors Hall of Fame Award for encouraging the “Advancement of Invention and Process,” among students of all ages.

Students from any school or who are home-schooled are welcome to exhibit. Signing up and bringing exhibits to Super Science Saturday is free, easy and convenient. Exhibits may be brought to Ridgewood High School from 5 to 7:30 p.m. Friday, Feb. 26, or starting at 8:30 a.m. on Saturday, Feb. 27, the day of the event. Volunteers will be there to help you find your exhibit space. Parents can sign up at supersciencesaturday.org so we can reserve a space for their student’s exhibit.

Students do not need to stay with their exhibits for the entire event. They can enjoy the 9:30 a.m. show by special guest “Thomas Edison” (wonderfully played by actor Patrick Garner of Montclair), witness interactive exhibits of robotics, wind energy and drone racing, and see a live video presentation of arctic core sampling and what it tells us about the earth’s climate history. There also are ever-popular events, such as the Great Paper Airplane Fly-off, 28-foot Egg Drop Challenge and model rocket launches, and interactive exhibits by 60 amateur and professional scientists.

Through Super Science Saturday, students can showcase their science projects to a much larger audience and be inspired by all of the educational and fun shows and exhibits at the event. For more information on Super Science Saturday, please visit supersciencesaturday.org.

MichaelAaron Flicker

Head of the Super Science Saturday Executive Committee

https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/ridgewood-letter-science-is-super-1.1514613

Posted on 12 Comments

Reader says that Mr. Sedon and Mrs. Knudsen are the only 2 on the Ridgewood Council actually doing their job

Village Council Meeting

file photo by Boyd Loving

I’m against the single super sized garage and how the Council plans to fund it through the County. However I understand why developers and the Chamber are in favor of it – they stand to profit from it’s construction and/or operation. Much as I disagree with them I at least understand their motives. What I can’t fathom however is that our Council majority seems so set in its ways on THIS design and THIS way of funding it. Why? Do they think that this is really the best solution for Ridgewood? It seems more like they have a bone to pick with their Council mates.

The Council’s job is to say to the developers and the Chamber that yes, we understand you’d like to make more money but this is not the best solution for the Village. It isn’t. What they’ve actually done is side with the developers to use all of their collective authority to ram this plan though as quickly as possible. Again, why? The Council majority is treating the results of a NON BINDING referendum as an electoral mandate when the only question they posed to us in the fall was essentially “do you think we need more parking?”. E-mails I received from the Mayor said that the design was not final (apparently it was) and made no mention of financing the project through the County. Just when I thought my intelligence couldn’t be any more insulted by these 3.

And to those that say that we could bond the garage through the Village if only Mr. Sedon and Mrs. Knudsen would agree with the developers, I’d say that Mr. Sedon and Mrs. Knudsen are the only 2 on the Council actually doing their job. They, like many of us, feel that while we need a parking solution, there are better ways to go about it. And the rush to get this done now in the face of growing doubt and opposition only raises questions about the Council majority’s motives.

Posted on 3 Comments

Vatican back peddles on Trump remarks

Pope Francis

Vatican: Pope Francis’ Comments About Donald Trump Not ‘Personal Attack or Instruction on How to Vote’

by THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.19 Feb 20165,343

The Vatican spokesman, Father Federico Lombardi, has issued aclarification regarding the Pope’s remarks to journalists Thursday, when he said, in answer to a question about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, that a person who only thinks of building walls and not about building bridges is no Christian.

Aboard the plane returning from Mexico to Rome, the Pope answered Reuters reporter Phil Pullella by saying, “I would only say: if he said these things, this man is no Christian. But we’d have to see whether he said these things. And in this matter, I would give him the benefit of the doubt.”

Since news reports bore headlines suggesting that the Pope had denied Trump’s Christianity, and other comments by the Pope had also caused some confusion, the papal spokesman released a statement Friday in an effort to clarify what the Pope was trying to say.

Lombardi said that Pope-watchers know that Francis is always repeating that we should not build walls but bridges. “He repeats this over and over, constantly, and he has also said it many times regarding the issue of migration in Europe,” he said. “So it is not a specific issue, limited to this case” but part of his general attitude, consistent with “following the Gospel directives of welcome and solidarity.”

The spokesman also insisted that the Pope was not intending a personal judgment on Trump, or trying to tell Catholics how to vote at the upcoming election.

“This case drew a lot of attention,” Lombardi said, “but he never intended it to be in any way a personal attack or an instruction on how to vote. The Pope has made it clear that he would not meddle in the voting issues in the election campaign of the United States.”

The priest said that media reports often overlooked that the Pope had said that his words “depended on the accuracy and truth of what he had been told regarding the Republican candidate’s positions, thus also giving him the benefit of the doubt.”

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/19/vatican-pope-on-trump-not-meant-as-a-personal-attack-or-an-instruction-on-how-to-vote/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Posted on 3 Comments

N.J. won’t get federal funds to improve safety on rail lines carrying oil tankers

Tanker Train

BY SCOTT FALLON
STAFF WRITER |
THE RECORD

Despite the millions of gallons of volatile crude being transported through the state by train, New Jersey will receive none of the $10 million awarded by the federal government Thursday to improve safety conditions on rail lines carrying the oil.

million awarded by the federal government Thursday to improve safety conditions on rail lines carrying the oil.

