He has the platform, but it’s all about communicating it.
By Paul Meara
Posted: 02/16/2016 11:00 AM EST
If we know anything about Bernie Sanders’ campaigning prowess it’s that he can make up ground quickly. And there’s no better candidate to do that against than Hillary Clinton, whose approval or favorability numbers have never strengthened after announcing a candidacy bid for any public office. That said, the Clintons have generally high popularity numbers with African Americans and it’s going to be an uphill climb once again for Sanders to capture a large swath of that support.
With the Nevada Caucuses just eight days away and South Carolina Primaries only 15, Bernie has his work cut out for him. Luckily for him it seems like more and more black support, especially young, seems to be turning more and more in his favor. At the same time, Clinton just picked up an endorsement from theCongressional Black Caucus PAC, and it’s likely she’ll pick up the support of President Obamaeventually, whose accomplishments she heavily touted in the Friday’s (February 11) Democratic debate.
While it may be a little outdated, a December poll by YouGov of South Carolina Democrats showed that African Americans heavily favored Clinton at almost 4 to 1. Nationally, a recent Fox News poll showed a 71 percent support figure among non-whites for Clinton compared to just 20 for Sanders. Barack Obama carried South Carolina in 2008 with 80 percent of the black vote and while that number may not be entirely necessary to hit in order to win the state, Bernie can’t have Hillary attaining a statistic near that, especially as they’re mostly split among whites in the state.
No turn around in presidential politics so far would be as big as if Bernie Sanders were able to cut 20 to 30 percent off of Clinton’s lead among African Americans in the state. That effort has already begun and for it to be even more effective, here are a few ways he can better gain the black vote in South Carolina and beyond.
Senate President Sweeney, Speaker Prieto, Lieutenant Governor Guadagno, members of the New Jersey State Legislature, friends, and my fellow New Jerseyans:
Today I come before you to present my budget for Fiscal Year 2017.
This is the seventh time I have presented a budget to this chamber, and I’m proud to say this for a seventh time.
This budget is balanced.
And once again it is balanced through fiscal responsibility, and not on the backs of our citizens, for the seventh straight year, this budget imposes no new taxes on the people of New Jersey.
I want to begin by saying thank you to the people of New Jersey for allowing me the great privilege of running for President of the United States.
It was the governing experience of this great state, the reforms we tackled here in New Jersey, the bi-partisan hard choices we made, and the recovery from one of the largest natural disasters in our country’s history, that I felt, prepared me for higher office.
While the result was not what I had hoped for, the experience has made me a better Governor, a better American, and a better person.
I owe that growth to the people of New Jersey and I intend to use it to make the next two years great ones for our state.
We have more work to be done here in New Jersey.
And I look forward to working together with all of you to get it done.
There are two key principles that are the foundations of the proposal I’m sharing with you today.
The first is fiscal restraint.
We’ve put New Jersey’s financial house back in order.
And we’re going to keep it that way.
The 2017 fiscal year budget calls for $34.8 billion in State appropriations.
Discretionary spending is $2 billion less than in 2008.
That means that 95% of all the growth in this budget is for pensions, government worker health benefits, and debt service.
We’ll return to that subject later.
We have showed that smart fiscal management and focusing on our real priorities allows us to do more with less.
The days of taxing and spending and wasting taxpayer money have gone to the dustbin of history where they belong.
The second principle is to continue advancing the hard reforms New Jersey needs, so we can build a stronger economy and make this State a better place to live — for our generation and the next.
These are the same principles that have underpinned everything my administration has done over the last six years and we’ve seen the results.
This budget builds upon these principles.
In it, we meet our obligations, we further our commitment to the most vulnerable, and we continue to make investments in the future.
This budget provides a pension payment that is the largest in our state’s history more than any administration ever before, contrary to the hyperbole from special interest groups.
With the State no longer forced to rely on one-shot gimmicks, non-recurring revenues are at the lowest level in more than a decade.
When we took office, one shot revenues were 13% of the state budget.
Today, they are less than 1%.
That is responsible fiscal management.
The surplus is higher than any budget proposed during the past 10 years, nearly triple the fund balance we inherited from the last Administration.
It reflects the reforms and hard-fought gains we have secured over the last six years to end waste and right the fiscal ship.
One additional example — the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.
When we took over it was billions in debt.
We have repaid the federal government, lowered taxes, and it now runs a healthy surplus, bolstered by an unemployment rate that has been nearly cut in half in the last six years.
We’re now in our sixth consecutive year of private-sector job growth, the fastest in our state in fifteen years.
Consider that for a moment: since the turn of the century, private sector job growth in New Jersey has never been stronger than it is today, in this moment, under our leadership and reforms.
If you listened to the left wing groups and some in this chamber, you would think it is just the opposite.
