Ridgewood, NJ – Citizens for a Better Ridgewood (CBR) is pleased to announce that we will be endorsing Jeff Voigt, Bernadette Coughlan-Walsh and Ramon Hache for VillageCouncil in the May 10th municipal election.
CBR is committed to ensuring that Ridgewood engages in inclusive and comprehensive
planning that will promote reasonable and appropriate growth and progress, while preserving the character, size and scale of our Village for generations to come. “We believe Jeff, Bernadette and Ramon will make decisions that protect and improve the quality of life of Ridgewood residents, as the next Village Council addresses opportunities and challenges that will impact us all,” said Trustee Amy Bourque.
CBR met with all six candidates and chose to endorse Voigt, Walsh and Hache because they support CBR’s goal of comprehensive planning for the future of Ridgewood. These three candidates are dedicated to community engagement that allows residents a voice in their future, and will exercise independent judgment always in the best interest of Village residents. Lori Weil noted, “we feel these three candidates will work hard to thoughtfully address the many issues facing Ridgewood, and trust they are best prepared to move toward the future while still maintaining the charm and character of our Village.”
Ridgewood, NJ, The Concerned Residents of Ridgewood (CRR) is delighted to endorse Jeff Voigt, Bernie Walsh, and Ramon Hache for Councilpersons in the May 10th, 2016 Village elections.
“This election is about residents regaining control over the big decisions in our town, rather than falling in line behind applicants and institutions like Valley Hospital, which has sought to replace our Village planning with threats of litigation. As we embrace positive change in Ridgewood, our Council and Planning Board can no longer let applicants lead the discussion on the appropriate scale and intensity of new building and land use in our village,” said Pete McKenna, president of the CRR.
“We think Jeff, Bernie and Ramon will challenge a recent trend in Ridgewood government where bigger is always presumed to be better and where applicants for changes in land use are treated as higher authorities than our own residents. We
chose to endorse these three independent candidates because we feel they each will listen to residents on matters of village governance before reaching a conclusion. ,” added Mr. McKenna said.
“We have interviewed all the candidates and feel that Voigt, Walsh and Hache are best suited to restore a positive vision of the Village of Ridgewood’s future. Please get to know them and mark your calendar for Tuesday May 10th to vote as you see
fit,” a. Added Mr. McKenna.
The Concerned Residents of Ridgewood, Inc. (CRR), a grassroots organization that has sought moderation and sound land use planning at the H-Zone site, and opposes the expansion as currently exerted by Valley Hospital through its ongoing
litigation against the village.. A group of CRR members met individually with each candidate for Council in April of this year, to discuss their views and priorities for the village prior to their endorsement.
Science has taken a back seat at the United Nations.
On this Earth Day 2016, there is a great deal of frenzy about how our Earth is going to become uninhabitable, as the civilized activities of man allegedly trigger unstoppable global warming and climate change.
With the Obama administration set to commit the U.S. to the Paris climate agreement by signing our nation onto the document Friday, it is obvious that science has taken a back seat at the United Nations.
The environmentalists, bureaucrats and politicians who make up the U.N.’s climate panel recruit scientists to research the climate issue. And they place only those who will produce the desired results. Money, politics and ideology have replaced science.
U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres has called for a “centralized transformation” that is “going to make the life of everyone on the planet very different” to combat the alleged global warming threat. How many Americans are looking forward to the U.N. transforming their lives?
Following the Democratic majority’s rejection of changes to New Jersey’s school funding formula in the legislature last month, DOE Comissioner David Hespe saidWednesday that he believes lawmakers are better suited for making changes to the formula than the department in addressing the uneven distribution of money to under and over-funded schools. Lawmakers from both parties criticized the department and the administration of Governor Chris Christie for their inability to effect the necessary changes to the formula since Christie issued an executive order on school funding in 2012. JT Aregood, PolitickerNJ Read more
Hi James – here is a reader says story for you. Please take it if you find it interesting. I was surprised to find this fact and thought the voters should know:
Was Evan Weitz planted in Ridgewood by special interest groups?
It is a widely known speculation that our current mayor was sent to Ridgewood to bring Hudson County politics to Ridgewood. He ran for the office as soon as he moved to Ridgewood and has strategically placed the right people in different committees over the years to get the job done for developers and politicians. Rumors are that he is already renovating his house and preparing to move out once his task is done.
We looked at the council candidates for 2016. All but one are long term residents. Something VERY interesting came up for Evan Weitz. He moved to the village in late 2012 and in 2015 he was appointed to Financial Advisory Committee and made it’s CHAIR by resolution 15-301. We DID NOT find any other committee or volunteering experience from Evan before his role in Financial Advisory Committee and when he was made the chair, Janice Willet was Vice Chair of the committee already. She wasn’t promoted to the CHAIR of the committee and instead he was brought in and made the chairman. He has no prior experience with municipal financing in other towns or any experience with how Ridgewood works and our village’s finances or resident needs. He has not served in any other committee. Evan is an attorney by trade and has no experience or degree in Finance. This was evident with his answers in council meeting when he was cross examined.
