Chef John Benjamin of Park West Tavern in Ridgewood on his favorite kitchen tool and least favorite diner requests
AUGUST 27, 2014 LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2014, 1:21 AM
THE RECORD
After graduating from the Culinary Institute of America, John Benjamin worked at some highly venerated restaurants, including Aureole in Manhattan and The French Laundry in California’s Napa Valley. And before he was named executive chef for the Park West Tavern this past December, the soft-spoken 45-year-old Greenwood Lake resident worked as executive chef for eight years at one of New Jersey’s most formal and acclaimed dining establishments, Restaurant Latour at the Crystal Springs Resort in Hardyston. Last month, Park West Tavern received three out of four stars from The Record.
Favorite kitchen tool: Japanese mandolin. It’s good for slicing garlic, potatoes, mushroom, onions very thin. And the Japanese one is plastic, thin and not too expensive – maybe $23. It fits in any kitchen cabinet.
Dish I’m most proud of: Right now we are offering a simple salad of watermelon, heirloom tomatoes and burrata cheese, with a spicy red-wine vinaigrette for $12. I like it ’cause it’s nice and refreshing; it’s light and cool.
What diners don’t know about chefs: The long hours they work —10 in the morning to midnight for me; the dedication we have for the craft we have; the stress.
What irks me most about diners: They want to create their own entrée. Someone will say, “I don’t want the pork in the pappardelle pasta.” But it has pork in it for a reason.
– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/food-and-dining-news/dining-news/chef-john-benjamin-of-park-west-tavern-in-ridgewood-on-his-favorite-kitchen-tool-and-least-favorite-diner-requests-1.1076507#sthash.ISt47mfG.dpuf
Author: James
Grease-laden spill cleaned up at Ridgewood treatment plant in Glen Rock
file photo
Grease-laden spill cleaned up at Ridgewood treatment plant in Glen Rock
AUGUST 26, 2014, 6:06 PM LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY, AUGUST 26, 2014, 6:11 PM
BY CHRIS HARRIS
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD
Ridgewood officials said municipal workers dealt with a substantial cooking grease spill Tuesday at the village’s wastewater treatment plant on Prospect Street in Glen Rock.
Roberta Sonenfeld, Ridgewood’s village manager, said 200 gallons of “watery FOG [fats, oils, and gases]” spurt from a “burst transfer line” connected to a delivery truck’s storage tank.
Some of the grease ended up draining into the wetlands of a nearby stream that feeds into the Ho-Ho-Kus Brook.
Officials said containment booms were used to control the spill.
“Our vacuum then sucked up the contained material,” Public Works director and Village Engineer Chris Rutishauser said, adding none of the grease reached the water.
Neighbors living next to the plant, sited at the intersection of Rock Road, said Tuesday that the area smelled “like a Burger King parking lot” following the accident. Those neighbors reported seeing village workers in the stream.
Village officials said this is the first time such a spill has happened there, and added that they immediately contacted the state’s Department of Environmental Protection about the spill.
– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/grease-laden-spill-cleaned-up-at-ridgewood-treatment-plant-in-glen-rock-1.1076342#sthash.CWQgzsOi.dpuf
New Jersey Alerts Consumers on Car Sharing Services
New Jersey Alerts Consumers on Car Sharing Services
New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance Commissioner Ken Kobylowski today alerted consumers to the potential loss of insurance coverage in connection with popular business activities known as car-sharing or Transportation Network Companies (TNC) provided by online firms such as Lyft, SideCar and UberX. TNCs offer transportation services for a fee using smart phone applications to connect potential passengers with drivers offering their personal vehicles. When individuals use their own private passenger automobiles to transport individuals for a fee, they risk driving without proper insurance and/or having inadequate coverage for themselves, their vehicle, their passengers and third parties who may sustain personal injury and/or property damage.
“Car-sharing is growing in popularity with New Jersey consumers who are obtaining and providing transportation through Internet purveyors,” said Commissioner Kobylowski. “In many cases, there may not be auto insurance coverage for these activities. There may also be legitimate coverage denials under personal automobile policies in the unfortunate event of an accident. Consumers need to use caution when weighing whether to pay for transportation or to make their personal vehicles available to others for a fee through these companies.”
Typically, personal auto insurance policies exclude coverage for drivers using their personal vehicles as “public or livery conveyances,” that is providing rides to members of the public for a fee. In addition, the failure to disclose this use of the vehicle to the insurer may result in the insurer seeking to void the policy for misrepresentation. The TNC may have an insurance policy that purports to cover the driver and passengers while the vehicle is transporting a paying passenger. However, New Jersey consumers should be aware that these policies are not reviewed by the Department. Further, being covered by different policies for different uses of the vehicle is a new concept that has not been tested under our State’s laws and in our courts.