But facts are a stubborn thing.
The housing market has experienced double-digit growth and building permits are at their highest number in a decade.
We’ve shrunk the size of our government, and are doing more with less.
We’ve achieved historic investment in our school system, seen our crime rates drop, and have closed a state prison.
And we’ve helped thousands of people whose lives have been blighted by drug addiction to get a fresh start.
All of this progress can lead us, with continued reforms, to a strong, stable economic outlook.
With every budget that I have presented in this chamber, New Jersey has continued to advance down the path towards a future of greater justice and opportunity for all.
When it comes to making the investments we need, we’ve never hesitated.
But we’ve shown that we can live within our means.
And today, it’s important that we continue to hold our course.
Because no matter how much progress we’ve achieved, all this can still be undone.
That’s right, reversed.
The private sector job growth, reversed.
The housing market recovery, reversed.
The smaller government we have achieved, bloated once again.
We live in a time when our national economy and the global economy face new threats.
New Jersey cannot stand alone — our state has to be ready to weather the economic storms as well as the actual storms.
In the eight years before I took office, taxes and fees had been increased 115 times, making New Jersey the most heavily taxed state in the nation and placing an undue burden on residents and job-creators alike.
Since taking office, I’ve held the line on taxes.
I’ve vetoed the millionaire’s tax every time it’s come to my desk.
I vetoed a legislative proposal to increase the Corporate Business Tax.
I have vetoed five income tax increases passed by this body.
As Governor, I’ve also provided well-needed tax relief.
Last year, I raised the State earned income tax credit from 20% to 30% of the federal credit in concert with the signing of the FY16 budget.
My 2011 Business Tax Reforms have saved the business sector over $3 billion.
And by far, the broadest impact benefitting New Jersey taxpayers was our collaboration on the 2% property tax cap, which has brought property tax growth to a near halt, averaging less than 2% statewide since we passed the cap.
That compares to 7% per year in the 10 years before the law was enacted.
We are making real progress rolling back taxes that should never have been enacted in the first place.
If we stop exercising this type of fiscal restraint, if we back away from the reforms we all fought to achieve these past six years, then we’re going to go back to the bad old days.
Bureaucracy and mediocrity and wastefulness are like weeds.
You need to keep ripping them up and we know there are plenty of powerful special interests who would like to go back to the old days of giveaways on the back of our taxpayers.
We need to continue our work together and enhance the competitiveness of New Jersey.
Instead, just in the past two weeks, yet another economically irresponsible constitutional amendment was proposed by the Legislature that would mandate a near doubling of the minimum wage, which will have a chilling effect on the steady growth of our small business sector.
This proposed increase is on top of those imposed just three short years ago through, again, a constitutional amendment.
The New Jersey Business and Industry Association just released a report on out-migration from New Jersey caused by high taxes and expensive mandates.
Their study concluded that 2 million residents and $18 billion in annual income left our State over the last 10 years.
These facts are not debatable.
They come directly from internal revenue service statistics, not from the rantings of some left-wing think tank.
Are they leaving for Florida, North Carolina, and South Carolina?
Yes, their warmer climates and more inviting tax structures are tempting.
But who are the top two states we are losing citizens to?
Pennsylvania and New York.
The only thing warmer there is their lower taxes.
Those who propose higher taxes and more regulation in this chamber better look in the mirror and to our borders before they act.
62% of businesses surveyed said they would not open another location in New Jersey if they were to expand.
66% said they would not retire here.
67% said they take the estate and inheritance taxes into consideration when making business decisions.
This isn’t a hypothetical policy debate anymore, 2 million people and $18 billion have fled our State as a result of our tax structure.
It is not only older New Jerseyans.
In fact, New Jerseyans 18 to 34 years old leave more than any other age group.
We are losing both, with our antiquated and tone-deaf tax policies.
The time to act is now.
I’ve already called for repeal of the Estate Tax.
What has the legislature done?
They’ve called for yet another government mandated doubling of wages, and an amendment that will cause a $3 billion tax increase on all New Jerseyans.
Where does it end?
Some people in this room want to address the next generation of funding for the Transportation Trust Fund solely on the back of taxpayers by imposing a hike on gas prices without any discussion of tax fairness.
Never mind that we’re already one of the most heavily taxed states in the country, and excessive taxes are driving people and businesses to other states.
And never mind that my administration has repeatedly welcomed, and continues to welcome, the Legislative leadership to reach a sensible, equitable agreement on this issue.
In fact, I was ready to act last year and Democrats refused because of your mid-term elections.
That’s the fact.
The TTF was last renewed five years ago, and that authorization is expiring because that was the length of its term.
To imply that the TTF is in crisis and is suddenly and unexpectedly “running out of money” is a politically driven mischaracterization.