So the reader asks what is the rationale for bringing a new comer to Financial Advisory Committee and bring him as the chair. Who brought him in? Who are his backers? This is he representing there? Is he being planted to complete some work that PA could not complete?
A Billion Dollar Stool to Reach the Bottom Rung of the Job Ladder
Adam Millsap
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
In February, the Obama administration proposed a “First Job” initiative. The main goal of the aptly titled initiative is to help unemployed young people obtain their first job by spending $5.5 billion on grants, training, and direct wages. Unfortunately – but unsurprisingly – the press release failed to acknowledge the most significant factor impeding employment in this age group: the minimum wage.
Everyone knows that a first job is a vital step in a young person’s development. Research has shown that work experience at a young age teaches positive work habits, time management, perseverance, and improves self-confidence. Increases in teenage employment also reduce the rate of violent crime. Yet despite these well-known benefits, the US maintains a minimum wage policy that makes it very difficult for all but the most productive teenagers to find a job.
When the minimum wage was discussed in the late 19th and early 20th century it was in the context of preventing the least skilled, most “undesirable” workers from finding a job, with the goal of eradicating the unemployable people. For the next 80-plus years it was common knowledge that a minimum wage would reduce employment among the least-skilled workers. The only debate was about whether such a reduction was desirable from society’s perspective, as many of the appalling eugenicists of the time contended.
As late as 1987, the New York Times editorial staff recommended a minimum wage of $0 because of its negative effects on employment. The Times argued that the minimum wage was an ineffective anti-poverty tool whose employment costs outweighed any benefits from higher wages.
Ridgewood Nj, 220 years ago next week, on April 28, 1796, Amelia Simmons published the first cookbook “American Cookery”, written by an American. Prior to that, the cookbooks used in the Thirteen Colonies were British, and lacked information on how to use foods, spices and other ingredients found in America.
As historian Greg Mangan states, what made Simmons’s work unique “was its recognition of the deficiencies of existing British cookbooks when it came to understanding American culture”, and that it provides valuable insights into the methods and foods that helped colonists forge a uniquely American culinary identity.
A skillful cook, historian Karen Hess points out that Simmons recipes had a variety of herbs, as well as wine, and “extraordinarily fine roasting techniques”. She incorporated common early American foods – cornmeal, pumpkins, and molasses — into her recipes, and was the first cookbook author to mention “pearl ash”, (a wood ash, the forerunner of baking powder) to lighten or leaven dough.
American Cookery also shows the influence of Dutch words in our area at that time – words like slaw, meaning salad; and cookey, from koekje, meaning cookie.
The impact of American Cookery on local Ridgewood residents at that time can be seen in an 1823 book of hand-written recipes by Ridgewood native Jeanette Pells. Two of her recipes (Ginger bread and Sugar cake) call for one or two teaspoons of pearl ash.
To learn more about food preparation and cooking in Ridgewood in the 18th and 19th centuries, come to the Schoolhouse Museum’s new exhibit “Farm and Home”using artifacts from the 18th and 19th centuries.
The Museum is located at 650 E. Glen Ave., Ridgewood, NJ, and visiting hours are Thursdays and Saturdays; 1 to 3 p.m. and Sundays; 2 to 4 p.m. To contact the museum: 201-447 3242 or [email protected]
“Ms. Hauck got elected last time because the West side of Ridgewood voted and the Eastside did not. Check the records. I believe this “committee” came into existence after that election. Most of those in administration, on the board, and doctors from Valley that live in Ridgewood are also from the West side, and, I would be willing to bet, most of this front they call a Financial Advisory Committee live on the West side. Get it ? It is nothing more than a power play by a relatively small group of people with big money and egos that could care less about the overall well being of Ridgewood. And you are right 1:44, that could easily happen, but not just to that neighborhood.”
While others say , ” please don’t make this a West v. East thing. That tears a community apart and it’s insulting. I happen to live on the West side, within spitting distance of the East side – the argument that we are 2 separate groups doesn’t fly.”
Lets face it , “that has been the undercurrent for several years and now with all of the disputes going on, especially with the so called “crown jewel”, a lot of people are making this an east side west side thing… and some postings implying people living near the hospital are suckers, selfish, nimby etc. has done wonders to cement that feeling…and yes it is unfortunate but it is becoming a huge reality…”
“I’ll stick to my original comment for which I think I’m entitled after 33 yrs. It’s a power play, pure and simple. I have not said anything that people who have resided here have not said privately, trust me. But if nothing else, maybe it will get the people in this town to wake up, vote these people and their friends out, and stop the train wreck. That’s what the statement was intended to do. Sometimes being “politically correct “”does not work.”
“I live on the west side and I have email from Gwenn saying the previous administration did not take care of the west side and she and the current administration are making sure that west side is not neglected. So, she definitely tried to play that card.”
4-Mile Run & 1-Mile Family Walk Saturday, April 23, 2016, at Garret Mountain in Woodland Park, N.J.