The Christie administration was among 34 applicants seeking a portion of the funds set aside by the Federal Railroad Administration to upgrade rail crossings along lines that have experienced an exponential increase in crude shipments. The oil, from the recent oil boom in North Dakota’s Bakken rock formation, has been involved in several fiery derailments, including one in Canada that killed 43 people three years ago.

Steve Schapiro, a spokesman for the state Department of Transportation, said agency officials were disappointed in not receiving any funds but understands the process was competitive.

Related:  Oil train bridges targeted in study; group says span over Passaic River decaying

Bergenfield Mayor Norman Schmelz was less diplomatic, saying the funding was inadequate to begin with. An estimated 15 to 30 trains, each carrying as much as 3 million gallons of crude, pass through his town each week. Like many communities in New Jersey, Bergenfield has homes, businesses, schools and government buildings within feet of the rail line.

“Ten million dollars probably wouldn’t be enough for Bergen County let alone the whole United States,” said Schmelz, whose emergency managers are preparing a response plan in case of a derailment. “I can’t believe there would be places in the country that are in more of a dire situation than here.”

Grants were awarded Thursday to transportation departments in Washington state, California, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Arkansas and Louisiana.

Federal Railroad Administration officials said they received requests totaling $50.8 million, more than five times the money available. “In short, there is more need than funding available and a lot of strong applications,” said Marc Willis, an agency spokesman. Neither state nor federal officials provided details Thursday about New Jersey’s application.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/n-j-won-t-get-federal-funds-to-improve-safety-on-rail-lines-carrying-oil-tankers-1.1514369

Posted on 5 Comments

New Jersey Representatives in Rare Agreement on Criticism of the Presidents Cuba Visit

fidel-castro

Garrett: President Should Not Visit Cuba Until Murderers are Returned to U.S.
Menendez : It is totally unacceptable for the president of the United States to reward a dictatorial regime
Feb 18, 2016
the staff  of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ  – Rep. Scott Garrett (NJ-05) issued the following statement after the Obama Administration announced the president will visit Cuba and meet with President Castro as early as next month:

“I’m disappointed that President Obama is willing to travel to Cuba knowing full well that the Castro regime mocks our laws and continues to harbor convicted New Jersey cop-killer Joanne Chesimard and terrorist William Morales. Despite repeated calls from me and my colleagues, the president has yet to mention the extradition of U.S. fugitives as a condition of building diplomatic relations. Cuba’s refusal to return the fugitives is insulting to everyone who has waited years to see these cold-blooded killers face justice, and the president must prioritize the extradition of U.S. fugitives in all future negotiations with the Cuban regime.”

Garrett has been a longtime critic of the Cuban regime and has repeatedly called on their government to extradite  and terrorist William Morales so they can face justice for their crimes.

While NJ Senator Bob Menendez also criticized the Presidents visit :

“It is totally unacceptable for the president of the United States to reward a dictatorial regime with a historic visit when human rights abuses endure and democracy continues to be shunned,” Menendez, who is Cuban-American, said Thursday. Menendez spoke at the Union of Cuban Ex-Political Prisoners.

“Despite the lack of reciprocity from a despotic and reinvigorated Castro regime, the president is rewarding this oppressive regime with a visit,” Menendez said. “In the case of Cuba, we should at very least expect that Joanne Chesimard will step off Air Force One with U.S. marshals.”

Posted on 7 Comments

POPE PICKS FIGHT WITH TRUMP ENTERS U.S. ELECTION BATTLE

Vatican wall

 

February 18,2016

the staff if the Ridgewood blog

Pope  Frances entered the fray of US election politics saying, “a person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian. This is not in the gospel. As far as what you said about whether I would advise to vote or not to vote, I am not going to get involved in that. I say only that this man is not Christian if he said things like that. We must see if he said things in that way and in this I give the benefit of the doubt.”

In response to the Pope, Donald  Trump released a statement and held a press conference :

If and when the Vatican is attacked by ISIS, which as everyone knows is ISIS’s ultimate trophy, I can promise you that the Pope would have only wished and prayed that Donald Trump would have been President because this would not have happened. ISIS would have been eradicated unlike what is happening now with our all talk, no action politicians.

The Mexican government and its leadership has made many disparaging remarks about me to the Pope, because they want to continue to rip off the United States, both on trade and at the border, and they understand I am totally wise to them. The Pope only heard one side of the story – he didn’t see the crime, the drug trafficking and the negative economic impact the current policies have on the United States. He doesn’t see how Mexican leadership is outsmarting President Obama and our leadership in every aspect of negotiation.

For a religious leader to question a person’s faith is disgraceful. I am proud to be a Christian and as President I will not allow Christianity to be consistently attacked and weakened, unlike what is happening now, with our current President. No leader, especially a religious leader, should have the right to question another man’s religion or faith. They are using the Pope as a pawn and they should be ashamed of themselves for doing so, especially when so many lives are involved and when illegal immigration is so rampant.