Remedies for any fix of the TTF cannot be made in a vacuum.
The reality is that New Jersey is fully able to support the current capital program as originally proposed in the current five-year authorization.
My administration continues to examine ways to control cash flow and make the most of every taxpayer dollar that the TTF spends.
So, while we wait for realistic proposals and for a legitimate discussion on tax fairness, not just tax hikes, my administration has been hard at work analyzing cost drivers and ways to maintain its roadways in a more cost-effective manner.
There is time to reach a reasonable agreement.
But it will need to be the right one for the hardworking taxpayers of New Jersey.
As if an isolated gas tax hike and 79% government mandated wage increase on our small businesses isn’t enough, New Jersey families and businesses continue to face the potential of another economy-killing proposed constitutional amendment, championed by some in this room, which seeks to divide our state between the government world and the real world.
The constitutional amendment mandates pension payments and places government workers ahead of every other citizen of the state in our state budget.
Approval of this amendment would place government workers:
Ahead of our students.
Ahead of our hospitals.
Ahead of the disabled.
Ahead of our seniors.
And the burden of the cost would be put on the backs of the taxpayers.
Taxpayers who do not receive anything close to these levels of benefits in their lives, would be required to pay for exactly what the public sector unions demand.
Platinum level health benefits.
Exorbitant pensions for life.
How out of line are these benefits from the real world every day New Jerseyans live in?
Take the average government worker who pays $126,000 for their pension and health benefits over 30 years.
Their return?
$2.4 Million in benefits.
This is not the real world New Jerseyans live in.
This chamber cannot divide our state between government workers with huge benefits and every day New Jersey taxpayers who not only don’t have those benefits, but also must pay for them for a privileged few.
There is an option to avoid this, our non-partisan commission has put forward a plan to save $2 billion on government worker health benefits and use it to save the pension system.
Failure to do this will raise taxes, cut municipal aid, hurt students and the disabled, and take aid from our seniors.
We can work together to avoid this.
I am ready to work with you.
Can we put aside partisanship and special interests and put all New Jerseyans first?
If we don’t, only our people will suffer.
And, if you were going to write a playbook for how to wreck the economy and divide a state, this would be it.
Pensions and health benefits already present the largest burden on our budget.
Increased pension, employee health benefits, and debt service together account for an astounding 95% of the growth of this budget.
You heard correctly, 95%.
On pensions, we are proposing to make a $1.9 billion contribution to the State’s pension funds.
This is $550 million more than last year, and in fact, it’s the largest contribution in New Jersey history.
Our overall commitment to the State pension system is bigger than any previous administration.
With this payment, my administration will have made more than $6.2 billion in pension payments.
That is nearly double the total of the last five Governors combined.
The problem is a broken system created by unsustainable giveaways, by politicians to special interests.
The reality is that continuing to bury our heads in the sand only grows the problem and diminishes those with the courage to take on this challenge.
I know you have the courage to make hard choices.
We’ve made them together in the past.
For our children and grandchildren, we simply cannot move in the wrong-headed and backwards direction of locking in platinum-plated benefits into the constitution, at the expense of hardworking, taxpaying families.
Now at the same time, I’m not willing to let gridlock and politics stop our progress on this issue.
In order for the State to be able to afford this pension payment and protect valuable priorities for the rest of our citizens, this budget calls for $250 million in savings from public employee and retiree health costs.
Through reasonable reforms such as requiring the use of generic drugs when available, modest increases in co-pays to discourage unnecessary visits, and establishing new delivery methods for primary care services, we can continue to provide quality care, but with important savings.
Absent any reforms, State costs for government worker and retiree health insurance would increase by $487 million, and at a comparable rate moving forward.
We cannot afford this.
Let me be clear, all of you cannot afford this type of spiraling growth.
Left unchecked, this will kill our ability to cover the cost of essential services that we expect of government, protecting our most vulnerable, making investments in our schools and infrastructure, attracting business, and for those who care about the future viability of their pensions — our ability to make adequate payments.
Or, it will require massive tax increases our citizens cannot sustain.
A 10% sales tax?
A 23% income tax increase?
Insanity.
These are common sense reforms that will save everyone money while still providing great coverage to employees.
As a first step, I’m looking for $250 million in savings in this budget.
Let’s talk more about what that $250 million means.
That’s $250 million in State savings, but this will help everyone.
$250 million in State savings means another $200 million in savings for local governments, school districts, and property taxpayers that fund them.
That’s real property tax relief.
And more than $100 million in savings for State and local employees, who will benefit from reduced premium sharing.
That’s less money coming out of the employee’s paycheck.
It’s a win-win-win for our citizens.
And this isn’t a pie in the sky request or experimentation.
It’s been done before, with great success here in New Jersey.
There are local governments that have already moved out of our State Health Care Plan to address the escalating costs.