As part of our 30th anniversary celebrations, we are continuing our commitment of supporting local nonprofit organizations by hosting a 4-mile run and 1-mile family walk on Saturday, April 23, 2016, to benefit three local Habitat for Humanity affiliates:
Please consider joining us to support these three worthy affiliates by becoming a sponsor, by making a donation or by participating in our event!
Visit our website at www.asbnow.com to learn more and to view our
Charity Run/Walk brochure.
For further information, please contact Diane Kerner at Atlantic Stewardship Bank at
(201)444-7100 or by email [email protected]
April, 17, 2016
By Rep. Scott Garrett (New Jersey’s 5th Congressional District)
Ridgewood NJ, For too long, tax and spend politicians have used the tax code to confiscate more money from working families in New Jersey because they believe the government can spend the funds better than those that earned it. And each tax season, New Jerseyans are painfully reminded of their high tax burden.
At over 70,000 pages containing 4 million words, chances are you didn’t read the entire U.S. tax code before filing your taxes this year. In fact, the tax code is so long and complicated that you probably ended up having to pay a person or a service for their expertise — all the while hoping that they read and understood all 70,000 pages.
This is a tax code in desperate need for reform. Reform that keeps more money in New Jersey, ends the special interest loopholes, and lowers the overall tax margins for everyone.
Keep the money at home
Some politicians view tax reform and the ever-growing government as yet another opportunity to empower themselves at the expense of hardworking New Jersey taxpayers. By advocating for more programs and more benefits, big government spenders are really placing their faith in bureaucrats. So rather than send taxpayer dollars to Washington and hope bureaucrats send it back, I am fighting to keep more of your money in your own pocket.
Our overly complex tax code is the lifeblood of the biggest scam perpetuated by Washington politicians. They take your hard-earned money through a broken tax system that no one understands, and then cut backroom deals to give this money to their favored programs. And if some tiny amount actually comes home, the taxpayers are supposed to thank Washington for giving some of it back.
Think of it this way. If someone stole a $50 bill out of your pocket, would you thank that person after they brought you a happy meal from a fast food restaurant? f course not! It’s your money and you know better how it should be spent.
Even the playing field
Next, we must end the tax benefit system bestowed to Washington’s favored industries. The current tax code is a grab bag of loopholes, deductions, and escape routes for those fortunate enough to be able to hire an army of tax attorneys and lobbyists.
Every year, pinstriped lobbyists descend upon Washington to receive their tax carve outs — known as tax credits — for their industry. Not only does this arrangement let the federal government pick winners and losers, it misallocates the capital investment that so many struggling industries need. And the individual taxpayer, who has no lobbyist in Washington, is left picking up the tab.
This is not the type of economic liberty and freedom of opportunity the Founders envisioned.
New Jerseyans should no longer be expected to pay for government favors enjoyed by mega-corporations and Washington’s preferred industries. Every industry should play on the same, even playing field, not the rigged system of carve outs we have now. Additionally, the number of deductions — which allow businesses to lower their tax burden –should be significantly reduced.
If it’s broke, fix it
And on the individual level, we need a simpler, fairer, and flatter tax code free of loopholes. The average American spent 13 hours preparing their taxes last year — totaling more than 6 billion hours for all Americans. Navigating the tax code has become too complicated and time consuming. Instead, the tax code needs to be simplified so that high-powered corporate executives, who can hire expensive tax attorneys to lower their rates and find loopholes, don’t end up paying a lower percentage than a single mom working two jobs.
Thomas Jefferson once wrote, “I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
New Jerseyans have been frustrated by bureaucrats in Washington who continuously waste tax dollars. Comprehensive tax reform will force the government to be more efficient, effective, and accountable to the people. Americans deserve a tax system that provides equal opportunity and economic freedom for everyone, not just those who have power and influence in Washington
Political signs in the village-owned planters and in the sidewalk cutouts (for the shade trees) in the Central Business District were unheard of in Ridgewood until someone (as yet unidentified) paid to have the “Vote Yes” signs printed, assembled, and distributed around the Village last Fall in time to influence the Parking Garage vote. And now we are told that there is some kind of regulation in place for political signs that permitted these kinds of signs to be put up in this manner?
What is the text of that regulation as it appears today? How did it appear last fall when the “Vote Yes” signs were erected? What earlier iterations of that regulation existed by which these kinds of shenanigans were completely prevented in the past? Or are we just now seeing the results of a creative interpretation on an old, unchanged regulation by an enterprising new election lawyer or cynical political operator? If that regulation was changed in such a way as to permit or encourage this kind of nonsense, what was the “before” and “after” of this change, and exactly how and when did it occur?
The guiding hands of Councilwoman Hauck, Mayor Aronsohn, Deputy Mayor Pucciarelli, and the Village Manager so clearly appear to be behind this unfortunate development that nobody should ever accept an explanation that does not implicate them. If we want to revert back to a non-partisan form of local government, which we are supposed to be guranteed under the Faulkner Act, nobody that supported the Three Amigos in their misbehavior in recent years, or who is currently receiving political support from them, should ever be elected to Village Council, even by mistake.