Traditional share-the-expense carpooling or ride-sharing arrangements in which friends, neighbors, or co-workers share driving duties and the cost of gasoline are not considered commercial-type activities and are typically covered by individual insurance policies.
“Garden State consumers should not find out after the fact that they do not have sufficient insurance coverage to engage in TNC activities,” said Commissioner Kobylowski. “Taking steps now, before entering into TNC agreements, can prevent serious financial losses.”
Commissioner Kobylowski offered the following tips for consumers considering TNC transactions:
•Carefully review any written agreements offered by a TNC;
•Before relying on any TNC provided insurance coverage, ask for a copy of the firm’s insurance policy;
•Consumers should review their own personal auto policies for possible exclusions of coverage for using the vehicle to carry passengers for a fee (also known as “livery”);
•Consumers should also consult with their carrier or agent to identify the correct type of policy and coverage if they intend to engage in TNC activities including considering purchase of a commercial policy for TNC activities.
More Information
Consumers who want more information on buying auto insurance can visit the Department’s Web site at: https://www.state.nj.us/dobi/autoplanner.htm.
The best way for New Jersey consumers to protect their financial interests is to research any agent or company being considered for coverage and should:
•STOP before writing a check, signing a contract or giving out personal information;
•CALL the Department at 1-800-446-7467, or
•CONFIRM that the agent and company are licensed to write insurance in New Jersey by going online for agents at: https://www20.state.nj.us/DOBI_LicSearch/insSearch.jsp, and for carriers at: https://www.state.nj.us/dobi/data/inscomp.htm.

Obama Pursuing Climate Accord in Lieu of Treaty
Obama Pursuing Climate Accord in Lieu of Treaty
By CORAL DAVENPORTAUG. 26, 2014
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress.
In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summit meeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world’s largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution. But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.
To sidestep that requirement, President Obama’s climate negotiators are devising what they call a “politically binding” deal that would “name and shame” countries into cutting their emissions. The deal is likely to face strong objections from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from poor countries around the world, but negotiators say it may be the only realistic path.
“If you want a deal that includes all the major emitters, including the U.S., you cannot realistically pursue a legally binding treaty at this time,” said Paul Bledsoe, a top climate change official in the Clinton administration who works closely with the Obama White House on international climate change policy.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
GOV. JERRY BROWN TO MEXICAN ILLEGALS: ‘YOU’RE ALL WELCOME IN CALIFORNIA’
GOV. JERRY BROWN TO MEXICAN ILLEGALS: ‘YOU’RE ALL WELCOME IN CALIFORNIA’
On Monday evening, California Governor Jerry Brown said all Mexicans, including illegal immigrants, are welcome in California.
According to the Los Angeles Times, while introducing Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, who said America is “the other Mexico,” Brown “spoke about the interwoven histories of Mexico and California.” He “nodded to the immigrants in the room, saying it didn’t matter if they had permission to be in the United States.”
“You’re all welcome in California,” Brown reportedly said.
Brown has made California a sanctuary state by signing the Trust Act, giving driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. He has also expanded financial aid to illegal immigrants by signing the California DREAM Act. Peña Nieto reportedly “thanked state officials for embracing foreigners, citing measures that extend state benefits to immigrants.”
https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/08/26/Jerry-Brown-to-Mexican-Illegals-You-re-All-Welcome-in-CA
Atlas Shrugged: Who is John Galt? hits theaters September 12th, 2014.
Why Isn’t Monetary Pumping Helping the Economy?
Why Isn’t Monetary Pumping Helping the Economy?
Mises Daily: Monday, August 25, 2014 by Frank Shostak
Despite all the massive monetary pumping over the past six years and the lowering of interest rates to almost zero most commentators have expressed disappointment with the pace of economic growth. For instance, the yearly rate of growth of the European Monetary Union (EMU) real GDP fell to 0.7 percent in Q2 from 0.9 percent in the previous quarter. In Q1 2007 the yearly rate of growth stood at 3.7 percent. In Japan the yearly rate of growth of real GDP fell to 0 percent in Q2 from 2.7 percent in Q1 and 5.8 percent in Q3 2010.