They are innovating with new health plans, collaborating with their employees, and generating year over year savings.
They’ve just done this in Burlington County. We can do this statewide.
This is how we achieve the hard reforms our state needs, and put New Jersey on a sustainable path to the future.
We can continue to serve all the people of our state well, while preserving the fiscal restraint that has brought stability to our state over the last six years.
And if we do that, we can also deliver a fairer and better deal for taxpayers.
This fiscal responsibility will allow us to maintain the State’s other commitments.
My proposed budget includes over $16 billion in direct and indirect property tax relief, including $13.3 billion in school aid, $1.5 billion in municipal aid, and $1 billion in direct property taxpayer relief programs.
More than 440,000 seniors and citizens with disabilities will receive an average Homestead Benefit of $515, and more than 160,000 will receive an average Property Tax Freeze benefit of more than $1,200.
More than 200,000 other homeowners earning up to $75,000 will receive an average of more than $400 in Homestead Benefit.
We’re also going to continue working to extend our support for the most vulnerable members of our society.
We’re going to continue investing in housing assistance programs for low-income individuals as well as individuals with developmental disabilities.
Some of you in this room have begun to turn your attention to some of these issues affecting our most in-need residents.
I want to welcome you to that discussion about how we are serving the most vulnerable, those facing housing uncertainty, and how we are helping those in grips of poverty.
This year, we’re maintaining more than $17 million in State and Federal funding for the Division of Family Development’s Social Services for the Homeless Program.
We’re also committing $42 million for the State Rental Assistance Program, and more than $14 million for homelessness prevention and emergency shelters throughout New Jersey.
Because of this commitment, we have made startling progress in reducing homelessness and giving people the hand up they need to end the cycle that housing uncertainty contributes to.
In 2015, homelessness is a staggering 41% lower than it was in 2007.
From 2014 to 2015 alone, we reduced the number of homeless in New Jersey by nearly 14%.
Rates of homelessness among families with children declined by 25% in the last year.
Through a volatile and tough economic period, we protected these programs and reformed government to work better and the results have been extraordinary in helping people get off the streets.
When it comes to healthcare too, we’re making some important investments that will change and save lives.
Last month I called on this Legislature to join me in doubling down on our State’s fight against drug addiction.
We have a chance to help people beat this disease.
We have a chance to reclaim the lives of thousands of our fellow New Jerseyans.
In fact, 2015 saw the first decline in overdose deaths in four years.
That’s why we’re making a historic investment of more than $100 million in state and federal funds to extend access to care for mental health and substance use.
By providing more competitive reimbursement rates for services and providers, we have a chance to dramatically increase access to treatment.
This is the first significant Behavioral Health rate increase in more than a decade, and it’s going to make a big difference by improving critical services, getting more people into treatment earlier, and reducing the size of the burden which currently falls on Emergency Rooms.
With our highly successful Drug Court Program, we’re going to continue investing to provide mandatory treatment to more first-time, non-violent drug offenders.
My budget proposal includes funding of nearly $64 million to maintain and expand this program.
For individuals with developmental disabilities, there will be an additional $48.8 million to create community placement and services, continuing our commitment to transition individuals with developmental disabilities out of institutions and into the community, with the opportunity to live full lives among their families, friends, and neighbors.
For families, we’re providing an additional $25.8 million to support children with needs including behavioral health, substance use, and intellectual and developmental disabilities.
For women, we’re going to continue funding vital preventative and reproductive services.
We’re providing more than $15 million to support pregnant mothers and young children through the Home Visitation Program.
Over $20 million will also go towards supporting women’s services and domestic violence reduction programs.
And to invest in training our next generation of medical professionals who can deliver the world-class care that New Jerseyans deserve, we’re also making a $60 million investment in graduate medical education for New Jersey’s teaching hospitals.
Since 2010 we’ve more than tripled our funding to offset the cost of educating our doctors, and this is important to continue investing in our long-term challenges as well as the short term.
That’s why we’re also continuing to invest in improving the quality of public education.
In the last five years, we’ve changed the face of education in New Jersey.
And we’ve given more of our young people a fighting chance for the future.
This budget proposes our sixth year of historic investments in education, with $13.3 billion in direct aid to schools, and pension and health benefits payments.
I’m proposing nearly $100 million in additional K-12 school aid for New Jersey school districts, taking our total investment to more than $9 billion.
Under this plan, every single school district will have increased funding.
We’re going to continue investing in our incredibly successful charter schools system.
The number of students attending charter schools has nearly doubled during the course of my administration, and we’ve seen charter schools having a huge impact in allowing students to achieve their full potential and turn around education results for at risk communities.
For fiscal year 2017, funding will be provided to support Charter School Aid to ensure per student funding for charter schools remains steady.