WASHINGTON — Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The Obama administration has lobbied Congress to block the bill’s passage, according to administration officials and congressional aides from both parties, and the Saudi threats have been the subject of intense discussions in recent weeks between lawmakers and officials from the State Department and the Pentagon. The officials have warned senators of diplomatic and economic fallout from the legislation.
Adel al-Jubeir, the Saudi foreign minister, delivered the kingdom’s message personally last month during a trip to Washington, telling lawmakers that Saudi Arabia would be forced to sell up to $750 billion in treasury securities and other assets in the United States before they could be in danger of being frozen by American courts.
MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH CEREMONY -THE MOVING WALL
Military Appreciation Month Ceremony – Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 5:30pm at Overpeck County Park – Amphitheater, Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey.
The Moving Wall can be viewed May 20th to 23rd ; 7am to 10pm.
The Official National Military Appreciation Month Facebook page and directly tied to www.nmam.org
Company Overview
National Military Appreciation Month (NMAM), as designated by Congress, provides a period encompassing both the history and recognition of our armed services with an in-depth look at the diversity of its individuals and achievements. It allows Americans to educate each generation on the historical impact of our military through the participation of the community with those who serve encouraging patriotism and love for America.
This month gives the nation a time and place on which to focus and draw attention to our many expressions of appreciation and recognition of our armed services via numerous venues and also to recall and learn about our vast American military history.
Long Description
National Military Appreciation Month started as a simple idea; to gather America around its military family to honor, rememb…See More
General Information
National Military Appreciation Month-May 2016 includes Loyalty Day (1st), Military Spouse Appreciation Day (6th) VE Day(8th)…See More
Mission
This month gives the nation a time and place on which to focus and draw attention to our many expressions of appreciation an…See More
by Marcia Ringel and Alan Seiden
Co-Chairs, The Preserve Graydon Coalition, Inc
Ridgewood Nj, With the spring comes our biannual Village Council election. On May 10, or (more accurately) when sworn in on July 1, three new council members will take the seats occupied by Paul Aronsohn, Gwenn Hauck, and Albert Pucciarelli since 2012.
The candidates are Richard (Rich) Brooks, Bernadette (Bernie) Coghlan-Walsh, Ramon Hache, Jeffrey (Jeff) Voigt, Evan Weitz, and Janice Willett. We asked them to share their views on Graydon, environmental preservation, open space, and more, including the future of the Schedler property. Their full, unedited written replies appear in alphabetical order under each question, below.
If the Coalition decides to endorse candidates, we will announce them soon. Meanwhile, if you would you like to share any thoughts about that, you may write to:[email protected] or reply to this message. To ensure authenticity, please sign your email message with your name. Comments will be confidential and not shared or published.
1. Have you or your family been Graydon members in the past? If so, please describe a memory of the park and lake.
Brooks: Yes. We were seasonal members for many years when our kids were younger and used the pool on an almost daily basis when it was open. My son was a guard at Graydon while he was still in school. My daughter and my nephew, who was living with us at the time, attended Graydon Camp, had wonderful times, and met their friends at Graydon all the time. Our memories of Graydon are great. We love the sandy beach, cool water, being with our neighbors, etc.
Coghlan-Walsh: My family has been a member of Graydon since 1998. One of my most vivid memories of Graydon is of my now 12 year old son Emmett when he was 2. His siblings were in the 4 foot dock area on Linwood and I was with a friend who was helping me watch my children. She was on one side of the dock I was on the other and she was holding Emmett. She let him stand on the dock and told him to go to me. To all of our surprise he ran in the complete opposite direction and leapt off the dock with a huge smile on his face! We all hurried to that side and when he surfaced he was swimming and laughing. Now he does that same smile from the high dive!
Hache: Some of my fondest memories are of my brothers and I spending entire summer days at Graydon. We would stay in the water until our fingers looked like prunes. To us, it was more of a lake than just a pool. We would save up our money to buy ice cream from the ice cream truck that would pull up on the Maple Avenue entrance.
Voigt: Patty and I joined Graydon years ago, when our kids were just tykes. We’d come from Minnesota, the land of lakes, and found Graydon not only a reminder of that, but also a great place to meet other young families. And that was before the Pavilion—which has enhanced it.
Weitz: Yes, my family has been a member of Graydon every year since we moved to Ridgewood several years ago. My wife is a teacher and she and my children spend at least 4 days a week at Graydon during the summer. Graydon was amongst one of the reasons we moved to Ridgewood and is one of my family’s favorite places in Ridgewood.
My favorite memory of Graydon is watching my now 6 year old daughter learn to swim at Graydon and then seeing her jump into the water for the first time without a life vest.
Willett: When my parents first moved the family to Ridgewood in the summer of 1966, we joined Graydon immediately and spent many wonderful afternoons there—it was the best possible introduction to Ridgewood. The big slides (now long gone, of course) were a particular highlight. When my children were little, we joined Graydon every summer and spent many equally wonderful afternoons and evenings at the pool. I generally packed a lunch, and on really hot days I would pack dinner as well (or have pizza delivered to Graydon!) and stay till closing time. When my children were in elementary school, I would often pick them up from school at lunchtime on hot days in June and take them to Graydon for a picnic lunch and a quick swim to cool off.