Donald J. Trump

Posted on Leave a comment

Hollywood hospital pays $17,000 in bitcoins to hackers who took control of computers

hacker-fares

Richard WintonContact Reporter

Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center paid a $17,000 ransom in bitcoins to a hacker who seized control of the hospital’s computer systems and would give back access only when the money was paid, the hospital’s chief executive said Wednesday.

The assault on Hollywood Presbyterian occurred Feb. 5, when hackers using malware infected the institution’s computers, preventing hospital staff from being able to communicate from those devices, said CEO Allen Stefanek.

The hacker demanded 40 bitcoins, the equivalent of about $17,000, he said.

“The malware locks systems by encrypting files and demanding ransom to obtain the decryption key. The quickest and most efficient way to restore our systems and administrative functions was to pay the ransom and obtain the decryption key,” Stefanek said. “In the best interest of restoring normal operations, we did this.”

The hospital said it alerted authorities and was able to restore all its computer systems by Monday with the assistance of technology experts.

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-hollywood-hospital-bitcoin-20160217-story.html

Posted on 4 Comments

2015 saw largest increase in traffic deaths in 50 years

17south_crash_theridgewoodblog

file photo by Boyd Loving

BY JOAN LOWY
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON  — The number of traffic deaths in the United States rose 8 percent from 2014 to 2015, the largest year-to-year percentage increase in a half-century, according to preliminary estimates Wednesday by the National Safety Council.

About 38,300 people were killed on U.S. roads, and 4.4 million people were seriously injured, the council said. That would make 2015 the deadliest driving year since 2008.

The council said a stronger economy and lower unemployment rates were probably among the key factors, along with lower gas prices. With driving more affordable, more people are on the road. Average gas prices were 28 percent lower last year than in 2014 and are projected to continue dropping this year.

The Transportation Department estimates a 3.5 percent increase in the number of miles driven by motorists in the United States in 2015.

The council’s estimates correspond with one from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which also found an 8 percent increase in fatalities for the first half of 2015.

Among the biggest increases last year were in Oregon (27 percent), Georgia (22 percent), Florida (18 percent) and South Carolina (16 percent). Only 13 states showed improvement, including New Mexico (a 20 percent drop), Kansas (down 7 percent) and New Jersey (lower by 2 percent).

The estimated cost of motor-vehicle deaths, injuries and property damage in 2015 was $412.1 billion, according to the council, a nonprofit organization created by Congress to promote safety. That total includes wage and productivity losses, medical expenses, administrative expenses, employer costs and property damage.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/2015-saw-largest-increase-in-traffic-deaths-in-50-years-1.1513235

Posted on 2 Comments

Healthcare : Open Letter to Patients, Physicians, and Lawmakers

1379441947-obamacare3-300x27721

Open Letter to Patients, Physicians, and Lawmakers

February 14, 2016 By Sharon Jellinek MD

This is the first letter I’ve ever written to a political figure and I pray that someone on your staff will bring this letter to your attention. I have been a physician for close to 30 years. I am a second-generation pediatrician struggling to keep an independent solo practice alive. Not one politician has addressed what I feel is the major threat to health care…the physician-patient relationship. Without this, there is no quality of care no matter what you do. Physician patient relationships require time with the patient.Most of my diagnosis is derived from my patient-parent interview and a “hands on exam” of the child. You cannot possibly read a cookbook of medical questions and treatments and have the same result. The current insurance treadmill model of primary care makes this impossible. There is a hemorrhaging exodus of well-trained physicians unwilling to jeopardize this patient relationship. Insurance companies are pushing the small man (or woman), like myself, out and replacing us with cheaper, less qualified “health care extenders” i.e. nurse practitioners, physician’s assistants, pharmacists, or whomever they can place in a white coat for less money. This is at the expense of the patient and the profit of the insurance company.

I have done everything by the book. During my 12 years of postgraduate training I earned a degree in chemistry and biology, a Masters degree in Microbiology, and MD degree from Georgetown University Medical School where I also completed my pediatric residency. I am board-certified and recertified. I have a spotless record and a loyal patient following. I am not saying this to fluff my feathers but to emphasize my dedication to my calling. It is not just a job to me. This is what I was meant to do, and I will only do it the correct way.

Coming from generations of physicians, I take my job very seriously. My father was also a pediatrician and started his office in the basement of our home. I know what quality care is, and what it is not. I grew up knowing that medicine can exist without the interference of insurance companies. At that time, people paid a fair price for an office visit and had catastrophic hospital coverage for hospitalization and procedures. (My father actually was the physician who saved John F. Kennedy’s son, John John. His name is Dr. Ira Seiler M.D. It is a true story accessible through the archives. He also attended John F. Kennedy’s inaugural ball and parade).

My father instilled in me a respect for the patient-physician relationship without which there is no quality care. Insurance companies have continued to decrease our payments knowing that we will need to see more patients in a shorter amount of time to make up for the decreasing reimbursement rates. You do not have time to foster a relationship. This may result in more medical mistakes but ultimately bring in more money to the pockets of the insurance company. This is a very dangerous game, and I have refused to play it. For that I have been threatened and penalized.