Up to six new charter schools will open in the next fiscal year, supporting an additional 1,100 students.
We’re going to continue working to expand charter school opportunities for families in failing school districts.
And as I said before you last month, at my direction the Department of Education has begun to take steps to aggressively slash regulation for New Jersey charter schools and give them the tools they need to serve even more students in even greater ways.
We’re also going to continue strengthening Higher Education in New Jersey, so that all our students can reach their full potential.
Our overall Higher Education funding will be more than $2.2 billion, with steady funding for our institutions of Higher Education.
Investment in student aid programs will also continue, and we’re going to invest an extra $17.8 million in Tuition Aid Grants to bring our total funding to more than $400 million.
Grants are vital for allowing tens of thousands of New Jersey students to go to college, so this is a reasonable investment that will make a big difference for a lot of students.
We’re also going to add a fifth class to the Governor’s Urban Scholarship program, so we can support more than 600 students in targeted school districts.
Finally, let’s talk about how we’re investing in the overall management and administration of our State.
I’m pleased that today’s budget reflects our continued trend towards greater savings and efficiency, with a State workforce that is 10,000 people smaller than when I took office.
Funding for executive operations continues to remain flat.
We can all do more with less and the executive branch is leading by example.
At the same time, there are other areas of administration where we need to continue investing so all our communities have the governance they need.
So we’re also going to continue providing over $1.5 billion in Municipal Aid.
That includes more than $107 million in Transitional Aid to support cities with the biggest financial and management challenges, which will go along with providing valuable State support and expertise to promote good government and sustainable operations for local authorities.
The success of New Jersey depends on the success of all our communities.
So that’s our budget for Fiscal Year 2017.
Now for the final big question.
Will we work together to make progress for our citizens or will we just engage in partisanship?
Many of you are already focused on the next election, raising money, some spending their own money to run advertisements already.
Let me remind you, the election of our next Governor is 630 days away.
630 days.
Are we going to waste those days on partisanship and politics?
Or will you work with me to use those 630 days to help bring relief to our overburdened taxpayers?
We have made so much progress over the 2,220 days together.
Against all odds … nearly 10% unemployment when we started.
5.1% unemployment today.
$11 billion deficit when we started.
$800 Million surplus today.
7% yearly property tax increases when we started. Less than 2% average per year today.
Zero net private sector job growth in the eight years before we started.
230,000 new private sector jobs in the last six years and, this year, the best private sector job growth in 15 years.
The largest public University merger, between Rutgers and UMDNJ, in American history which previous governments had tried and failed over and over again.
Over $1.3 Billion invested in capital improvements to our colleges and universities for the first time in 30 years.
Over $24 Billion invested in our infrastructure in the last six years.
Criminal justice reform which made bail available to those who deserve it and keeps the truly violent off our streets.
Crime rates down.
Prison population down and a state prison closed.
Drug courts in every county and a new emphasis on treating this disease and saving lives.
More of our developmentally disabled in group homes and fewer in institutions.
More of our poor receiving good health care and charity care in our hospitals dramatically reduced.
A dramatic expansion of solar energy and the meeting of our 2020 clean air goals, all without taxing our citizens through the discredited Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
More money is being spent on K-12 education than anytime in history and more families being saved by charter schools in our cities than ever before.
And all of this has been done with no new state tax increases in six years, no radical expansion of government regulation and 10,000 fewer state employees.
We did all of this together in the last 2,220 days.
Regardless of our party differences.
Regardless of the relentless selfishness of the special interests.
Regardless of the constant negativity of the media.
Are we willing to do this again over the last 630 days or will we succumb to politics, selfishness, and negativity?
I am standing here to tell you I am willing to continue to fix the remaining problems.
Let’s take the next steps to insure our future.
Lower taxes to stop people leaving New Jersey.
Build infrastructure in a way that is fair to our taxpayers.
Fix our pension and health benefit system in a way that will not divide and burden our taxpayers, but will bring closer together the real world and the excesses of the government world.
I am ready to work with you if you are willing to stop the partisanship and the reckless amending of our constitution to score political points.
We can sit and reason together for the next 630 days or we can fight for the next 630 days and leave our citizens without hope.
I want to face the future with faith and hope in the people we elected and appointed to make life better.
All the problems created by people can be solved by people — and we’re the ones who have to make it happen.
Over the years I’ve also been honored to work with all of you to make good things happen in New Jersey.
We might not always agree on everything, but we’ve always been able to have the hard conversations we need to move our State forward.
Let’s do that now, and continue to invest in making New Jersey the greatest State possible for all our people.
Thank you, God Bless You, and God Bless New Jersey.
The other GOP candidates are finally starting to fight on Donald Trump’s terms, to judge by the slugfest that was Saturday night’s debate. But it speaks volumes — whole encyclopedias — about the ignorance of our political and media elites that they’re only now realizing that much of what Trump’s been doing is just busting balls.