I re-joined Graydon again a few years ago when I stopped working full-time and I go almost every day on my bike for at least a couple of hours—it’s heavenly to sit with my feet in the sand and relax with a book, and I can do my half-mile swim either in the lanes or across the length of the deep end. I’ve already renewed my membership for this summer! Whenever anyone in my family suggests going somewhere on vacation in the summer, I always think in terms of how many Graydon days I’ll have to give up and whether or not it’s worth it, and I usually decide that I’d rather just stay in Ridgewood. I look forward to opening day, and I mourn the end of the season. Graydon is truly my “happy place”—we are so fortunate to have such a wonderful facility right in the middle of town!
2. Where does environmental preservation rank among your personal priorities?
Brooks: Top of the list. I’ve been a member of the Parks, Recreation and Conservation Board for the last six years; Chairman for the last three. I’m totally committed to making Ridgewood clean, green and accessible to all who live here.
Coghlan-Walsh: I have been involved in environmental activities most of my life. My family owned a nursery and I believe our parents instilled in us all the need to be environmentally aware. We live near Twinney Park and I work with my family and our neighbors to help keep it clean and in winter shovel the pond for skating. I work for a company that works on sustainability efforts worldwide and I’m proud to be a partner in their endeavors. I believe it is important for people to always maintain a positive attitude towards the environment and fit into their life the things that they deem important.
Hache: Environmental preservation is very important to me. I personally contribute to both national and state conservationist organizations. Our available open spaces are quickly disappearing. I fear that, at the current pace, my children and their children, will not be able to enjoy as many open spaces as I did as a kid.
Voigt: It’s a plank of my campaign, actually. And it goes beyond preservation. We actually have to clean up toxic sites and make our water safer. You’ve heard there’s lead in our water already. But did you know there’s PFOA too? It’s been linked to cancer, and yet, have you heard one word from the Council on it, ever? So, preservation isn’t enough, in my view.
Weitz: Environmental preservation is amongst my highest priorities. One of the things that makes Ridgewood special is our green spaces, especially those spaces set aside for family activities like Graydon. I cannot imagine a Ridgewood that does not value our green space and if elected I will ensure that Ridgewood remains just as beautiful tomorrow as it is today.
Willett: Environmental preservation is one of the most serious obligations of anyone in municipal government—or government at any level, for that matter. As a Councilperson, however, I would always want to weigh the benefits of preservation against the costs, in the interest of fiscal prudence and in order to make the best use of our resources.
3. Could residents who love Graydon Park, with its sandy-bottom, partly spring-fed swimming pond surrounded by a beach, rely on you, as a Council member, to work to preserve it? What does “preserve Graydon” mean to you? What kinds of physical changes, if any, would you support?
Brooks: The Village of Ridgewood, specifically the Parks and Recreation Department, has implemented many capital upgrades and improvements at Graydon over the past several years. New water diffusers, new pumping systems, the new deck with enhanced food service areas are three examples that provide additional margins of health, safety and comfort for all Graydon patrons. In the future, the focus must be on enhancements that provide a better Graydon experience, while maintaining safety. For example, renovating restrooms and changing areas, making the entire park more accessible for residents with special needs, and adding Wi-Fi that can be accessed easily are things that are being considered.
Coghlan-Walsh: I have been a proud supporter of Graydon since we moved to Ridgewood. And we’ve been active members since! I supported Graydon during my tenure on the Village Council from 2010-2014. Preserve to me is simple, make sure the water filling Graydon is always clean and fresh, the sand clean of debris, the filters working properly to maintain the water balance and the buildings including the bathrooms are maintained for use. I believe Graydon is a treasure and should remain “simple”. I did support the installation of the ramp into the pool. It has given access to those with some difficulty. I’ve watched the use of this ramp and am quite surprised at the number of senior that use it. Other than making sure the playground is maintained, the benches, etc. I don’t believe any new physical changes are needed.
Hache: I enjoy taking my children to Graydon. I want them to enjoy the park just as I did as a kid. Actually, the facilities today are much better than they were when I was growing up, particularly the dining area. Although at times it may not be self-sustaining, we should preserve it as it not only offers recreation in the summer, but it also helps with flooding issues right next to a brook that floods often. To me, “preserve Graydon” means protecting one of our valuable landmarks that is unique to Ridgewood. It is an intricate part of our historic Village landscape.
Voigt: Graydon is wonderfully different, isn’t it? A real fixture of Village life. Why change it? There are however, more important priorities for the Council, such as the cleanup issues I just mentioned. That said, as you can see from my record on the zoning board, I don’t support changes out of character with the town.
Weitz: Yes, you can absolutely depend on me to preserve Graydon. Preserving Graydon to me means keeping Graydon unique and special. In terms of physical change, I am open to looking at some of the facilities around Graydon that could be upgraded while preserving the historical character and profile of Graydon – which must include keeping the sandy-bottom, partly spring-fed swimming pond and beach.