In the US the yearly rate of growth of real GDP stood at 2.4 percent in Q2 against 1.9 percent in the prior quarter. Note that since Q1 2010 the rate of growth followed a sideways path of around 2.2 percent. The exception is the UK where the growth momentum of GDP shows strengthening with the yearly rate of growth closing at 3.1 percent in Q2 from 3 percent in Q1. Observe however, that the yearly rate of growth in Q3 2007 stood at 4.3 percent.
https://mises.org/daily/6853/
The Italian Job: How Borrowing And Printing Lead To An Economic Dead End
The Italian Job: How Borrowing And Printing Lead To An Economic Dead End
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/21/2014 12:33 -0400
Earlier this week Bloomberg published a devastating chart showing real hourly wage growth for the first 60 months of every cycle going back to 1949. The 11 cycle average gain was 9% and the largest was 19% a half century back.
Fast forward to the 60 months of ZIRP and QE since the Great Recession officially ended in June 2009, however, and you get a drastically different picture: Real hourly wages have risen by just 0.5%, and in the great scheme of things that’s a rounding error.
Surely the above chart is also flat-out proof that massive money printing doesn’t work. After all, reflating wages, jobs and incomes is what the monetary politburo claims it’s all about. Indeed, the Fed has insouciantly cast a blind eye to the massive bubbles building everywhere in the financial system, and has kept money market rates relentlessly at zero for six years running on the grounds that it is not yet done “stimulating” the labor market.
So why does this abysmally failed and dangerous experiment continue unabated—as Yellen will undoubtedly confirm at Jackson Hole? Self-evidently, it is irresistibly convenient to both Wall Street and Washington. The former gorges on a massive diet of carry trade gambling windfalls thanks to ZIRP and the Greenspan/Bernanke/Yellen “put”; and the latter gets a fiscal get-out-of-jail-free card owing to the Fed’s massive repression of interest rates. Indeed, with the public debt now topping $17.7 trillion, the implicit (and fraudulent) debt service relief from current ultra-low interest rates amounts to upwards of $500 billion per year.
Stated differently, where there should be extreme caution on Wall Street, there is actually irrational exuberance beyond Alan Greenspan’s wildest imagination back in December 1996. And where there should be fiscal panic in Washington owing to prospective red ink of another $15 trillion over the next decade (under “un-rosy scenario”), there is unmitigated and universal complacency.
The evil of monetary central planning, of course, is exactly what is unfolding: it drastically distorts pricing signals and thereby sows the seeds of eventual financial correction shocks and the consequent economic disorder. But there is something else, and its worse. Namely, the addiction to money printing and artificial debt fueled stimulus has become so deeply entrenched in the Wall Street-Washington corridor that the mainstream narrative has lost any semblance of historical perspective and realistic appreciation of the dead-end path on which the system is now embarked.
The monumental extent of monetary expansion and debt accretion since the turn of the 21st Century, for example, goes unrecognized, and is assumed to be merely a permanent and sustainable feature of the financial landscape. And that blindness might even be understandable had it been accompanied by an unusual surge of prosperity of the “party now, pay later” variety. In fact, however, the core metrics of prosperity——real GDP growth, breadwinner employment, investment in productive assets and real household incomes—-have all gone in the opposite direction, having fallen drastically below all historical norms.
The contrasts below are dispositive. Real GDP growth during the last 14 years has averaged only 1.8%—-barely half the average rate during the prior 50 years. Likewise, breadwinner jobs are still 5% below their turn of the century level; real net investment in plant and equipment is 20% below its late 1990s levels; and real median household income is down by 5%.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-21/italian-job-how-borrowing-and-printing-lead-economic-dead-end
Nearly Every Mass Shooting Has This One Thing In Common, And It Isn’t Weapons
Nearly Every Mass Shooting Has This One Thing In Common, And It Isn’t Weapons
Dom The Conservative06/10/2014
Evidence shows that the common factor in nearly every mass shooting is that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been taking them at one point before committing their crimes.
Multiple credible scientific studies going back more then a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior. One need only Google relevant key words or phrases to see for themselves.www.ssristories.com is one popular site that has documented over 4500 “ Mainstream Media “ reported cases from around the World of aberrant or violent behavior by those taking these powerful drugs, according to the Liberty Crier.
The extensive list shows how psychotropic drugs are linked in every case of murder and suicide:
https://universalfreepress.com/nearly-every-mass-shooting-has-this-one-thing-in-common-and-it-isnt-weapons/
A Lesson in Economic Analysis from the Minimum Wage Debate
A Lesson in Economic Analysis from the Minimum Wage Debate
Mises Daily: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 by Ken Zahringer
In the ebb and flow of interventionist politics, there are some issues that surface periodically regardless of how many times and how completely they are proven to be harmful to the very people they are purported to help. Currently the tide is once again carrying the minimum wage to the forefront of collective attention. Supporters of this and similar measures often use straw-man arguments, like the one in the picture below.