I am trying desperately to keep my small practice alive. I spend at least 30 minutes with each patient, they have access to me via my personal cell phone 24/7. I have no wait times, will always see a sick patient that day, try to avoid ER/Urgent Care visits by seeing the patient after hours myself ( to avoid medical mistakes since after hours clinics usually are not staffed by pediatricians and I end up correcting the mistakes at 3am for free anyway). Many times I’ll bring a chart home and research a condition and if I don’t know something I will find out. And for this I am listed as a physician that is not cost effective, or in other words I spend too much time per patient, which results in less revenue to the insurance company.

Medicine is not a 9-to-5 job, it is a calling and my greatest fear is that no one is going to want to do this job for a salary of $6000 a year, which after all my office expenses, I earned. And that is not from poor business skills or lack of patients. It is from decreasing reimbursement rates and higher overhead. This is why most physicians have left private practice to join hospital settings or larger groups. Many people don’t know that I have to pay not one but two malpractice payments in the state of Pennsylvania, licensing and board fees, rising medical and office supply fees which total @ 15,000 a month. I have one nurse, a receptionist, myself and one part-time relief doctor who is amazing, having trained at both Duke and Northwestern. I have not taken a paycheck in 8 months.

I continue to do this job because that’s what I was meant to do and I don’t want to give up on my patients. I should not be subject to prejudice for practicing good medicine. I am scared who will take care of these children or my family when those like me are finally forced out completely.

I am not a “healthcare provider”.  I am a physician and there is a very big difference. I hope that you will think about this in your fight to fixthe problems in healthcare, because it’s more than just repealing Obamacare. It is putting medicine back into the hands of the patient, consumer, and the physician. Insurance companies are for profit companies, parasitizing my expertise and exploiting your savings. If they are getting paid for my expertise and training, maybe the CEO’s of these insurance companies should try doing the surgeries and treating the patients themselves.

Sincerely,

Sharon S. Jellinek M.D.

Posted on Leave a comment

3 key issues in Christie’s budget and how they could affect you

Chris_christie_theridgewoodblog

By Samantha Marcus and Susan K. Livio | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
on February 17, 2016 at 8:21 AM, updated February 17, 2016 at 11:10 AM

TRENTON — Here is a look at three key issues from Gov. Chris Christie’s Tuesday budget speech that could have a big impact on New Jersey residents.

1. PENSIONS

The problem: The public pension system is underfunded by about $54 billion, and the state is responsible for about $40 billion of that.

Christie proposes to make a $1.9 billion contribution to government worker pensionsGov. Chris Christie urges the chamber to put aside partisan politics and proposes to contribute $1.86 billion to government worker pensions during the 2017 Budget Address from the Statehouse in Trenton. 02/16/2016 (Courtesy of NJTV)

Since 1996, governors from both parties have contributed less than what actuaries recommended, and the state skipped payments altogether from 2001 to 2004. And while the state was taking a pension holiday, it increased benefits for employees. In 2011, Christie struck a historic pension reform deal with Democrats, in which public workers and employers were required to pay more into the system. Christie slashed payments after two years, however, to balance the budget.

What Christie is proposing: A $1.86 billion contribution in the fiscal year beginning July 1, about $550 million more than the state is expected to contribute this year.

Chances at passing: Very good.

“This budget provides a pension payment that is the largest in our state’s history more than my administration ever before, contrary to the hyperbole from special interest groups,” Christie said.

https://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/what_are_the_key_issues_in_the_upcoming_budget.html?ath=9c46bfc08d76232bb5a5e00eeaf0bfa2#cmpid=nsltr_strybutton

Posted on 4 Comments

Governor Chris Christie’s Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Address

gov christie press lrg2

Feb. 16, 2016 – Governor Chris Christie’s Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Address As Prepared for Delivery

_____________________________________________________________

Trenton, New Jersey
February 16, 2016

Senate President Sweeney, Speaker Prieto, Lieutenant Governor Guadagno, members of the New Jersey State Legislature, friends, and my fellow New Jerseyans:

Today I come before you to present my budget for Fiscal Year 2017.

This is the seventh time I have presented a budget to this chamber, and I’m proud to say this for a seventh time.

This budget is balanced.

And once again it is balanced through fiscal responsibility, and not on the backs of our citizens, for the seventh straight year, this budget imposes no new taxes on the people of New Jersey.

I want to begin by saying thank you to the people of New Jersey for allowing me the great privilege of running for President of the United States.

It was the governing experience of this great state, the reforms we tackled here in New Jersey, the bi-partisan hard choices we made, and the recovery from one of the largest natural disasters in our country’s history, that I felt, prepared me for higher office.

While the result was not what I had hoped for, the experience has made me a better Governor, a better American, and a better person.

I owe that growth to the people of New Jersey and I intend to use it to make the next two years great ones for our state.

We have more work to be done here in New Jersey.

And I look forward to working together with all of you to get it done.

There are two key principles that are the foundations of the proposal I’m sharing with you today.

The first is fiscal restraint.

We’ve put New Jersey’s financial house back in order.

And we’re going to keep it that way.

The 2017 fiscal year budget calls for $34.8 billion in State appropriations.

Discretionary spending is $2 billion less than in 2008.