Willett: I can assure you that I would be the strongest possible advocate for Graydon. Preserving Graydon means keeping the sandy bottom, holding chemicals to a minimum, and keeping the beach sand clean and the water skimmed—and I would love to see new bathrooms, a new bike rack, and maybe a general sprucing up, such as a new coat of paint on the railings around the entrance. Mainly, though, I want to keep Graydon open and adequately staffed.
4. In some years, opening hours at Graydon have been cut back. (Historically, Graydon closed at sunset.) How do you view such reductions in opening hours? Would it be appropriate to use municipal funds to maintain full operating hours of this Village amenity throughout the swimming season?
Brooks: The primary objective for any entity that provides a water recreation area like a pool, lakefront beach or an ocean beach must be the safety of its patrons with absolutely no compromises made. Staffing at Graydon is directly related to an available labor pool of people who have the appropriate lifeguarding certifications, training and availability at any given moment. Staffing at Graydon is only indirectly related to any budgetary considerations, so I think accessing alternate funding centers misses the real challenge. If we don’t have enough of the properly certified guards to maintain safety at Graydon, and we cannot guarantee the safety of every patron, of every age, we cannot open. Simply put, the Village cannot allow safety to be compromised at Graydon—ever.
Coghlan-Walsh: My view from when I was on the Village Council has not changed; I believe Graydon should remain open until sunset. Many families like ours, have both parents working and often the only time spent as a family at Graydon is in the evening and on weekends. This is a taxpayer funded entity and all taxpayers should be able to use and enjoy the pool. I would support using municipal funds to keep it open.
Hache: It would be appropriate to use municipal funds to maintain full operating hours. My concern is not only for the hours of operation but also for the season schedule. We must ensure Graydon is on a consistent and full schedule from Memorial Day to Labor Day. Failure to do so would undermine sales of season passes. Ultimately, Graydon should not be viewed as a for profit venture. However, it is worth noting that it is the only revenue-generating recreational amenity of the Village.
Voigt: It’s not an issue right now. What will always be an issue, however, is taxes, and whether the Village would support an increase just to extend hours? I would rather not. We have to be creative, turn to solutions that don’t always come back to taxes, or to tapping into the municipal budget. Let’s see if we can’t make Graydon self-sustaining.
Weitz: I would like to keep Graydon open as long in the season as possible and as late as possible. However, I prefer not use municipal funds but rather to focus on ways of making Graydon more financially sustainable so that it can support additional services without using municipal funds.
I believe that Graydon is a special place. However, seasonal membership has been declining while daily passes have been increasing. We need to better understand that trend. We also need to look at fees we charge vendors to provide services as Graydon to make sure that we are being as fiscally responsible to the people of Ridgewood as possible.
Willett: I am always a little sad when Graydon closes at 7:30pm—it’s so lovely to be there at sunset, although we do get to enjoy that at the end of the season when the days get shorter—but I also understand the constraints on municipal spending. I was aghast last year when there was discussion of closing for the week leading up to Labor Day, but that ultimately didn’t happen. I was also not a fan when Graydon didn’t open till noon—it just looks so forlorn sitting there unused. Frankly, I don’t even like it when sections of the pool are closed due to insufficient staffing, but I’ve learned to live with it. Right now, Graydon more than covers its direct expenses—but there is a lot of pressure on the overall budget because of our contractual obligations, and I am concerned about various services having to be reduced as a result. This is one of the reasons I am running for Village Council.
5. What are your views regarding the impact on Ridgewood of New Jersey state law on open space?
Brooks: If the current Governor’s plan is to alter how Open Space funds approved by a majority of state residents in the most recent election, he is making an unforgiveable error in judgment. Ridgewood will be shortchanged of valuable opportunities to purchase an ever decreasing inventory of available open space, and this is truly unfortunate. All local government officials should lobby their state government representatives, as well as the Governor’s office, to try and make sure this bait-and-switch does not occur.
Coghlan-Walsh: First, Ridgewood has a dwindling amount of open space. That is a fact that can’t be denied. We have only a few properties left that are considered “open”. I believe any progress in Ridgewood should be the decision of the residents not the State.
Hache: New Jersey’s open space law has aided in adding a few acres of parks and recreational fields to Ridgewood, as well as allowing the Village to accumulate more than $670,000 through the open space tax of half a cent per $100 of valuation on taxable real property in the Village.
Voigt: I’m not a tree hugger–even though I went to UVM undergrad. But, I am for the environment writ large, our quality of life here, and open spaces. I wish we didn’t have such limited resources, or so much utilized space. We have to enhance what we have. And so my commitment is to work with others to do just that.
Weitz: I think it’s critical to honor both the letter and spirit of state law requiring us to have open space. However, I see the legal requirements in this area as a floor, not a ceiling. If elected, I will ensure that open space is a priority for Ridgewood.
Willett: Certainly, more open space is always a desirable goal—but again, fiscal prudence must be a consideration.