It’s a blue-collar ritual, with clear rules — overtly insulting, sure, but with infinite subtleties. It can be a test of manliness, a sign of respect, a way of bonding and much more.
Rule No. 1: You can wince, but don’t squeal.
Rule No. 2: Bust right back, if you can.
Not knowing how to play is no excuse. And not getting it shows you have no idea how a huge swath of America lives — the Americans whom Trump has made his base.
From the start, Trump targeted the (mostly) white working class, which happens to be 40 percent of the country. And he’s done it not just with issues, but with how he talks — the ball-busting, the “bragging,” the over-the-top promises.
The American traditions of free expression and respectful discourse are slipping away, and college campuses and Twitter are prime examples, according to a member of the Federal Communications Commission.
“I think that poses a special danger to a country that cherishes First Amendment speech, freedom of expression, even freedom of association,” FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai told the Washington Examiner. “I think it’s dangerous, frankly, that we don’t see more often people espousing the First Amendment view that we should have a robust marketplace of ideas where everybody should be willing and able to participate.
Media bias is a bigger problem than high dollar donations for 2016 likely voters focused on the presidential election, according to a new national survey.
Rasmussen Reports found that when asked “Which is the bigger problem in politics today,” voters picked media bias over money, 47 percent to 45 percent.
What’s more, the survey found that voters believe that the media has too much power in politics. Some 66 percent said it was too powerful, compared to just 26 percent who said the media wielded just enough influence in the election.
“Middle-aged voters tend to believe more strongly than other voters that the media have too much influence over elections,” said the poll analysis.
Business-lobbying organization says brain drain makes it hard for state to attract cutting-edge companies that need younger, skilled employees
New Jersey loses a portion of its senior population every year to less-expensive — and less snowy — states like Florida and North Carolina. But a new study of outmigration trends issued by the New Jersey Business & Industry Association raises new alarms about the number of so-called millennials who have also been leaving the state.
Of all the age groups in New Jersey that experienced a net loss in population from 2007 to 2014, the highest rate was among people between the ages of 18 and 34, according to the business-lobbying organization.
That brain drain hurts the overall New Jersey economy and makes it harder for the state to attract the type of companies that rely on young, skilled workers, the association said.
The new data on millennials leaving New Jersey was included in NJBIA’s broader outmigration study, which concluded that the state had a net loss of 682,062 residents between 2005 and 2014. And from 2004 to 2013, New Jersey lost $18 billion in net adjusted gross income, the NJBIA said.
The organization blamed New Jersey’s high taxes and overregulation for that loss of wealth and residents, and it offered a list of recommendations that ranged from tax reform to better workforce development and making higher education more affordable as remedies.
Ridgewood Nj, Rep. Scott Garrett (NJ-05), a senior member of the House Budget Committee, released the following statement after President Obama unveiled his Fiscal Year 2017 budget proposal to Congress today:
“President Obama’s budget proposal reads like a how-to book on creating debt, raising taxes, and crippling the economy. Unfortunately, the final edition of this wildly unpopular story is full of broken budget policies that hurt New Jersey families and—spoiler alert—it still never balances. And as soon as hardworking families were starting to feel some relief at the fuel pump, the president’s budget proposes a new tax on oil that will increase costs for all Americans.
“It’s unfortunate that, after years of an underperforming economy and a nearly $20 trillion national debt, the president still feels that the best solution is more spending and higher taxes. I’ll continue to fight to rein-in wasteful spending and create a government that is efficient, accountable, and effective so everyone can have the opportunity to get ahead.”
BOE-REA Negotiations
Click here to read a Letter to the Editor of The Ridgewood News, which appeared in the paper on February 12, 2016.
Click here to read the Ridgewood Board of Education’s Fact-Finding Presentation with the The Ridgewood Education Association.
BOE Meets on February 22 at 7:30 p.m.
The Ridgewood Board of Education will hold a Regular Public Meeting on Monday, February 22, 2016 at 7:30 p.m.
The public is invited to attend the meeting at the Ed Center, 49 Cottage Place, Floor 3. The meeting may also be viewed on FiOS channel 33, Optimum channel 77 or from computers via the “Live BOE Meeting” tab on the district website.FiOS channel 33, Optimum channel 77 or from computers via the “Live BOE Meeting” tab on the district website.
Click here to view the agenda for the February 8, 2016 Regular Public Meeting.
Click here to view the minutes of the January 25, 2016 Regular Public Meeting.
Far as I know there are five elected officials. I do not recall seeing Roberta’s name in the voting booth. Her opinion is of no importance to any discussion and I wish she would keep her mouth shut. There are two very obvious misogynists in the bunch – one wears his balding head for all to see and one covers his with a cheap rug. They have no use for women, none. If Roberta were not doing their calling, talking their talk, walking their walk, they would oust her instantly.