That means that 95% of all the growth in this budget is for pensions, government worker health benefits, and debt service.

We’ll return to that subject later.

We have showed that smart fiscal management and focusing on our real priorities allows us to do more with less.

The days of taxing and spending and wasting taxpayer money have gone to the dustbin of history where they belong.

The second principle is to continue advancing the hard reforms New Jersey needs, so we can build a stronger economy and make this State a better place to live — for our generation and the next.

These are the same principles that have underpinned everything my administration has done over the last six years and we’ve seen the results.

This budget builds upon these principles.

In it, we meet our obligations, we further our commitment to the most vulnerable, and we continue to make investments in the future.

This budget provides a pension payment that is the largest in our state’s history more than any administration ever before, contrary to the hyperbole from special interest groups.

With the State no longer forced to rely on one-shot gimmicks, non-recurring revenues are at the lowest level in more than a decade.

When we took office, one shot revenues were 13% of the state budget.

Today, they are less than 1%.

That is responsible fiscal management.

The surplus is higher than any budget proposed during the past 10 years, nearly triple the fund balance we inherited from the last Administration.

It reflects the reforms and hard-fought gains we have secured over the last six years to end waste and right the fiscal ship.

One additional example — the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.

When we took over it was billions in debt.

We have repaid the federal government, lowered taxes, and it now runs a healthy surplus, bolstered by an unemployment rate that has been nearly cut in half in the last six years.

We’re now in our sixth consecutive year of private-sector job growth, the fastest in our state in fifteen years.

Consider that for a moment: since the turn of the century, private sector job growth in New Jersey has never been stronger than it is today, in this moment, under our leadership and reforms.

If you listened to the left wing groups and some in this chamber, you would think it is just the opposite.

But facts are a stubborn thing.

The housing market has experienced double-digit growth and building permits are at their highest number in a decade.

We’ve shrunk the size of our government, and are doing more with less.

We’ve achieved historic investment in our school system, seen our crime rates drop, and have closed a state prison.

And we’ve helped thousands of people whose lives have been blighted by drug addiction to get a fresh start.

All of this progress can lead us, with continued reforms, to a strong, stable economic outlook.

With every budget that I have presented in this chamber, New Jersey has continued to advance down the path towards a future of greater justice and opportunity for all.

When it comes to making the investments we need, we’ve never hesitated.

But we’ve shown that we can live within our means.

And today, it’s important that we continue to hold our course.

Because no matter how much progress we’ve achieved, all this can still be undone.

That’s right, reversed.

The private sector job growth, reversed.

The housing market recovery, reversed.

The smaller government we have achieved, bloated once again.

We live in a time when our national economy and the global economy face new threats.

New Jersey cannot stand alone — our state has to be ready to weather the economic storms as well as the actual storms.

In the eight years before I took office, taxes and fees had been increased 115 times, making New Jersey the most heavily taxed state in the nation and placing an undue burden on residents and job-creators alike.

Since taking office, I’ve held the line on taxes.

I’ve vetoed the millionaire’s tax every time it’s come to my desk.

I vetoed a legislative proposal to increase the Corporate Business Tax.

I have vetoed five income tax increases passed by this body.

As Governor, I’ve also provided well-needed tax relief.

Last year, I raised the State earned income tax credit from 20% to 30% of the federal credit in concert with the signing of the FY16 budget.

My 2011 Business Tax Reforms have saved the business sector over $3 billion.

And by far, the broadest impact benefitting New Jersey taxpayers was our collaboration on the 2% property tax cap, which has brought property tax growth to a near halt, averaging less than 2% statewide since we passed the cap.

That compares to 7% per year in the 10 years before the law was enacted.

We are making real progress rolling back taxes that should never have been enacted in the first place.

If we stop exercising this type of fiscal restraint, if we back away from the reforms we all fought to achieve these past six years, then we’re going to go back to the bad old days.

Bureaucracy and mediocrity and wastefulness are like weeds.

You need to keep ripping them up and we know there are plenty of powerful special interests who would like to go back to the old days of giveaways on the back of our taxpayers.

We need to continue our work together and enhance the competitiveness of New Jersey.

Instead, just in the past two weeks, yet another economically irresponsible constitutional amendment was proposed by the Legislature that would mandate a near doubling of the minimum wage, which will have a chilling effect on the steady growth of our small business sector.

This proposed increase is on top of those imposed just three short years ago through, again, a constitutional amendment.

The New Jersey Business and Industry Association just released a report on out-migration from New Jersey caused by high taxes and expensive mandates.

Their study concluded that 2 million residents and $18 billion in annual income left our State over the last 10 years.

These facts are not debatable.

They come directly from internal revenue service statistics, not from the rantings of some left-wing think tank.

Are they leaving for Florida, North Carolina, and South Carolina?

Yes, their warmer climates and more inviting tax structures are tempting.

But who are the top two states we are losing citizens to?

Pennsylvania and New York.

The only thing warmer there is their lower taxes.

Those who propose higher taxes and more regulation in this chamber better look in the mirror and to our borders before they act.

62% of businesses surveyed said they would not open another location in New Jersey if they were to expand.

66% said they would not retire here.