I discovered this ad through one of my friends who shared it on Facebook. It was originally posted on July 12, 2014 on the website of OurTime.org. I propose to deconstruct this pseudo-argument here, pointing out its major errors. I do this not to convince hard-core supporters of raising the minimum wage that it is a bad idea; I doubt that is possible by any means. Rather, this can be a short lesson for those interested in sound economic analysis in how to proceed when confronted by opposing arguments buttressed by seemingly sound statistics.
The Ceteris Paribus Principle
The statement in the box is worded rather ambiguously, which is typical for this type of argument. It can be interpreted two different ways. On the one hand, it could be claiming that the minimum wage hike caused the increase in employment. This is a clear violation of ceteris paribus (i.e., all other things being equal or held constant), which is at the core of any good analysis and cannot be stressed often enough. In order for that interpretation to be valid, we must assume that all states are identical in all other respects and that the increase in the minimum wage was the only economic condition that changed. This is clearly not the case. States use a variety of policy initiatives to encourage job growth; focusing on this one factor ignores significant heterogeneity among states.
In its weaker form, the statement could merely be claiming that jobs were created in spite of the increase. This is obvious and trivial. In order for this interpretation to be meaningful we must assume that the minimum wage is the biggest kid on the block, the overriding factor that swamps all others. It’s all or nothing; either it kills all job growth or it’s not a factor. This is what makes the argument a straw man. It is overly simplified and no one who opposes the minimum wage takes the position it attempts to refute. The minimum wage is simply one factor among many affecting the job market; real-world outcomes are a result of a constellation of factors, each playing its part. But this is not the only thing wrong with this version of the argument — it gets better (or worse).
https://mises.org/daily/6854/A-Lesson-in-Economic-Analysis-from-the-Minimum-Wage-Debate
Why It Makes Sense for Burger King to Become a Canadian Company
Why It Makes Sense for Burger King to Become a Canadian Company
Stephen Moore / @StephenMoore / August 25, 2014
How many iconic American companies have to leave or threaten to leave these shores for foreign lands before Washington acts to fix our anti-growth tax system and keep firms, profits, and jobs here in the U.S.?
Burger King became the latest Fortune 100 company to announce it is looking to leave. The company is considering a deal to merge with Canadian restaurant chain Tim Hortons and move its headquarters north across the border. The multi-billion dollar deal would make the $11.4 billion hamburger company now based in Miami a Canadian firm valued at more than $21 billion. The technical term for this transaction is an “inversion.”
Why is it happening? The combined federal and state corporate income tax rate in Florida is 38.6 percent, near the highest in the world and more than a third higher than the combined national and provincial rate of 28.0 percent in Ontario, Canada. This is costing American workers jobs and the U.S. capital investment.
No surprise that tax shares for both Tim Hortons and Burger King soared nearly 20 percent at the prospect of less of the company’s profits being taken in taxes—a boon to investors of more than $3 billion in one day. So far this year companies like Pfizer, Walgreens, AbbVie, and others have investigated similar moves to lower their tax bills.
Expect a blizzard more of these tax moves if the U.S. corporate tax isn’t reduced quickly to at most the average in the industrialized world of 25 percent. Better yet would be to abolish the corporate tax altogether and tax the shareholders on these profits. This would cause a flood of companies to come to the U.S. rather than leave.
The hamburger is a quintessential American food. What could be more unpatriotic than giving firms like Burger King a financial incentive to leave the U.S. because of the high tax rate here? Thanks, Congress!
https://dailysignal.com/2014/08/25/makes-sense-burger-king-become-canadian-company/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
Warren Buffett to Invest in Burger King’s Planned Deal for Tim Hortons
Berkshire Hathaway Expected to Provide About 25% of Financing, Thrusting Billionaire Into U.S. Tax Debate
Judicial Watch: Lerner emails aren’t missing
Judicial Watch: Lerner emails aren’t missing
By Bernie Becker – 08/25/14 08:32 PM EDT
A conservative group suing the IRS said Monday that the Obama administration has acknowledged that former agency official Lois Lerner’s emails are recoverable.
Judicial Watch, which says it was among the groups that the IRS improperly scrutinized, said that Justice Department attorneys told the group late last week that the government backed up all emails in case of catastrophe.