6. If high-density housing came to town, how should the Council ensure adequate open space for all residents?
Brooks: A discussion of Open Space needs in the Village needs to be a fundamental part of any development discussion in the Village. We have strong Open Space advocates in place (but we need more volunteers) and they are actively involved in the discussion.
Coghlan-Walsh: High density it appears is coming to town. The Council has final review but it will be imperative for the Planning Board and Zoning Board to ensure adequate green space is included in each and every development. They have the ability to demand enough green space to be adequate for their new population of residents.
Hache: These issues are not directly related but the Village should continue to look to add acreage to its open space inventory, when and where appropriate since the Village is currently in a deficit of open space for its residents.
Voigt: Well, you can’t just make space where there isn’t any. And, there isn’t really any here. Now, you may know there’s an open space budget surplus. So we could look into acquiring more land, and enhancing what we have– enough to accommodate modest growth. But high density? Really? It will just put more pressure on our already crowded spaces and town resources.
Weitz: Even independent of high-density housing, I think Ridgewood should strive to have as much open and green space as possible. I strongly encourage the development of new green and open spaces. Additionally, I support ensuring that all site plans submitted for any of the locations now being looked at for residential development include provision for new green and open spaces and fully take into account the impact those developments will have on the community.
Willett: Whether or not high-density housing comes to town, we should regularly assess our open space availability and the need—and means—to create additional open space.
7. What’s your feeling about the role of the Village Council to limit or reduce the amount of impermeable surface in town, especially in the floodplain, which includes Graydon, Vets Field, and more?
Brooks: The Village must always consider the needs of all it residents whenever development is considered, but especially our fellow residents who are most vulnerable because of a disability. Public facilities, like Graydon or any other park in town, should be more accessible for all, not less. This is what a truly caring community, like Ridgewood, does to help those in need.
Coghlan-Walsh: The velocity flood plain is from just east of Graydon at the Hohokus border to the bottom part of the brook near Brookside field. History has proven through several floods that this area will flood continually. The DEP limits some of the construction in the Flood Plain but it is important for the Village Council to work with the Parks & Rec department to ensure no further construction.
Hache: The Village recently added a rain garden which replaced impermeable surface with native plants on the edge of the Graydon Pool parking lot, right next to the brook. We should continue to leverage the resources in our engineering department to identify opportunities where we could continue this practice in our flood plain. It is incumbent upon our Village Council to ensure that those impermeable surfaces are limited to ensure that we mitigate future flooding issues. This can be effectively achieved by setting guidelines that the Village would be compelled to follow.
Voigt: On the zoning board, I vote every chance I get against new impermeable surfaces. If the Council didn’t bypass the zoning board to approve one big development after another, we’d have a lot fewer of these surfaces, too.
Weitz: The use of space along the HoHoKus brook requires balancing many factors. The creek will flood regularly. We must balance environmental impact, projected flooding impacts on neighbors including those downstream, sports needs, the ultimate cost to maintain fields (including repairs after floods) and the need for cooling grass/dirt. I will seek to find ways to balance these concerns and any decisions I make would weigh all of these factors.
Willett: The Village Council should have a voice in every decision affecting Ridgewood. In general, I prefer natural to artificial surfaces—but I would want to evaluate on a case-by-case basis and have conversations with people on both sides of the issue before making decisions in specific instances.
8. Would you approve the construction of a 90-foot baseball diamond on the Schedler property? Why or why not?
Brooks: I cannot predict whether or not we will have a vote for such a project. I do think the development of the Schedler property needs to be considered carefully with all stakeholders and Ridgewood residents having the option of taking part in the discussion. If this means taking a step back and re-thinking some decisions that have already been made, by previous administrations, I would support that step.
Coghlan-Walsh: I have never been nor will I ever be in favor of a 90 foot baseball field on the Schedler property. The dangers of those balls going into the highway far outweigh the need for another baseball field.
Hache: As a father of three small children, I have serious concerns regarding the safety of a 90-foot baseball diamond on Schedler. We also have to consider the adverse impact on noise levels the clearing of the trees would have on nearby residences. Although I would prefer to have a passive park area on the site, I am willing to support the 60-foot diamond as proposed by Schedler residents. I would also support directing part of the $670,000 accumulated through the open space tax to repair and preserve the Schedler house. It could perhaps be used as a facility for community programs and activities, similar to how The Stable has been used next to Graydon.
Voigt: No. And you’d say no, too, if you realized that the only way a 90-foot diamond gets built there is if home plate is on Route 17. But more to the point is that all of this has an impact on the people who live there. We’re really a Village of neighborhoods and; respecting those neighborhoods and the people in them is important.
Weitz: While I strongly believe in developing the Schedler property into green and open space, I have some concerns about that location for a 90-foot baseball diamond. Currently studies are under way to assess the feasibility of the Schedler property for the 90-foot baseball diamond and other uses. I believe the prudent decision is to wait on the results of those studies before making a final judgment.
Willett: I’ve walked the Schedler property and have some concerns about fitting a 90-foot baseball diamond there, but I am in favor of some sort of mixed active-passive refurbishment of that property.