67% said they take the estate and inheritance taxes into consideration when making business decisions.

This isn’t a hypothetical policy debate anymore, 2 million people and $18 billion have fled our State as a result of our tax structure.

It is not only older New Jerseyans.

In fact, New Jerseyans 18 to 34 years old leave more than any other age group.

We are losing both, with our antiquated and tone-deaf tax policies.

The time to act is now.

I’ve already called for repeal of the Estate Tax.

What has the legislature done?

They’ve called for yet another government mandated doubling of wages, and an amendment that will cause a $3 billion tax increase on all New Jerseyans.

Where does it end?

Some people in this room want to address the next generation of funding for the Transportation Trust Fund solely on the back of taxpayers by imposing a hike on gas prices without any discussion of tax fairness.

Never mind that we’re already one of the most heavily taxed states in the country, and excessive taxes are driving people and businesses to other states.

And never mind that my administration has repeatedly welcomed, and continues to welcome, the Legislative leadership to reach a sensible, equitable agreement on this issue.

In fact, I was ready to act last year and Democrats refused because of your mid-term elections.

That’s the fact.

The TTF was last renewed five years ago, and that authorization is expiring because that was the length of its term.

To imply that the TTF is in crisis and is suddenly and unexpectedly “running out of money” is a politically driven mischaracterization.

Remedies for any fix of the TTF cannot be made in a vacuum.

The reality is that New Jersey is fully able to support the current capital program as originally proposed in the current five-year authorization.

My administration continues to examine ways to control cash flow and make the most of every taxpayer dollar that the TTF spends.

So, while we wait for realistic proposals and for a legitimate discussion on tax fairness, not just tax hikes, my administration has been hard at work analyzing cost drivers and ways to maintain its roadways in a more cost-effective manner.

There is time to reach a reasonable agreement.

But it will need to be the right one for the hardworking taxpayers of New Jersey.

As if an isolated gas tax hike and 79% government mandated wage increase on our small businesses isn’t enough, New Jersey families and businesses continue to face the potential of another economy-killing proposed constitutional amendment, championed by some in this room, which seeks to divide our state between the government world and the real world.

The constitutional amendment mandates pension payments and places government workers ahead of every other citizen of the state in our state budget.

Approval of this amendment would place government workers:

Ahead of our students.

Ahead of our hospitals.

Ahead of the disabled.

Ahead of our seniors.

And the burden of the cost would be put on the backs of the taxpayers.

Taxpayers who do not receive anything close to these levels of benefits in their lives, would be required to pay for exactly what the public sector unions demand.

Platinum level health benefits.

Exorbitant pensions for life.

How out of line are these benefits from the real world every day New Jerseyans live in?

Take the average government worker who pays $126,000 for their pension and health benefits over 30 years.

Their return?

$2.4 Million in benefits.

This is not the real world New Jerseyans live in.

This chamber cannot divide our state between government workers with huge benefits and every day New Jersey taxpayers who not only don’t have those benefits, but also must pay for them for a privileged few.

There is an option to avoid this, our non-partisan commission has put forward a plan to save $2 billion on government worker health benefits and use it to save the pension system.

Failure to do this will raise taxes, cut municipal aid, hurt students and the disabled, and take aid from our seniors.

We can work together to avoid this.

I am ready to work with you.

Can we put aside partisanship and special interests and put all New Jerseyans first?

If we don’t, only our people will suffer.

And, if you were going to write a playbook for how to wreck the economy and divide a state, this would be it.

Pensions and health benefits already present the largest burden on our budget.

Increased pension, employee health benefits, and debt service together account for an astounding 95% of the growth of this budget.

You heard correctly, 95%.

On pensions, we are proposing to make a $1.9 billion contribution to the State’s pension funds.

This is $550 million more than last year, and in fact, it’s the largest contribution in New Jersey history.

Our overall commitment to the State pension system is bigger than any previous administration.

With this payment, my administration will have made more than $6.2 billion in pension payments.

That is nearly double the total of the last five Governors combined.

The problem is a broken system created by unsustainable giveaways, by politicians to special interests.

The reality is that continuing to bury our heads in the sand only grows the problem and diminishes those with the courage to take on this challenge.

I know you have the courage to make hard choices.

We’ve made them together in the past.

For our children and grandchildren, we simply cannot move in the wrong-headed and backwards direction of locking in platinum-plated benefits into the constitution, at the expense of hardworking, taxpaying families.

Now at the same time, I’m not willing to let gridlock and politics stop our progress on this issue.

In order for the State to be able to afford this pension payment and protect valuable priorities for the rest of our citizens, this budget calls for $250 million in savings from public employee and retiree health costs.

Through reasonable reforms such as requiring the use of generic drugs when available, modest increases in co-pays to discourage unnecessary visits, and establishing new delivery methods for primary care services, we can continue to provide quality care, but with important savings.

Absent any reforms, State costs for government worker and retiree health insurance would increase by $487 million, and at a comparable rate moving forward.

We cannot afford this.

Let me be clear, all of you cannot afford this type of spiraling growth.