The government lawyers added that the problem was not that the emails couldn’t be found, but that the back-up system was too onerous to search, Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch’s president, said Monday.
“This is a jaw-dropping revelation. The Obama administration had been lying to the American people about Lois Lerner’s missing emails,” Fitton said in a statement, adding that the group would bring the government’s statements up with Judge Emmet Sullivan, who is presiding over the group’s lawsuit.
But an administration official with knowledge of Friday’s conversation said Judicial Watch’s statement, which runs counter to months of statements from a variety of administration and IRS higher-ups, was off-base.
The administration official said Justice Department lawyers had dropped no bombshells last week, and that Judicial Watch was mischaracterizing what the government had said.
The official said that Justice lawyers were only referring to tapes backing up IRS emails that were routinely recycled twice a year before 2013, when the investigation into the Tea Party controversy began.
The IRS has acknowledged those procedures were in place since it told lawmakers in June that Lerner’s computer crashed in 2011, leaving the agency unable to recover many of her emails over a two-year span.
John Koskinen, the IRS commissioner, has testified before Congress several times over the last two months that the tapes backing up Lerner’s emails were recycled.
“There is no newly divulged back-up system that was not previously known about,” the official said. “Government lawyers were simply referring to the back-up system at the IRS that Commissioner Koskinen had already disclosed.”
Lerner has been a central figure in the IRS investigation since May 2013, when she became the first agency official to acknowledge and apologize for the improper scrutiny of Tea Party groups.
She has since retired from the IRS, been found in contempt of Congress by the House and been referred to the Justice Department for potential criminal charges.
Judicial Watch’s Monday statement noted that Treasury’s inspector general for tax administration, which outlined the IRS’s improper scrutiny of Tea Party groups, is investigating the back-up system for e-mails.
The administration official said that the inspector general is examining whether any data can be recovered from the previously recycled back-up tapes and suggested that could be the cause of the confusion between the government and Judicial Watch.
Reader says its time for strict enforcement of the Village maintenance code
Reader says its time for strict enforcement of the Village maintenance code
I’m glad to see that this has come to the attention of our council.
If the owners do not respond, paper them with daily fines, and if appropriate, force a tax sale/auction if the property is in arrears.
I’d also like to see strict enforcement of the maintenance code that includes:
Bushes blocking the view at many corners in town.
Non-political signs on properties (from the dummies who live on the ‘cut through streets’= your lawn signs that are actually on Village property make this place look like shit. “Drive like your kids live here’ signs look like Hopper ave in waldwick’. Go ask the signal bureau to make a ‘slow children’ permanent sign. (your signs are illegal as they are not political)
Lots of sidewalks that need to be replaced.
Peeling paint on many homes.
The lazy residents that put their recyclables and yard waste cans out 4 days before pickup, and leave the stuff out there 3 days after.
And since the RPD does NOTHING about the cars parked on the street all night , the street sweepers cannot do their job in the morning and there is always crap on the streets blowing around.-hence the reason for this ordinance.
Do something about the barking dogs.( too many of you newbies think its ‘fashionable’ to ‘rescue’ a pitbull or junkyard dog mutt. I hope your homeowner’s insurance company is aware of it because sooner than later you will have a claim.
Every one of the lazy residents that gets a dog and puts up an invisible fence creates a territorial animal that barks and growls. Learn how to take care of an animal that needs social interaction. Its not a plant.
Reader says the Village needs to seize the agenda from the developers
Reader says the Village needs to seize the agenda from the developers
Answer – we need parking AND common sense. Unfortunately with the team we have running the show, we’re unlikely to get either.
Until the Village seizes the agenda from the developers, we will be in a state of continuous reaction. Developers want to build huge buildings because they make more money that way. Certain citizens are not in favor of huge buildings. Developers then say that if they can’t build a huge building then they won’t build anything. Then other citizens say that the town is is disrepair and we need to do something so let’s just build the huge buildings because what other choice do we have?
Come to think of it, I’d settle for some common sense and will drive around the block looking for a spot in the meantime.
Over $400k in missing quarters, but collection process still the same
Photo credit:Boyd A. Loving
Over $400k in missing quarters, but collection process still the same
August 25,2014
Boyd A. Loving
12:32 PM
Ridgewood NJ, Despite having lost over $400k in quarters to “shrinkage,” the Village continues to collect quarters from parking meters by emptying open meter containers into empty pickle buckets. These photos were taken on Monday, 08/25/2014 in the Central Business District.
And the band played on . . .
Photo credit:Boyd A. Lovin



