Roberta has no business………..NONE WHATSOEVER………..interjecting her opinion into anything. She takes sides and argues with the Council Majority and with residents. No, Sir Rurik, this is not about her being a woman. What a pitiful sidetrack you are trying to get on. Her double-X chromosome is not at issue here. What is at issue is that she is way way too big for her britches, so to speak. She thinks she is an elected official when she absolutely is not.
2 clear choices to fix N.J.’s pension crisis | Opinion
By Thomas Byrne
I’m watching the state pension fund melt as the stock market drops.
The fund is well-diversified but domestic equities are still the largest single exposure. Ironically, the alternative investments which have produced good net results for beneficiaries are unpopular with many labor leaders because we are paying fees to outside experts rather than managing complex investments internally. But that is another story.
The fund balances are declining for two reasons. First, stock markets here and abroad have been bad for nearly a year. Second, our cash flow is negative as over $9 billion in annual benefits dwarf about $3 billion in contributions from the state and its municipalities.
N.J. faces financial calamity without reductions in pensions | Opinion
At the heart of the plan is to save over $2 billion in health benefit spending, using those savings to provide funding for pension benefits earned to date.
Bottom line — if I’m a public employee, I’m worried about my retirement and hopeful that politicians come up with realistic solutions before it’s too late.
Democrats led by state Senate President Steve Sweeney (D-Gloucester) have proposed a ballot referendum to constitutionally mandate large annual contributions into the pension system. Great for beneficiaries if it passes.
But the odds of passage seem slim; early polling shows that when the public realizes that it is likely to cause huge tax increases and/or major cuts to key programs, a majority would vote no.
Even assuming steady growth of over 3 percent in annual State revenues, and a millionaires’ tax raising $650 million a year beginning in 2018, and 60 percent of revenue growth being available for pension funding, and pension assets earning a steady 7.9 percent (unlikely), an additional $2.8 billion in new taxes on people other than millionaires will be needed by 2022 to pay for the current pension and health benefits.
The public will vote “No” on that amount of new taxes, particularly when it is to fund a level of benefits that they themselves could never get. With another year gone post-referendum, we’re billions more in the hole and pensions are that much less secure.
Some disagree, saying that the pensions are secure because even if the pension funds were to run dry, the state would be forced to pay retirees out of the state operating budget. It is misleading to represent that as fact. We simply don’t know. The state’s highest court has never ruled on this issue.
Every year we don’t properly fund the pension system, the future cost goes up exponentially.
I’d hate to bet my retirement security on the premise that the court would either obliterate crucial state programs or essentially mandate huge tax increases by ruling that over 25 percent of the state budget, $9 billion of $34 billion, must be for pension payments. And even if a court did so rule, the possibility exists that the state would pay out in scrip rather than in cash. That is not far-fetched; Illinois and California have used scrip to some degree in recent years.
It should never come to this. There is another way.
The central tenet is that the state can honor all pensions accrued to date by aligning benefits to those in the private sector, and recycling the cost savings to fill the unfunded liability in the pension funds.
Sweeney: Christie’s pension commission’s proposed savings is a ‘fantasy’State Senate President Steve Sweeney met with the Star-Ledger Editorial Board to discuss issues, including how to solve the state’s public workers’ pension crisis. (Video by Andre Malok | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com)
Some of the savings involving health care are structural, and would have no cost to public employees. We should at least enact those reforms.
The rub is that other proposals require public employees to accept a lower level of benefits going forward. That is exceedingly unpleasant. But losing retirement security would be far more so. That is the choice. Denial will not solve this.
Benefit levels are far higher for New Jersey public employees than is common in the private sector. It is the Obama administration, not Republicans, that has said health benefits at the New Jersey level should be subject to a luxury tax.
So there are two paths.
Ask taxpayers to continue subsidizing a level of health benefits that even the Obama administration says is too rich.
Put those benefits at or near the highest level specified under Obamacare, and use those savings to fill the hole in the pension funds.
Certain Democrats say “just make the payments.” But when the governor asked a joint session of the legislature for a show of hands on who was willing to vote for higher taxes in order to do so, not a hand went up.
I am one of the petitioners and I can tell you that many who have signed for me state categorically that they voted YES on the November referendum and are furious at the way the Council Majority is trying to shove this huge garage through by having the county bond it.
No one is happy with the County bonding it. They want a garage, almost everyone wants a garage, but they want a reasonable size and they want Ridgewood to issue the bond. And to answer your snarky suggestion, we are not collecting email addresses. Leave that level of underhandedness to those who use private email lists such as CHURCH GROUP lists to disseminate their campaign information. (yes, you know who you are).