Left unchecked, this will kill our ability to cover the cost of essential services that we expect of government, protecting our most vulnerable, making investments in our schools and infrastructure, attracting business, and for those who care about the future viability of their pensions — our ability to make adequate payments.

Or, it will require massive tax increases our citizens cannot sustain.

A 10% sales tax?

A 23% income tax increase?

Insanity.

These are common sense reforms that will save everyone money while still providing great coverage to employees.

As a first step, I’m looking for $250 million in savings in this budget.

Let’s talk more about what that $250 million means.

That’s $250 million in State savings, but this will help everyone.

$250 million in State savings means another $200 million in savings for local governments, school districts, and property taxpayers that fund them.

That’s real property tax relief.

And more than $100 million in savings for State and local employees, who will benefit from reduced premium sharing.

That’s less money coming out of the employee’s paycheck.

It’s a win-win-win for our citizens.

And this isn’t a pie in the sky request or experimentation.

It’s been done before, with great success here in New Jersey.

There are local governments that have already moved out of our State Health Care Plan to address the escalating costs.

They are innovating with new health plans, collaborating with their employees, and generating year over year savings.

They’ve just done this in Burlington County. We can do this statewide.

This is how we achieve the hard reforms our state needs, and put New Jersey on a sustainable path to the future.

We can continue to serve all the people of our state well, while preserving the fiscal restraint that has brought stability to our state over the last six years.

And if we do that, we can also deliver a fairer and better deal for taxpayers.

This fiscal responsibility will allow us to maintain the State’s other commitments.

My proposed budget includes over $16 billion in direct and indirect property tax relief, including $13.3 billion in school aid, $1.5 billion in municipal aid, and $1 billion in direct property taxpayer relief programs.

More than 440,000 seniors and citizens with disabilities will receive an average Homestead Benefit of $515, and more than 160,000 will receive an average Property Tax Freeze benefit of more than $1,200.

More than 200,000 other homeowners earning up to $75,000 will receive an average of more than $400 in Homestead Benefit.

We’re also going to continue working to extend our support for the most vulnerable members of our society.

We’re going to continue investing in housing assistance programs for low-income individuals as well as individuals with developmental disabilities.

Some of you in this room have begun to turn your attention to some of these issues affecting our most in-need residents.

I want to welcome you to that discussion about how we are serving the most vulnerable, those facing housing uncertainty, and how we are helping those in grips of poverty.

This year, we’re maintaining more than $17 million in State and Federal funding for the Division of Family Development’s Social Services for the Homeless Program.

We’re also committing $42 million for the State Rental Assistance Program, and more than $14 million for homelessness prevention and emergency shelters throughout New Jersey.

Because of this commitment, we have made startling progress in reducing homelessness and giving people the hand up they need to end the cycle that housing uncertainty contributes to.

In 2015, homelessness is a staggering 41% lower than it was in 2007.

From 2014 to 2015 alone, we reduced the number of homeless in New Jersey by nearly 14%.

Rates of homelessness among families with children declined by 25% in the last year.

Through a volatile and tough economic period, we protected these programs and reformed government to work better and the results have been extraordinary in helping people get off the streets.

When it comes to healthcare too, we’re making some important investments that will change and save lives.

Last month I called on this Legislature to join me in doubling down on our State’s fight against drug addiction.

We have a chance to help people beat this disease.

We have a chance to reclaim the lives of thousands of our fellow New Jerseyans.

In fact, 2015 saw the first decline in overdose deaths in four years.

That’s why we’re making a historic investment of more than $100 million in state and federal funds to extend access to care for mental health and substance use.

By providing more competitive reimbursement rates for services and providers, we have a chance to dramatically increase access to treatment.

This is the first significant Behavioral Health rate increase in more than a decade, and it’s going to make a big difference by improving critical services, getting more people into treatment earlier, and reducing the size of the burden which currently falls on Emergency Rooms.

With our highly successful Drug Court Program, we’re going to continue investing to provide mandatory treatment to more first-time, non-violent drug offenders.

My budget proposal includes funding of nearly $64 million to maintain and expand this program.

For individuals with developmental disabilities, there will be an additional $48.8 million to create community placement and services, continuing our commitment to transition individuals with developmental disabilities out of institutions and into the community, with the opportunity to live full lives among their families, friends, and neighbors.

For families, we’re providing an additional $25.8 million to support children with needs including behavioral health, substance use, and intellectual and developmental disabilities.

For women, we’re going to continue funding vital preventative and reproductive services.

We’re providing more than $15 million to support pregnant mothers and young children through the Home Visitation Program.

Over $20 million will also go towards supporting women’s services and domestic violence reduction programs.

And to invest in training our next generation of medical professionals who can deliver the world-class care that New Jerseyans deserve, we’re also making a $60 million investment in graduate medical education for New Jersey’s teaching hospitals.

Since 2010 we’ve more than tripled our funding to offset the cost of educating our doctors, and this is important to continue investing in our long-term challenges as well as the short term.

That’s why we’re also continuing to invest in improving the quality of public education.

In the last five years, we’ve changed the face of education in New Jersey.

And we’ve given more of our young people a fighting chance for the future.

This budget proposes our sixth year of historic investments in education, with $13.3 billion in direct aid to schools, and pension and health benefits payments.