9. Have you ever found yourself thinking, in any context in Ridgewood, “They knew it was there when they moved there”?
Brooks: No. I live on East Ridgewood Avenue, where the NJ Transit buses and my neighbors from town routinely travel at speeds that are twice the posted limit. I knew that problem was a potential issue when I moved here, but I love my home. Some consideration from the offending drivers, however, would be nice, but I’m enough of a realist to manage my expectations.
Coghlan-Walsh: No. That is a very close minded statement.
Hache: I do not find myself thinking in that context. Ridgewood is made up of a lot of different neighborhoods and many of those neighborhoods are in the proximity of schools, hospitals, and businesses. That kind of thinking is insensitive and can undermine the fact that, significant changes in the intensity of use would adversely impact our residents, their quality of life, health, safety and well-being. If you move next to a hospital that is 40’ tall, is it ok for that hospital to then be 80’ tall and adversely impact property values?
Voigt: I think we’re all attracted to this Village for what it is already, if that’s the question. It’s not that we can’t grow reasonably/enhance what we have. We have to. It’s how. I am just not into Supersizing our town and believe we need to treat people with respect—i.e. as if they were our neighbors.
Weitz: No.
Willett: Yes, but only in very specific cases—such as when someone who lives next to a school complains about the traffic on the street at dropoff and pickup times. I’m not sympathetic in those cases.
10. Optional: any additional comments related to Graydon, preservation of a natural environment, open space, clean water, or other environmental issues and how you envision your role to support them as an elected official.
Brooks: Graydon is Ridgewood’s jewel and its amenities and character should be supported and, when possible, preserved so that they reflect the original intent of its founders. As technologies develop, such as better ways to maintain water quality, and/or customer safety and health, they should be evaluated and adopted, if appropriate. In addition, special needs users should be accommodated and encouraged to use Graydon easily and without stigma, and we as a Village should support this use though tangible means.
It’s difficult to imagine how an elected official would meander through some of these Graydon issues, because they have not been examined in recent years, and there always seem to be more pressing issues to consider besides a swimming facility that only a relative fraction of residents use. This is unfortunate, and I hope to get some of these issues back into the discussion. Graydon is a great asset for the Village.
Coghlan-Walsh: I have always believed that Graydon has not been used to its fullest potential. After dark events, community parties, etc will bring new people to Graydon that are not as familiar with Graydon as they should be. It is also a way of finding more volunteers to help with the maintenance of the facility through community organized activities thereby reducing the operating costs. I’m still hoping to organize a traditional clam bake party! Perhaps project one of a new term on Council for me!!
Hache: I envision my role as an elected official serving on the Village Council as a steward of the future. I am referring to the future of our children and of future generations. My legacy, I hope, is that I hand over to our future residents a beautiful, unique, and historic Ridgewood.
Voigt: All of these questions come down to one thing: change. How’s it managed? How do we honor our traditions and yet still move ahead? My answers come from leadership experiences with many organizations in times of change, whether as President of the Wharton Healthcare Alumni Association, or as a small business owner right here in town, or as a 5-year member of the Ridgewood zoning board, or simply, as a Ridgewood family man. These answers are to foster give and take, to keep digging until there’s a mutually acceptable answer, and to shine a light on the unintended consequences of a decision––before it is made. Vote for me, and you will be voting for these kinds of answers.
Weitz: I currently serve as the Chairperson of the Financial Advisory Committee (FAC) – an organization charged with advising Village officials on the full range of budget and management issues. In that role, I have had a real insight into exactly how our Village is managed on a daily basis that has prepared me to lead on the Village Council. While on the FAC, I have taken a real interest in Graydon.
Last season, Graydon essentially broke even financially. I feel strongly that we need to make Graydon financially sustainable by ensuring that Graydon has a capital improvement fund that is funded from Graydon revenue. Additionally, the number of seasonal passes has declined while the number of daily passes has gone up. I think we need to understand this trend and make sure that newer families to Ridgewood understand the value of Graydon and just how special a place it is.
As I mentioned above, my family has been seasonal members of Graydon every year since we moved to Ridgewood. On so many occasions, I have watched my children play in the sand at Graydon and enjoyed all that Graydon has to offer. I am dedicated to making sure that continues for generations to come.
Willett: In general, I feel strongly that one of the most important responsibilities of an elected official is to make sure that anything that is a common good—open space, clean water, clean air, etc.—receives proper oversight and resources.
Ridgewood NJ, Perhaps some residents Leaving the village hall Couldn’t help but notice the mayors car had some pretty distinctive campaign information strategically placed in the rear window.
Please take these events serious only a few votes in 2012 launched the Village into this disastrous mess.
2012 Ridgewood Election Results
Albert J. Pucciarelli – 2078
Keith Killion – 1711
Rissell R Forenza – 817
Paul Aronsohn – 2479
Mary Jane Shinozuka – 1484
Gwenn H Hauck – 1727
Final voting registration for the May 10th Municipal Election is April 19th. To register to vote, individuals may register in the Village Clerk’s office from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM or in the Ridgewood Library Lobby on April 19th from 4:30 PM to 9:00 PM.