Defence minister Moshe Ya’alon says his country is seeing signs of a much-feared nuclear arms race in the Middle East
By Raf Sanchez, Jerusalem
2:01PM GMT 14 Feb 2016
Israel has picked up signs of the beginning of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East as Arab states seek nuclear weapons to counter Iran, the Israeli defence minister has warned.
Moshe Ya’alon said Sunni Arab nations were not reassured by last year’s nuclear deal between Iran and six world powers and were making their own preparations for nuclear weapons.
“We see signs that countries in the Arab world are preparing to acquire nuclear weapons, that they are not willing to sit quietly with Iran on brink of a nuclear or atomic bomb,” Mr Ya’alon said.
The defence minister gave no evidence to back up his claims but Israel closely monitors the military activities of its Arab neighbours.
Israel and the Sunni Gulf countries do not have diplomatic ties but are known to talk through back channels and are united in their opposition to Iran.
New Jersey Transit and 11 rail unions head back to the bargaining table this week, trying to avert a strike that could start the second weekend in March.
A NJ Transit conductor waits for passengers to board the NJ Transit train from New York Penn Station to Trenton, NJ on May 13, 2015 in New York City.
If rail workers do walk out, New Jersey commuters could face a nightmare scenario, according to Tracy Noble, the manager of public and government affairs for AAA Mid-Atlantic.
“If you think your commute right now is bad, once those people that typically take transit are additional drivers on our roadways, the commute time is going to have catastrophic results. You could be looking at a commute that takes upwards of two to three hours when it only typically took you a 45 minute short train ride, bus ride,” she said. “The impact of people not being able to use transit to get to their place of business is going to be detrimental to our infrastructure.”
NJ State Senate President Steve Sweeney admits he’s extremely concerned about the situation.
“We want more people to take mass transportation, not less,” he said. “We’re very concerned about that and I know there’s been 2 federal panels commissioned at this point, but no solution yet.”
He also said out a transit strike will only sour even more Jersey commuters on NJ Transit, and many are unhappy with the agency already.
“The 9 percent rate hike didn’t help, the 9 percent rate hike actually hurt, and the more expensive you make mass transportation the less attractive it is for people to take it,” he said.
Noble said this is a serious situation and commuters should begin preparing for service disruptions in case a strike occurs
We Mourn the Loss of Gerald F. DeSimone – True Patriot
This is one of the saddest emails we’ve ever had to send. One of our own Patriots has departed G-d’s earth and we are wounded with this great loss.Gerald F. DeSimone, 82, of Wanaque, formerly of Ridgewood, entered into eternal rest on February 10, 2016. Survived by his wife Patricia nee Stankan, his daughters, Erika, Andrea and son in law Bryan Daly.
Editors note: Gerry ran the Ridgewood 4th of July Committee for years, he is probably best known for bringing Buzz Aldrin to a Ridgewood 4th Celebration. Gerry was a personal friend of this blog and instrumental to its founding . Through Gerry I meet Rep. Scott Garrett, yelled at Tom Kean Jr, fell out with Kevin J. O’Toole and had many fun filled adventures in New Jersey politics.
A memorial mass will be celebrated on Saturday February 20th at 10:00 am at the Church of the Nativity in Midland Park.
Gerry was a Korean Veteran. A wonderful husband and family man. He was an unselfish fellow who helped many conservatives in Bergen County with his heart and head. It’s truly a sad day for us all especially for those who had the pleasure of meeting and working with him.
Gerry was instrumental in the formation and growth of NJTPC; he was the creative force in our having the July 4th Float in the Ridgewood Parade – a tradition we have been keeping since the inception. He always had time to support the very basis for good government – small, lean and honest politicians. He did not tolerate fools gladly; his talk was straight and unabashedly true to conservative ideas and ideals. We are so very fortunate to have known him and his influence will remain with NJTPC as it should.
Our sincerest condolences for Pat and his family as well as other friends and associates. He contributed to the NJ Tea Party Coalition as a Board member who knew how important our constitutional liberties are.
Rest in Peace Gerry – you will be in our hearts forever!
Mapped: Negative central bank interest rates now herald new danger for the world
Negative rates are becoming the “new abnormal” in a shaky world economy. With fresh panic hitting markets, are we finally hitting the limits of what monetary policy can achieve? Click on the countries to find out
The world’s tentative experiment with negative interest rates got off to an unremarkable start.
Sweden’s Riksbank – the world’s oldest central bank – became the first major monetary authority to cross the rubicon and take its main policy rate into the red exactly a year ago to the month (see map above).
The Riksbank’s move followed the likes of Switzerland and Denmark, who had turned negative in a bid to stimulate flagging inflation and halt the punishing appreciation of their currencies.