I’m proposing nearly $100 million in additional K-12 school aid for New Jersey school districts, taking our total investment to more than $9 billion.

Under this plan, every single school district will have increased funding.

We’re going to continue investing in our incredibly successful charter schools system.

The number of students attending charter schools has nearly doubled during the course of my administration, and we’ve seen charter schools having a huge impact in allowing students to achieve their full potential and turn around education results for at risk communities.

For fiscal year 2017, funding will be provided to support Charter School Aid to ensure per student funding for charter schools remains steady.

Up to six new charter schools will open in the next fiscal year, supporting an additional 1,100 students.

We’re going to continue working to expand charter school opportunities for families in failing school districts.

And as I said before you last month, at my direction the Department of Education has begun to take steps to aggressively slash regulation for New Jersey charter schools and give them the tools they need to serve even more students in even greater ways.

We’re also going to continue strengthening Higher Education in New Jersey, so that all our students can reach their full potential.

Our overall Higher Education funding will be more than $2.2 billion, with steady funding for our institutions of Higher Education.

Investment in student aid programs will also continue, and we’re going to invest an extra $17.8 million in Tuition Aid Grants to bring our total funding to more than $400 million.

Grants are vital for allowing tens of thousands of New Jersey students to go to college, so this is a reasonable investment that will make a big difference for a lot of students.

We’re also going to add a fifth class to the Governor’s Urban Scholarship program, so we can support more than 600 students in targeted school districts.

Finally, let’s talk about how we’re investing in the overall management and administration of our State.

I’m pleased that today’s budget reflects our continued trend towards greater savings and efficiency, with a State workforce that is 10,000 people smaller than when I took office.

Funding for executive operations continues to remain flat.

We can all do more with less and the executive branch is leading by example.

At the same time, there are other areas of administration where we need to continue investing so all our communities have the governance they need.

So we’re also going to continue providing over $1.5 billion in Municipal Aid.

That includes more than $107 million in Transitional Aid to support cities with the biggest financial and management challenges, which will go along with providing valuable State support and expertise to promote good government and sustainable operations for local authorities.

The success of New Jersey depends on the success of all our communities.

So that’s our budget for Fiscal Year 2017.

Now for the final big question.

Will we work together to make progress for our citizens or will we just engage in partisanship?

Many of you are already focused on the next election, raising money, some spending their own money to run advertisements already.

Let me remind you, the election of our next Governor is 630 days away.

630 days.

Are we going to waste those days on partisanship and politics?

Or will you work with me to use those 630 days to help bring relief to our overburdened taxpayers?

We have made so much progress over the 2,220 days together.

Against all odds … nearly 10% unemployment when we started.

5.1% unemployment today.

$11 billion deficit when we started.

$800 Million surplus today.

7% yearly property tax increases when we started. Less than 2% average per year today.

Zero net private sector job growth in the eight years before we started.

230,000 new private sector jobs in the last six years and, this year, the best private sector job growth in 15 years.

The largest public University merger, between Rutgers and UMDNJ, in American history which previous governments had tried and failed over and over again.

Over $1.3 Billion invested in capital improvements to our colleges and universities for the first time in 30 years.

Over $24 Billion invested in our infrastructure in the last six years.

Criminal justice reform which made bail available to those who deserve it and keeps the truly violent off our streets.

Crime rates down.

Prison population down and a state prison closed.

Drug courts in every county and a new emphasis on treating this disease and saving lives.

More of our developmentally disabled in group homes and fewer in institutions.

More of our poor receiving good health care and charity care in our hospitals dramatically reduced.

A dramatic expansion of solar energy and the meeting of our 2020 clean air goals, all without taxing our citizens through the discredited Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

More money is being spent on K-12 education than anytime in history and more families being saved by charter schools in our cities than ever before.

And all of this has been done with no new state tax increases in six years, no radical expansion of government regulation and 10,000 fewer state employees.

We did all of this together in the last 2,220 days.

Regardless of our party differences.

Regardless of the relentless selfishness of the special interests.

Regardless of the constant negativity of the media.

Are we willing to do this again over the last 630 days or will we succumb to politics, selfishness, and negativity?

I am standing here to tell you I am willing to continue to fix the remaining problems.

Let’s take the next steps to insure our future.

Lower taxes to stop people leaving New Jersey.

Build infrastructure in a way that is fair to our taxpayers.

Fix our pension and health benefit system in a way that will not divide and burden our taxpayers, but will bring closer together the real world and the excesses of the government world.

I am ready to work with you if you are willing to stop the partisanship and the reckless amending of our constitution to score political points.

We can sit and reason together for the next 630 days or we can fight for the next 630 days and leave our citizens without hope.

I want to face the future with faith and hope in the people we elected and appointed to make life better.

All the problems created by people can be solved by people — and we’re the ones who have to make it happen.

Over the years I’ve also been honored to work with all of you to make good things happen in New Jersey.

We might not always agree on everything, but we’ve always been able to have the hard conversations we need to move our State forward.

Let’s do that now, and continue to invest in making New Jersey the greatest State possible for all our people.

Thank you, God Bless You, and God Bless New Jersey.